the power of the terminating chase
play

THE POWER OF THE TERMINATING CHASE Markus Krtzsch Maximilian Marx - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Jan 25, 2024 •283 likes •1.75k views

THE POWER OF THE TERMINATING CHASE Markus Krtzsch Maximilian Marx Sebastian Rudolph TU Dresden Download Paper Lisbon, ICDT 2019 Invited Tutorial Fig. 1: The Chase Part 1: Tuple-Generating Dependencies Part 1: Existential Rules

  1. ✱ ✱ ✳ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✳ ✱ Reasoning for existential rules is difficult Theorem: Query entailment under constraints is undecidable (but recursively enumerable). There is a fixed rule set Σ and BCQ q , such that {D | Σ ✱ D | = q } is undecidable. Proof (sketch): Use a standard encoding of a Turing machine in logical rules, and apply it to a universal Turing machine. Existential quantifiers are used to create new memory cells and time points. � Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 11 of 54

  2. Reasoning for existential rules is difficult Theorem: Query entailment under constraints is undecidable (but recursively enumerable). There is a fixed rule set Σ and BCQ q , such that {D | Σ ✱ D | = q } is undecidable. Proof (sketch): Use a standard encoding of a Turing machine in logical rules, and apply it to a universal Turing machine. Existential quantifiers are used to create new memory cells and time points. � This also implies that we cannot restrict to finite models. Example: Consider a database r ( a ✱ b ) with constraints r ( x ✱ y ) → ∃ z ✳ r ( y ✱ z ) r ( x ✱ y ) → t ( x ✱ y ) t ( x ✱ y ) ∧ r ( y ✱ z ) → t ( x ✱ z ) The BCQ ∃ x ✳ t ( x ✱ x ) is not entailed by this theory, but it holds in all finite models. Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 11 of 54

  3. Universal models Certain answer semantics: What is true in all models? But it is often enough to consider “most general models”: Definition: A model I of a set of rules Σ is universal if it admits a homomor- phism h : I → J to every model J of Σ . Fact: The BCQs entailed by rule set Σ are exactly the BCQs that hold true on any of its universal models. (The same works for all query languages whose models are closed under homomorphisms) Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 12 of 54

  4. Decidable fragments In the search for decidable fragments, several main principles have been explored: • Finite models: there is a finite universal model – full dependencies (no ∃ ) – many acyclicity notions (more on this later) • Tree-like models: there is universal model of bounded treewidth – Guarded rules – Frontier-guarded rules • Rewritability: entailment can be reduced to first-order model checking – Linear tgds – Sticky rules None of the general criteria are decidable, but the concrete conditions are. Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 13 of 54

  5. Part 2: The Chase

  6. Applying a rule Database D Rule ρ = ϕ [ x ✱ y ] → ∃ z ✳ ψ [ x ✱ z ] Definition: Rule ρ is applicable to D if: 1. there is a function h : x ∪ y → adom ( D ) such that h ( ϕ ) ⊆ D (a match) 2. there is no function h ′ : x ∪ z → adom ( D ) with h ′ ( x ) = h ( x ) for all x ∈ x and h ′ ( ψ ) ⊆ D The D ′ is the result of applying ρ to D under h if D ′ = D ∪ ˆ h ( ψ ) and: • ˆ h ( x ) = h ( x ) for all x ∈ x • ˆ h ( z ) is a fresh null for all z ∈ z Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 15 of 54

  7. The Chase(s) A chase constructs a sequence of databases D 0 = D ✱ D 1 ✱ D 2 ✱ . . . by applying rules. The Standard Chase (a.k.a. restricted chase) • Apply rules to matches in some order (strategy) The Skolem Chase (a.k.a. semi-oblivious chase) • Apply skolemised rules (in any order) The Datalog-first Chase • Apply rules to matches in some order that prioritises the application of rules without existential quantifiers Other prominent chases: oblivious chase and core chase Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 16 of 54

  8. ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ Will it terminate? D = { Bicycle ( c ) } Bicycle ( x ) → ∃ v ✳ hasPart ( x ✱ v ) ∧ Wheel ( v ) Wheel ( x ) → ∃ w ✳ properPartOf ( x ✱ w ) ∧ Bicycle ( w ) properPartOf ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( x ✱ y ) hasPart ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( y ✱ x ) partOf ( x ✱ y ) → hasPart ( y ✱ x ) Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 17 of 54

  9. ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ Will it terminate? D = { Bicycle ( c ) } Bicycle ( x ) → ∃ v ✳ hasPart ( x ✱ v ) ∧ Wheel ( v ) Wheel ( x ) → ∃ w ✳ properPartOf ( x ✱ w ) ∧ Bicycle ( w ) properPartOf ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( x ✱ y ) hasPart ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( y ✱ x ) partOf ( x ✱ y ) → hasPart ( y ✱ x ) Applying the standard chase may yield: Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 17 of 54

  10. ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ Will it terminate? D = { Bicycle ( c ) } Bicycle ( x ) → ∃ v ✳ hasPart ( x ✱ v ) ∧ Wheel ( v ) Wheel ( x ) → ∃ w ✳ properPartOf ( x ✱ w ) ∧ Bicycle ( w ) properPartOf ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( x ✱ y ) hasPart ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( y ✱ x ) partOf ( x ✱ y ) → hasPart ( y ✱ x ) Applying the standard chase may yield: D 1 = D ∪ { hasPart ( c ✱ n 1 ) ✱ Wheel ( n 1 ) } Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 17 of 54

  11. ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ Will it terminate? D = { Bicycle ( c ) } Bicycle ( x ) → ∃ v ✳ hasPart ( x ✱ v ) ∧ Wheel ( v ) Wheel ( x ) → ∃ w ✳ properPartOf ( x ✱ w ) ∧ Bicycle ( w ) properPartOf ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( x ✱ y ) hasPart ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( y ✱ x ) partOf ( x ✱ y ) → hasPart ( y ✱ x ) Applying the standard chase may yield: D 1 = D ∪ { hasPart ( c ✱ n 1 ) ✱ Wheel ( n 1 ) } D 2 = D 1 ∪ { partOf ( n 1 ✱ c ) } Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 17 of 54

  12. ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ Will it terminate? D = { Bicycle ( c ) } Bicycle ( x ) → ∃ v ✳ hasPart ( x ✱ v ) ∧ Wheel ( v ) Wheel ( x ) → ∃ w ✳ properPartOf ( x ✱ w ) ∧ Bicycle ( w ) properPartOf ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( x ✱ y ) hasPart ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( y ✱ x ) partOf ( x ✱ y ) → hasPart ( y ✱ x ) Applying the standard chase may yield: D 1 = D ∪ { hasPart ( c ✱ n 1 ) ✱ Wheel ( n 1 ) } D 2 = D 1 ∪ { partOf ( n 1 ✱ c ) } D 3 = D 2 ∪ { properPartOf ( n 1 ✱ n 2 ) ✱ Bicycle ( n 2 ) } Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 17 of 54

