the advent of true direct potable reuse
play

The Advent of True Direct Potable Reuse Brent Alspach, PE ARCADIS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Advent of True Direct Potable Reuse Brent Alspach, PE ARCADIS Acknowledgements Co-Author Gilbert Trejo, El Paso Water Utilities (EPWU) El Paso Water Utilities: John Balliew Fernie Rico Aide Zamarron


  1. The Advent of True Direct Potable Reuse Brent Alspach, PE ARCADIS

  2. Acknowledgements • Co-Author – Gilbert Trejo, El Paso Water Utilities (EPWU) • El Paso Water Utilities: – John Balliew – Fernie Rico – Aide Zamarron • ARCADIS – Caroline Russell – Corin Marron – Sanaan Villalobos – George Maseeh – Dan Olson

  3. Background

  4. Water Resources Overview El Paso Water Utilities (EPWU) Service area population ~ 800,000 Estimated demand ~ 118,000 AF (2013) (105 MGD) 1970s 225 gpcd Specific consumption 2013 132 gpcd • Groundwater • Desalinated brackish groundwater Water sources • Rio Grande river • Reclaimed water Average annual rainfall 8.7 inches

  5. Water Resources Overview El Paso Water Utilities (EPWU) Service area population ~ 800,000 Estimated demand ~ 118,000 AF (2013) (105 MGD) 1970s 225 gpcd Specific consumption 2013 132 gpcd • Groundwater • Desalinated brackish groundwater Water sources • Rio Grande river Conservation has been effective! • Reclaimed water Average annual rainfall 8.7 inches

  6. Current Drought Conditions • Reduced river water allocation: − Normal: 60,000 AFY − 2013: 10,000 AF • Received at least average allocation from the Rio Grande only 3 times in the past 17 yrs • Reservoir storage is low  EPWU has instituted several August 28, 2013 drought support programs Courtesy: Texas A&M

  7. July 8, 2013 June 2, 1994 Courtesy: NASA

  8. 2014 Summer Daily Peak

  9. Daily Peak Without River Water

  10. Long History of Reuse Fred Hervey Water Reclamation Plant WWTP designed to meet drinking water standards

  11. Long History of Reuse EPWU has been using reclaimed water treated to drinking water standards for aquifer recharge since 1985.

  12. Long History of Reuse Why not utilize indirect potable reuse?

  13. Source Water Quality Comparison Average 2011 Concentrations @... Rio Bosque Parameters Shallow Rogers WTP Bustamante Groundwater WWTP Effluent Rio Grande Shallow Wells pH NA 6.9 8.5 7.8 Alkalinity, mg/L as CaCO 3 NA 97 176 288 TDS, mg/L 722 - 3,087 1,069 580 791 Hardness, mg/L NA 228 210 279 NA TOC, mg/L NA 4.3 3.8 Turbidity, NTU NA 3.8 168 1.6 NA Nitrate, mg/L as N 8 - 88.7 16.4 1.3 Total Phosphorus, mg/L as P NA 3.1 0.4 NA Bromide, mg/L 1.3 - 3.2 0.3 0.09 NA

  14. Source Water Quality Comparison Average 2011 Concentrations @... Rio Bosque Parameters Shallow Rogers WTP Bustamante Groundwater WWTP Effluent Rio Grande Shallow Wells pH NA 6.9 8.5 7.8 Alkalinity, mg/L as CaCO 3 NA 97 176 288 TDS, mg/L 722 - 3,087 1,069 580 791 Hardness, mg/L NA 228 210 279 NA TOC, mg/L NA 4.3 3.8 Turbidity, NTU NA 3.8 168 1.6 Additional injection treatment NA Nitrate, mg/L as N 8 - 88.7 16.4 1.3 required Total Phosphorus, mg/L as P NA 3.1 0.4 NA Bromide, mg/L 1.3 - 3.2 0.3 0.09 NA

