rebalancing in the dark rebalancing in the dark
play

Rebalancing in the Dark Rebalancing in the Dark Bill Martin Centre - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Rebalancing in the Dark Rebalancing in the Dark Bill Martin Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge HM Treasury seminar, 27 th July 2010 y , y Disclaimer: views expressed are the authors and are not necessarily those of the


  1. Rebalancing in the Dark Rebalancing in the Dark Bill Martin Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge HM Treasury seminar, 27 th July 2010 y , y Disclaimer: views expressed are the author’s and are not necessarily those of the CBR

  2. Outline Outline 1 1. Rumsfeld uncertainty Rumsfeld uncertainty 2 2. Medium-term scenarios di i 3. Robust rebalancing strategy

  3. How much uncertainty? 1. Recession forecasting errors 2. Credit crunch impact? 3. Lessons from past business cycles

  4. Recession forecast errors Overprediction of 2009 GDP level, % of outturn HM Treasury Consensus 12.0 10.0 8.0 8.0 % 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 Two years ahead One year ahead

  5. Bean’s wealth calculation 1. Fall in consumption in advanced countries due to wealth shock (banks’ write-offs) 2. But loss of advanced country GDP relative to potential “more than 10 times bigger” than (1) “ So we cannot come near to explaining the “Great Contraction” purely in terms of wealth effects.”

  6. Credit crunch? Bank lending to non-financial business & households, % of GDP 20.0 16.0 12 0 12.0 % 8.0 4.0 0.0 -4.0 1Q 1980 1Q 1985 1Q 1990 1Q 1995 1Q 2000 1Q 2005 1Q 2010

  7. Recession puzzle of 2009 Percentage points unless stated 2008 2009 Output gap, % (new data) -2.2 -9.3 Output gap, % (old data) -1.8 -8.9 Identified factors: -2.0 -5.2 Export shortfall -0.4 -3.1 Wealth & confidence shocks Wealth & confidence shocks -1.6 1 6 -3.1 3 1 Stabilising fiscal policy 0.0 1.1 Unexplained residual 0.2 -3.7

  8. Banking crisis “lessons” – two camps • Camp 1 – permanent loss Camp 1 permanent loss (Reinhart & Rogoff & many others) • Camp 2 – strong recovery (C (Cecchetti, Mussa, Ormerod) h i M O d)

  9. Rumsfeld uncertainty • Deeply uncertain outlook - not fan chartable • Credit crunch – large impact? large impact? • Policy makers have to consider a range of sharply • Policy makers have to consider a range of sharply contrasting future economic conditions of seemingly equal prior plausibility

  10. Two medium-term scenarios • Fast & slow recovery scenarios - updated for June Budget • Fast recovery scenario - strong export revival, strong competitiveness response, credit crunch fades di h f d • Slow recovery scenario - more limited export revival & competitiveness li it d t i l & titi response, credit crunch persists

  11. Scenario analysis – three steps 1. Baseline – align with OBR forecast but query - productivity assumption - import penetration assumption import penetration assumption 2 2. Impose alternative assumptions Impose alternative assumptions - external trade & competitiveness impact - asset prices & credit crunch impact 3. Model “fast” and “slow” recovery profiles

  12. OBR productivity projection Productivity index (GDP per worker; 2007=100; OBR projection after 2009) mechanical projection: 2.0 % growth p.a. after 2007 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 1949 1959 1969 1979 1989 1999 2009

  13. Import “elasticity” I Annual import "elasticity" - import growth divided by private TFE growth 40.0 y 1949-2010 35.0 30.0 25.0 25 0 ency, %, yearly 20.0 15.0 10.0 Freque 5.0 0.0 below 0.5 0.5 to 1 1 to 1.5 1.5 to 2 2 to 2.5 above 2.5

  14. Import “elasticity” II Import "elasticity" - overlapping 5-year intervals 50.0 0 arly, 1949-2010 45.0 40.0 35.0 30.0 quency, %, 5-yea 25.0 20.0 15.0 10.0 5 0 5.0 Freq 0.0 below 0.5 0.5 to 1 1 to 1.5 1.5 to 2 2 to 2.5 above 2.5

  15. HMT & OBR forecasts for 2010 Forecast for 2010 Volume growth, % Import “elasticity” y GDP GDP I Imports t PBR Dec 2009* 1.3 0.7 0.6 Budget Mar 2010* 1.2 2.3 1.4 Budget June 2010 1.2 5.5 2.3 *Mid-point forecasts. Imports ex. MTIC fraud. Elasticity – p p y import growth divided by private TFE growth (inferred )

  16. Rebalancing assumed The forecast is conditioned on the assumption that: “ the shape of the recovery in the UK economy embodies an orderly adjustment in the sectoral financial balances and a rebalancing of domestic financial balances and a rebalancing of domestic and external demand supported by sterling’s depreciation. ” December 2009 PBR, A.42, page 146 See also March 2010 Budget B 42 page 157 See also March 2010 Budget B.42, page 157

  17. Scenario analysis – three steps 1. Baseline – align with OBR forecast but query - productivity assumption - import penetration assumption import penetration assumption 2 2. Impose alternative assumptions Impose alternative assumptions - external trade & competitiveness impact - asset prices & credit crunch impact 3. Model “fast” and “slow” recovery profiles

  18. Scenarios – GDP growth GDP growth projections Fast Slow Consensus OBR Projection from 2009 4 2 0 % -2 -4 -6 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

  19. Scenarios - unemployment Unemployment rate, end-year, % Fast recovery F t Sl Slow recovery P Projection from 2009 j ti f 2009 12 10 8 % 6 4 2 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

  20. Scenarios – private financial surplus Private sector financial surplus, % of GDP Fast recovery Slow recovery Projection from 2009 14 12 10 8 8 % 6 4 2 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

  21. Private surplus – slow recovery Private sector financial surplus, % of GDP Slow recovery Projection from 2009 14.0 9.0 % 4.0 -1.0 -6.0 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015

  22. Scenarios – budget deficit Budget deficit, % of GDP Fast recovery Slow recovery Projection from 2009 14 12 10 8 % 6 4 2 2 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

  23. Scenarios – government debt Government debt, end-year, % of GDP Fast recovery Slow recovery Projection from 2009 100 80 60 60 % 40 20 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

  24. Private financial wealth & public debt Private financial wealth & government debt, % of GDP Private financial wealth Government debt Slow recovery projection from 2009 100 80 80 60 % 40 20 0 2007 2007 2008 2008 2009 2009 2010 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013 2013 2014 2014 2015 2015

  25. Scenarios – balance of payments Current account of balance of payments deficit, % of GDP Fast recovery Slow recovery Projection from 2009 4 2 2 % 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 -2 2 -4

  26. “Full-employment” financial balances "Full employment" financial balances, % of GDP in 2015 strong trade performance g p moderate trade performance p 10.0 9.0 8.0 7.0 7 0 6.0 % 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 Unemployment Budget surplus Private deficit BoP deficit

  27. Scenario lessons • Optimistic OBR • Fast recovery with latent balance of payments problem payments problem • Slow recovery trap

  28. Policy challenges • Keeping the recovery going - is monetary policy enough? y p y g • Encouraging a balanced recovery - supporting resource reallocation supporting resource reallocation - raising future competitiveness - resisting currency appreciation resisting currency appreciation

Recommend


More recommend