  13. ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ Will it terminate? D = { Bicycle ( c ) } Bicycle ( x ) → ∃ v ✳ hasPart ( x ✱ v ) ∧ Wheel ( v ) Wheel ( x ) → ∃ w ✳ properPartOf ( x ✱ w ) ∧ Bicycle ( w ) properPartOf ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( x ✱ y ) hasPart ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( y ✱ x ) partOf ( x ✱ y ) → hasPart ( y ✱ x ) Applying the standard chase may yield: D 1 = D ∪ { hasPart ( c ✱ n 1 ) ✱ Wheel ( n 1 ) } D 2 = D 1 ∪ { partOf ( n 1 ✱ c ) } D 3 = D 2 ∪ { properPartOf ( n 1 ✱ n 2 ) ✱ Bicycle ( n 2 ) } D 4 = D 3 ∪ { hasPart ( n 2 ✱ n 3 ) ✱ Wheel ( n 3 ) } Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 17 of 54

  14. ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ Will it terminate? D = { Bicycle ( c ) } Bicycle ( x ) → ∃ v ✳ hasPart ( x ✱ v ) ∧ Wheel ( v ) Wheel ( x ) → ∃ w ✳ properPartOf ( x ✱ w ) ∧ Bicycle ( w ) properPartOf ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( x ✱ y ) hasPart ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( y ✱ x ) partOf ( x ✱ y ) → hasPart ( y ✱ x ) Applying the standard chase may yield: D 1 = D ∪ { hasPart ( c ✱ n 1 ) ✱ Wheel ( n 1 ) } D 5 = D 4 ∪ { partOf ( n 1 ✱ n 2 ) } D 2 = D 1 ∪ { partOf ( n 1 ✱ c ) } D 3 = D 2 ∪ { properPartOf ( n 1 ✱ n 2 ) ✱ Bicycle ( n 2 ) } D 4 = D 3 ∪ { hasPart ( n 2 ✱ n 3 ) ✱ Wheel ( n 3 ) } Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 17 of 54

  15. ✱ ✱ ✱ Will it terminate? D = { Bicycle ( c ) } Bicycle ( x ) → ∃ v ✳ hasPart ( x ✱ v ) ∧ Wheel ( v ) Wheel ( x ) → ∃ w ✳ properPartOf ( x ✱ w ) ∧ Bicycle ( w ) properPartOf ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( x ✱ y ) hasPart ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( y ✱ x ) partOf ( x ✱ y ) → hasPart ( y ✱ x ) Applying the standard chase may yield: D 1 = D ∪ { hasPart ( c ✱ n 1 ) ✱ Wheel ( n 1 ) } D 5 = D 4 ∪ { partOf ( n 1 ✱ n 2 ) } D 2 = D 1 ∪ { partOf ( n 1 ✱ c ) } D 6 = D 5 ∪ { hasPart ( n 2 ✱ n 1 ) } D 3 = D 2 ∪ { properPartOf ( n 1 ✱ n 2 ) ✱ Bicycle ( n 2 ) } D 4 = D 3 ∪ { hasPart ( n 2 ✱ n 3 ) ✱ Wheel ( n 3 ) } Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 17 of 54

  16. ✱ ✱ Will it terminate? D = { Bicycle ( c ) } Bicycle ( x ) → ∃ v ✳ hasPart ( x ✱ v ) ∧ Wheel ( v ) Wheel ( x ) → ∃ w ✳ properPartOf ( x ✱ w ) ∧ Bicycle ( w ) properPartOf ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( x ✱ y ) hasPart ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( y ✱ x ) partOf ( x ✱ y ) → hasPart ( y ✱ x ) Applying the standard chase may yield: D 1 = D ∪ { hasPart ( c ✱ n 1 ) ✱ Wheel ( n 1 ) } D 5 = D 4 ∪ { partOf ( n 1 ✱ n 2 ) } D 2 = D 1 ∪ { partOf ( n 1 ✱ c ) } D 6 = D 5 ∪ { hasPart ( n 2 ✱ n 1 ) } D 3 = D 2 ∪ { properPartOf ( n 1 ✱ n 2 ) ✱ Bicycle ( n 2 ) } D 7 = D 6 ∪ { partOf ( n 3 ✱ n 2 ) } D 4 = D 3 ∪ { hasPart ( n 2 ✱ n 3 ) ✱ Wheel ( n 3 ) } Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 17 of 54

  17. Will it terminate? D = { Bicycle ( c ) } Bicycle ( x ) → ∃ v ✳ hasPart ( x ✱ v ) ∧ Wheel ( v ) Wheel ( x ) → ∃ w ✳ properPartOf ( x ✱ w ) ∧ Bicycle ( w ) properPartOf ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( x ✱ y ) hasPart ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( y ✱ x ) partOf ( x ✱ y ) → hasPart ( y ✱ x ) Applying the standard chase may yield: D 1 = D ∪ { hasPart ( c ✱ n 1 ) ✱ Wheel ( n 1 ) } D 5 = D 4 ∪ { partOf ( n 1 ✱ n 2 ) } D 2 = D 1 ∪ { partOf ( n 1 ✱ c ) } D 6 = D 5 ∪ { hasPart ( n 2 ✱ n 1 ) } D 3 = D 2 ∪ { properPartOf ( n 1 ✱ n 2 ) ✱ Bicycle ( n 2 ) } D 7 = D 6 ∪ { partOf ( n 3 ✱ n 2 ) } D 4 = D 3 ∪ { hasPart ( n 2 ✱ n 3 ) ✱ Wheel ( n 3 ) } D 8 = D 7 ∪ { partOf ( n 3 ✱ n 4 ) ✱ Bicycle ( n 4 ) } Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 17 of 54

  18. Will it terminate? D = { Bicycle ( c ) } Bicycle ( x ) → ∃ v ✳ hasPart ( x ✱ v ) ∧ Wheel ( v ) Wheel ( x ) → ∃ w ✳ properPartOf ( x ✱ w ) ∧ Bicycle ( w ) properPartOf ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( x ✱ y ) hasPart ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( y ✱ x ) partOf ( x ✱ y ) → hasPart ( y ✱ x ) Applying the standard chase may yield: D 1 = D ∪ { hasPart ( c ✱ n 1 ) ✱ Wheel ( n 1 ) } D 5 = D 4 ∪ { partOf ( n 1 ✱ n 2 ) } D 2 = D 1 ∪ { partOf ( n 1 ✱ c ) } D 6 = D 5 ∪ { hasPart ( n 2 ✱ n 1 ) } D 3 = D 2 ∪ { properPartOf ( n 1 ✱ n 2 ) ✱ Bicycle ( n 2 ) } D 7 = D 6 ∪ { partOf ( n 3 ✱ n 2 ) } D 4 = D 3 ∪ { hasPart ( n 2 ✱ n 3 ) ✱ Wheel ( n 3 ) } D 8 = D 7 ∪ { partOf ( n 3 ✱ n 4 ) ✱ Bicycle ( n 4 ) } The chase can continue forever . . . Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 17 of 54

  19. ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ Will it terminate? D = { Bicycle ( c ) } Bicycle ( x ) → ∃ v ✳ hasPart ( x ✱ v ) ∧ Wheel ( v ) Wheel ( x ) → ∃ w ✳ properPartOf ( x ✱ w ) ∧ Bicycle ( w ) properPartOf ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( x ✱ y ) hasPart ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( y ✱ x ) partOf ( x ✱ y ) → hasPart ( y ✱ x ) Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 18 of 54