  15. Source Water Quality Comparison Average 2011 Concentrations @... Rio Bosque Parameters Shallow Rogers WTP Bustamante Groundwater WWTP Effluent Rio Grande Shallow Wells pH NA 6.9 8.5 7.8 Alkalinity, mg/L as CaCO 3 NA 97 176 288 TDS, mg/L 722 - 3,087 1,069 580 791 Hardness, mg/L NA 228 210 279 NA TOC, mg/L NA 4.3 3.8 Turbidity, NTU NA 3.8 168 1.6 NA Nitrate, mg/L as N 8 - 88.7 16.4 1.3 Total Phosphorus, mg/L as P NA 3.1 0.4 NA Bromide, mg/L 1.3 - 3.2 0.3 0.09 NA

  16. Source Water Quality Comparison Average 2011 Concentrations @... Rio Bosque Parameters Shallow Rogers WTP Bustamante Groundwater WWTP Effluent Rio Grande Shallow Wells pH NA 6.9 8.5 7.8 Alkalinity, mg/L as CaCO 3 NA 97 176 288 TDS, mg/L 722 - 3,087 1,069 580 791 Hardness, mg/L NA 228 210 279 Typical bromide concentrations in NA TOC, mg/L NA 4.3 3.8 conventional supplies: Turbidity, NTU NA 3.8 168 1.6 NA Nitrate, mg/L as N 8 - 88.7 16.4 1.3 0.063 mg/L* Total Phosphorus, mg/L as P NA 3.1 0.4 NA * Water Research Foundation (2011) Bromide, mg/L 1.3 - 3.2 0.3 0.09 NA

  17. Source Water Quality Comparison Average 2011 Concentrations @... Rio Bosque Parameters Shallow Rogers WTP Bustamante Groundwater WWTP Effluent Rio Grande Shallow Wells pH NA 6.9 8.5 7.8 Alkalinity, mg/L as CaCO 3 NA 97 176 288 TDS, mg/L 722 - 3,087 1,069 580 791 Hardness, mg/L NA 228 210 279 NA TOC, mg/L NA 4.3 3.8 Additional extraction treatment Turbidity, NTU NA 3.8 168 1.6 required NA Nitrate, mg/L as N 8 - 88.7 16.4 1.3 Total Phosphorus, mg/L as P NA 3.1 0.4 NA Bromide, mg/L 1.3 - 3.2 0.3 0.09 NA

  18. Source Water Quality Comparison Average 2011 Concentrations @... Rio Bosque Parameters Shallow Rogers WTP Bustamante Groundwater WWTP Effluent Rio Grande Shallow Wells pH NA 6.9 8.5 7.8 Alkalinity, mg/L as CaCO 3 NA 97 176 288 TDS, mg/L 722 - 3,087 1,069 580 791 Hardness, mg/L NA 228 210 279 Avoid subsurface injection NA TOC, mg/L NA 4.3 3.8 Turbidity, NTU NA 3.8 168 1.6 NA Nitrate, mg/L as N 8 - 88.7 16.4 1.3 Total Phosphorus, mg/L as P NA 3.1 0.4 NA Bromide, mg/L 1.3 - 3.2 0.3 0.09 NA

  19. Source Water Quality Comparison Average 2011 Concentrations @... Rio Bosque Parameters Shallow Rogers WTP Bustamante Groundwater WWTP Effluent Rio Grande Shallow Wells pH NA 6.9 8.5 7.8 Alkalinity, mg/L as CaCO 3 NA 97 176 288 TDS, mg/L 722 - 3,087 1,069 580 791 Hardness, mg/L NA 228 210 279  Direct potable reuse NA TOC, mg/L NA 4.3 3.8 Turbidity, NTU NA 3.8 168 1.6 NA Nitrate, mg/L as N 8 - 88.7 16.4 1.3 Total Phosphorus, mg/L as P NA 3.1 0.4 NA Bromide, mg/L 1.3 - 3.2 0.3 0.09 NA

