purpose of thi s meeti ng
play

PURPOSE OF THI S MEETI NG is to Discuss the Need and Present the - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

PURPOSE OF THI S MEETI NG is to Discuss the Need and Present the Proposed Alternatives to Improve US-62 From SH-9 to Anadarko in Caddo County N City of Anadarko Project Beginning Project End Caddo County, Oklahoma PURPOSE OF THE


  1. PURPOSE OF THI S MEETI NG …is to Discuss the Need and Present the Proposed Alternatives to Improve US-62 From SH-9 to Anadarko in Caddo County N City of Anadarko Project Beginning Project End Caddo County, Oklahoma

  2. PURPOSE OF THE PROJECT …is to Correct the Deficient Curves on US-62 and Improve the Safety of the Roadway N NS 2610 Rd. NS 2620 Rd. Anadarko, OK Apache “Y” NS 2630 Rd. West Project East Project

  3. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PROCESS Develop Initial Identify Preliminary Data Problem Alternatives Collection Initial Tribal Public Alternative Meeting Meeting Screening TODAY

  4. PROJECT HI STORY Prior Study by ODOT  Three Alternatives Studied o • Improvements to Existing • North Alignment • South Alignment Public Meeting Held o February 28, 2012 North Alternative Selected o Field Survey – Found Isolated o Grave Site Additional Alternatives o Considered Identify Initial Data Preliminary Alternative Problem Collection Screening Alternatives

  5. CORRI DOR WI DE I MPROVEMENTS  SH-9 From Fort Cobb to US-62 (Apache “Y”) Fort N Cobb E 1330 Rd Washita River E 1340 Rd N 2610 Rd. E 1350 Rd N 2570 Rd. Initial Data Option Apache Preliminary N 2580 “Y” Collection Options Screening Rd.

  6. PROJECT AREA I NFORMATI ON  General Data 2-Lane Roadway With 3-Foot Shoulders o Speed Limit – Posted 65 mph o 1 Bridge Structure (Hog Creek) o Existing (2015) Traffic: 3,780 Vehicles / Day o Projected Traffic (2036): 5,270 Vehicles / Day (10% Trucks) o Identify Initial Data Preliminary Alternative Problem Collection Screening Alternatives

  7. PROJECT AREA I NFORMATI ON  General Data 2-Lane Roadway With 3-Foot Shoulders o Speed Limit – Posted 65 mph o 1 Bridge Structure (Hog Creek) o Existing (2015) Traffic: 3,780 Vehicles / Day o Projected Traffic (2036): 5,270 Vehicles / Day (10% Trucks) o N NS 2620 Rd. Identify Initial Data Preliminary Alternative Problem Collection Screening Alternatives

  8. PROJECT AREA I NFORMATI ON General Data  2-Lane Roadway With 3-Foot Shoulders o Speed Limit – Posted 65 mph o 1 Bridge Structure (Hog Creek) o Existing (2016) Traffic: 3,780 Vehicles / Day o Projected Traffic (2036): 5,270 Vehicles / Day o (10% Trucks)  Collision Data Total: 90 Documented Accidents (2009-2015) o • 48 Personal Property Damage • 38 Injury • 4 Fatal More Than Twice the State Average for Collisions o (expressed in crashes per million vehicle miles) • US-62: 155.4 (65.6 injury, 6.9 fatality) • Statewide for Non Interstates: 63.82 (30.56 injury, 2.60 fatality) Identify Initial Data Preliminary Alternative Problem Collection Screening Alternatives

  9. COLLI SI ON DATA

  10. EXI STI NG CONDI TI ONS EXI STI NG CONDI TI ONS WARRANT I MPROVEMENT Roadway Deficiencies  Narrow Shoulders o Roadway Geometry o • Horizontal Curves – 11 Total, 6 Deficient (Curvature and Superelevation) • Vertical Curves – 35 Total, 12 Deficient Limited Sight Distance o Identify Initial Data Preliminary Alternative Problem Collection Screening Alternatives

  11. EXI STI NG CONDI TI ONS EXI STI NG CONDI TI ONS WARRANT I MPROVEMENT Roadway Deficiencies  Narrow Shoulders o Roadway Geometry o • Horizontal Curves – 11 Total, 6 Deficient (Curvature and Superelevation) • Vertical Curves – 35 Total, 12 Deficient Limited Sight Distance o N NS 2610 Rd. NS 2620 Rd. Anadarko, OK Apache “Y” NS 2630 Rd. West Project East Project

  12. EXI STI NG CONDI TI ONS EXI STI NG CONDI TI ONS WARRANT I MPROVEMENT Roadway Deficiencies  Narrow Shoulders o Roadway Geometry o • Horizontal Curves – 11 Total, 6 Deficient (Curvature and Superelevation) • Vertical Curves – 35 Total, 12 Deficient Limited Sight Distance o NS 2620 Rd. NS 2610 Rd. West Project East Project Identify Initial Data Preliminary Alternative Problem Collection Screening Alternatives

  13. PROJECT CONSTRAI NTS Identified Project Constraints  Topography o Homes & Businesses o • Driveways • Local Access Utilities o Tribal Properties & Cultural Sites o Environmental Resources o Identify Initial Data Preliminary Alternative Problem Collection Screening Alternatives

  14. PROJECT CONSTRAI NTS Identified Project Constraints  Topography o Homes & Businesses o • Driveways • Local Access Utilities o Tribal Properties & Cultural Sites o Environmental Resources o Identify Initial Data Preliminary Alternative Problem Collection Screening Alternatives

