Transportation and General Civil Engineering Projects Broward - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Continuing Engineering Services for Transportation and General Civil Engineering Projects Broward County, Florida

2 Why Atkins

3 Existing and Past Clients

25+ years Experienced in Civil Engineering PM of experience serving municipal government Water and sewer; paving and education clients in and grading; drainage; Broward County signing and striping David Bannett, PE, LEED AP Project Manager Construction Dedicated, focused, administration driven, and passionate about Roadways, parks, serving clients well! neighborhood improvements, traffic calming 4

Key Personnel David Bannett, PE, LEED AP Project Manager Joseph Garrity, PE, PMP Glenn Myers, PE Quality Assurance Principal of the Firm Manager Pijush Talukder, PE, PMP Michael Ryan, PE Chris Russo, PE, PTOE Hector Lopez, PE Paul Mannix, PE Martine Fils-Aime, PE Drainage Design/ Permitting Signal Design/ Construction and Transportation Planning/ Structures and Bridge Roadway Design Lead Lead ITS Lead Engineering Inspection Traffic Studies Lead Design Lead 5

Subconsultants CBE Harold Aiken, PE Gregory Stelmack, PE Luis Jurado Civil Site Engineering and Surveying and ROW Mapping Geotechnical and Testing Services Utility Design Daniel Checchia Steven Shaup, PE Glenn Davis Utility coordination and Movable Span Bridge Design Traffic Data Collection Subsurface Utility Verification and Structural Support 6

› Field reconnaissance Project Management › Survey Approach › Geotechnical › Conflict resolution › State, federal, local relations › Proactive › Expedite process › Front-end document/bid specs › Permit tracking › 30%, 60%, 90%, final reviews › Scoping meeting with staff › Quantities/cost estimate › Proposal development 7

QA/QC Process Independent process Check for constructability and biddability Perform early and often Documented process Joseph Garrity, PE, PMP Quality Assurance Manager 8

Scope › Identify deficiencies or potential issues along the corridor and recommend solutions to accommodate all modes of viable transportation Major Issues Minor Issues Maintenance Issues 9

Monarch Lakes Blvd N Flamingo Rd Miramar Blvd Pembroke Rd Bicycle facilities Major Issues Deficiencies or potential issues along the corridor 10

Bicycle facilities Monarch Lakes Blvd Intersection 11

Monarch Lakes Blvd Pembroke Rd N Flamingo Rd Miramar Blvd Pedestrian facilities Major Issues Deficiencies or potential issues along the corridor 12

Pedestrian facilities Pembroke Rd intersection Red Rd intersection Aventine Apartments at Miramar 13

14 N Pembroke Rd Deficiencies or potential issues along the corridor Vehicles Major Issues

Monarch Lakes Blvd N Flamingo Rd Miramar Blvd Pembroke Rd • Widen bus stop pads • Pavement deterioration • Cross slopes issues Minor Issues • Clear zone violations caused Deficiencies or potential issues along the corridor by landscaping 15

Flamingo Rd intersection Flamingo Rd Flamingo Rd Flamingo Rd Flamingo Rd 16

Flamingo Rd Pembroke Rd Flamingo Rd • Damaged guardrail • Cracked/damaged sidewalk • Silted inlets • Poor retro-reflectivity on street signs • Deteriorated pavement markings Maintenance Issues • Sodded areas less than 2 feet wide between Deficiencies or potential issues along the corridor sidewalk and curb and gutter 17

Flamingo Rd Pembroke Rd Rear end crashes 203 Crash Locations (2013-2017) N

Volume Flamingo Rd AM Peak Pembroke Rd Volume Flamingo Rd Delay LOS PM Peak Pembroke Rd Operate with significant delays Traffic Analysis and low average speeds

AM Peak (7:30 ‐ 8:30) NBL NB NBR SBL SB SBR EBL EB EBR WBL WB WBR Volume (2016) 425 1357 116 304 1839 188 310 586 389 320 1033 171 LOS F D D E F D F F F F F F Delay (Seconds) 81 53 38 77 77 46 103 88 90 96 75 42 Available Storage (Ft) 300 300 300 350 200 350 475 n/a Synchro 50% Queue 251 17 175 22 185 190 0 n/a Synchro 95% Queue 363 72 223 87 282 285 57 n/a HCS 50% Queue 300 100 200 200 225 225 150 n/a HCS 95% Queue 450 175 300 300 350 350 275 n/a PM Peak (5:00 ‐ 6:00) NBL NB NBR SBL SB SBR EBL EB EBR WBL WB WBR Volume (2016) 322 1241 183 348 1715 285 368 644 231 290 657 316 LOS F D D F D D F E E F E F Delay (Seconds) 84 42 35 84 42 38 84 57 58 83 65 82 Available Storage (Ft) 300 300 300 350 200 350 475 n/a Synchro 50% Queue 185 14 199 10 210 166 184 n/a Synchro 95% Queue 241 74 258 81 271 219 78 n/a HCS 50% Queue 13 11 14 16 15 12 24 n/a HCS 95% Queue 325 275 350 400 375 300 600 n/a 20

