U sing I nte rfo lio fo r T PAC do ssie r pre paratio n & - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

U sing I nte rfo lio fo r T PAC do ssie r pre paratio n & annual re vie ws August 28, 2019 Anne Windham

T able o f Co nte nts T e nure and Pro mo tio n we bpage and c o nte nt, Slide s 3-4 Ne w Pro c e dure s and Po lic ie s, Slide s 5-10 T PAC Do ssie r Pre p Guide , Slide s 11-15 I nte rfo lio Ac c e ss and Wo rkflo w, Slide s 16-23 L o gging into and Navigating I nte rfo lio , Slide s 24-36 Co ntac t I nfo , Slide 37

Whe n yo u have que stio ns abo ut I nte rfo lio , start by lo o king o n this page . T he re ’ s lo ts o f info rmatio n he re and yo u may find an answe r! I f no t, c all Anne o r E va (c o ntac t info o n last slide )

T he lo we r po rtio n o f the T e nure & Pro mo tio n page has use ful do c ume nts, mo st o f whic h are no w update d fo r 2019-2020.

Ne w Pro c e dure s and Po lic ie s • T he Co ve r Me mo will no w be a PDF F illable F o rm • # 2 o n c he c klist is no w the writte n e xplanatio n to the c andidate o f the de partme ntal re c o mme ndatio n • De partme nts are re quire d to pro vide writte n po st-re appo intme nt fe e dbac k to c andidate (in plac e o f annual re vie w)

TPAC cover memo Date completed _______________ Candidate name: _________________________ Department: _______________________________ Recommendation Appointment as: Professor _____ Associate Professor _____ with tenure _____ without tenure _____ Senior Lecturer _____ Promotion to: Professor _____ Associate Professor _____ with tenure _____ without tenure _____ Senior Lecturer _____ Distinguished Senior Lecturer _____ Reappointment as: Assistant Professor _____ Distinguished Senior Lecturer _____ Senior Lecturer _____ Lecturer _____ Is this a Professor of the Practice _____ or (Research) _____ title? (leave blank if neither) Start date _________ End date (for term appointments only) __________ Department Meeting Date of meeting ______ Did the candidate attend the meeting? ______ Vote* on recommendation: # in favor _____ # opposed _____ #abstentions _____ (provide reason for abstentions, if known, in the Department Chair’s summary) Department quorum: ___________ * Be clear about the voting procedures and the relevant electorate: • Retired faculty are not eligible to vote, and should participate in the discussion only in exceptional circumstances. • The quorum and official vote tally include those present and/or participating in the discussion of the case via teleconference, Skype, etc. • Votes received by proxy or e-mail should be reported separately (as an attachment to this document) • Voting by secret ballot is preferred and taking “straw votes” in order to arrive at a consensus is not recommended.

Department Meeting (continued) Names of attending eligible voting faculty: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Names of eligible voting faculty not in attendance (please provide reason for absence in parenthesis): _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Department chair’s summary (attach separate document) Please provide a full and candid discussion of the issues raised in the meeting relative to this candidacy and of the strengths and weaknesses of the case. Summarize the reasons for any abstentions or minority opinions. Briefly describe the academic unit’s view of the importance of the candidate’s academic specialty within the larger field or discipline. A draft of this memo should be circulated to all participants for their comments; the chair should inform all members that if any of them has a serious objection which cannot be resolved, they may communicate their views to TPAC in a separate memo. Any such minority communications must be made available to all members who participated in the consideration of the case. Additional space for any further information _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

No tific atio n o f De partme nt Re c o mme ndatio n H andbo o k o f Ac ade mic Administratio n: At the time o f the re c o mme ndatio n, the c andidate shall be no tifie d in writing what the re c o mme ndatio n is and, to who m it will be se nt; in the c ase o f a ne gative re c o mme ndatio n, the c andidate has a right to be info rme d o f the re aso ns fo r the de partme nt's de c isio n.

No tific atio n o f De partme nt Re c o mme ndatio n Windham, Anne <anne_windham@brown.edu> Your reappointment review 1 message Windham, Anne <anne_windham@brown.edu> Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 12:07 PM To: Josiah Carberry <josiah@brown.edu> Dear Josiah, The department met yesterday to review your reappointment dossier. I am pleased to inform you that the department is recommending a four-year reappointment. The discussion covered your research, teaching and service over the three years since your initial appointment. Faculty members noted that you have been productive in your research and are publishing in high quality journals, your service to the department and university is quite strong, and although you struggled somewhat in your first year of teaching you have made excellent progress in that respect. Your dossier and the department's recommendation will now be forwarded to TPAC for review. Please note that a staff person in the Dean of the Faculty's Office will contact you regarding your right to appear at the TPAC meeting. All best, Anne Anne Windham Senior Associate Dean of the Faculty Brown University Providence, RI 02912 (401) 863-5410

I nte rfo lio ’ s wo rkflo w always mo ve s fo rward! Workflow for TPAC Cases (including reappointment feedback) De partme nt De partme nt admin Do FOffic e T PAC vo ting re vie w (c hair (Anne / E va) Me mbe rs fac ulty and (o ptio nal) manage r) De partme nt Do FOffic e Admin (c hair (Anne / E va and manage r)