Student Success and Support Program: An Overview Student Success and Support Program Committee August 21, 2014
Key Topics SSSP: from recommendations to regulations Review of SB 1456 provisions Estimated implementation timeline SB 1456 links to student equity SSSP Funding Formula
Student Success Task Force : 8 Focus Areas, 22 Recommendations 1. Increase college and career readiness 2. Strengthen support for entering students 3. Incentivize successful student behaviors 4. Align course offerings to meet student needs
Student Success Task Force : 8 Focus Areas, 22 Recommendations 5. Improve education of basic skills students 6. Revitalize and re-envision professional development 7. Enable efficient statewide leadership and increase coordination among colleges 8. Align resources with student success recommendations
Road to SSSP SSTF Title 5 Regulations Senate Bill 1456 Recommendations
Matriculation Then & Now 3 funded core services: orientation, assessment, 8 funded components counseling/advising/other student education planning Colleges required to Institutional AND student provide core requirements matriculation services, Incentivizes student but students not required completion of core to complete them services Stand-alone program Clear link to student planning equity planning
SB 1456: Student Success Act of 2012 Provides a “policy framework” Re-purpose and re-focus Matriculation on core services of orientation, assessment, and counseling/advising to assist students in developing education plans Leveraging technology to reach a greater number of students Requiring Board of Governors to adopt policies to mandate orientation, assessment, and student ed. plans, along with an exemption and appeals process
Overview of Bill Language EC 78210: Renames Matriculation Act of 1986 as the Seymour- Campbell Student Success Act of 2012 EC 78211: Delineates the Legislature’s intent for the Student Success Act: Aligns matriculation language to SSTF recommendations regarding services needed to support students in developing an “informed” ed goal, developing ed plans and declaration of course of study. Shared responsibility between instruction and student services, based on “evidenced - based” practices of what works. Targets funding on core services, such as counseling and advising, through a broad array of service delivery mechanisms.
Overview of Bill Language EC 78212: Delineates the student’s and the institution’s responsibility for the purpose of achieving the student's educational goals and completing the student’s course of study. To ensure students are not unfairly impacted, requires the BOG to establish a reasonable, phased-in implementation period based on resources available to serve students. Funded program named “Student Success and Support Program.”
Overview of Bill Language EC 78215: Defines role of BOG in developing policies and processes for: 1. Requiring student participation in core services; 2. Exempting specific student groups; and, 3. Requiring an appeals process. To ensure students are not unfairly impacted, delineates process the BOG will use to develop policies and requires the BOG to establish a reasonable, phased-in implementation period based on resources available to serve nonexempt students.
Overview of Bill Language EC 78216: Clarifies the use of existing matriculation funds for Student Success and Support Program services and BOG’s role in developing criteria for the funding formula. Identifies some considerations for funding formula, including numbers of students served.
Overview of Bill Language EC 78216(b)(4): As a condition of receipt of funds, requires districts to implement common assessment (if using an assessment instrument for placement) and student success scorecard, once these are established by the BOG. EC 78216(b)(5): Provides BOG with the authority to fund other services, as funding allows. EC 78216(c): Delineates plan requirements
Overview of Bill Language BOG Fee Waiver Conditions EC 76300: Places conditions on eligibility for BOG Fee Waiver. Students must meet academic and progress standards, as defined by the BOG; The academic conditions would be phased in over a reasonable period of time as determined by the BOG. Requires adequate and reasonable notification to students
Student Success & Support Program Planning & Implementation Timeline Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 Implementation Implementation Year 2: District/College-Level District/College-Level System-level Planning Year: FY 15-16 allocations • Year 3: Implementation Planning Year: Implementation Year 1: • FY 15-16 • based on 14-15 workgroups Program plans & Develop program • • allocations year-end data plans convened October budgets submitted based on reported Implement MIS 2012 to develop • Continue to ensure • 14-15 year- Application of • changes & ensure proposals for title 5 accurate & end data funding formula accurate & complete Matriculation complete data reported beginning this year data reporting revisions, new reporting Legislative Allocations remain • • allocation formula, Allocations remain • report due consistent as prior & revised MIS data consistent as prior July 1, 2016 year, new formula not elements & year, new formula applied definitions not applied Funding targeted to • New program Legislative • • core services of planning & budget implementation orientation, process developed report due July 1, assessment, SB 1456 effective 2014 (biannually • counseling & advising, January 1, 2013 thereafter) & other education planning services
Student Equity and SSSP
SB 1456 and Student Equity EC 78216(b)(4): Links funding to the new Scorecard EC 78216(c)(7): Delineates plan requirements & link to student equity: “Coordination with college student equity plans to ensure that the college has identified strategies to monitor and address equity issues and mitigate any disproportionate impacts on student access and achievement.”
Student Equity Requirements Success Indicators Access: Percentage of each pop. group enrolled compared group’s representation in adult population within community served – Census data; locally available data Course Completion: Ratio of number of credit courses that students by pop. group complete compared to number of courses in which students in that group are enrolled on the census day of term - DataMart ESL and Basic Skills Completion: Ratio of number of students by pop. group who complete a degree-applicable course after having completed the final ESL or basic skills course to the number of those students who complete such a final course - DataMart; Scorecard; Basic Skills Tracker
Student Equity Requirements Success Indicators Degree and Certificate Completion: Ratio of number of students by pop. group who receive a degree or certificate to number of students in that group with same informed education goal as documented in student ed. plan – DataMart; Scorecard Transfer: Ratio of number of students by pop. group who complete a min. of 12 units and have attempted a transfer level course in math or English, to number in that group who transfer after one or more (up to six) years – DataMart; Scorecard Student Success and Support Services: The effect of mandatory participation of new students in SSSP services and enrollment priority on indicators A-E above, as well as the loss of Board of Governors (BOG) fee waiver of new students.
SB 1456 & Student Equity EC 78216(c)(2): Delineates plan requirements regarding college efforts to implement interventions for at-risk students: “A description of the college’s process to identify students at risk for academic or progress probation and the college’s plan for interventions or services to students.”
Student Equity & SSSP Evaluating disproportionate impact in following SSSP components: Admissions Assessment and Placement Orientation Counseling and Advising (education planning) Follow-up (evaluation of student progress) Prerequisites
Assessing for Disproportionate Impact Questions to consider in SSSP processes: Do male and female students access counseling services in different proportions relative to their representation on the campus? Are younger students more likely to complete orientation? If a student is older (26 years or older), is s/he more likely to assess into basic skills level math? Is race/ethnicity associated with lower success rates in prerequisites in certain fields of study?
Planning Timelines Education Score Card* Master College Education Master Plan Plan/Program Tied to Accreditation cycle, each three- six years, may be updated annually Review Student Success and Support Program Plan Every 3 years, updated annually Student Equity Student Success Student Equity Planning Basic Skills & Support Every 3-5 years Initiative Program Basic Skills Initiative Plan Every year, submitted each October (plan template/instructions released in April) * As a starting point for discussion of institutional outcomes & equity
Recommend
More recommend