patent liability patent liability
play

Patent Liability Patent Liability Team KANG Team KANG Group 1 - PDF document

Nov 15, 2023 •139 likes •278 views

Patent Liability Patent Liability Team KANG Team KANG Group 1 Group 1 Overview Overview Camera tracking moveable Camera tracking moveable transmitter apparatus transmitter apparatus Sentry robot

  1. Patent Liability Patent Liability Team KANG Team KANG Group 1 Group 1

  2. Overview Overview � “ “ Camera tracking moveable Camera tracking moveable � transmitter apparatus” ” transmitter apparatus � “ “ Sentry robot Sentry robot ” ” � � “ “ Automatic tracking camera control Automatic tracking camera control � system ” ” system

  3. Similar Product/Patent Similar Product/Patent � “ “ Camera tracking moveable transmitter Camera tracking moveable transmitter � apparatus” ” apparatus • US Patent 4,905,315 US Patent 4,905,315; filed 30 June 1988 ; filed 30 June 1988 • � Summary: Summary: � • An apparatus for mounting and positioning an An apparatus for mounting and positioning an • associated device associated device • Method: array of IR sensors at equal angular Method: array of IR sensors at equal angular • positions about an axis positions about an axis • Sensors receive signal from transponder Sensors receive signal from transponder • � Info is used to extrapolate angular Info is used to extrapolate angular � displacement/ position displacement/ position

  4. Claims Claims � Possible conflicting claims: Possible conflicting claims: � • Claims 1 and 5 Claims 1 and 5 • � Deal with using IR sensors to position Deal with using IR sensors to position � camera camera • Similar Similar • � Motion sensors position camera platform in Motion sensors position camera platform in � general area general area • Different Different • � Motion sensors are ancillary, not main Motion sensors are ancillary, not main � method of detection method of detection

  5. Course of Action Course of Action � Term of patent expires in a few Term of patent expires in a few � months months • Can wait to submit the patent to avoid Can wait to submit the patent to avoid • infringement claims infringement claims

  6. Similar Product/Patent Similar Product/Patent � “ “ Sentry robot Sentry robot ” ” � • Patent application Patent application • 20070208459; Filed ; Filed 20070208459 27 Feb 2007 27 Feb 2007 • Designed by Designed by • Samsung to patrol Samsung to patrol border between N. border between N. and S. Korea and S. Korea � Summary Summary � • This This - - > > • • Moving background Moving background • algorithm algorithm • Video targeting Video targeting •

  7. Claims Claims � Possible conflicts: Possible conflicts: � • Body pivoting about main base Body pivoting about main base • � Camera moves independently of main body Camera moves independently of main body � • Gun on main body following where camera Gun on main body following where camera • looks looks • Optically track and follow a target w/ gun Optically track and follow a target w/ gun • � Similarity Similarity � • Overall structure and method Overall structure and method • � Difference Difference � • Specific structure of body Specific structure of body • • Targeting algorithm Targeting algorithm •

  8. Course of Action Course of Action � Clever wording of patent application Clever wording of patent application � � What to do in case of conflict with a What to do in case of conflict with a � patent application? patent application? � Patent for using a sentry gun or just Patent for using a sentry gun or just � one specific application? one specific application? • Pay licensing/ royalty fees Pay licensing/ royalty fees •

  9. Similar Product/Patent Similar Product/Patent � “ “ Automatic tracking camera control Automatic tracking camera control � system ” ” system • US Patent 5,434,617 US Patent 5,434,617; filed 7 Dec 1994 ; filed 7 Dec 1994 • � Summary: Summary: � • Uses differences between two frames to Uses differences between two frames to • track a target track a target • Two cameras: Two cameras: • � Main camera Main camera � � Second camera acting as ancillary sensor Second camera acting as ancillary sensor �

  10. Claims Claims � Possible conflicts: Possible conflicts: � • Use of Use of “ “ current image current image” ” • • Use of Use of “ “ previous image previous image” ” • • Use of threshold box to reduce noise Use of threshold box to reduce noise • • Use of pixel differences Use of pixel differences • � Similarity Similarity � • More or less the same algorithm More or less the same algorithm • � Difference Difference � • Method of using ancillary sensors Method of using ancillary sensors • • Specifics: probably a moving background Specifics: probably a moving background • algorithm algorithm

  11. Course of Action Course of Action � Free video algorithms found online Free video algorithms found online � • Fair use under open Fair use under open- - source license? source license? • • May have to change video algorithm May have to change video algorithm • � Evaluate probability of Evaluate probability of � litigation/ infringement claims litigation/ infringement claims

