Quantifying uncertainty of deep neural networks in skin lesion - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

quantifying uncertainty of deep neural networks in skin
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Quantifying uncertainty of deep neural networks in skin lesion - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 Quantifying uncertainty of deep neural networks in skin lesion classification Pieter Van Molle , Tim Verbelen, Cedric De Boom, Bert Vankeirsbilck, Jonas De Vylder, Bart Diricx, Tom Kimpe, Pieter Simoens, Bart Dhoedt pieter.vanmolle@ugent.be 2


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Quantifying uncertainty of deep neural networks in skin lesion classification

Pieter Van Molle, Tim Verbelen, Cedric De Boom, Bert Vankeirsbilck, Jonas De Vylder, Bart Diricx, Tom Kimpe, Pieter Simoens, Bart Dhoedt

1

pieter.vanmolle@ugent.be

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Background

Deep learning → SOTA in image classification Can we augment the dermatologist workflow? Skin lesion classification

  • ISIC Archive
  • At MICCAI: ISIC Challenge

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Background

Deep learning → SOTA in image classification Can we augment the dermatologist workflow? Skin lesion classification

  • ISIC Archive
  • At MICCAI: ISIC Challenge

Limitations of neural networks

  • only a point estimate
  • typically overconfident


for a single class

!!

Correctly capturing uncertainty is indispensable

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Background

Bayesian modelling → introduces uncertainty in deep learning e.g. MC dropout Can we augment the dermatologist workflow?

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Background

Bayesian modelling → introduces uncertainty in deep learning e.g. MC dropout Can we augment the dermatologist workflow?

Contribution

Uncertainty metric that leverages MC dropout

  • based on the overlap between output distributions

models doubt

  • bounded between 0 and 1

interpretable by a dermatologist

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Quantifying uncertainty

...

Calculate the BC uncertainty using the top-2 class histograms Dropout masks Classi!er Softmax outputs Output histograms

} }

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Results

0.0 ]0.0, 0.2] ]0.2, 0.4] ]0.4, 0.6] ]0.6, 0.8] ]0.8, 1.0] BC uncertainty 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Accuracy 268 94 32 43 57 7

Expectation When the model is confident, it should perform better

low uncertainty high accuracy 7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Thank you for your attention

Pieter Van Molle, Tim Verbelen, Cedric De Boom, Bert Vankeirsbilck, Jonas De Vylder, Bart Diricx, Tom Kimpe, Pieter Simoens, Bart Dhoedt

8

pieter.vanmolle@ugent.be