spatial competition with heterogeneous firms
play

Spatial Competition with Heterogeneous Firms Jonathan Vogel - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Spatial Competition with Heterogeneous Firms Jonathan Vogel November 2007 Jonathan Vogel () Spatial Competition 11/14 1 / 32 Introduction I model endogenous product dierentiation with heterogeneous rms Jonathan Vogel () Spatial


  1. Spatial Competition with Heterogeneous Firms Jonathan Vogel November 2007 Jonathan Vogel () Spatial Competition 11/14 1 / 32

  2. Introduction I model endogenous product di¤erentiation with heterogeneous …rms Jonathan Vogel () Spatial Competition 11/14 2 / 32

  3. Introduction I model endogenous product di¤erentiation with heterogeneous …rms Two branches of product di¤erentiation literature Jonathan Vogel () Spatial Competition 11/14 2 / 32

  4. Introduction I model endogenous product di¤erentiation with heterogeneous …rms Two branches of product di¤erentiation literature Economists tend to hold product characteristics …xed when considering pricing decisions and …rm behavior more generally = ) endogeneity bias Jonathan Vogel () Spatial Competition 11/14 2 / 32

  5. Introduction Motivating example Estimate the change in domestic-…rm pro…t resulting from an increase in a tari¤ Jonathan Vogel () Spatial Competition 11/14 3 / 32

  6. Introduction Motivating example Estimate the change in domestic-…rm pro…t resulting from an increase in a tari¤ First step 2 3 � demand system � market shares 4 5 = prices ) marginal costs product characteristics Jonathan Vogel () Spatial Competition 11/14 3 / 32

  7. Introduction Motivating example Estimate the change in domestic-…rm pro…t resulting from an increase in a tari¤ First step 2 3 � demand system � market shares 4 5 = prices ) marginal costs product characteristics Counter-factual exercise 2 3 � market shares � demand system 4 5 = NEW marginal costs ) prices FIXED product characteristics Jonathan Vogel () Spatial Competition 11/14 3 / 32

  8. Introduction Endogenous di¤erentiation and …rm heterogeneity Markets are rarely perfectly competitive —–Spence (1976), Dixit Stiglitz (1977), Salop (1979) Firm productivity di¤ers signi…cantly both within and across industries —–Jovanovic (1982), Hopenhayn (1992) Models studying …rm heterogeneity in monopolistically competitive industries abstract from or treat as exogenous product placement —–Melitz (2002), Syverson (2004), Melitz Ottaviano (2005) Jonathan Vogel () Spatial Competition 11/14 4 / 32

  9. Introduction Spatial competition Spatial competition models are ideally suited to answer: How does …rm heterogeneity a¤ect product placement in product space or …rm location in geography? Spatial competition literature dates back to Hotelling (1929) Two-stage model of Bertrand competition in which location di¤erentiates otherwise homogeneous goods Jonathan Vogel () Spatial Competition 11/14 5 / 32

  10. Introduction While a spatial competition framework would be ideal, …nding equilibria in "simple" symmetric-…rm Hotelling-style models has proven di¢cult Jonathan Vogel () Spatial Competition 11/14 6 / 32

  11. Introduction While a spatial competition framework would be ideal, …nding equilibria in "simple" symmetric-…rm Hotelling-style models has proven di¢cult Hotelling was wrong Jonathan Vogel () Spatial Competition 11/14 6 / 32

  12. Introduction While a spatial competition framework would be ideal, …nding equilibria in "simple" symmetric-…rm Hotelling-style models has proven di¢cult Hotelling was wrong D’Aspremont, Gabszewicz, and Thisse (1979) prove that no pure-strategy equilibrium exists to a standard Hotelling model Jonathan Vogel () Spatial Competition 11/14 6 / 32

  13. Introduction While a spatial competition framework would be ideal, …nding equilibria in "simple" symmetric-…rm Hotelling-style models has proven di¢cult Hotelling was wrong D’Aspremont, Gabszewicz, and Thisse (1979) prove that no pure-strategy equilibrium exists to a standard Hotelling model Salop (1979) and Syverson (2004) abstract from product placement Jonathan Vogel () Spatial Competition 11/14 6 / 32

  14. Introduction While a spatial competition framework would be ideal, …nding equilibria in "simple" symmetric-…rm Hotelling-style models has proven di¢cult Hotelling was wrong D’Aspremont, Gabszewicz, and Thisse (1979) prove that no pure-strategy equilibrium exists to a standard Hotelling model Salop (1979) and Syverson (2004) abstract from product placement Lancaster (1979) assumes that product placement and prices are chosen simultaneously Jonathan Vogel () Spatial Competition 11/14 6 / 32

