strategic planning presentation
play

Strategic Planning Presentation Board of Education Meeting October - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Strategic Planning Presentation Board of Education Meeting October 1, 2020 Project Overview Environmental Scan Organizational Assessment Phase 1: Analysis Step 1 September Analyze Implications Step 2 Define Desired Future:


  1. Strategic Planning Presentation Board of Education Meeting October 1, 2020

  2. Project Overview • Environmental Scan • Organizational Assessment Phase 1: Analysis Step 1 September • Analyze Implications Step 2 • Define Desired Future: Vision, Mission, Priority Outcomes Step 3 Phase 2: • Develop Strategic Themes, Objectives Strategy Development and Measures October-November Step 4 • Define Strategic Initiatives Step 5 • Create Action Plans Phase 3: Action Step 6 Planning • Develop Monitoring and Review Process November-January Step 7 2

  3. Mountain View Whisman School District Strategic Planning Process Phase 1: Analysis September Phase 2: Strategy Development October-November Leadership Overview Phase 3: Action Planning Define Priority Outcomes and Data Gathering Strategic Themes November-January and Stakeholder Input Stakeholder Determine Phasing, Input Review Identify Initiative Refine Environmental, Sponsors and Owners Organizational Train and Create Action Plans for Trends and Issues Support Phase 1 Initiatives Develop Strategy Identify Objectives, Develop Teams SWOT and Measures, Monitoring Prioritize Initiatives Process Communication 3

  4. Progress to date Collected Facilitated Conducted Facilitated Conducted and Strategy community input interviews analyzed Session with survey with session with with all data on past 60 district 1134 PTA board district stakeholders respondents Leaders members performance * * Including parents, board members, teachers, classified staff, school administrators and district leaders 4

  5. Analysis Phase Findings

  6. The percentage of Hispanic, economically disadvantaged and English learner students have declined, while the percentage of Asian students have increased MVWSD Student Demographics 45% 40% 35% -7% -6% 30% +1% 25% -7% 20% +5% 15% +2% 10% +1% 5% -1% +2% 0% 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Hispanic White Asian Multi-Racial Other English Learners Economically Disadvantaged Students with Disabilities Homeless 6 Other includes Filipino, African American, Pacific Islander and Not Reported

  7. Over the past five years, the percentage of students meeting and exceeding standards has increased by 10 points in both ELA and Math MVWSD 5-Year Trends in ELA and Math % Meeting or Exceeding Standards 80% 71% 68% 66% 66% 70% 60% 60% 64% 64% 62% 60% 50% 54% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Math ELA 7

  8. Over the past two years, Grade 5 has seen increases of 5 points in the percentage of students meeting or exceeding standards in both Math and ELA; performance results are slightly lower in middle school grades ELA and Math by Grade % Meeting or Exceeding Standards 100% 80% * * 60% 40% 20% 0% Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade 3 4 5 6 7 8 2018 Math 2019 Math 2018 ELA 2019 ELA 8

  9. Five year trends in Math show gains for all student groups, with the greatest gains for students who are Asian, Hispanic, and economically disadvantaged and students with disabilities, however significant gaps remain Math by Subgroups % Meeting or Exceeding Standards 100% +9% +3% 80% 60% 40% +8% +6% 20% +10% +1% 0% 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Asian Hispanic White Students with Disabilities English Learners Economically Disadvantaged 9

  10. Five year trends in ELA show greatest gains for Hispanic students, those who are economically disadvantaged and students with disabilities , although significant gaps remain the gap is closing more in ELA than in Math ELA by Subgroups % Meeting or Exceeding Standards 100% +6% +3% 80% 60% +15% 40% +12% +10% 20% +6% 0% 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Asian Hispanic White Students with Disabilities English Learners Economically Disadvantaged 10

  11. In Math, MVWSD has higher percentages not meeting standards in the middle school grades; while in ELA there are fewer students exceeding standards in the middle grades Math ELA MVWSD Student Performance Levels by Grade MVWSD Student Performance Levels by Grade Math 2018-19 2018-19 100% 100% 90% 90% 80% 80% 70% 70% 60% 60% 50% 50% 40% 40% 30% 30% 20% 20% 10% 10% 0% 0% Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Standard Not Met: Level 1 Standard Nearly Met: Level 2 Standard Not Met: Level 1 Standard Nearly Met: Level 2 Standard Met: Level 3 Standard Exceeded: Level 4 Standard Met: Level 3 Standard Exceeded: Level 4 11

