Status of the Mechanics of Tracking Detector Szymon Sroka, Wolfgang - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CLICdp Tracker Technology Meeting Status of the Mechanics of Tracking Detector Szymon Sroka, Wolfgang Klempt Szymon Krzysztof Sroka, Wolfgang Klempt

Presentation Layout I. Tracking Detector System  Tracker Layout ‐ Two different scenarios (Reminder)  Tracker Layout ‐ Current status. Arrangement of modules ‐ > Barrel  Tracker Layout ‐ Current status. Arrangement of modules – > End ‐ Caps  End ‐ Caps ‐ > Upgrade of dimensions  End ‐ Caps ‐ > Conceptions, ideas, remarks. Brainstorming. 1/13/2016 Szymon Krzysztof Sroka, Wolfgang Klempt 2

Tracker Layout Two different scenarios Outer Sub ‐ system: Outer Sub ‐ system: ‐ 4 End ‐ Caps ‐ 5 End ‐ Caps ‐ 3 Tracker’s Layers ‐ 3 Tracker’s Layers Inner Sub ‐ system: Inner Sub ‐ system: ‐ 7 End ‐ Caps ‐ 7 End ‐ Caps ‐ 3 Tracker’s Layers ‐ 3 Tracker’s Layers 1/13/2016 Szymon Krzysztof Sroka, Wolfgang Klempt 3

Tracker Layout “Layer 5 & layer 4” Towards Lightweight Tracker Support Structure proposed by Fernando Duarte Ramos Current status Arrangement of modules ‐ > Barrel Layer 6 Layer 5 One of possible design proposal ‐ Single Modules Package (Zoom in) Support Plate 4 x (Module + Cold Plate + Power BUS) Arrangement of “Layer 4, 3, 2, 1” Electronics Cards and Conception of 3D Space Frame Layer 5 Power Suppliers Layer 4 Layer 3 Layer 2 Layer 1 Layer 0 1/13/2016 Szymon Krzysztof Sroka, Wolfgang Klempt 4

Tracker Layout Tracker Barrel Current status Number Number of Arrangement of modules ‐ > Barrel Number of Length Modules Angular of Barrel Radii of Modules of along the spacing Outer & Inner Sub ‐ System Modules around Barrel "beam [deg] [mm] perimet [mm] axis“ [ ‐ ] er [ ‐ ] Layer 5 Inner Sub ‐ System Layer 4 0 15 32 12.714 131.55 963.2 1 38 9.4740 345 963.2 32 2 32 11.250 558.55 1384.6 46 Layer 3 Outer Sub ‐ System 3 84 46 7.826 815 2523.4 Layer 2 4 64 84 5.625 1151.45 2523.4 5 82 Layer 1 84 4.390 1456.45 2523.4 Layer 0 e.g. Layer 0 Module package ‐ plate support for layer 0 e.g. Layer 1 Module package ‐ plate support for layer 1 Module package ‐ plate support for layers 2,3,4,5 e.g. Layer 5 1/13/2016 Szymon Krzysztof Sroka, Wolfgang Klempt 5

Tracker Layout A1 A2 Modules size = 30 mm x 30 mm Current status Gaps between modules = 0.1 mm A1 = 3.45 m2 = 3450000 mm2 Arrangement of Modules – > End ‐ Caps A2 = 2.85m2 = 2850000 mm2 Outer Sub ‐ System Numbers of Modules_1 = 128 x30 Numbers of Modules_2 = 106 x 30 Layer 5 A1 A2 Modules size = 30 mm x 30 mm Gaps between modules = 0.1 mm Layer 4 A1 = 3.45m2 = 3450000 mm2 A2 = 4.355m2 = 4350000 mm2 Layer 3 Numbers of Modules_1 = 128 x30 Numbers of Modules_2 = 160 x30 A A 6 different sensors Gaps between modules = 0.1 mm A = 9.78m2 = 9780000 mm2 Inactive area of sensors near to edges A A Modules size = 30 mm x 30 mm Gaps between modules = 0.1 mm A1 = 8.7m2 = 8700000 mm2 Numbers of Modules_1 = 160 x30 Numbers of Modules_2 = 160 x30 1/13/2016 Szymon Krzysztof Sroka, Wolfgang Klempt 6

On the example of "Disc 0" Tracker Layout Current status Modules size = 15 mm x 15 mm Arrangement of modules –> End ‐ Caps Gaps between modules = 0.1 mm A1 = 0.324m2 = 324000 mm2 Inner Sub ‐ System A2,3 = 0.162 m2 = 162000 mm2 Petals are located in 3 planes ! Modules size = 15 mm x 15 mm Petals are located in 4 planes ! ( similar to the CMS concept Layer 2 Layer 1 Modules size = 15 mm x 15 mm Petals are located in 3 planes ! Layer 0 3 different sensors Gaps between sensors = 0.1 mm A = 0.75m2 = 75000 mm2 Inactive area of sensors near to edges Modules size = 15 mm x 15 mm Gaps between modules = 0.1 mm A1 = 0.648m2 = 648000 mm2 Petals are located in 2 planes ! 1/13/2016 Szymon Krzysztof Sroka, Wolfgang Klempt 7