  20. ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ Will it terminate? D = { Bicycle ( c ) } Bicycle ( x ) → ∃ v ✳ hasPart ( x ✱ v ) ∧ Wheel ( v ) Wheel ( x ) → ∃ w ✳ properPartOf ( x ✱ w ) ∧ Bicycle ( w ) properPartOf ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( x ✱ y ) hasPart ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( y ✱ x ) partOf ( x ✱ y ) → hasPart ( y ✱ x ) Applying the Datalog-first chase yields: Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 18 of 54

  21. ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ Will it terminate? D = { Bicycle ( c ) } Bicycle ( x ) → ∃ v ✳ hasPart ( x ✱ v ) ∧ Wheel ( v ) Wheel ( x ) → ∃ w ✳ properPartOf ( x ✱ w ) ∧ Bicycle ( w ) properPartOf ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( x ✱ y ) hasPart ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( y ✱ x ) partOf ( x ✱ y ) → hasPart ( y ✱ x ) Applying the Datalog-first chase yields: D 1 = D ∪ { hasPart ( c ✱ n 1 ) ✱ Wheel ( n 1 ) } Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 18 of 54

  22. ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ Will it terminate? D = { Bicycle ( c ) } Bicycle ( x ) → ∃ v ✳ hasPart ( x ✱ v ) ∧ Wheel ( v ) Wheel ( x ) → ∃ w ✳ properPartOf ( x ✱ w ) ∧ Bicycle ( w ) properPartOf ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( x ✱ y ) hasPart ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( y ✱ x ) partOf ( x ✱ y ) → hasPart ( y ✱ x ) Applying the Datalog-first chase yields: D 1 = D ∪ { hasPart ( c ✱ n 1 ) ✱ Wheel ( n 1 ) } D 2 = D 1 ∪ { partOf ( n 1 ✱ c ) } Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 18 of 54

  23. ✱ ✱ Will it terminate? D = { Bicycle ( c ) } Bicycle ( x ) → ∃ v ✳ hasPart ( x ✱ v ) ∧ Wheel ( v ) Wheel ( x ) → ∃ w ✳ properPartOf ( x ✱ w ) ∧ Bicycle ( w ) properPartOf ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( x ✱ y ) hasPart ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( y ✱ x ) partOf ( x ✱ y ) → hasPart ( y ✱ x ) Applying the Datalog-first chase yields: D 1 = D ∪ { hasPart ( c ✱ n 1 ) ✱ Wheel ( n 1 ) } D 2 = D 1 ∪ { partOf ( n 1 ✱ c ) } D 3 = D 2 ∪ { properPartOf ( n 1 ✱ n 2 ) ✱ Bicycle ( n 2 ) } Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 18 of 54

  24. ✱ Will it terminate? D = { Bicycle ( c ) } Bicycle ( x ) → ∃ v ✳ hasPart ( x ✱ v ) ∧ Wheel ( v ) Wheel ( x ) → ∃ w ✳ properPartOf ( x ✱ w ) ∧ Bicycle ( w ) properPartOf ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( x ✱ y ) hasPart ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( y ✱ x ) partOf ( x ✱ y ) → hasPart ( y ✱ x ) Applying the Datalog-first chase yields: D 1 = D ∪ { hasPart ( c ✱ n 1 ) ✱ Wheel ( n 1 ) } D 2 = D 1 ∪ { partOf ( n 1 ✱ c ) } D 3 = D 2 ∪ { properPartOf ( n 1 ✱ n 2 ) ✱ Bicycle ( n 2 ) } D 4 = D 3 ∪ { partOf ( n 1 ✱ n 2 ) } Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 18 of 54

  25. Will it terminate? D = { Bicycle ( c ) } Bicycle ( x ) → ∃ v ✳ hasPart ( x ✱ v ) ∧ Wheel ( v ) Wheel ( x ) → ∃ w ✳ properPartOf ( x ✱ w ) ∧ Bicycle ( w ) properPartOf ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( x ✱ y ) hasPart ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( y ✱ x ) partOf ( x ✱ y ) → hasPart ( y ✱ x ) Applying the Datalog-first chase yields: D 1 = D ∪ { hasPart ( c ✱ n 1 ) ✱ Wheel ( n 1 ) } D 5 = D 4 ∪ { hasPart ( n 2 ✱ n 1 ) } D 2 = D 1 ∪ { partOf ( n 1 ✱ c ) } D 3 = D 2 ∪ { properPartOf ( n 1 ✱ n 2 ) ✱ Bicycle ( n 2 ) } D 4 = D 3 ∪ { partOf ( n 1 ✱ n 2 ) } Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 18 of 54

  26. Will it terminate? D = { Bicycle ( c ) } Bicycle ( x ) → ∃ v ✳ hasPart ( x ✱ v ) ∧ Wheel ( v ) Wheel ( x ) → ∃ w ✳ properPartOf ( x ✱ w ) ∧ Bicycle ( w ) properPartOf ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( x ✱ y ) hasPart ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( y ✱ x ) partOf ( x ✱ y ) → hasPart ( y ✱ x ) Applying the Datalog-first chase yields: D 1 = D ∪ { hasPart ( c ✱ n 1 ) ✱ Wheel ( n 1 ) } D 5 = D 4 ∪ { hasPart ( n 2 ✱ n 1 ) } D 2 = D 1 ∪ { partOf ( n 1 ✱ c ) } D 3 = D 2 ∪ { properPartOf ( n 1 ✱ n 2 ) ✱ Bicycle ( n 2 ) } D 4 = D 3 ∪ { partOf ( n 1 ✱ n 2 ) } No further rules are applicable. The chase terminates. Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 18 of 54

  27. ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ Will it terminate? D = { Bicycle ( c ) } Bicycle ( x ) → hasPart ( x ✱ w ( x )) ∧ Wheel ( w ( x )) Wheel ( x ) → properPartOf ( x ✱ b ( w )) ∧ Bicycle ( b ( w )) properPartOf ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( x ✱ y ) hasPart ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( y ✱ x ) partOf ( x ✱ y ) → hasPart ( y ✱ x ) Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 19 of 54

  28. ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ Will it terminate? D = { Bicycle ( c ) } Bicycle ( x ) → hasPart ( x ✱ w ( x )) ∧ Wheel ( w ( x )) Wheel ( x ) → properPartOf ( x ✱ b ( w )) ∧ Bicycle ( b ( w )) properPartOf ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( x ✱ y ) hasPart ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( y ✱ x ) partOf ( x ✱ y ) → hasPart ( y ✱ x ) Applying the skolem chase yields: Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 19 of 54

  29. ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ Will it terminate? D = { Bicycle ( c ) } Bicycle ( x ) → hasPart ( x ✱ w ( x )) ∧ Wheel ( w ( x )) Wheel ( x ) → properPartOf ( x ✱ b ( w )) ∧ Bicycle ( b ( w )) properPartOf ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( x ✱ y ) hasPart ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( y ✱ x ) partOf ( x ✱ y ) → hasPart ( y ✱ x ) Applying the skolem chase yields: D 1 = D ∪ { hasPart ( c ✱ w ( c )) ✱ Wheel ( w ( c )) } Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 19 of 54

