Project Safira – Eliminating fatalities in the Upstream Oil and Gas Industry IADC SAPC Chapter meeting 14 th February 2019
About IOGP Wherever you are… IOGP’s Members Wherever you go... produce 40% of the Whatever you do… world’s oil and gas - chances are you’re relying safely, efficiently on oil and gas for heat, and reliably light, power and mobility
Who we are IOGP works on behalf of the world’s oil and gas companies and organizations to promote safe, responsible and sustainable exploration and production The Association encompasses many of the world's leading publicly-traded, private and state-owned oil and gas companies, industry associations and major upstream service companies
81 Members around the world Map shows locations of Member Head Offices. Many operate globally
PROJECT SAFIRA Eliminating Fatalities in our Industry
Project Safira – why do we want to do something?
Project Safira – for no more fatalities in our industry
Eliminating fatalities due to Process Safety Events
Click image to show video online
Process safety events – high severity, low frequency 7 fatalities 11 fatalities 31 fatalities 2015 2010 2012 As well as severe environmental and business consequences
However… IOGP Members report on average 5 fatal PSEs per year We see a 4+ fatality event on average every 18 months 7 fatalities: Ignited release during 31 fatalities: Ignited release during production activities maintenance activities of pipeline 4 fatalities: Ignited release during 4 fatalities: Non ignited release during modifications to pipeline repair activities of pipeline 11 fatalities: Ignited release 4 fatalities: Ignited release during road 5 fatalities: Ignited release during well drilling activities from flexible hose failure tanker loading 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
56 PSEs Unknown Fatal PSEs are either Ignited or Struck-by events [CATEGO Ignited RY 128 Fatalities NAME] Unknown Ignited events are 75% of fatalities Struck-by Nearly all 4+ fatality events ignited Ignited Almost half of PSEs occur during maintenance, inspection and testing – this is equivalent for either Ignited or Struck-by events • About 1/3 during drilling, workover and well services • Fewer than 20% during normal production ops • Causes are NOT the same as Environmental Tier 1/Tier 2 PSE’s
Air Transport Safety Strategy
The Aviation Safety Staircase (2006-2016 Global Offshore Helicopters) 140 120 Fatalities 100 80 60 40 20 0 This is where we would be as an industry Source Data – EASA Safety Risk Portfolio
Aviation SubCommittee Safira Focus Areas 1. Effective implementation of common industry standards • IOGP Aircraft Management Guidelines Work Group (590): aligning 590 with 577 writing style to read more as Recommended Practices (RP) including contractual language • IOGP Member commitment to implementation of RP 2. Aircraft design & reliability (enhanced gearbox and rotor failure detection, maintenance, and design) • Industry Collaborative Working Group (ASC, Regulators, Aircraft Operators, OEM’s, HeliOffshore) – set expectations for design and reliability from end user. • ASC role to set end user expectations for aircraft reliability and design. Ensure end user alignment with initiatives to drive IOGP member implementation. 3. Assured flight path (aircraft loss of control and collision avoidance) • HTAWS Development & Implementation (ASC, Regulators, OEM’s, Aircraft Operators, HeliOffshore) • ASC role now is to drive implementation of new technology through 590RP • Flight Path Management Work Group (ASC, Aircraft Operators, HeliOffshore) • ASC role is end user support of current initiatives and FCOM implementation
Land Transportation
Since 2005, land transportation-related incidents reported to IOGP resulted in 163 workforce fatalities 35 32 31 29 30 28 25 20 15 15 10 9 10 8 7 6 6 5 5 6 again in 2017 0 (tbc) 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Fatalities FAR After significant fewer fatalities in 2009, little progress has been made Something needs to change if we want to achieve no fatalities
Project Safira – for no more fatalities in the Upstream Industry The IOGP Land Transportation Subcommittee has proposed a strategy to eliminate land transport related workforce fatalities Three-point seat belts Safer vehicles Enhanced vehicle technology
Three-point seatbelts – “Why” Seat belt use is the most important factor in reducing the severity of injuries from traffic collisions. Wearing a seat-belt reduces the risk of fatal injury by: IOGP land transportation fatality data analysis indicates that the lack of using a seatbelt was a contributing factor in 32% of the land transportation workforce fatalities since year 2010.
Safe(r) vehicles – “Why” Global New Car Assessment Program (NCAP) approach: • No loss of life is acceptable • People make mistakes • People are vulnerable – the starting point for the design of a “Safe System” is human tolerance to forces. The difference between a five and zero star car – life and death…
Advanced vehicle technology – “Why” Provide maximum safety to the vehicle occupants to avoid crash occurring in the first place and/or reducing severity of the outcome in case of a vehicle crash. Advanced vehicle technologies - examples: - Autonomous Emergency Braking - Posted speed recognition - Roll stability systems - Forward collision warning - Electronic Stability Control - Rollover protection - Speed limiters - Lane Departure / Keep assist - etc. The appropriate advanced vehicle technology should be based on the outcome of a risk assessment.
Update of the IOGP Life Saving Rules
Common set of industry Life-Saving Rules for the front-line worker, regardless of who their employer is Commitment from all IOGP Members to adopt the Rules so that we have one implemented standardized set in the industry Feedback from operators and contractors that implemented, those that went their own way, and those that chose not to at all Reviewed the last five years of data (fatalities and high-potential events reported to IOGP) Revised set of 9 IOGP Life-Saving Rules launched in the summer
Goal Within 3 years all IOGP Members use the IOGP Life-Saving Rules Within 5 years, the entire industry
But why will one set for an industry help? • Means for comparing outcomes resulting from standardized process implementation within or among organizations • Enables investigators to compare data and to interpret the relevance and efficacy of an intervention • Workers are able to relate to one another in meaningful ways (including the standardization of terms used) • As more organisations begin to use the same standard protocols with the same data fields, the ability to analyse risk will be enhanced • Reduces worker cognitive dissonance and thus the risk of human error • Building on the same solid foundation, rather than struggling to grasp the range of safety concepts • Allow workers to learn from each other's experiences (i.e. new ideas on how to address problems — what has worked, what has not worked and why). Source: WHO in the Int. J. for Quality in Health Care, Volume 26, Issue 2, 1 April 2014, Pages 109 – 116
Responding to the challenge: safe and competitive Technology Improving Safety performance Human Performance Standardization Collaboration Self Verification Operating Digitization & Culture of care discipline technology & reducing Standardization Management reducing risk of equipment, likelihood of Systems Increasing processes and human error Design speed & quality procedures Self of learning Operating verification discipline Systems & Inherently safe processes design Future… Last few decades
Registered Office City Tower 40 Basinghall Street 14th Floor London EC2V 5DE For more information please contact: United Kingdom T +44 (0)20 3763 9700 F +44 (0)20 3763 9701 Chris Hawkes Brussels Office Safety Director Bd du Souverain,165 4th Floor ch@iogp.org B-1160 Brussels Belgium T +32 (0)2 566 9150 F +32 (0)2 566 9159 Houston Office 16225 Park Ten Place, Suite 500 Houston, Texas 77084 United States T +1 (713) 338 3494 www.iogp.org reception@iogp.org
Recommend
More recommend