  15. PROJECT CONSTRAI NTS Identified Project Constraints  Topography o Homes & Businesses o • Driveways • Local Access Utilities o Tribal Properties & Cultural Sites o Environmental Resources o Identify Initial Data Preliminary Alternative Problem Collection Screening Alternatives

  16. PROJECT CONSTRAI NTS  Data Collection Area Encompassed all Alternatives o Database Research and Field Reconnaissance o N NS-2610 Rd. NS-2620 Rd. Anadarko, OK Apache “Y” NS-2630 Rd. West Project East Project

  17. PROJECT CONSTRAI NTS Tribal Properties (West Project)  Trust Lands (Hatched) o According to Information From the Counties and BIA o Primarily in the West Project o N NS-2620 Rd. NS-2610 Rd. Apache “Y” West Project

  18. PROJECT CONSTRAI NTS Tribal Church and Cemetery  Ware’s Chapel o Ware’s Cemetery o Grave Site (Helen James o Died 1912?) Grave Site NS-2620 Rd. Ware’s Cemetery Ware’s Chapel

  19. PROJECT CONSTRAI NTS Tribal Church and Cemetery  Ware’s Chapel o Ware’s Cemetery o Grave Site (Helen James o Died 1912?) Grave Site NS-2620 Rd. Ware’s Cemetery Ware’s Chapel

  20. PROJECT CONSTRAI NTS Wetlands and Streams  Streams – Hog Creek & o Tributaries, Washita River Wetlands – Associated With o Washita River Large Floodplain o N NS-2610 Rd. NS-2620 Rd. Anadarko, OK Apache “Y” NS-2630 Rd. East Project West Project

  21. PROJECT CONSTRAI NTS Cultural Resources  OK Indian Missionary Conference o Center and Campground (Potential Historic Buildings) One Known Archaeological Site o N NS-2610 Rd. Campground Anadarko, OK NS-2620 Rd. Apache “Y” NS-2630 Rd. East Project West Project

  22. DEVELOPMENT OF ALTERNATI VES DEVELOPMENT OF ALTERNATI VES Proposed Design Criteria  o Roadway Section • Two 12-Foot Lanes • 8-Foot Shoulders o Design Speeds – 65 mph o Clear Zone – 28 Feet o Maximum Superelevation of 8% 8% 8% 8% Identify Initial Data Alternative Preliminary Problem Collection Alternatives Screening

  23. ALTERNATI VES OVERVI EW  Overview West Project – Alternatives 1, 2 and 3 o • Different Alignments Cross Country • Hog Creek Bridge • County Road Intersections With Heavier Movement East Project – Alternatives A, B and C o • Different Offsets – North • Far East End – All Centered on Existing • Horizontal Curve Corrections Combinations o NS 2620 Rd. N NS 2610 Rd. Alternative 3 Anadarko, OK Apache “Y” NS 2630 Rd. West Project East Project

  24. ALTERNATI VES - WEST PROJECT  Overview West Project – Alternatives 1, 2, and 3 o • Different Alignments Cross Country • Hog Creek Bridge • County Road Intersections With Heavier Movement • South Alternative – Floodplain, NRCS Dam, & Reservoir N NS 2610 Rd. Alternative 3 NS 2620 Rd. Apache “Y”

  25. ALTERNATI VE 1  Overview Aligns With Improvements at Apache Y o Closest to Existing Alignment o Key Features o • Offset 50 feet South • Three Curves Greater Than 6% Superelevation • Left Turn Lanes at NS 2610 Rd. & NS 2620 Rd. N NS 2610 Rd. NS 2620 Rd. Apache “Y”

  26. ALTERNATI VE 1  Overview Cemetery Aligns With Improvements at Apache Y o NS 2620 Rd. NS 2620 Rd. Closest to Existing Alignment o Key Features o - 5.00% • Offset 50 Feet South • Three Curves Greater Than 6% Superelevation • Left Turn Lanes at NS 2610 Rd. & NS 2620 Rd. • Steep Grade West of NS 2620 Rd., 5% NS 2620 Rd. NS 2610 Rd. West Project East Project

  27. ALTERNATI VE 1  Overview NS 2620 Rd. Aligns With Improvements at Apache Y o Closest to Existing Alignment o Key Features o • Offset 50 Feet South • Three Curves Greater Than 6% Superelevation • Steep Grade West of NS 2620 Rd. • Left Turn Lanes at NS 2610 Rd. & NS 2620 Rd. • Steep Grade West of NS 2620 Rd., 5% Bridge Over Hog Creek Offset to South – 50 Feet o N NS 2610 Rd. NS 2620 Rd. Apache “Y”

  28. ALTERNATI VE 2 Overview  Aligns With Improvements at Apache Y o Key Features o • Offset 35 Feet North • Two Curves Greater Than 6% Superelevation • Climbing Lane • Left Turn Lanes at NS 2610 Rd. & NS 2620 Rd. N NS 2610 Rd. NS 2620 Rd. Apache “Y”

  29. ALTERNATI VE 2 Overview  Aligns With Improvements at Apache Y o < < - 4% Key Features o • Offset 35 Feet North NS 2620 Rd. • Two Curves Greater Than 6% Superelevation • Climbing Lane • Left Turn Lanes at NS 2610 Rd. & NS 2620 Rd. • Improve Grades West of NS 2620 Rd., < 4% NS 2620 Rd. NS 2610 Rd. West Project East Project

Recommend


More recommend