  30. ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ Will it terminate? D = { Bicycle ( c ) } Bicycle ( x ) → hasPart ( x ✱ w ( x )) ∧ Wheel ( w ( x )) Wheel ( x ) → properPartOf ( x ✱ b ( w )) ∧ Bicycle ( b ( w )) properPartOf ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( x ✱ y ) hasPart ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( y ✱ x ) partOf ( x ✱ y ) → hasPart ( y ✱ x ) Applying the skolem chase yields: D 1 = D ∪ { hasPart ( c ✱ w ( c )) ✱ Wheel ( w ( c )) } D 2 = D 1 ∪ { partOf ( w ( c ) ✱ c ) } Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 19 of 54

  31. ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ Will it terminate? D = { Bicycle ( c ) } Bicycle ( x ) → hasPart ( x ✱ w ( x )) ∧ Wheel ( w ( x )) Wheel ( x ) → properPartOf ( x ✱ b ( w )) ∧ Bicycle ( b ( w )) properPartOf ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( x ✱ y ) hasPart ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( y ✱ x ) partOf ( x ✱ y ) → hasPart ( y ✱ x ) Applying the skolem chase yields: D 1 = D ∪ { hasPart ( c ✱ w ( c )) ✱ Wheel ( w ( c )) } D 2 = D 1 ∪ { partOf ( w ( c ) ✱ c ) } D 3 = D 2 ∪ { properPartOf ( w ( c ) ✱ b ( w ( c ))) ✱ Bicycle ( b ( w ( c ))) } Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 19 of 54

  32. ✱ ✱ ✱ Will it terminate? D = { Bicycle ( c ) } Bicycle ( x ) → hasPart ( x ✱ w ( x )) ∧ Wheel ( w ( x )) Wheel ( x ) → properPartOf ( x ✱ b ( w )) ∧ Bicycle ( b ( w )) properPartOf ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( x ✱ y ) hasPart ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( y ✱ x ) partOf ( x ✱ y ) → hasPart ( y ✱ x ) Applying the skolem chase yields: D 1 = D ∪ { hasPart ( c ✱ w ( c )) ✱ Wheel ( w ( c )) } D 4 = D 3 ∪ { partOf ( w ( c ) ✱ b ( w ( c ))) } D 2 = D 1 ∪ { partOf ( w ( c ) ✱ c ) } D 3 = D 2 ∪ { properPartOf ( w ( c ) ✱ b ( w ( c ))) ✱ Bicycle ( b ( w ( c ))) } Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 19 of 54

  33. ✱ ✱ Will it terminate? D = { Bicycle ( c ) } Bicycle ( x ) → hasPart ( x ✱ w ( x )) ∧ Wheel ( w ( x )) Wheel ( x ) → properPartOf ( x ✱ b ( w )) ∧ Bicycle ( b ( w )) properPartOf ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( x ✱ y ) hasPart ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( y ✱ x ) partOf ( x ✱ y ) → hasPart ( y ✱ x ) Applying the skolem chase yields: D 1 = D ∪ { hasPart ( c ✱ w ( c )) ✱ Wheel ( w ( c )) } D 4 = D 3 ∪ { partOf ( w ( c ) ✱ b ( w ( c ))) } D 2 = D 1 ∪ { partOf ( w ( c ) ✱ c ) } D 5 = D 4 ∪ { hasPart ( b ( w ( c )) ✱ w ( c )) } D 3 = D 2 ∪ { properPartOf ( w ( c ) ✱ b ( w ( c ))) ✱ Bicycle ( b ( w ( c ))) } Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 19 of 54

  34. Will it terminate? D = { Bicycle ( c ) } Bicycle ( x ) → hasPart ( x ✱ w ( x )) ∧ Wheel ( w ( x )) Wheel ( x ) → properPartOf ( x ✱ b ( w )) ∧ Bicycle ( b ( w )) properPartOf ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( x ✱ y ) hasPart ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( y ✱ x ) partOf ( x ✱ y ) → hasPart ( y ✱ x ) Applying the skolem chase yields: D 1 = D ∪ { hasPart ( c ✱ w ( c )) ✱ Wheel ( w ( c )) } D 4 = D 3 ∪ { partOf ( w ( c ) ✱ b ( w ( c ))) } D 2 = D 1 ∪ { partOf ( w ( c ) ✱ c ) } D 5 = D 4 ∪ { hasPart ( b ( w ( c )) ✱ w ( c )) } D 3 = D 2 ∪ { properPartOf ( w ( c ) ✱ b ( w ( c ))) ✱ D 6 = D 5 ∪ { hasPart ( b ( w ( c )) ✱ w ( b ( w ( c )))) ✱ Bicycle ( b ( w ( c ))) } Wheel ( w ( b ( w ( c )))) } Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 19 of 54

  35. Will it terminate? D = { Bicycle ( c ) } Bicycle ( x ) → hasPart ( x ✱ w ( x )) ∧ Wheel ( w ( x )) Wheel ( x ) → properPartOf ( x ✱ b ( w )) ∧ Bicycle ( b ( w )) properPartOf ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( x ✱ y ) hasPart ( x ✱ y ) → partOf ( y ✱ x ) partOf ( x ✱ y ) → hasPart ( y ✱ x ) Applying the skolem chase yields: D 1 = D ∪ { hasPart ( c ✱ w ( c )) ✱ Wheel ( w ( c )) } D 4 = D 3 ∪ { partOf ( w ( c ) ✱ b ( w ( c ))) } D 2 = D 1 ∪ { partOf ( w ( c ) ✱ c ) } D 5 = D 4 ∪ { hasPart ( b ( w ( c )) ✱ w ( c )) } D 3 = D 2 ∪ { properPartOf ( w ( c ) ✱ b ( w ( c ))) ✱ D 6 = D 5 ∪ { hasPart ( b ( w ( c )) ✱ w ( b ( w ( c )))) ✱ Bicycle ( b ( w ( c ))) } Wheel ( w ( b ( w ( c )))) } The chase will certainly continue forever . . . Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 19 of 54

  36. Chase termination Some observations: • Termination is strategy-dependent for standard and Datalog-first chase, but not for skolem chase • Whenever skolem chase terminates, standard chase terminates for all strategies • Whenever standard chase terminates (for some/all strategies), Datalog-first chase terminates (for all/some strategies) • Termination always depends on the concrete database instance Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 20 of 54

  37. Chase termination Some observations: • Termination is strategy-dependent for standard and Datalog-first chase, but not for skolem chase • Whenever skolem chase terminates, standard chase terminates for all strategies • Whenever standard chase terminates (for some/all strategies), Datalog-first chase terminates (for all/some strategies) • Termination always depends on the concrete database instance We can define rule classes based on their termination behaviour: Termination on . . . instance D all instances CT sk CT sk Skolem chase D ∀ CT std CT std Standard chase (all strategies) D∀ ∀∀ CT dlf CT dlf Datalog-first chase (all strategies) D∀ ∀∀ Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 20 of 54

  38. The chase termination problem Theorem (Gogacz & Marcinkowski, ICALP’14; Grahne & Onet, Fund.Inf.’18): The classes CT x D ( ∀ ) and CT x ∀ ( ∀ ) are undecidable for all x ∈ { sk ✱ std ✱ dlf } . Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 21 of 54