Storage lengths Existing recommended North to west 300 450 50% turn lanes AM Peak (7:30 ‐ 8:30) NBL NB NBR SBL SB SBR EBL EB EBR WBL WB WBR Volume (2016) 425 1357 116 304 1839 188 310 586 389 320 1033 171 LOS F D D E F D F F F F F F Delay (Seconds) 81 53 38 77 77 46 103 88 90 96 75 42 Available Storage (Ft) 300 300 300 350 200 350 475 n/a Synchro 50% Queue 251 17 175 22 185 190 0 n/a Synchro 95% Queue 363 72 223 87 282 285 57 n/a East to north HCS 50% Queue 300 100 200 200 225 225 150 n/a 200 375 88% HCS 95% Queue 450 175 300 300 350 350 275 n/a turn lanes PM Peak (5:00 ‐ 6:00) NBL NB NBR SBL SB SBR EBL EB EBR WBL WB WBR Volume (2016) 322 1241 183 348 1715 285 368 644 231 290 657 316 LOS F D D F D D F E E F E F Delay (Seconds) 84 42 35 84 42 38 84 57 58 83 65 82 Available Storage (Ft) 300 300 300 350 200 350 475 n/a Synchro 50% Queue 185 14 199 10 210 166 184 n/a Synchro 95% Queue 241 74 258 81 271 219 78 n/a HCS 50% Queue 13 11 14 16 15 12 24 n/a West to north HCS 95% Queue 325 275 350 400 375 300 600 475 600 26% n/a turn lanes 21

N Extend right turn lane at Extend left turn lanes at Flamingo/Red Road Flamingo/Pembroke intersection intersection Extend left turn lanes at Flamingo/Pembroke intersection Flamingo Rd Mill and resurface/ overbuild to correct roadway cross-slope Pembroke Rd Extend right turn lane at Flamingo/Pembroke intersection Extend right turn lane at Flamingo/Pembroke intersection Proposed Solutions Roadway improvements 22 22

N Flamingo Rd Pedestrian actuated signal Pedestrians flashing signs Provide bike lane widths that meet current standards Provide pedestrian Green pavement access across marking all conflict Flamingo/Red area Road intersection Proposed Solutions Reconfigure signals to accommodate pedestrian movement 23

24

25 Proposed Reconfigure signals to accommodate pedestrian movement Proposed Solutions Current

Monarch Lakes Blvd N Reconstruct Reconstruct ADA complaint ADA complaint curb ramps curb ramps Flamingo Rd Reconstruct ADA complaint Reconstruct Reconstruct curb ramps Reconstruct ADA complaint ADA complaint bus landing pad curb ramps curb ramps Miramar Blvd Reconstruct Reconstruct ADA complaint bus landing pad curb ramps Proposed Solutions Reconstruct curb ramps (ADA complaint) and add detectable warnings at Flamingo/Monarch 26 lakes and Flamingo/Pembroke intersections

Monarch Lakes Blvd N Pembroke Rd Provide a minimum 10’ shared path (Greenway) along western side of canal between Pembroke Road and Monarch Lakes Boulevard Alt-1 Flamingo Rd Monarch Lakes Blvd Pembroke Rd Provide 6' sidewalk (sheet pile wall) along eastern side of canal between Pembroke Road and Monarch Lakes Boulevard Alt-2 Flamingo Rd Proposed Solutions Alternative 1 & 2 27

Monarch Lake Blvd N Minimal Improved Reduced MOT pedestrian lane impacts connectivity blockage Flamingo Rd Miramar Blvd Reduced rear end crashes Pembroke Rd Increase Increased Improved pedestrian visibility of traffic safety cyclist movement Benefits of the Proposed Solutions

29 Sample Project Experience

State Road A1A Reconstruction Project Description: Reconstruction of State Road A1A from Flamingo Ave to Oakland Park Blvd. including roadway, buffered bike lane, sidewalk, landscape, lightning, traffic control, and signing and pavement markings. 30

American Heritage School Zone Flasher Improvements Project Description: School zone improvements for American Heritage School, within the City limits of Plantation in Broward County. 31

Why Atkins Extensive and relevant municipal Broad based technical abilities and experience including Complete attention to detail, budget, and Street projects with a long track materials. record of successful delivery. Personal local services and Successful past and commitment to clients and continuing performance on successful project delivery. similar contracts. 32

33 Questions?