the sm works
play

The SM works ATLAS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

I N C LOSING Felix Yu JGU Mainz EFTs for Collider Physics, Flavor Phenomena and EWSB November 13, 2014 I N C LOSING O UR S TORY T HUS F AR Felix Yu JGU Mainz EFTs for Collider Physics, Flavor Phenomena and EWSB November 13, 2014 The SM


  1. I N C LOSING Felix Yu JGU Mainz EFTs for Collider Physics, Flavor Phenomena and EWSB November 13, 2014

  2. I N C LOSING O UR S TORY T HUS F AR Felix Yu JGU Mainz EFTs for Collider Physics, Flavor Phenomena and EWSB November 13, 2014

  3. The SM works ATLAS https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/AtlasPublic/StandardModelPublicResults Also CMS https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMSPublic/PhysicsResultsCombined 3

  4. The SM works (?) von Manteuffel 4

  5. The SM works (!) von Manteuffel 5

  6. Aside 1 Anonymized comment overheard during this workshop “Disgusting level of agreement” 6

  7. Collective mood since the Higgs discovery Disgusting (yet impressive) level of agreement 7

  8. Collective mood since the Higgs discovery Disgusting (yet impressive) level of agreement Can the SM be right? 8

  9. Aside 2 2 nd Anonymized comment overheard during this workshop “But we know it’s wrong” 9

  10. The SM lives on, but only as an EFT • Quadratic sensitivity of Higgs mass to new scales • Fermion masses and mixings • Dark matter • Neutrinos • Baryogenesis • Inflation • … Disgusting (yet impressive) level of agreement between SM and data, but a spectacular failure in many regards 10

  11. Attacking the SM • Flavor • Electroweak precision • Collider 11

  12. Attacking the SM • Flavor • Electroweak precision • Collider Ultimately, precision calculations, discrepant data, and robust interpretations will spell the downfall of the SM, no matter which sector breaks through first 12

  13. The Flavor Attack Buras 13

  14. The Flavor Attack – a 12 step program Buras Also B →D τ ν B →D* τ ν 14

  15. SM starting to crack? Straub 15

  16. SM starting to crack? S. Jäger 16

  17. SM starting to crack? Altmannshofer 17

  18. SM starting to crack? Mannel 18

  19. SM starting to crack? Ricciardi 19

  20. SM starting to crack? Hurth 20

  21. From hints to discovery • Many checks and tests remain – Power corrections – Long-distance QCD – Charm threshold • More data – Belle II: 50-75 ab -1 luminosity anticipated by 2021 • About 100  luminosity of Belle or BaBar 21

  22. Still more data-mining S. Jäger 22

  23. Still more precision calculations Hurth 23

  24. Still more precision calculations Feldmann 24

  25. Thinking of new physics • Will discriminate NP models by patterns of deviations in observables Buras 25

  26. Thinking of new physics • Will discriminate NP models by patterns of deviations in observables De Fazio 26

  27. Pattern recognition • Correlations alleviate uncomfortable flat directions between NP effects and theory errors Straub 27

  28. Pattern recognition • Correlations alleviate uncomfortable flat directions between NP effects and theory errors Straub 28

  29. Pattern recognition • Concrete models allow full exploration of observables beyond typical QFV measurements Altmannshofer 29

  30. Pattern recognition • Concrete models allow full exploration of observables beyond typical QFV measurements • Flavor is intimately intertwined with collider physics and electroweak physics in the SM 30

  31. Flavor model at the EW scale Bauer 31

  32. Flavor model at the EW scale Bauer 32

  33. The Higgs as a Flavor Anchor CMS-PAS-HIG-14-009 33

  34. The Higgs as a flavor violation probe Kopp 34

  35. The Higgs as a flavor violation probe CMS-PAS-HIG-14-005 35

  36. The Higgs as a CPV probe Kopp 36

  37. The Higgs as a CPV probe Kopp CPV sensitivity in h → τ + τ – Harnik, Martin, Okui, Primulando, FY PRD 88 (2013) 7, 076009 [arXiv:1308.1094] 37

