public education enrichment fund
play

Public Education Enrichment Fund Evaluation Presentation Board of - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Public Education Enrichment Fund Evaluation Presentation Board of Education Committee of the Whole April 5, 2011 Pr Prog ograms ams Ov Over er $1 $1 mi millio ion n 20 2009 09-10 10 Physical Education Athletics Libraries


  1. Public Education Enrichment Fund Evaluation Presentation Board of Education Committee of the Whole April 5, 2011

  2. Pr Prog ograms ams Ov Over er $1 $1 mi millio ion n 20 2009 09-10 10  Physical Education  Athletics  Libraries  Visual and Performing Arts  Student Support Professionals 3 PUBLIC EDUCATION ENRICHMENT FUND

  3. PEE EEF F Bu Budget get 2009-10 10 Sports, Libraries, Arts and Music (SLAM) Total: $15,000,000 Visual and Athletics, Performing $2,400,000 Arts, $5,000,000 Physical Education, $2,600,000 Libraries, $5,000,000 4 PUBLIC EDUCATION ENRICHMENT FUND

  4. PE PEEF EF Bu Budg dget 200 t 2009-10 10 General Educational Uses (The Third-Third) Total: $15,000,000 Teacher Translation and Recruitment, $203,515 Interpretation, $604,000 Formative General Assessments, Infrastructure, $335,000 $379,361 Career Tech- Education, $78,959 Reserve Funds Academic Coaches, for school sites, $603,500 goes to WSF, $3,227,767 Wellness Centers, $853,591 Violence Prevention, $911,294 In-kind Support - CARE, Truancy, Initiative, SF Promise, Salad Bars, Green Schools, $2,327,500 Learning Support Custodians, $808,845 Professionals, Peer Resources, $4,043,373 $623,295 5 PUBLIC EDUCATION ENRICHMENT FUND

  5. Ev Evaluation luation Forma mat PERFORMANCE THEORETICAL ANALYSIS IMPACT INVESTMENT DESCRIPTIVE QUALITATIVE QUANTITATIVE MEASURES PERSPECTIVE 2009-10 2010-11 Evaluation Evaluation Current Looking State Forward PUBLIC EDUCATION ENRICHMENT FUND 6

  6. Over ervie iew w for Eval alua uati tion on Mode del 2010-11 11 INVESTMENT GOALS PERFORMANCE MEASURES RESEARCH DESIGN • Human Capital: Teachers, • District Goal 1 - Access • Quantitative • Pre-Post PEEF librarians, coaches, and Equity: • Comparison Group coordinators, translators, • District-Level Data: Serving/reaching all custodians, and support staff. Formative and • Longitudinal Trend students/sites, review • Materials and Supplies: summative assessments, • Case Study Analysis access criteria for each Equipment, books, GPA, attendance rates, • Comparison to a norm program to ensure equity. instruments etc. • Data by subgroups dropouts and graduation • Professional development • District Goal 2 - Student rates, suspensions. and capacity building: Achievement: Ensure • Program-Level Data: Workshops, ECPLCs, and student learning and Services/ programs/ professional presentations, etc. prepare citizens of personnel, students/ tomorrow, measure sites/parents served, impact on academic and attendance and behavioral indicators. participation at events • District Goal 3 - and professional Accountability: development. Communication and transparency with the • Qualitative public. • Surveys – safety, engagement, increased access, school climate • Observations/site visits • Interviews/Testimonials • Pictures/Videos 7 PUBLIC EDUCATION ENRICHMENT FUND

  7. Progr gress ess of Evaluat ation n Frame mewor ork • 2009-10 Program Evaluation Report Finalized Internal Updates • Final Submission of Report for Controller’s Office CAC Presentation • Presented preliminary 2009-10 Evaluation Report • Received CAC member input February 16, 2011 • Established Feedback Loop on evaluation process • Presented preliminary 2009-10 Evaluation Report 14 Program Manager • Updated Logic Model for 2010-11 Meetings • Detailed review of performance measures with a focus on student impact Feb – Mar 2011 • Identified data sources maintained at program level • Drafted Program Evaluation design for 2011-12 8 PUBLIC EDUCATION ENRICHMENT FUND

