PROJECTOR: an automatic logic program rewriting tool for better - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

projector an automatic logic program rewriting tool for
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

PROJECTOR: an automatic logic program rewriting tool for better - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

PROJECTOR: an automatic logic program rewriting tool for better performance Nick Hippen & Yuliya Lierler Nick Hippen University of Nebraska at Omaha What is Answer Set Programming (ASP)? Constraint programming paradigm geared towards


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Nick Hippen University of Nebraska at Omaha

PROJECTOR: an automatic logic program rewriting tool for better performance

Nick Hippen & Yuliya Lierler

slide-2
SLIDE 2

What is Answer Set Programming (ASP)?

  • Constraint programming paradigm geared towards solving difficult

combinatorial search problems

  • Prolog-like syntax

Nick Hippen University of Nebraska at Omaha 2

Meaning X is a child of Y if Y is a parent of X. X is innocent if I have no reason to believe that X is guilty Logic Rule 𝑑ℎ𝑗𝑚𝑒 𝑌, 𝑍 ← 𝑞𝑏𝑠𝑓𝑜𝑢 𝑍, 𝑌 . 𝑗𝑜𝑜𝑝𝑑𝑓𝑜𝑢 𝑌 ← 𝑜𝑝𝑢 𝑕𝑣𝑗𝑚𝑢𝑧 𝑌 . Head ← Body

slide-3
SLIDE 3

ASP Solver Architecture

Nick Hippen University of Nebraska at Omaha 3

PROJECTOR

logic program rewritten logic program

Grounder ASP Solver

grounded program answer sets logic program

Grounder ASP Solver

grounded program answer sets

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Grounding Logic Programs

Nick Hippen University of Nebraska at Omaha 4

Logic Program Grounded Program Intelligently Grounded Program 𝑞𝑏𝑠𝑓𝑜𝑢 𝑐𝑝𝑐, 𝑏𝑚𝑚𝑧 . 𝑞𝑏𝑠𝑓𝑜𝑢 𝑛𝑏𝑠𝑠𝑧, 𝑘𝑝ℎ𝑜 . 𝑡𝑗𝑐𝑚𝑗𝑜𝑕 𝑐𝑝𝑐, 𝑛𝑏𝑠𝑠𝑧 . 𝑑𝑝𝑣𝑡𝑗𝑜 𝑌, 𝑍 ← 𝑞𝑏𝑠𝑓𝑜𝑢 𝑄1, 𝑌 , 𝑞𝑏𝑠𝑓𝑜𝑢 𝑄2, 𝑍 , 𝑡𝑗𝑐𝑚𝑗𝑜𝑕 𝑄1, 𝑄2 , 𝑌 ≠ 𝑍. 𝑞𝑏𝑠𝑓𝑜𝑢 𝑐𝑝𝑐, 𝑏𝑚𝑚𝑧 . 𝑞𝑏𝑠𝑓𝑜𝑢 𝑛𝑏𝑠𝑠𝑧, 𝑘𝑝ℎ𝑜 . 𝑡𝑗𝑐𝑚𝑗𝑜𝑕 𝑐𝑝𝑐, 𝑛𝑏𝑠𝑠𝑧 . 𝑑𝑝𝑣𝑡𝑗𝑜 𝑘𝑝ℎ𝑜, 𝑛𝑏𝑠𝑠𝑧 ← 𝑞𝑏𝑠𝑓𝑜𝑢 𝑏𝑚𝑚𝑧, 𝑘𝑝ℎ𝑜 , 𝑞𝑏𝑠𝑓𝑜𝑢 𝑐𝑝𝑐, 𝑛𝑏𝑠𝑠𝑧 , 𝑡𝑗𝑐𝑚𝑗𝑜𝑕 𝑏𝑚𝑚𝑧, 𝑐𝑝𝑐 , 𝑘𝑝ℎ𝑜 ≠ 𝑛𝑏𝑠𝑠𝑧. … 𝑑𝑝𝑣𝑡𝑗𝑜 𝑐𝑝𝑐, 𝑐𝑝𝑐 ← 𝑞𝑏𝑠𝑓𝑜𝑢 𝑐𝑝𝑐, 𝑐𝑝𝑐 , 𝑞𝑏𝑠𝑓𝑜𝑢 𝑐𝑝𝑐, 𝑐𝑝𝑐 , 𝑡𝑗𝑐𝑚𝑗𝑜𝑕 𝑐𝑝𝑐, 𝑐𝑝𝑐 , 𝑐𝑝𝑐 ≠ 𝑐𝑝𝑐. … 𝑞𝑏𝑠𝑓𝑜𝑢 𝑐𝑝𝑐, 𝑏𝑚𝑚𝑧 . 𝑞𝑏𝑠𝑓𝑜𝑢 𝑛𝑏𝑠𝑠𝑧, 𝑘𝑝ℎ𝑜 . 𝑡𝑗𝑐𝑚𝑗𝑜𝑕 𝑐𝑝𝑐, 𝑛𝑏𝑠𝑠𝑧 . 𝑑𝑝𝑣𝑡𝑗𝑜 𝑏𝑚𝑚𝑧, 𝑘𝑝ℎ𝑜 ← 𝑞𝑏𝑠𝑓𝑜𝑢 𝑐𝑝𝑐, 𝑏𝑚𝑚𝑧 , 𝑞𝑏𝑠𝑓𝑜𝑢 𝑛𝑏𝑠𝑠𝑧, 𝑘𝑝ℎ𝑜 , 𝑡𝑗𝑐𝑚𝑗𝑜𝑕 𝑐𝑝𝑐, 𝑛𝑏𝑠𝑠𝑧 , 𝑏𝑚𝑚𝑧 ≠ 𝑘𝑝ℎ𝑜.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Improving Performance