  39. The chase termination problem Theorem (Gogacz & Marcinkowski, ICALP’14; Grahne & Onet, Fund.Inf.’18): The classes CT x D ( ∀ ) and CT x ∀ ( ∀ ) are undecidable for all x ∈ { sk ✱ std ✱ dlf } . The cases CT x D ( ∀ ) are simple: • Simulate a Turing machine in a standard encoding • Halting reduces to chase termination These cases are recursively enumerable (r.e.). Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 21 of 54

  40. The chase termination problem Theorem (Gogacz & Marcinkowski, ICALP’14; Grahne & Onet, Fund.Inf.’18): The classes CT x D ( ∀ ) and CT x ∀ ( ∀ ) are undecidable for all x ∈ { sk ✱ std ✱ dlf } . The cases CT x D ( ∀ ) are simple: • Simulate a Turing machine in a standard encoding • Halting reduces to chase termination These cases are recursively enumerable (r.e.). Membership of CT sk ∀ in r.e. is also simple, due to the following result [Marnette, PODS’09]: D ∗ , where D ∗ is the critical instance Proposition: Σ ∈ CT sk ∀ if and only if Σ ∈ CT sk consisting of all atoms that can be stated over the signature using constants from Σ and an additional constant ∗ . Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 21 of 54

  41. Universal chase termination Hardness of CT sk ∀ is more tricky: how to simulate a Turing machine starting from D ∗ ? • Every conjunctive query already matches • It is difficult to apply rules in any orderly fashion Solved by [Gogacz & Marcinkowski, ICALP’14] (showing r.e.-completeness) Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 22 of 54

  42. Universal chase termination Hardness of CT sk ∀ is more tricky: how to simulate a Turing machine starting from D ∗ ? • Every conjunctive query already matches • It is difficult to apply rules in any orderly fashion Solved by [Gogacz & Marcinkowski, ICALP’14] (showing r.e.-completeness) The case of CT std ∀∀ (and with it CT dlf ∀∀ ) is more difficult. The critical instance is no longer relevant for all-instances termination: Observation: Every rule set is in CT std D ∗ . Indeed, CT std ∀∀ and CT dlf ∀∀ are no longer r.e., although the exact degree of their undecidability remains open. Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 22 of 54

  43. Decidable cases Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 23 of 54

  44. Decidable cases The (supposed) undecidability of chase termination has motivated significant research activities for finding sufficient termination criteria: • omega-restrictedness [Syrjänen, LPNMR 2001] • weak-acyclicity [Fagin et al., Theo. Comp. Sci. 2005] • lambda restrictedness [Gebser, Schaub, Thiele, LPNMR 2007] • finite domain [Calimeri et al. ICLP 2008] • super-weak acyclicity [Marnette, PODS 2009] • safety [Meier, Schmidt, & Lausen, Proc. VLDB 2009] • argument restrictedness [Lierler & Lifschitz, ICLP 2009] • joint acyclicity [MK & Rudolph, IJCAI 2011] • acyclic graph of rule dependencies [Baget et al., Artif. Intell. 2011] • Ω -acyclicity [Greco, Spezzano, & Trubitsyna, ICLP 2012] • model faithful & model summarising ayclicity [Cuenca Grau et al., J. Artif. Intell. Res. 2013] All of these criteria apply to CT sk ∀ . Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 23 of 54

  45. Chase variants in practice Standard chase rule applications are harder than skolem chase rule applications: • Skolem chase: guess match and verify absence of conclusions – NP • Standard chase: guess match and verify non-entailment of conclusion – NP NP ( = Σ 2 p ) Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 24 of 54

  46. Chase variants in practice Standard chase rule applications are harder than skolem chase rule applications: • Skolem chase: guess match and verify absence of conclusions – NP • Standard chase: guess match and verify non-entailment of conclusion – NP NP ( = Σ 2 p ) Nevertheless, the standard chase is implemented by many existential rule engines: • DEMo [Pichler & Savenkov, VLDB’09] • RDFox [Motik et al., AAAI’14] • Llunatic [Geerts et al., VLDB’14] • Pegasus [Meier, VLDB’14] • PDQ [Benedikt, Leblay, & Tsamoura, VLDB’14; VLDB’15] • Graal [Baget et al., RuleML ’15] • VLog [Urbani, Jacobs, & MK, AAAI’16; Urbani et al., IJCAR’18] See [Benedikt et al., PODS’17] and [Urbani et al., IJCAR’18] for recent benchmarks. Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 24 of 54

  48. Part 3: Expressivity

  49. ✱ ✳ Expressive power What is the expressive power of fragments of existential rules for which the chase terminates? Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 27 of 54

  50. ✱ ✳ Expressive power What is the expressive power of fragments of existential rules for which the chase terminates? Follow-up question: what is “expressive power”? Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 27 of 54

  51. Expressive power What is the expressive power of fragments of existential rules for which the chase terminates? Follow-up question: what is “expressive power”? � descriptive, not computational complexity Definition: Consider a finite signature R EDB of (extensional) database relations. An abstract query over R EDB is a set D of concrete databases over R EDB . A set of rules Σ and BCQ q realise D if, for every database D over R EDB , D ✱ Σ | = q exactly if D ∈ D ✳ where Σ and q may use additional relations beyond R EDB . � Expressivity = abstract queries that can be realised (by a rule fragment) Note: This is closer to the program view than to the ontology view. Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 27 of 54

  52. A note on Datalog Distinguishing extensional (EDB) and intensional (IDB) predicates is common for Datalog. Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 28 of 54

  53. A note on Datalog Distinguishing extensional (EDB) and intensional (IDB) predicates is common for Datalog. Datalog as Second-Order Language • EDB predicates = FO predicates; IDB prediates = SO variables • Query answering: Second-order model checking • Query containment et al.: undecidable Datalog as First-Order Language • EDB predicates = input predicates; IDB prediates = auxiliary/output predicates • Query answering: first-order entailment • Query containment et al.: decidable Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 28 of 54

  54. A note on Datalog Distinguishing extensional (EDB) and intensional (IDB) predicates is common for Datalog. Datalog as Second-Order Language • EDB predicates = FO predicates; IDB prediates = SO variables • Query answering: Second-order model checking • Query containment et al.: undecidable Datalog as First-Order Language • EDB predicates = input predicates; IDB prediates = auxiliary/output predicates • Query answering: first-order entailment • Query containment et al.: decidable We only use EDB predicates to define expressivity. Everything here is first order. Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 28 of 54

  55. ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ Data complexity for CT sk ∀ Marnette [PODS 2009] showed the following general result: Theorem: For every Σ ∈ CT sk ∀ and concrete database D , the skolem chase over Σ and D is polynomial in the size of D . The data complexity of BCQ entailment over CT sk ∀ is PTime-complete. Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 29 of 54

  56. ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ Data complexity for CT sk ∀ Marnette [PODS 2009] showed the following general result: Theorem: For every Σ ∈ CT sk ∀ and concrete database D , the skolem chase over Σ and D is polynomial in the size of D . The data complexity of BCQ entailment over CT sk ∀ is PTime-complete. Proof: There is a tuple-preserving mapping h from any database D to the critical instance D ∗ : • h ( c ) = c for all constants in Σ • h ( c ) = ∗ for all other constants h extends to function terms by setting h ( f ( c ) = f ( h ( c )) . Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 29 of 54