  8. PEEF Libraries 2009-10 & 2010-11 9 PUBLIC EDUCATION ENRICHMENT FUND

  9. Libr brar aries ies 200 009-10 0 PE PEEF EF Ev Eval aluation ation Theoretical Perspective - Quality School Library Programs Impact Student Achievement Most Important: Full-time, certified school librarians  Appropriate support staff  Incremental increases in the following can result in incremental gains in student learning: Increased hours of access for both individual student visits and group visits by classes  Larger collections of print and electronic resources with access at school and from home  Up-to-date technology with connectivity to databases and automated collections  Instruction implemented in collaboration with teachers that is integrated with classroom  curriculum and includes problem-solving, critical thinking and communication of ideas and information Increased student usage of school library services  Higher total library expenditures  Leadership activities by the librarian in providing professional development for teachers, serving on  key committees, and meeting regularly with the principal Kachel, Debra E., and Graduate Students of LSC 5530 School Library Advocacy. School library research 10 PUBLIC EDUCATION ENRICHMENT FUND

  10. Libr brar aries ies 200 009-10 0 PE PEEF EF Ev Eval aluation ation Descriptive:  Teacher Librarians hired, supplied library materials and resources, professional development.  5 School libraries were renovated: SOTA, Carver, Burton, El Dorado, & Everett.  Implementation of the Destiny on-line catalog as a tracking system.  On display at the City Library is an example of a third grade unit titled: San Francisco. This is an example of student work, librarian collaborating with teachers on a student project.  Professional development sessions occur monthly and there is one-on-one coaching. Attendance logs for PD sessions are maintained.  Schools have access to powerful subscription resources such as NetTrekker, Teaching Books, AP Images, Ferguson’s and Wilson’s Web.  Teacher Librarians at three sites (ISA,Balboa,Chavez) made web presence via School Loop. 11 PUBLIC EDUCATION ENRICHMENT FUND

  11. Libr brar aries ies 200 009-10 0 PE PEEF EF Ev Eval aluation ation Qualitative: Testimony at PEEF – CAC community forums 1. Creating a safe space. “The library is a place that they can go and be safe, and it’s been helpful. ” – Parent Learning practical life skills 2. “I am really happy with libraries for many reasons. They teach me to go online on the ” – 1 st grade student computer. “My daughter was a slow reader. And she struggled with reading, but the librarian 3. suggested poetry as a way for her to learn. ” – Parent Collaboration between teacher librarian and teacher positively impacts student 4. performance. “All my teachers stay with their classes during library time. It has made for some great collaborative projects and they all know what their students are doing. ” – Teacher Librarian 12 PUBLIC EDUCATION ENRICHMENT FUND

  12. Libr brar aries ies 200 009-10 0 PE PEEF EF Ev Eval aluation ation Qualitative Continued… 2010-11 Criteria for Teacher Librarian Allocation to K-12 Schools Elementary Schools Schools Less than 200 = .3 FTE  Schools btw. 201 - 315 = .4 FTE  Schools btw. 316 – 400 = .5 FTE  Schools over 400 = .6 FTE  Middle Schools Schools less than 349 =.4 FTE  Schools 350 - 1000 = .6 FTE  Schools over 1000 = .6 FTE  High Schools 1.0 FTE Librarian to support 5 county, small, and alternative high schools.  Large high school partial staffing support of $25,000 per site for 12 large high schools.  13 PUBLIC EDUCATION ENRICHMENT FUND

  13. Libr brar aries ies 200 009-10 0 PE PEEF EF Ev Eval aluation ation Quantitative:  Number of certified teacher librarians: From 6 (Pre PEEF) to 42 (Current PEEF).  Accessibility of library services to students with a certified teacher librarian – 50,170 (95%).  School libraries were opened at an average of 21 hrs/week.  Average Monthly Book Circulation – 16,757 (Pre PEEF) to 26,248 (Current PEEF) books in the last 3 years.  Number of libraries that have technology access and use online subscription resources (library research/reference database). Increased from 47 (Pre PEEF) to 105 (Current PEEF). 14 PUBLIC EDUCATION ENRICHMENT FUND

  14. Libr brar aries ies 200 009-10 0 PE PEEF EF Ev Eval aluation ation Quantitative Continued…  Correlation between the total hours in an average week the library is opened for students and the circulation statistics : r = 0.62, p < 0.05, n = 38  Correlation between the number of students served and the circulation statistics: r = 0.73, p < 0.05, n = 37  Correlation between the Instructional Partner: Coordination and the circulation statistics: r = 0.31, p > 0.05, n = 38 15 PUBLIC EDUCATION ENRICHMENT FUND

Recommend


More recommend