Smaller grounding sizes often translate into faster solve times Idea: Split a logic rule into multiple rules so that the number of variables present in each new rule is smaller than that of the original. Projection Two types: 𝛽 and 𝛾

Nick Hippen University of Nebraska at Omaha 5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

PROJECTOR Result: 𝛽

Nick Hippen University of Nebraska at Omaha 6

Logic Program PROJECTOR: 𝜷-projection 𝑑𝑝𝑣𝑡𝑗𝑜 𝑌, 𝑍 ← 𝑞𝑏𝑠𝑓𝑜𝑢 𝑄1, 𝑌 , 𝑞𝑏𝑠𝑓𝑜𝑢 𝑄2, 𝑍 , 𝑡𝑗𝑐𝑚𝑗𝑜𝑕 𝑄1, 𝑄2 , 𝑌 ≠ 𝑍. 𝑞0 𝑍, 𝑄1 ← 𝑡𝑗𝑐𝑚𝑗𝑜𝑕 𝑄1, 𝑄2 , 𝑞𝑏𝑠𝑓𝑜𝑢 𝑄2, 𝑍 . 𝑞1 𝑍, 𝑌 ← 𝑞𝑏𝑠𝑓𝑜𝑢 𝑄1, 𝑌 , 𝑞0 𝑍, 𝑄1 . 𝑑𝑝𝑣𝑡𝑗𝑜 𝑌, 𝑍 ← 𝑌 ≠ 𝑍, 𝑞1 𝑍, 𝑌 .

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Nondeterministic behavior

Nick Hippen University of Nebraska at Omaha 7

Logic Program PROJECTOR: 𝜷-projection Scenario #1 PROJECTOR: 𝜷-projection Scenario #2 𝑑𝑝𝑣𝑡𝑗𝑜 𝑌, 𝑍 ← 𝑞𝑏𝑠𝑓𝑜𝑢 𝑄1, 𝑌 , 𝑞𝑏𝑠𝑓𝑜𝑢 𝑄2, 𝑍 , 𝑡𝑗𝑐𝑚𝑗𝑜𝑕 𝑄1, 𝑄2 , 𝑌 ≠ 𝑍. 𝑞0 𝑍, 𝑄1 ← 𝑡𝑗𝑐𝑚𝑗𝑜𝑕 𝑄1, 𝑄2 , 𝑞𝑏𝑠𝑓𝑜𝑢 𝑄2, 𝑍 . 𝑞1 𝑍, 𝑌 ← 𝑞𝑏𝑠𝑓𝑜𝑢 𝑄1, 𝑌 , 𝑞0 𝑍, 𝑄1 . 𝑑𝑝𝑣𝑡𝑗𝑜 𝑌, 𝑍 ← 𝑌 ≠ 𝑍, 𝑞1 𝑍, 𝑌 . 𝑞0 𝑄2, 𝑌 ← 𝑡𝑗𝑐𝑚𝑗𝑜𝑕 𝑄1, 𝑄2 , 𝑞𝑏𝑠𝑓𝑜𝑢 𝑄1, 𝑌 . 𝑞1 𝑍, 𝑌 ← 𝑞𝑏𝑠𝑓𝑜𝑢 𝑄2, 𝑍 , 𝑞0 𝑄2, 𝑌 . 𝑑𝑝𝑣𝑡𝑗𝑜 𝑌, 𝑍 ← 𝑌 ≠ 𝑍, 𝑞1 𝑍, 𝑌 .