  12. Questions? Questions?

Recommend

Supreme Court Overturns Federal Circuit on Liability for Inducing Infringement and Standard for

Supreme Court Overturns Federal Circuit on Liability for Inducing Infringement and Standard for

Supreme Court Overturns Federal Circuit on Liability for Inducing Infringement and Standard for Definiteness of Patent Claims: What Does This Mean for Patent Owners and Challengers? Stephen Baskin Paul Hughes Sharon Israel Andy Pincus

345 views • 22 slides
Patent Marking: Federal Circuit Expands Liability Threat p y presents presents Complying With

Patent Marking: Federal Circuit Expands Liability Threat p y presents presents Complying With

Patent Marking: Federal Circuit Expands Liability Threat p y presents presents Complying With the False Marking Statute to Avoid Claims A Live 90-Minute Teleconference/Webinar with Interactive Q&A Today's panel features: Nathan Cummings,

657 views • 51 slides
5/25/2011 Patent Reform Topics Law & economic model for understanding patent law

5/25/2011 Patent Reform Topics Law & economic model for understanding patent law

5/25/2011 Patent Reform Topics Law & economic model for understanding patent law Evaluate aspects of the patent system Patent acquisition: role of private parties and government Patent Reform Patent scope First to file v.

281 views • 4 slides
N Destination i? 108 US 8,687,777 B1 Page 2 Related U.S. Application Data 5,572.581 A 1 1/1996

N Destination i? 108 US 8,687,777 B1 Page 2 Related U.S. Application Data 5,572.581 A 1 1/1996

US008687777B1 (12) United States Patent US 8,687,777 B1 (10) Patent No.: * Apr. 1, 2014 Lavian et al. (45) Date of Patent: (54) SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VISUAL (56) References Cited PRESENTATION AND SELECTION OF VR U.S. PATENT

2.01k views • 162 slides
c12) United States Patent US 9,521,255 Bl (10) Patent No.: Lavian et al. (45) Date of Patent:

c12) United States Patent US 9,521,255 Bl (10) Patent No.: Lavian et al. (45) Date of Patent:

111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 US009521255Bl c12) United States Patent US 9,521,255 Bl (10) Patent No.: Lavian et al. (45) Date of Patent: Dec. 13, 2016 (54) (56) References Cited SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR

1.55k views • 133 slides
Patent family - background Patent family - background Patent family - background 1883

Patent family - background Patent family - background Patent family - background 1883

The Derwent patent family The Derwent patent family and its application in and its application in Patent Statistical Analysis Patent Statistical Analysis WIPO-OECD Workshop on Statistics in the Patent Field, Geneva, Sept 18-19, 2003 Doina

114 views • 8 slides
c12) United States Patent US 8,548,135 Bl (10) Patent No.: Lavian et al. (45) Date of Patent:

c12) United States Patent US 8,548,135 Bl (10) Patent No.: Lavian et al. (45) Date of Patent:

111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 US008548135B 1 c12) United States Patent US 8,548,135 Bl (10) Patent No.: Lavian et al. (45) Date of Patent: Oct. 1, 2013 (54) SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VISUAL 5,335,276 A

599 views • 23 slides
c12) United States Patent US 8,345,835 Bl (10) Patent No.: Or-Bach et al. (45) Date of Patent:

c12) United States Patent US 8,345,835 Bl (10) Patent No.: Or-Bach et al. (45) Date of Patent:

111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 US008345835Bl c12) United States Patent US 8,345,835 Bl (10) Patent No.: Or-Bach et al. (45) Date of Patent: *Jan. 1, 2013 (54) SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VISUAL 5,006,987 A

1.62k views • 135 slides
c12) United States Patent US 8,054,952 Bl (10) Patent No.: Or-Bach et al. (45) Date of Patent:

c12) United States Patent US 8,054,952 Bl (10) Patent No.: Or-Bach et al. (45) Date of Patent:

sta,_rt~) 111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 US008054952B 1 c12) United States Patent US 8,054,952 Bl (10) Patent No.: Or-Bach et al. (45) Date of Patent: *Nov. 8, 2011 5,708,422 A * (54) SYSTEMS AND METHODS

828 views • 51 slides
(12) United States Patent US 8,867,708 B1 (10) Patent N0.: *oa. 21, 2014 Lavian et a]. (45)

(12) United States Patent US 8,867,708 B1 (10) Patent N0.: *oa. 21, 2014 Lavian et a]. (45)

US008867708B1 (12) United States Patent US 8,867,708 B1 (10) Patent N0.: *oa. 21, 2014 Lavian et a]. (45) Date of Patent: 4,897,866 A 1/1990 Majmudar et a1. (54) SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VISUAL 5,006,987 A 4/1991 Harles PRESENTATION AND