  57. ✱ ✱ Data complexity for CT sk ∀ Marnette [PODS 2009] showed the following general result: Theorem: For every Σ ∈ CT sk ∀ and concrete database D , the skolem chase over Σ and D is polynomial in the size of D . The data complexity of BCQ entailment over CT sk ∀ is PTime-complete. Proof: There is a tuple-preserving mapping h from any database D to the critical instance D ∗ : • h ( c ) = c for all constants in Σ • h ( c ) = ∗ for all other constants h extends to function terms by setting h ( f ( c ) = f ( h ( c )) . This extended mapping satisfies: r ( t ) ∈ chase sk ( Σ ✱ D ) implies r ( h ( t )) ∈ chase sk ( Σ ✱ D ∗ ) . Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 29 of 54

  58. Data complexity for CT sk ∀ Marnette [PODS 2009] showed the following general result: Theorem: For every Σ ∈ CT sk ∀ and concrete database D , the skolem chase over Σ and D is polynomial in the size of D . The data complexity of BCQ entailment over CT sk ∀ is PTime-complete. Proof: There is a tuple-preserving mapping h from any database D to the critical instance D ∗ : • h ( c ) = c for all constants in Σ • h ( c ) = ∗ for all other constants h extends to function terms by setting h ( f ( c ) = f ( h ( c )) . This extended mapping satisfies: r ( t ) ∈ chase sk ( Σ ✱ D ) implies r ( h ( t )) ∈ chase sk ( Σ ✱ D ∗ ) . In particular: the depth and structure of function terms in chase sk ( Σ ✱ D ) is restricted to the depth and structure of terms in chase sk ( Σ ✱ D ∗ ) . Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 29 of 54

  59. Data complexity for CT sk ∀ Marnette [PODS 2009] showed the following general result: Theorem: For every Σ ∈ CT sk ∀ and concrete database D , the skolem chase over Σ and D is polynomial in the size of D . The data complexity of BCQ entailment over CT sk ∀ is PTime-complete. Proof: There is a tuple-preserving mapping h from any database D to the critical instance D ∗ : • h ( c ) = c for all constants in Σ • h ( c ) = ∗ for all other constants h extends to function terms by setting h ( f ( c ) = f ( h ( c )) . This extended mapping satisfies: r ( t ) ∈ chase sk ( Σ ✱ D ) implies r ( h ( t )) ∈ chase sk ( Σ ✱ D ∗ ) . In particular: the depth and structure of function terms in chase sk ( Σ ✱ D ) is restricted to the depth and structure of terms in chase sk ( Σ ✱ D ∗ ) . The only data-dependent part are the additional constants in D : the number of distinct terms and tuples is polynomial in this respect. � Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 29 of 54

  60. ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ From CT sk ∀ to Datalog The previous insight can be taken further [MK & Rudolph IJCAI’11; Zhang, Zhang & You AAAI’15] ∀ and BCQ q , there is a set of Datalog rules Σ ′ and Theorem: For every Σ ∈ CT sk BCQ q ′ such that {D | D ✱ Σ | = q } = {D | D ✱ Σ ′ | = q ′ } . Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 30 of 54

  61. From CT sk ∀ to Datalog The previous insight can be taken further [MK & Rudolph IJCAI’11; Zhang, Zhang & You AAAI’15] ∀ and BCQ q , there is a set of Datalog rules Σ ′ and Theorem: For every Σ ∈ CT sk BCQ q ′ such that {D | D ✱ Σ | = q } = {D | D ✱ Σ ′ | = q ′ } . Proof (idea): The terms in any skolem chase over Σ are bounded in size. One can “flatten” such terms by increasing the arity of predicates, e.g., p ( f ( a ✱ b )) �→ ˆ p ( f ✱ a ✱ b ) Arities must be large enough to accommodate all possible terms, but unused positions can be filled by a special constant � , e.g., q ( f ( s ( a ✱ b ) ✱ t ( c ✱ d ))) �→ ˆ q ( f ✱ s ✱ a ✱ b ✱ t ✱ c ✱ d ) q ( f ( a ✱ g ( b ))) �→ ˆ q ( f ✱ a ✱ � ✱ � ✱ g ✱ b ✱ � ) It is easy to apply these replacements to rules and queries. � Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 30 of 54

  62. Discussion Summary: Essentially all known chase termination criteria recognise fragments of existential rules that are basically syntactic simplifications of Datalog. • Existential rules are usually more concise (flattening may incur exponential predicate arity) • Combined complexity is accordingly higher (typically 2ExpTime-complete) • But the expressive power is not more than Datalog Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 31 of 54

  63. Discussion Summary: Essentially all known chase termination criteria recognise fragments of existential rules that are basically syntactic simplifications of Datalog. • Existential rules are usually more concise (flattening may incur exponential predicate arity) • Combined complexity is accordingly higher (typically 2ExpTime-complete) • But the expressive power is not more than Datalog Thesis Previous research on chase termination is best motivated from an ontological view, while not leading to significant advances for using rules as declarative programs/queries. Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 31 of 54

  64. ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ Beyond P Surprisingly, this severe restriction in expressivity is specific to the skolem chase: Theorem: There is a rule set Σ ∈ CT dlf ∀∀ and a BCQ q that express a non-elementary Boolean query. Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 32 of 54

  65. ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ Beyond P Surprisingly, this severe restriction in expressivity is specific to the skolem chase: Theorem: There is a rule set Σ ∈ CT dlf ∀∀ and a BCQ q that express a non-elementary Boolean query. Proof: We reduce from the following non-elementary decision problem: Input: A Turing machine M and a number k Question: When started on the empty tape, does M halt in at most 2 2 ··· 2 steps? ���� k times Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 32 of 54

  66. Beyond P Surprisingly, this severe restriction in expressivity is specific to the skolem chase: Theorem: There is a rule set Σ ∈ CT dlf ∀∀ and a BCQ q that express a non-elementary Boolean query. Proof: We reduce from the following non-elementary decision problem: Input: A Turing machine M and a number k Question: When started on the empty tape, does M halt in at most 2 2 ··· 2 steps? ���� k times Three ingredients are needed: 1. Rules that receive an input chain first ( e 0 ) ✱ next ( e 0 ✱ e 1 ) ✱ . . . ✱ next ( e k − 1 ✱ e k ) ✱ last ( e k ) and construct a k -exponentially long chain (interesting) 2. Rules that simulate a Turing machine in time and space bounded by this chain (boring) 3. Rules that ensure termination even on malformed inputs (interesting) Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 32 of 54

  67. Building a long chain We construct a series of k full binary trees of depth 2 ✱ 2 2 ✱ 2 2 2 ✱ . . . (we omit the roots) Tree #1 Tree #2 next left, right level counter Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 33 of 54

  68. Building a long chain We construct a series of k full binary trees of depth 2 ✱ 2 2 ✱ 2 2 2 ✱ . . . (we omit the roots) Tree #1 Tree #2 Tree #3 next left, right level counter Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 33 of 54