  15. Introduction While a spatial competition framework would be ideal, …nding equilibria in "simple" symmetric-…rm Hotelling-style models has proven di¢cult Hotelling was wrong D’Aspremont, Gabszewicz, and Thisse (1979) prove that no pure-strategy equilibrium exists to a standard Hotelling model Salop (1979) and Syverson (2004) abstract from product placement Lancaster (1979) assumes that product placement and prices are chosen simultaneously Either assume that …rms are homogeneous or abstract from location choice Jonathan Vogel () Spatial Competition 11/14 6 / 32

  16. Introduction I allow …rms to randomize over prices Jonathan Vogel () Spatial Competition 11/14 7 / 32

  17. Introduction I allow …rms to randomize over prices Nevertheless, strategies are pure along equilibrium path Jonathan Vogel () Spatial Competition 11/14 7 / 32

  18. Introduction I allow …rms to randomize over prices Nevertheless, strategies are pure along equilibrium path Tractability of framework allows me to answer questions of the form: Jonathan Vogel () Spatial Competition 11/14 7 / 32

  19. Introduction I allow …rms to randomize over prices Nevertheless, strategies are pure along equilibrium path Tractability of framework allows me to answer questions of the form: Will a …rm locate closer to its relatively less productive neighbor? Jonathan Vogel () Spatial Competition 11/14 7 / 32

  20. Introduction I allow …rms to randomize over prices Nevertheless, strategies are pure along equilibrium path Tractability of framework allows me to answer questions of the form: Will a …rm locate closer to its relatively less productive neighbor? Does opening the black box of di¤erentiation yield new insight into the mechanism linking productivity to pro…t and market share? Jonathan Vogel () Spatial Competition 11/14 7 / 32

  21. Introduction I allow …rms to randomize over prices Nevertheless, strategies are pure along equilibrium path Tractability of framework allows me to answer questions of the form: Will a …rm locate closer to its relatively less productive neighbor? Does opening the black box of di¤erentiation yield new insight into the mechanism linking productivity to pro…t and market share? How does the productivity of direct competitors a¤ect outcomes such as pro…t, market share, and the ease with which consumers substitute between goods? Jonathan Vogel () Spatial Competition 11/14 7 / 32

  22. Introduction Technical contributions A set of SPNE to a standard Hotelling-style model generalized in two 1 ways: …rm heterogeneity 1 horizontal and vertical di¤erentiation (vertical not in presentation) 2 Firms use pure strategies along the equilibrium path 2 There is a unique economic outcome in any strict SPNE under a 3 simple re…nement Jonathan Vogel () Spatial Competition 11/14 8 / 32

  23. Setup Consumers A mass L of consumers uniformly distributed along a unit circumference Jonathan Vogel () Spatial Competition 11/14 9 / 32

  24. Setup Consumers A mass L of consumers uniformly distributed along a unit circumference Each consumer inelastically demands one good Jonathan Vogel () Spatial Competition 11/14 9 / 32

  25. Setup Consumers A mass L of consumers uniformly distributed along a unit circumference Each consumer inelastically demands one good A consumer located at point z buys from …rm i if p i + t k z � i k � min f p j + t k z � j kg j where t > 0 Jonathan Vogel () Spatial Competition 11/14 9 / 32

  26. Setup Consumer preferences t 1 p A p B B z A A graphical representation of consumer preferences Jonathan Vogel () Spatial Competition 11/14 10 / 32

  27. Setup Firms: costs Firm i is associated with a constant marginal cost of production k i Jonathan Vogel () Spatial Competition 11/14 11 / 32

  28. Setup Firms: costs Firm i is associated with a constant marginal cost of production k i Additionally, …rm incurs a "shipping cost" of 2 τ d , with τ 2 [ 0 , t ) , to ship a good to a consumer located a distance d from its location Jonathan Vogel () Spatial Competition 11/14 11 / 32

  29. The game Firms play a two-stage game of complete information Jonathan Vogel () Spatial Competition 11/14 12 / 32

  30. The game Firms play a two-stage game of complete information Location stage 1 Jonathan Vogel () Spatial Competition 11/14 12 / 32

  31. The game Firms play a two-stage game of complete information Location stage 1 Price stage 2 Jonathan Vogel () Spatial Competition 11/14 12 / 32

  32. The game Stage one: location stage There is a set of n � 2 …rms The vector of marginal costs ( k 1 , ..., k n ) is common knowledge All …rms simultaneously choose locations along the circumference of the circle Jonathan Vogel () Spatial Competition 11/14 13 / 32

Recommend


More recommend