  20. Source Water Quality Comparison Average 2011 Concentrations @... Rio Bosque Parameters Shallow Rogers WTP Bustamante Groundwater WWTP Effluent Rio Grande Shallow Wells pH NA 6.9 8.5 7.8 Alkalinity, mg/L as CaCO 3 NA 97 176 288 TDS, mg/L 722 - 3,087 1,069 580 791 Hardness, mg/L NA 228 210 279  Direct to distribution! NA TOC, mg/L NA 4.3 3.8 Turbidity, NTU NA 3.8 168 1.6 NA Nitrate, mg/L as N 8 - 88.7 16.4 1.3 Total Phosphorus, mg/L as P NA 3.1 0.4 NA Bromide, mg/L 1.3 - 3.2 0.3 0.09 NA

  21. Why Pipe-to-Pipe DPR…? • Close to proximity of Roberto R. Bustamante WWTP and Jonathan Rogers WTP infrastructure • Cost of re-treating advanced treated water • Advanced treated water has better quality than raw water blending supplies [Big Spring (TX) model] • No regulatory roadblocks Direct-to-distribution DPR makes sense.

  22. Project Status

  23. Project Status • Feasibility assessment Advanced Purified Water • Concept development Treatment Plant (APWTP) • Pilot testing • Preliminary design • Detailed design • Construction

  24. Project Status  Feasibility assessment Advanced Purified Water  Concept development Treatment Plant (APWTP) • Pilot testing • Preliminary design • Detailed design • Construction

  25. Project Status  Feasibility assessment Participation By:  Concept development • EPWU • Pilot testing • ARCADIS • NWRI • Preliminary design • Expert Panel • Detailed design • TCEQ • Construction

  26. Project Status  Feasibility assessment Participation By:  Concept development • EPWU • Pilot testing • ARCADIS • NWRI • Preliminary design • Expert Panel • Detailed design • TCEQ • Construction

  27. Project Status  Feasibility assessment Pilot site under construction  Concept development • Pilot testing • Preliminary design • Detailed design • Construction

  28. Roberto R. Bustamante WWTP Site

  29. Treatment Processes

  30. Treatment Processes Bustamante WWTP Cl 2 Activated Pre-Aeration Primary Settling Secondary Settling Sludge Screening/ Discharge to Grit Removal Riverside Canal 10 MGD Return Activated Sludge To APWTP Denitrifying Filters

  31. Treatment Processes Bustamante WWTP Cl 2 Activated Pre-Aeration Primary Settling Secondary Settling Sludge Screening/ Discharge to Grit Removal Riverside Canal 10 MGD Return Activated Sludge To APWTP Denitrifying APWTP Filters Secondary Cl 2 Disinfection O 3 Clarifier NF/RO MF/UF Effluent Denitrifying GAC for H 2 O 2 Backwash Concentrate UV AOP Clearwell Filters Quenching

  32. Treatment Processes Not covered Other key pilot test components : today • Coagulant testing • On-line monitoring evaluation • Process control study • Finished water pipe loop testing APWTP Secondary Cl 2 Disinfection O 3 Clarifier NF/RO MF/UF Effluent Denitrifying GAC for H 2 O 2 Backwash Concentrate UV AOP Clearwell Filters Quenching

  33. Treatment Processes APWTP Secondary Cl 2 Disinfection O 3 Clarifier NF/RO MF/UF Effluent Denitrifying GAC for H 2 O 2 Backwash Concentrate UV AOP Clearwell Filters Quenching

  34. Denitrifying Filters APWTP Secondary Cl 2 Disinfection O 3 Clarifier NF/RO MF/UF Effluent Denitrifying GAC for H 2 O 2 Backwash Concentrate UV AOP Clearwell Filters Quenching Objective(s) Benefit(s) - to inert N 2 Convert dissolved NO 3 Enable the use of NF (vs. RO) Remove particulate matter Enhance MF/UF pretreatment Provide an additional pathogen barrier Further reduce public health risk

Recommend


More recommend