Tracker Layout End ‐ Caps ‐ > Upgrade of Dimensions Tracker End ‐ Caps Number Angle Angular of planes between Outer Radii Number of spacing in on which Inner Radii of Z Coordinate of End ‐ Petals in of End ‐ Caps Petals around one plane Number of Petals End ‐ Caps Caps [mm] two planes EndCaps [mm] perimeter [ ‐ ] are [deg] [mm] [deg] placed [ ‐ ] Inner Sub ‐ System 0 530.6 12 (x2) 2 30 15 112.0 414.0 1 107.1 815.1 12 (x2) 2 30 15 545.0 2 1099.6 12 (x2) 2 30 15 137.3 545.0 3 1384.1 12 (x2) 2 30 15 167.5 545.0 4 1668.6 12 (x2) 2 30 15 197.7 545.0 5 1960.1 12 (x2) 2 30 15 227.9 545.0 6 2237.6 12 (x2) 2 30 15 258.1 545.0 Outer Sub ‐ System 1 24 (x2) 15 7.5 617.2 1429.9 1317.2 2 2 1623.8 24 (x2) 2 15 7.5 617.2 1429.9 3 1930.4 24 (x2) 2 15 7.5 617.2 1429.9 4 2237.6 24 (x2) 2 15 7.5 617.2 1429.9 1/13/2016 Szymon Krzysztof Sroka, Wolfgang Klempt 8

End ‐ Caps Conceptions, ideas, remarks Brainstorming Questions: How to make support structure for the modules? How to make support structure for both End ‐ Caps system? How to cool down the systems? How to perform an overlap in ϕ and keep the system hermetic ? 1/13/2016 Szymon Krzysztof Sroka, Wolfgang Klempt 9

Backup slides 1/13/2016 Szymon Krzysztof Sroka, Wolfgang Klempt 11

New Tracker Layout Arrangement of Modules ‐ ‐ Barrel Layer 2 Inner Tracking Sub ‐ System ‐ Barrel Layer 2 Layer 1 Layer 1 Layer 0 Layer 0 1/13/2016 Szymon Krzysztof Sroka, Wolfgang Klempt 12

New Tracker Layout Arrangement of Modules ‐ Barrel Layer 5 Outer Tracking Sub ‐ System ‐ Barrel Layer 5 Layer 4 Layer 3 Layer 4 Layer 3 1/13/2016 Szymon Krzysztof Sroka, Wolfgang Klempt 13

New Tracker Layout Arrangement of Modules ‐ EndCaps Outer Tracker Sub ‐ System ‐ EndCaps Petal ver.1 – Outer Sub ‐ System Petal ver.2 – Outer Sub ‐ System Commnets: Commnets: 6 different sensors Modules size = 30 mm x 30 mm Gaps between sensors = 0.1 mm Gaps between modules = 0.1 mm Area = 0.145 m2 = 145000 mm2 Area = 0.183 m2 = 183000 mm2 Inactive area of sensors near to edges Numbers of Modules = 160 Inner Tracker Sub ‐ System ‐ EndCaps Petal ‘’Disc1’’ – Inner Sub ‐ System Petal ‘’Disc0’’ – Inner Sub ‐ System Commnets: Commnets: Modules size = 15mm x 15mm Modules size =15 mm x 15 mm Gaps between modules = 0.1 mm Gaps between modules = 0.1 mm Area = 0.046 m2 = 46000 mm2 Area = 0.026 m2 = 26000 mm2 Numbers of Modules = 201 Numbers of Modules = 116 1/13/2016 Szymon Krzysztof Sroka, Wolfgang Klempt 14

New Tracker Layout Arrangement of Modules ‐ EndCaps Petal ‘’Disc2’’ – Inner Sub ‐ System Petal ‘’Disc3’’ – Inner Sub ‐ System Petal ‘’Disc4’ – Inner Sub ‐ System Commnets: Commnets: Commnets: Modules size =15 mm x 15 mm Modules size =15 mm x 15 mm Modules size =15 mm x 15 mm Gaps between modules = 0.1 mm Gaps between modules = 0.1 mm Gaps between modules = 0.1 mm Area = 0.041m2 = 41000 mm2 Area = 0.044m2 = 44000 mm2 Area = 0.043m2 = 43000 mm2 Numbers of Modules = 179 Numbers of Modules = 195 Numbers of Modules = 189 Petal ‘’Disc6’ – Inner Sub ‐ System Petal ‘’Disc5’ – Inner Sub ‐ System Commnets: Commnets: Modules size =15 mm x 15 mm Modules size =15 mm x 15 mm Gaps between modules = 0.1 mm Gaps between modules = 0.1 mm Area = 0.039m2 = 39000 mm2 Area = 0.036m2 = 36000 mm2 Numbers of Modules = 169 Numbers of Modules = 159 1/13/2016 Szymon Krzysztof Sroka, Wolfgang Klempt 15

Alice’s Modules Conception Estimated contributions of the Outer Layer Stave to the material budget Component Material Thickness [µm] 50 FPC Metal Layer Aluminium 100 FPC Insulating Layers Polyimide Module 120 Module Plate Carbon Fibre 300 Pixel Chip Silicon 100 Glue Eccobond 54 40 Carbon fleece 30 Graphite foil 64 Cooling pipe Polyimide Cold Plate - Cooling fluid Water 120 Carbon Plate Carbon Fibre 100 Glue Eccobond 54 200 Metal Layer Aluminium Power Bus 200 Insulating layers Polyimide 100 Glue Eccobond 54 1/13/2016 Szymon Krzysztof Sroka, Wolfgang Klempt 16

1/13/2016 Szymon Krzysztof Sroka, Wolfgang Klempt 17