ruxolitinib nella mielofibrosi
play

Ruxolitinib nella mielofibrosi Francesco Passamonti Universit - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Ruxolitinib nella mielofibrosi Francesco Passamonti Universit dellInsubria Varese - Italy Ruxolitinib: long term clinical data 53% of RUX achieves spleen response at any time The probability of maintaining a spleen response is 0.51


  1. Ruxolitinib nella mielofibrosi Francesco Passamonti Università dell’Insubria Varese - Italy

  2. Ruxolitinib: long term clinical data • 53% of RUX achieves spleen response at any time • The probability of maintaining a spleen response is 0.51 at 3 years and 0.48 at 5.0 years • Anemia, thrombocytopenia and infections are the key AEs All grades 54% JUMP (Int-1R) 163 Int-1R Grade 3-4 24.5% All grades 96% COMFORT I (Int-2&HR) 155 Anemia Grade 3-4 45% Int-2/HR All grades 96% COMFORT II (Int-2&HR) 146 Grade 3-4 42% • Baseline anemia does not impact on responses • Development of anemia does not affect survival Verstovsek S, et al. Br J Haematol. 2013; 161(4): 508-516; Verstovsek S, et al. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(3):799-807; Gupta V Haematologica. 2016 Dec;101(12):e482-e484.; Verstovsek S, et al. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(3):799-807; Harrison et al; Leukemia. 2016 May 23; Giraldo P, et al. EHA 2015, P675

  3. To manage low PLT counts: the EXPAND study • Stratum 1 (75-99×10 9 /L) or stratum 2 (50-74×10 9 /L) • The maximum safe starting dose was 10 mg twice daily in both strata Spleen response was achieved at w48 in 33.3% and 30.0% of pts in stratum 1 and stratum 2, respectively. Vannucchi AM et al, Haematologica 2018

  4. The case of lymphomas during JAKi • Among 626 MPNs (69 received RUX), 4 (6%) developed B-cell lymphomas while receiving JAKi and 2 (0.4%) while receiving non JAKi (16-fold higher) • Lymphomas were of aggressive B-cell type, extranodal, or leukemic with high MYC expression • Median time from JAKi to NHL was 25 months • Clonal B cells were present in the BM of 15% of PMF, regardless of treatment Porpacizy et al. Blood 2018

  5. Ruxolitinib can reduce JAK2 allele burden in MF • One-third of evaluable JAK2 V617F-positive patients had a ˃20% reduction in allele burden Harrison et al; Leukemia. 2016 Aug;30(8):1701-7

  6. Long-term effect of ruxolitinib on BM fibrosis RUX (up to 66 months) effect on BM morphology in 68 patients with advanced MF vs. 192 matching patients treated with BAT In addition, BM fibrosis reduction was associated with: • Regression of leukoerythroblastosis • Durable reduction of circulating blasts Kvasnicka et al. Journal of Hematology & Oncology (2018) 11:42

  7. Overall survival analysis of 5-year pooled data from COMFORT-I/II • Ruxolitinib resulted in 30% reduction in risk of death compared to control • RPSFT (rank-preserving structural failure time, used in oncology to test OS after treatment switching) the OS advantage was more pronounced with ruxolitinib patients compared to control OS, Overall survival; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; Verstovsek et al. J Hematol Oncol. 2016; 127(3):276 – 8. ITT, intention to treat; RPSFT, rank-preserving structural failure time.

  8. RUX discontinuation/failure an unmet clinical need • 86 patients discontinued RUX after a median of 79 months • Median survival of patients who discontinue RUX is 14 months • 33% of patients acquired a new mutation at the time of RUX discontinuation ( ASXL1 in 60%) • Patients with clonal evolution had shorter survival after RUX discontinuation than those without clonal evolution Newberry et al, Blood 2017

  9. JAKi-failure: a treatment algorithm for MF Pardanani and Tefferi Blood 2018;132:492-500

  10. Circulating blasts in MF: an unmet clinical need  328 RUX-treated patients: 289 in chronic phase (blasts <5%), 33 in CPe (blasts, 5-9%) and 6 in accelerated phase-AP- (blasts, 10-19%) MF-AP (BC 10-19%) MF-CP (BC 5-9%)  RUX improves survival in patients with MF and 5-9%-blast cells  Survival of AP-MF is not increased by RUX Masarova L et al. Blood 2017 130:201