  38. The Higgs as a CPV probe Brod 38

  39. The Higgs as a CPV probe Brod 39

  40. The Higgs as the SM Anchor • Central role of the SM Higgs – Unitarize longitudinal gauge boson scattering El Hedri 40

  41. Unitarization and NMSSM dark matter El Hedri 41

  42. The Higgs as the SM Anchor • Central role of the Higgs – Unitarize longitudinal gauge boson scattering – Breaks chiral SU(2) L symmetry, gives masses to charged fermion masses – Not yet determined to be the SM Higgs • To move forward, either compute in concrete models, simplified models, or an EFT 42

  43. The Higgs as the SM Anchor • Crucially important for the EFT to be precise and complete for data interpretation Trott 43

  44. The Higgs as the SM Anchor • Crucially important for the EFT to be precise and complete for data interpretation Trott 44

  45. The Higgs as the SM Anchor • SM-EFT to dimension 6 covers flavor, EW observables, Higgs physics Falkowski 45

  46. The Higgs as the SM Anchor • Interplay with EW observables must be self- consistent! Trott 46

  47. The Higgs as the SM Anchor • Interplay with EW observables must be self- consistent! But still promising attack of the SM-EFT Falkowski 47

  48. The Higgs as the SM Anchor • Interplay with EW observables must be self- consistent! But still promising attack of the SM-EFT Falkowski 48

  49. Higgs Collider physics • Central program of LHC Run 2 – Experimental data thus far is disgustingly impressive – Must test Higgs via its decays, production modes, couplings, width, mass, branching fractions • Ideal marketplace for crosstalk between theory and experiment 49

  50. Precision calculations of Higgs xsecs Haralander 50

  51. Precision calculations of Higgs xsecs B. Jäger 51

  52. Precision calculations of EW xsecs B. Jäger 52

  53. Need precise theory differential distributions Haralander 53

  54. Differential distributions powerful NP probe In all cases, h → γγ FY, PRD 90, 015009 (2014) [arXiv:1404.2924] 54

  55. The stakes: the fate of the universe Goertz 55

  56. The stakes: the fate of the universe Goertz 56

  57. The stakes: the fate of the universe Goertz 57

  58. The stakes: gauge hierarchy resolution Carmona 58

  59. The stakes: gauge hierarchy resolution Carmona 59

  60. The stakes: GH resolution, many new states to discover Kaminska 60

  61. The stakes: GH resolution, many new states to discover Kaminska 61

  62. The stakes: GH resolution, many new states, new tool of boosted techniques Flacke Flacke 62

  63. The stakes: GH resolution, many new states, new tool of boosted techniques Flacke 63

  64. Also need SM in the boosted regime Pecjak 64

  65. SM also entering unbroken SU(2) regime Turczyk 65

  66. SM also entering unbroken SU(2) regime Turczyk 66

  67. NP searches enabled only by precise jet physics calculations Hoang 67

  68. SM: magic still possible Schabinger 68

  69. SM: puzzles still remain Manohar 69

  70. Next chapter of our story • Struggle between the SM and the data continues • More data will come in LHC Run 2, HL-LHC, Belle 2, LBNF, Muon g-2, Mu2e, Xenon 1T, IceCube, Fermi- LAT, Planck, BICEP-II, ILC, FCC/CEPC/SPPC, LSST, DESI, … 70

  71. Next chapter of our story “May you live in interesting times” • The questions are huge 71

  72. Next chapter of our story “May you live in interesting times” • The questions are huge • The questions are patient 72

  73. Next chapter of our story “May you live in interesting times” • The questions are huge • The questions are patient • The questions are very patient 73

  74. ATLAS https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/AtlasPublic/StandardModelPublicResults Also CMS https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMSPublic/PhysicsResultsCombined 75

Recommend


More recommend