  69. Building a long chain We construct a series of k full binary trees of depth 2 ✱ 2 2 ✱ 2 2 2 ✱ . . . (we omit the roots) Tree #1 Tree #2 Tree #3 next left, right level counter Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 33 of 54

  70. Building a long chain We construct a series of k full binary trees of depth 2 ✱ 2 2 ✱ 2 2 2 ✱ . . . (we omit the roots) Tree #1 Tree #2 Tree #3 next left, right level counter Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 33 of 54

  71. Building a long chain We construct a series of k full binary trees of depth 2 ✱ 2 2 ✱ 2 2 2 ✱ . . . (we omit the roots) Tree #1 Tree #2 Tree #3 next left, right level counter Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 33 of 54

  72. Building a long chain We construct a series of k full binary trees of depth 2 ✱ 2 2 ✱ 2 2 2 ✱ . . . (we omit the roots) Tree #1 Tree #2 Tree #3 next left, right level counter Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 33 of 54

  73. Building a long chain We construct a series of k full binary trees of depth 2 ✱ 2 2 ✱ 2 2 2 ✱ . . . (we omit the roots) Tree #1 Tree #2 Tree #3 next left, right level counter Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 33 of 54

  74. Building a long chain We construct a series of k full binary trees of depth 2 ✱ 2 2 ✱ 2 2 2 ✱ . . . (we omit the roots) Tree #1 Tree #2 Tree #3 next left, right level counter Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 33 of 54

  75. Building a long chain We construct a series of k full binary trees of depth 2 ✱ 2 2 ✱ 2 2 2 ✱ . . . (we omit the roots) Tree #1 Tree #2 Tree #3 next left, right level counter Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 33 of 54

  76. Building a long chain We construct a series of k full binary trees of depth 2 ✱ 2 2 ✱ 2 2 2 ✱ . . . (we omit the roots) Tree #1 Tree #2 Tree #3 next left, right level counter Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 33 of 54

  77. Building a long chain We construct a series of k full binary trees of depth 2 ✱ 2 2 ✱ 2 2 2 ✱ . . . (we omit the roots) Tree #1 Tree #2 Tree #3 . . . next left, right level counter Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 33 of 54

  78. Building a long chain And here are the rules: first ( v ) → ∃ x ✳ start ( x ✱ x ✱ v ) ∧ end ( x ) start ( x ✱ u ✱ v ) ∧ end ( u ) ∧ next ( v ✱ v ′ ) → ∃ y 1 ✱ y 2 ✳ start ( y 1 ✱ x ✱ v ′ ) ∧ succ ( y 1 ✱ y 2 ) ∧ end ( y 2 ) start ( x ✱ u ✱ v ) ∧ succ ( u ✱ u ′ ) → ∃ y ✳ left ( x ✱ y ) ∧ start ( y ✱ u ′ ✱ v ) left ( x ✱ y ) → ∃ y ′ ✳ right ( x ✱ y ′ ) ∧ succ ( y ✱ y ′ ) right ( x ✱ y ) ∧ succ ( x ✱ x ′ ) → ∃ y ′ ✳ left ( x ′ ✱ y ′ ) ∧ succ ( y ✱ y ′ ) end ( x ) ∧ right ( x ✱ y ) → end ( y ) Markus Krötzsch, ICDT 2019 – Invited Tutorial The Power of the Terminating Chase slide 34 of 54

Recommend

The Power of Networking in Your Job Search Presentation for Students Salmon P. Chase College of

The Power of Networking in Your Job Search Presentation for Students Salmon P. Chase College of

The Power of Networking in Your Job Search Presentation for Students Salmon P. Chase College of Law by Linda Tefend, CMF February 12, 2012 Todays Topics: Part 1: Why Network? Part 2: A Simple Approach Part 3: Using LinkedIn Effectively

900 views • 32 slides
Final Councillor Briefing on Elvetham Chase Fleet, Hart DC 18 th December 2017 Elvetham Chase

Final Councillor Briefing on Elvetham Chase Fleet, Hart DC 18 th December 2017 Elvetham Chase

Final Councillor Briefing on Elvetham Chase Fleet, Hart DC 18 th December 2017 Elvetham Chase Agenda : 1. Introduction 2. Final proposals 3. Education 4. Health 5. Highways 6. Conclusion 7. Questions Elvetham Chase Key aspects &

447 views • 17 slides
Bayesian Decomposition Michael Ochs Fox Chase Cancer Center Bioinformatics Fox Chase Cancer

Bayesian Decomposition Michael Ochs Fox Chase Cancer Center Bioinformatics Fox Chase Cancer

Bayesian Decomposition Michael Ochs Fox Chase Cancer Center Bioinformatics Fox Chase Cancer Center Making Proteins Bioinformatics Fox Chase Cancer Center A Closer Look at Translation Post-Trans- lational Modification RNA Splicing miRNA

672 views • 28 slides
Terminating Ring Exploration with Myopic Oblivious Robots GRASTA-MAC Open Problem Session

Terminating Ring Exploration with Myopic Oblivious Robots GRASTA-MAC Open Problem Session

Terminating Ring Exploration with Myopic Oblivious Robots GRASTA-MAC Open Problem Session Terminating Exploration Starting from an arbitrary configuration where no pair of robots are located on the same node Exploration Each node must be

336 views • 8 slides
Magnetrons - High Power RF Sources Brian Chase - Fermilab Michael Read - Calabazas Creek

Magnetrons - High Power RF Sources Brian Chase - Fermilab Michael Read - Calabazas Creek

Magnetrons - High Power RF Sources Brian Chase - Fermilab Michael Read - Calabazas Creek Research Inc Magnetron Collaboration Calabazas Creek Research Inc Michael Read, R. Lawrence Ives, Thuc Bui Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory

430 views • 32 slides
Terminating a Trust: Issues which may arise Raj Arumugam, 5 Stone Buildings Adam Cole, Walkers 26

Terminating a Trust: Issues which may arise Raj Arumugam, 5 Stone Buildings Adam Cole, Walkers 26

Terminating a Trust: Issues which may arise Raj Arumugam, 5 Stone Buildings Adam Cole, Walkers 26 June 2020 www.5sblaw.com Terminating a trust: issues which may arise How does a trust come to an end? No assets Terms of the trust

793 views • 24 slides
Chase Farm Hospital Natalie Forrest Chief executive and director of nursing, Chase Farm Hospital

Chase Farm Hospital Natalie Forrest Chief executive and director of nursing, Chase Farm Hospital

Chase Farm Hospital Natalie Forrest Chief executive and director of nursing, Chase Farm Hospital Contents New Chase Farm Hospital Drivers for change Services and facilities Our urgent care centre Our surgical facilities A digital hospital

310 views • 13 slides
On Confluence of Innermost Terminating Term Rewriting Systems Masahiko Sakai (Nagoya

On Confluence of Innermost Terminating Term Rewriting Systems Masahiko Sakai (Nagoya

On Confluence of Innermost Terminating Term Rewriting Systems Masahiko Sakai (Nagoya University) joint work with Sayaka Ishizuki, Michio Oyamaguchi Sep. 9, 2017, IFIP WG 1.6, Oxford 1 This talk Background: - Open problems on