  12. The Science test was first given in 2019. Grade 8 shows lower percentages exceeding than Grade 5, although the percentage meeting or exceeding is about the same Science MVWSD Student Performance Levels by Grade Science 2018-19 MVWSD Student Performance Level by Grade 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Grade 5 Grade 8 Standard Not Met: Level 1 Standard Nearly Met: Level 2 12 Standard Met: Level 3 Standard Exceeded: Level 4

  13. MVWSD has a smaller percentage of Hispanic students than the state, but more than neighboring districts Race/Ethnicity of State and Neighboring Districts 2019-20 Cupertino MVWSD State 3.9% 5.1% 4.3% 12.2% 5.2% 3.9% 35.0% 9.4% 14.1% 9.3% 54.9% 22.4% 18.1% 72.5% 29.7% Los Altos Palo Alto Sunnyvale 3.6% 2.0% 10.3% 8.0% 13.2% 10.4% 12.4% 8.2% 29.3% 43.2% 35.8% 34.4% 36.9% 29.2% 23.0% Other includes Filipino, African American, Pacific Islander and Not 13 Reported

  14. MVWSD has fewer economically disadvantaged students than the state, but more than most neighboring districts; MVWSD has more English learners than the state and most neighboring districts Student Program Categories of State and Neighboring Districts 2019-20 70% 60.7% 60% 50% 40% 34.0% 31.5% 29.7% 30% 21.8% 18.6% 20% 15.8% 10.2% 11.7% 11.1% 10.3% 9.6% 9.5% 9.4% 9.7% 10% 7.4% 6.0% 4.1% 3.2% 2.7% 0% State MVWSD Cupertino Los Altos Palo Alto Sunnyvale English Learners Economically Disadvantaged 14 Students with Disabilities Homeless

  15. When comparing to the state and neighboring districts, MVWSD outperforms the state and Sunnyvale in all subjects Math, ELA, and Science - State, MVWSD, and Neighboring Districts % Meeting or Exceeding Standards 2018-19 State MVWSD Cupertino Los Altos Palo Alto Sunnyvale 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Math ELA Science 15

  16. When comparing only students within subgroups, MVWSD outperforms the state and Sunnyvale but is still below neighboring districts; however these two populations of students may also have greater prevalence of economic disadvantage in MVWSD than other districts English Learners Students with Disabilities % Meeting or Exceeding Standards for % Meeting or Exceeding Standards for State and Neighboring Districts State and Neighboring Districts State State MVWSD MVWSD Cupertino Cupertino Los Altos Los Altos Palo Alto Palo Alto Sunnyvale Sunnyvale 0% 20% 40% 60% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Math ELA Science Math ELA Science 16

  17. When comparing strictly among students who are economically disadvantaged, MVWSD outperforms the state and Sunnyvale in all subjects; and is much closer in performance to other neighboring districts in ELA and Math Students who are Economically Disadvantaged % Meeting or Exceeding Standards for State and Neighboring Districts 27.5% State 39.2% 31.8% MVWSD 43.5% 45.3% Cupertino 52.3% 36.2% Los Altos 49.0% 40.8% Palo Alto 42.6% 21.8% Sunnyvale 32.7% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 17 Math ELA Science

  18. In Math, White and Hispanic students show about the same gap in achievement based on economic status, but Hispanic students perform at lower levels regardless of economic status Math - Students who are Economically MVWSD Math Disadvantaged or Non-Economically Disadvantaged Students who are Economically Disadvantaged or Non-Economically Disadvantaged % Meeting or Exceeding Standards by Race/Ethnicity % Meeting or Exceeding Standards by Race/Ethnicity 2018-19 2018-19 100% 91.1% 89.8% 90% 28.9% 80% 39.8% 71.4% 70% 62.2% 60% 42.4% 50.0% 50% 40% 29.0% 30% 20% 10% 0% White Hispanic Asian Economically Disadvantaged Non-Economically Disadvantaged 18

  19. In ELA, non-economically disadvantaged Hispanic students perform at considerably lower levels than White and Asian students, and there is not a large gap among Hispanic students based on economic status ELA - Students who are Economically MVWSD ELA Disadvantaged or Non-Economically Disadvantaged Students who are Economically Disadvantaged or Non-Economically Disadvantaged % Meeting or Exceeding Standards by Race/Ethnicity % Meeting or Exceeding Standards by Race/Ethnicity 2018-19 2018-19 100% 91.2% 86.5% 90% 16.9% 80% 74.3% 35.7% 70% 57.5% 60% 50.8% 15.9% 50% 41.6% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% White Hispanic Asian Economically Disadvantaged Non-Economically Disadvantaged 19

Recommend


More recommend