social media and the job market how to reconcile
play

Social Media and the Job Market: How to Reconcile Applicant Privacy - PDF document

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform Volume 48 | Issue 2 2015 Social Media and the Job Market: How to Reconcile Applicant Privacy with Employer Needs Peter B. Baumhart University of Michigan Law School Follow this and additional works


  1. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform Volume 48 | Issue 2 2015 Social Media and the Job Market: How to Reconcile Applicant Privacy with Employer Needs Peter B. Baumhart University of Michigan Law School Follow this and additional works at: htup://repository.law.umich.edu/mjlr Part of the Internet Law Commons, Labor and Employment Law Commons, and the Privacy Law Commons Recommended Citation Peter B. Baumhart, Social Media and the Job Market: How to Reconcile Applicant Privacy with Employer Needs , 48 U. Mich. J. L. Reform 503 (2015). Available at: htup://repository.law.umich.edu/mjlr/vol48/iss2/5 Tiis Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform by an authorized administrator of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact mlaw.repository@umich.edu.

  2. SOCIAL MEDIA AND THE JOB MARKET: HOW TO RECONCILE APPLICANT PRIVACY WITH EMPLOYER NEEDS Peter B. Baumhart* In the modern technological age, social media allows us to communicate vast amounts of personal information to countless people instantaneously. This infor- mation is valuable to more than just our “friends” and “followers,” however. Prospective employers can use this personal data to inform hiring decisions, thereby maximizing fit and minimizing potential liability. The question then arises, how best to acquire this information? For job applicants, the counter-question is how best to protect the privacy of their social media accounts. As these two competing desires begin to clash, it is important to find a method to mediate the conflict. Existing privacy law, whether rooted in constitutional, statutory, or common law, is insufficient to cope with the practice, and pending legislation also fails to ade- quately account for the legitimate interests of both parties. This Note advocates a novel solution: a modified information escrow that would provide employers with the relevant information they seek while keeping private the substantive content of applicants’ social media accounts. I NTRODUCTION When people tweet, upload pictures, or post status updates, they are not likely thinking about the long-term effects of those actions. We live in an age, however, of near-instantaneous communication accompanied by the capacity to indefinitely store electronically transmitted data; those effects are real and have the potential for serious and unanticipated consequences down the road. In particu- lar, social media activity is increasingly becoming an object of interest to employers, who are attempting to expand the pool of information from which they can learn about potential employees. This Note explores the developing employer practice of request- ing or requiring that applicants provide access to the private information located on their social media accounts. In doing so, this Note acknowledges the legitimate interests of each party to the hiring decision—the applicant and the employer—and seeks to ar- ticulate a solution that accommodates the needs of each. Part I will explain the practice at issue and examine the problems that neces- sarily arise. Part II will canvass the state of the law as it pertains (or * J.D. Candidate (2015), University of Michigan Law School. The author would like to thank Emily Brown, M. Jeanette Pitts, and Michael Powers for their helpful feedback and suggestions. The author would especially like to thank Professor J.J. Prescott, whose guidance was indispensable throughout the process of researching and writing this Note. 503

  3. 504 [V OL . 48:2 University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform might pertain) to the problems raised in Part I. Part III will describe the shortcomings of the current law and present an alternative solu- tion: a modified information escrow that recalibrates the budget of available information between the applicant and the employer to maximize the net payoff for both parties. I. E MPLOYERS , A PPLICANTS , AND S OCIAL M EDIA The use of social networking sites (SNSs) is more popular than ever, with over sixty-seven percent of Internet users having some form of social media presence. 1 Facebook alone had 1.32 billion active monthly users at the end of June 2014. 2 But by posting per- sonal information online, SNS users risk communicating that information to more than just their friends—tweets, status updates, pictures, and the like can provide a veritable treasure chest of infor- mation to teachers, co-workers, strangers, and, most importantly for this Note, potential employers. Although statistics regarding the fre- quency with which employers actually look at an applicant’s SNS profiles vary widely, 3 the trend is unquestionable, indicating that an applicant’s SNS account content appears to be fair game for em- ployers. This may not seem so troubling when the prospective employer is simply viewing information that the applicant has made public; some employers, however, are demanding applicants’ pass- words to view otherwise unavailable, private information. 4 In today’s 1. M AEVE D UGGAN & J OANNA B RENNER , P EW R ESEARCH C TR ., T HE D EMOGRAPHICS OF S O- CIAL M EDIA U SERS – 2012 3 (2012), available at http://pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/ Reports/2013/PIP_SocialMediaUsers.pdf. Compare id. (showing social media use by age as eighty-nine percent of users ages eighteen to twenty nine, seventy-seven percent of users ages thirty to forty-nine, fifty-two percent of users fifty to sixty-four, and thirty-two percent of users sixty-five and older), with A MANDA L ENHART ET AL ., P EW R ESEARCH C TR ., S OCIAL M EDIA & M O- BILE I NTERNET U SE A MONG T EENS AND Y OUNG A DULTS 17 (2010), available at http://web.pewin ternet.org/~/media/Files/Reports/2010/PIP_Social_Media_and_Young_Adults_Report_Fi nal_with_toplines.pdf (indicating that social media use by Internet users was seventy-two percent of users ages eighteen to twenty-nine and forty percent of users age thirty and older in 2009). 2. Company Info , F ACEBOOK , http://newsroom.fb.com/company-info/ (last visited Oct. 8, 2014). 3. The research on this statistic shows frequency of use ranging from approximately forty percent of employers to over ninety percent of employers. Compare Mary Lorenz, Two in Five Employers Use Social Media to Screen Candidates , C AREER B UILDER (July 1, 2013), http:// thehiringsite.careerbuilder.com/2013/07/01/two-in-five-employers-use-social-media-to- screen-candidates/ (claiming that thirty-nine percent of employers use social media to screen applicants), with J OBVITE , 2013 S OCIAL R ECRUITING S URVEY RESULTS 8 (2013), available at http:/ /web.jobvite.com/rs/jobvite/images/Jobvite_2013_SocialRecruitingSurveyResults. pdf (claiming that ninety-three percent of recruiters are likely to use an applicant’s SNS profile). 4. See, e.g. , Mark B. Gerano, Note, Access Denied: An Analysis of Social Media Password Demands in the Public Employment Setting , 40 N. K Y . L. R EV . 665, 672–73 (2013) (describing the

Recommend


More recommend