repository for germinal choice the genius factory
play

Repository for Germinal Choice The Genius Factory B Y : B R E N D - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Repository for Germinal Choice The Genius Factory B Y : B R E N D A N M C I N T Y R E Robert Klark Graham Born June 6 th , 1906 Became a millionaire after creating shatterproof glasses Highly reputed eugenicist


  1. Repository for Germinal Choice “The Genius Factory” B Y : B R E N D A N M C I N T Y R E

  2. Robert Klark Graham • Born June 6 th , 1906 • Became a millionaire after creating shatterproof glasses • Highly reputed eugenicist • Began collecting sperm in an underground bunker underneath a ranch near San Diego • Officially began the “Repository for Germinal Choice” (RFGC) in 1980. • Died on February 13 th , 1997

  3. “Nobel Prize Sperm Bank,” What is It?  Not an actual building at first  Collection of sperm stored in a bunker in Escondido, CA  A “pet project” of Robert Graham  Intended to collect and store sperm only from Nobel prize laureates  Originally named after Herman J Muller

  4. Requirements for Donors  Original requirements were very strict  Must have won the Nobel Prize  Eventually lowered to allow scientists and researchers to donate  Were considered “future Nobel laureates”  Due to lack of success, Paul Smith, a worker at the Repository, was sent to recruit college students  Near the end of the sperm bank’s existence, artists, athletes, and businessmen were allowed to donate

  5. Requirements for Recipients  Originally, women had to be part of Mensa to receive sperm  Proven to be false  Later, women on any intellectual level could receive sperm.  Requirements Included  Must be married  Must have husbands approval  Can not be homosexual  Only two women were reported to be refused sperm

  6. Controversy: William Shockley  An American physicist and inventor.  Won the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1956  The only Nobel Prize Laureate who donated sperm and openly admitted that he did so  Had extreme political views on the subjects of race and eugenics  Due to his beliefs, other Nobel Prize laureates dropped out from donating.  Shockley’s interaction with the sperm bank brought bad press

  7. Controversy: Robert Graham  Press began reporting on the sperm bank  Brought a lot of negative attention towards Robert Graham and the Repository.  People began insulting Robert Graham and picketing the sperm bank  Many potential donors refused to donate.  This controversy is believed to be the start of the downfall for the sperm bank

  8. End of the Nobel Prize Sperm Bank  Graham continued to manage his sperm bank until 1996, when he died  After his death, the responsibilities of the bank were passed on to Floyd Kimble  Kimble managed the bank for one year, before he too, died  The relatives of both Kimble and Graham then decided to shut down the sperm bank  All collected sperm was destroyed, and the documentation for the bank remained unfounded.  In the end, 229 children were believed to be created from the sperm bank

  9. The Positives about the RFGC  Changed the nature of sperm banks  Influenced the debate of positive eugenics  Influenced the talk of nature vs. nurture

  10. Interview with Robert Graham  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Y79Kpy4IYA

  11. Nature vs. Nurture Debate  Nature:  The intelligence of a person is determined primarily by their genetics.  Nurture:  The intelligence of a person is determined primarily by their upbrining  Graham believed that genetics (nature) plays the greatest role in a person’s intelligence.

  12. Discussion Question #1  Do you believe that the intelligence of a person is determined more by genetics or by their upbringing? Or do you believe that it is both equally? Explain

  13. Eugenics  Eugenics  The belief that the human species can be improved through breeding  Negative Eugenics  The human species can be improved by discouraging individuals with socially unacceptable qualities from breeding  Positive Eugenics  The human species can be improved by encouraging those with desirable traits to breed and reproduce  What Graham believed

  14. Discussion Question #2  Do you believe that eugenics as a whole is ethically right, or should nature be allowed to “take it’s course”?  How about Negative Eugenics?  Positive?

  15. Citations  Plotz, D. (2005). The genius factory: The curious history of the Nobel Prize sperm bank. New York: Random House.  Plotz , D. (2001). “The “genius babies,” and how they grew” . Slate. Retrieved March 5, 2016  Plotz, D. (2001). “ The “genius babies” grow up”. Slate. Retrieved March 5, 2016  Plotz , D. (2001). “The myths of the Nobel sperm bank”. Slate. Retrieved March 6, 2016  Plotz , D. (2005). “Darwin’s engineer”. Los Angeles Times Magazine. Retrieved March 9, 2016  Olding , P. (2006). “The genius sperm bank”. BBCNews. Retrieved March 10, 2016  “William Shockley”. IEEE Global History Network. IEEE. Retrieved March 7, 2016

Recommend


More recommend