theoretical inflation for unavailable products
play

Theoretical Inflation for Unavailable Products by Rachel - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Theoretical Inflation for Unavailable Products by Rachel Soloveichik ESCoE Virtual Conference, September 16 th to 18 th Disclaimer: The views in this presentation reflect those of the author and not necessarily those of the Department of


  1. Theoretical Inflation for Unavailable Products by Rachel Soloveichik ESCoE Virtual Conference, September 16 th to 18 th Disclaimer: The views in this presentation reflect those of the author and not necessarily those of the Department of Commerce or the Bureau of Economic Analysis.

  2. Preview of Theoretical Strategy • Hotel prices are higher in dense urban regions – Despite the higher prices, tourists still flock to cities with desirable amenities that aren’t available in rural regions • This observed behavior can be used to estimate theoretical inflation rates for unavailable products 2 Louisiana Vacations: New Orleans vs. Rural Region

  3. Preview of Empirical Results • Time spent at retail and recreational locations is a proxy for product availability – Product availability started dropping in March, bottomed out in April and slowly recovered in May and June • Theoretical inflation was at least 1.2 percentage points above the CPI in Q1 and 4.9 percentage points in Q2 – Published economic statistics miss approximately one third of the theoretical drop in real consumption • Two data appendixes provide with detailed data on specific products and specific regions 3

  4. Outline of Presentation • Review of price measurement literature • Development of new model to estimate theoretical prices for unavailable products • Empirical data on the exact unavailable products – Unavailable products include both products restricted under a government stay-in-place order and products that consumers voluntarily avoid • Regional estimates of product unavailability in the first and second quarter of 2020 – This unavailability is then used to calculate regional inflation rates 4

  5. Theoretical Price Measurement Problem • Laspeyres price index formula: – Price Index T = w 10 (p 1T /p 10 )+ w 20 (p 2T /p 20 )+…+ w n0 (p nT /p n0 ) – This formula requires prices for every product • The CPI assumes that unavailable products without price data have similar inflation as comparable products with price data – This assumption appears to be accurate in normal economic times (Bradley 2003) – However, the assumption might not apply when stay-in-place policies suddenly make broad product categories unavailable 5

  6. Relevant Price Index Literature • “New goods”: – (Hausman 1999), (Hausman 1997), (Petrin 2002), (Goolsbee and Petrin 2004), (Berndt et al. 1996), (Nordhaus 1996), (Diewert and Feenstra 2019), and (Diewert et al. 2019) • “Outlet substitution bias”: – (Reinsdorf 1993), (Hausman and Liebtag 2009), and (Greenlees and Mclelland 2008) • “Variety bias”: – (Feenstra 1994), (Broda and Weinstein 2010), and (Handbury and Weinstein 2014) • None of these literatures match COVID-19 6

  7. New Price Measurement Model • Tourists choose a rural or urban vacation – Six products: Housing, goods 1&2, services 1&2, and amenity – The amenity is only available in urban regions • Assumption: rational tourists visit the region where a vacation budget buys the most utility – Weather and travel costs are similar in the two regions – Theoretical rural prices equal theoretical urban prices, so that – The price premium for the unavailable rural amenity is ip aR = [(1–w h p hR - (w g1 p g1R +w g2 p g2R )- (w s1 p s1R +w s2 p s2R )]/w a 8

  8. Theoretical Prices for Unavailable Products • Assumption: the price premium for unavailable tourist amenities is smaller than the price premium for nonessential goods and services – Tourist amenities are generally considered more discretionary than nonessential products like clothing or elective surgery – Tourists are better able to plan around unavailable products • Comparing price indexes: Theoretical Prices ≥w h p hSIP +w g1 p g1SIP + w s1 p s1SIP +(w g2 + w s2 + w a )ip aR Quasi-BLS Prices =[w h p hSIP +(w g1 + w g2 ) p g1SIP + (w s1 + w s2 )p g1SIP ]/(1-w a ) 9

  9. Data Used to Measure Theoretical Inflation • ip aR are calculated using these data sources: – BEA’s regional income account gives p hR , (w g1 p g1R +w g2 p g2R )/(w g1 +w g2 ), and (w s1 p s1R +w s2 p s2R )/(w s1 +w s2 ) – BEA’s travel and tourism account gives w h , w g1 +w g2 , w s1 +w s2 , and w a – The paper calculates ip aR = 1.59 in the average region • Theoretical prices are calculated using this data: – BLS reports low monthly inflation for p hSIP , p g1SIP , and p g1SIP – Appendix A reports product unavailability in a full stay-in-place policy: w h =0.20, w g1 =0.27 w g2 =0.05, w s1 =0.31, w s2 =0.17, w a =0.02 – Appendix B reports actual product unavailability for every region 10

  10. Theoretical Inflation in Q1 and Q2 of 2020 11

  11. Data on Actual Product Unavailability • Google’s Mobility Trends gives mobility changes – Most unavailable products are sold at retail and recreational locations, so this paper focuses on that category – Dataset is publicly available at the day/county level • American Time Use Survey (ATUS) gives normal mobility levels – The paper calculates mobility levels for each region and day type – Mobility for smaller regions is smoothed to reduce volatility • Weather Underground gives daily weather – Holding local policy fixed, mobility is higher in pleasant weather 12

  12. ATUS Mobility for 2003-2018 Minutes Per Day at Retail and Recreational Locations 13 9/9/2020

  13. Average Mobility for March 2020 Minutes Per Day at Retail and Recreational Locations 14 9/9/2020

  14. Average Mobility for April 2020 Minutes Per Day at Retail and Recreational Locations 15 9/9/2020

  15. Average Mobility for May 2020 Minutes Per Day at Retail and Recreational Locations 16 9/9/2020

  16. Average Mobility for June 2020 Minutes Per Day at Retail and Recreational Locations 17 9/9/2020

  17. Impact of Temperature on Mobility 18

  18. Impact of Humidity on Mobility 19

  19. March Adjustment for Weather and Day Minutes Per Day at Retail and Recreational Locations 20 9/9/2020

  20. April Adjustment for Weather and Day Minutes Per Day at Retail and Recreational Locations 21 9/9/2020

  21. May Adjustment for Weather and Day Minutes Per Day at Retail and Recreational Locations 22 9/9/2020

  22. June Adjustment for Weather and Day Minutes Per Day at Retail and Recreational Locations 23 9/9/2020

  23. Summary of Actual Mobility Changes • ATUS respondents normally spend 75 minutes per day at retail and recreational locations – About 75 percent of this time is spent on nonessential activities • Almost every region sees a mobility drop in 2020 – Adjusted time fell 13 minutes per day in March, 33 minutes per day in April, 23 minutes per day in May, and 15 minutes per day in June – Theoretical inflation was at least 1.2 percentage points above the CPI in Q1 and 4.9 percentage points above the CPI in Q2 • Wealthy urban regions saw larger mobility drops 24

  24. Theoretical Inflation vs. Income in 2018 Bubble size is proportional to regional population 25 9/9/2020

  25. Conclusion • Inflation is underestimated when many common goods and services are unavailable – The paper then develops a new model to estimate theoretical cost-of-living when products are unavailable • The paper collected detailed data on both potential and actual product unavailability – Theoretical inflation was at least 1.2 percentage points above the CPI in Q1 and 4.9 percentage points above the CPI in Q2 – The published economic statistics miss approximately one third of the theoretical drop in real consumption 26

Recommend


More recommend