  11. Ruxolitinib efficacy is genotype-independent Percent Change From Baseline in Spleen Volume at Week 48 Change from Baseline, % Ruxolitinib JAK2 V617F positive (n = 75) JAK2 V617F negative (n = 22) Unknown mutation status (n = 1) BAT JAK2 V617F positive (n = 24) JAK2 V617F negative (n = 8) Unknown mutation status (n = 2) Harrison CN, et al. ASH 2011. Abstract 279. Guglielmelli et al, Blood 2014

  12. Single genomic alteration can predict outcomes in MF receiving JAK-inhibitors • 100 patients: RUX=77; MOME=23 • No mutation was associated with response • ASXL1 or EZH2 mutations were independently associated with shorter time to treatment failure • Impact on survival: Spiegel et al. Blood Adv. 2017 Sep 8;1(20):1729-1738

  13. JAKi predictors of response (I) • 548 MF patients treated with JAKi • Response: 50% decrease in spleen size at early (3 – 4 months on therapy) and late (5 – 12 months) timepoints after therapy initiation • Predictors of early response: • Higher doses of JAKi • BL spleen size 5 – 10 cm • Hemoglobin • Predictors of late response: • Obtainment of response at the earlier timepoint Menghrajani et al, Leuk Lymp 2018

  14. JAKi predictors of response (II) LCM, lower costal margin; OR, overall response; WBC, white blood cell. Palandri et al. Oncotarget. 2017

  15. JUMP: RUX efficacy per DIPSS stratification ≥ ≥ ≥ 25% and ≥ 50% reductions from baseline in palpable spleen length Low/Int-1 Int-2 High 25% to < 50% ≥ 50% 90 80 12 19,4 70 24,7 21,2 27,4 22,8 32,3 18,5 21,6 Patients (%) 60 25 20,8 12,1 22,6 34,1 29,5 26,3 50 29,7 40 30,3 68,5 63,7 30 56,6 57,6 50,2 45,5 51,6 46,2 39,7 52,2 48,4 51,5 51 47,6 20 41,4 40 32,2 24 10 0 Week 4 Week 12 Week 72 Week 8 Week 24 Week 48 Low/Int-1, n = 276 781 693 576 355 835 Int-2, n = 634 404 232 159 696 571 High, n = 156 99 51 33 135 175 • Number of patients with low-/Int-1 – , Int-2 – and high- risk MF who achieved ≥ • – – ≥ 50% spleen length reduction at any time in the study were 660 (79.5%), 465 – ≥ (67.1%) and 109 (61.6%), respectively – The median time to achieve ≥ 50% reduction in spleen length from BL was 4.7, 7.1 and 8.1 weeks, respectively BL, baseline; Int-, intermediate; MF,myelofibrosis. Passamonti et al, EHA 2017

  16. Best spleen response from baseline for each patient at any time during the study All Low + Int-1 – Risk Patients All Int-2 – Risk Patients Best spleen response (% change) Best spleen response (% change) 150.0 150.0 N = 830 N = 693 Mean = -75.24 Mean = -63.59 100.0 100.0 Median = -83.97 Median = -63.64 Min = -100.0 Min = -100.0 Max = 25.00 from BL from BL Max = 133.33 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 -50.0 -50.0 -100.0 Subject -100.0 Subject Best spleen response (% change) N = 177 Mean = -58.22 100.0 Median = -57.14 Min = -100.0 Max = 133.33 50.0 from BL All High-Risk Patients 0.0 -50.0 -100.0 BL, baseline; Int-, intermediate. Subject Passamonti et al, EHA 2017

  17. Old and new issues deserving considerations • Anemia and RBC transfusions • Almost all patients develop anemia • Manageable, potentially starting at lower doses • Occurrence of anemia on RUX does not reduce efficacy on spleen • Occurrence of anemia on RUX is not predictive of shortened survival • New investigative trials: luspatercept • Limits of platelet count value at baseline > 50 x10 9 /L • Infections • SIE and ELN guidelines* did not suggest any restriction on RUX use Passamonti & Maffioli Blood 2018; *Marchetti et al. Leukemia. 2017;31(4):882-888

  18. Conclusions • Ruxolitinib is the standard new treatment for MF with a 50% SVR representing the new bar of treatment goals in MF • Early treatment is an option, that is to be taken into consideration • Next therapies/combo should improve anti-clonal efficacy, restore normal hematopoiesis and prevent disease progression

Recommend


More recommend