slide-8
SLIDE 8

PROJECTOR Result: 𝛾

Nick Hippen University of Nebraska at Omaha 8

Logic Program PROJECTOR: 𝜷-projection PROJECTOR: 𝜸-projection 𝑛𝑏𝑚𝑓↓𝑑𝑝𝑣𝑡𝑗𝑜 𝑌, 𝑍 ← 𝑞𝑏𝑠𝑓𝑜𝑢 𝑄1, 𝑌 , 𝑞𝑏𝑠𝑓𝑜𝑢 𝑄2, 𝑍 , 𝑡𝑗𝑐𝑚𝑗𝑜𝑕 𝑄1, 𝑄2 , 𝑌 ≠ 𝑍 𝑛𝑏𝑚𝑓(𝑌). 𝑞0 𝑍, 𝑄1 ← 𝑡𝑗𝑐𝑚𝑗𝑜𝑕 𝑄1, 𝑄2 , 𝑞𝑏𝑠𝑓𝑜𝑢 𝑄2, 𝑍 . 𝑞1 𝑍, 𝑌 ← 𝑞𝑏𝑠𝑓𝑜𝑢 𝑄1, 𝑌 , 𝑞0 𝑍, 𝑄1 . 𝑛𝑏𝑚𝑓↓𝑑𝑝𝑣𝑡𝑗𝑜 𝑌, 𝑍 ← 𝑌 ≠ 𝑍, 𝑛𝑏𝑚𝑓 𝑌 , 𝑞1 𝑍, 𝑌 . 𝑞0 𝑍, 𝑄1 ← 𝑡𝑗𝑐𝑚𝑗𝑜𝑕 𝑄1, 𝑄2 , 𝑞𝑏𝑠𝑓𝑜𝑢 𝑄2, 𝑍 . 𝑞1 𝑍, 𝑌 ← 𝑞𝑏𝑠𝑓𝑜𝑢 𝑄1, 𝑌 , 𝑞0 𝑍, 𝑄1 , 𝑛𝑏𝑚𝑓(𝑌). 𝑛𝑏𝑚𝑓↓𝑑𝑝𝑣𝑡𝑗𝑜 𝑌, 𝑍 ← 𝑌 ≠ 𝑍, 𝑛𝑏𝑚𝑓 𝑌 , 𝑞1 𝑍, 𝑌 .

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Experimental Analysis

  • ASPCCG: ASP based natural language parser
  • 3 encodings of increasing levels of human optimization
  • Created by Matthew Buddenhagen, Yuliya Lierler & Peter Schuller
  • Enc1: No human optimization
  • Enc7: Moderate human optimization
  • Enc19: Notable human optimization

Nick Hippen University of Nebraska at Omaha 9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

ASPCCG: Encoding 1

Nick Hippen University of Nebraska at Omaha 10

Solve Time Grounding Size

slide-11
SLIDE 11

ASPCCG: Encoding 7

Nick Hippen University of Nebraska at Omaha 11

Solve Time Grounding Size

slide-12
SLIDE 12

ASPCCG: Encoding 19

Nick Hippen University of Nebraska at Omaha 12

Solve Time Grounding Size

slide-13
SLIDE 13

ASPCCG: Overall

Nick Hippen University of Nebraska at Omaha 13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Related, Current & Future Work

  • Related work: lpopt (Bichler, Morak, Woltran, 2016)
  • Paper will be submitted to Practical Aspects of Declarative Languages (PADL) 2019 this weekend
  • System PROJECTOR available on the UNO NLPKR Lab website

Future Work

  • Gather more benchmarks
  • Grounding size prediction
  • Improve language support

Nick Hippen University of Nebraska at Omaha 14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Acknowledgements

  • Michael Dingess
  • Brian Hodges
  • Daniel Houston
  • Roland Kaminski
  • Liu Liu
  • Dr. Mirek Truszczynski
  • Stefan Woltran

Nick Hippen University of Nebraska at Omaha 15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Ques Questio ions? ns?

Nick Hippen University of Nebraska at Omaha 16