534 views • 35 slides
Terminating via Ramseys Theorem Silvia Steila supervisor: Stefano Berardi co-supervisor:

Terminating via Ramseys Theorem Silvia Steila supervisor: Stefano Berardi co-supervisor:

Terminating via Ramseys Theorem Silvia Steila supervisor: Stefano Berardi co-supervisor: Paulo Oliva Universit` a degli studi di Torino January 26th, 2016 A first informal question Assume that a child really likes biscuits, he has z -many

463 views • 42 slides
Todays lecture Continue exploring C-strings Under the hood: sequence of chars w/ terminating

Todays lecture Continue exploring C-strings Under the hood: sequence of chars w/ terminating

Todays lecture Continue exploring C-strings Under the hood: sequence of chars w/ terminating null Review implementation of strcpy, strncpy As abstraction: client of string.h functions Write pig latin conversion program Pointer mechanics

489 views • 10 slides
CHASE Board June 2019 Nancy Dolson Department of Health Care Policy and Financing Hospital

CHASE Board June 2019 Nancy Dolson Department of Health Care Policy and Financing Hospital

CHASE Board June 2019 Nancy Dolson Department of Health Care Policy and Financing Hospital Transformation Program Refer to CHASE HTP update memo Additional materials for your information CHASE HTP work to date summary CHA

155 views • 11 slides
Termination of Rewrite Systems (Overview) 15ai Q: Why should we want terminating rewrite systems?

Termination of Rewrite Systems (Overview) 15ai Q: Why should we want terminating rewrite systems?

Termination of Rewrite Systems (Overview) 15ai Q: Why should we want terminating rewrite systems? A: Weve seen that to be useful a set of rewrite rules should be complete; to check completeness uses the Knuth Bendix procedure; AUTOMATED

189 views • 6 slides
Federal Fiscal Year 2017-18 CHASE Fee Program June 21, 2018 Overview CHASE Overview Fee

Federal Fiscal Year 2017-18 CHASE Fee Program June 21, 2018 Overview CHASE Overview Fee

Federal Fiscal Year 2017-18 CHASE Fee Program June 21, 2018 Overview CHASE Overview Fee and Payments Methodologies Net Reimbursement Overview Payment to Cost Ratio Reconciliation Process Overview 2 Overview Program Goals

468 views • 45 slides
Unit 7 Scheduling, Allocating Resources, Monitoring and Controlling, Evaluating and Terminating

Unit 7 Scheduling, Allocating Resources, Monitoring and Controlling, Evaluating and Terminating

Unit 7 Scheduling, Allocating Resources, Monitoring and Controlling, Evaluating and Terminating the Project Source: Project Management in Practice, 5th Edition, Mantel, Meredith, Shafer, Sutton, Wiley, 2014. Project Management: A Systems

926 views • 56 slides
Slides on thr Slides on threads eads borr borrowed by Chase owed by Chase Landon Cox Landon

Slides on thr Slides on threads eads borr borrowed by Chase owed by Chase Landon Cox Landon

Slides on thr Slides on threads eads borr borrowed by Chase owed by Chase Landon Cox Landon Cox Thr Thread states ead states Running Thread is Thread calls scheduled Lock or wait Thread is (or makes I/O request) Pre-empted (or yields) ?

825 views • 36 slides
Agreement Terminating Third Amended Third Supplementary Agreement Harbor Bay Isle Shoreline Park,

Agreement Terminating Third Amended Third Supplementary Agreement Harbor Bay Isle Shoreline Park,

Agreement Terminating Third Amended Third Supplementary Agreement Harbor Bay Isle Shoreline Park, Harbor Bay Business Park Phase III, Alameda Marc Zeppetello Chief Counsel Oakland Alameda San Francisco Bay Farm Island OAK Airport

328 views • 10 slides
HIRING, RETAINING AND TERMINATING HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS Chery ryl l Bernkn nknopf opf, , RN

HIRING, RETAINING AND TERMINATING HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS Chery ryl l Bernkn nknopf opf, , RN

HIRING, RETAINING AND TERMINATING HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS Chery ryl l Bernkn nknopf opf, , RN Barb b Gray, , RN, MN OCA Health thca care e Committ ittee ee Todays campers and staff are coming to camp with more health care needs

336 views • 29 slides
Confluence and Convergence in Probabilistically Terminating Reduction Systems Maja H. Kirkeby

Confluence and Convergence in Probabilistically Terminating Reduction Systems Maja H. Kirkeby

Confluence and Convergence in Probabilistically Terminating Reduction Systems Maja H. Kirkeby Henning Christiansen Computer Science, Roskilde University, Denmark LOPSTR 2017 Namur, Belgium Maja H. Kirkeby, Henning Christiansen

524 views • 35 slides
CPS 310 Threads and Concurrency: Topics Jeff Chase Duke

CPS 310 Threads and Concurrency: Topics Jeff Chase Duke

D D u k e S y s t t e m s CPS 310 Threads and Concurrency: Topics Jeff Chase Duke University h>p://www.cs.duke.edu/~chase/cps310 Terminology and syntax The abstractions for

664 views • 31 slides
CPS 310 Unix Process Model Jeff Chase Duke University

CPS 310 Unix Process Model Jeff Chase Duke University

D D u k e S y s t t e m s CPS 310 Unix Process Model Jeff Chase Duke University h>p://www.cs.duke.edu/~chase/cps310 Operating Systems: The Classical View Each process Programs has a

535 views • 52 slides
Complexity Analysis of Precedence Terminating Infinite Graph Rewrite Systems Naohi Eguchi Chiba

Complexity Analysis of Precedence Terminating Infinite Graph Rewrite Systems Naohi Eguchi Chiba

Complexity Analysis of Precedence Terminating Infinite Graph Rewrite Systems Naohi Eguchi Chiba University, Japan University of Innsbruck, Austria September 27, 2014 41st TRS meeting, Jozankei, Sapporo, Japan Introduction Complexity

392 views • 16 slides
CPS 310 Process = Address Space + Thread(s) Jeff Chase

CPS 310 Process = Address Space + Thread(s) Jeff Chase

D D u k e S y s t t e m s CPS 310 Process = Address Space + Thread(s) Jeff Chase Duke University hBp://www.cs.duke.edu/~chase/cps310 The story so far: process and kernel A

497 views • 39 slides
Deciding for others: the ethics of substituted decision making Dr. Jocelyn Chase Geriatric

Deciding for others: the ethics of substituted decision making Dr. Jocelyn Chase Geriatric

Deciding for others: the ethics of substituted decision making Dr. Jocelyn Chase Geriatric Medicine, UBC Clinical Instructor PHC Ethics Fellow Presenter Disclosure Presenter: Jocelyn Chase Relationships with financial sponsors: None

793 views • 51 slides
CHASE Board April 2019 Nancy Dolson Department of Health Care Policy and Financing Hospital

CHASE Board April 2019 Nancy Dolson Department of Health Care Policy and Financing Hospital

CHASE Board April 2019 Nancy Dolson Department of Health Care Policy and Financing Hospital Transformation Program Measure Scoring Summary Proposal 2 Background CHASE and HCPF to seek CMS approval for a five-year delivery system reform

251 views • 22 slides

More recommend