542 views • 53 slides
US 8,903,073 B2 Page 3 8,041,575 B2 * 1012011 Agarwal et al . ............ 704/270.1 (56)

US 8,903,073 B2 Page 3 8,041,575 B2 * 1012011 Agarwal et al . ............ 704/270.1 (56)

1502,~-"-~ 111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 US008903073B2 (12) United States Patent US 8,903,073 B2 (10) Patent No.: Or-Bach et al. (45) Date of Patent: *Dec. 2, 2014 (54) SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR

1.59k views • 135 slides
lf r::::==1r _v;_,su_ph_one--,-----' ' c_l 108c 1047 106 102a 110 108n US

lf r::::==1r _v;_,su_ph_one--,-----' ' c_l 108c 1047 106 102a 110 108n US

~ 111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 US008594280B 1 c12) United States Patent US 8,594,280 Bl (10) Patent No.: Or-Bach et al. (45) Date of Patent: *Nov. 26, 2013 5,416,831 A 5/1995 Chewning, III eta!. (54)

662 views • 39 slides
Conflicts in Patent Prosecution: Avoiding the Ethical Pitfalls Minimizing Risks of Malpractice

Conflicts in Patent Prosecution: Avoiding the Ethical Pitfalls Minimizing Risks of Malpractice

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Conflicts in Patent Prosecution: Avoiding the Ethical Pitfalls Minimizing Risks of Malpractice Liability and Ethics Sanctions THURSDAY, JUNE 22, 2017 1pm Eastern | 12pm Central

395 views • 38 slides
Patent Infringement: Structuring Opinions of Counsel Leveraging Opinion Letters to Reduce the

Patent Infringement: Structuring Opinions of Counsel Leveraging Opinion Letters to Reduce the

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Patent Infringement: Structuring Opinions of Counsel Leveraging Opinion Letters to Reduce the Risks of Liability and Enhanced Damages TUESDAY, DECEMBER 13, 2016 1pm Eastern |

670 views • 35 slides
Patent Strategy 4 Where to file a first non-provisional patent application, as mentioned in

Patent Strategy 4 Where to file a first non-provisional patent application, as mentioned in

Patent Strategy 4 Where to file a first non-provisional patent application, as mentioned in Patent Strategy 3? (as of February 2017) Again The Starting Point We have a typical product development circle: Idea Functional Model

406 views • 23 slides
The European Patent Office An introduction to the EPO and the European patent system Siobhn

The European Patent Office An introduction to the EPO and the European patent system Siobhn

The European Patent Office An introduction to the EPO and the European patent system Siobhn Yeats Director, JC Biotechnology 6 July 2015 Our mission As the patent office for Europe, we support innovation, competitiveness and economic

625 views • 24 slides
Calculating Damages for Patent Infringement in Different Jurisdictions Special Feature by AIPF

Calculating Damages for Patent Infringement in Different Jurisdictions Special Feature by AIPF

Calculating Damages for Patent Infringement in Different Jurisdictions Special Feature by AIPF Patent Committee October 7, 2019 Introduction By: Brendan Nugent, Michael Buck IP A patent owner often enters patent litigation with the aim of

297 views • 8 slides
The Integrated Patent Instrument Christopher C. Funk Abstract Inventors who apply for a patent at

The Integrated Patent Instrument Christopher C. Funk Abstract Inventors who apply for a patent at

The Integrated Patent Instrument Christopher C. Funk Abstract Inventors who apply for a patent at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) routinely negotiate with the PTO over the patents scope. The written record of that negotiation is called

807 views • 46 slides
1 Today's European patent system The Union's patent package Legal instruments Unified

1 Today's European patent system The Union's patent package Legal instruments Unified

US Bar EPO Liaison Council 29th Annual Meeting Munich, 18 October 2013 2. Unitary patent protection and Unified Patent Court State of play October 2013 D522 International Legal Affairs European Patent Office, Munich Today's European

421 views • 6 slides
Unitary Patent in Europe & Unified Patent Court (UPC ) An overview and a comparison to the

Unitary Patent in Europe & Unified Patent Court (UPC ) An overview and a comparison to the

Leifert & Steffan European and German Patent, Trademark & Design Attorneys Unitary Patent in Europe & Unified Patent Court (UPC ) An overview and a comparison to the classical patent system in Europe 1 Leifert & Steffan

417 views • 20 slides
The Unitary Patent & The Unified Patent Court Andrew Clay Partner Intellectual Property

The Unitary Patent & The Unified Patent Court Andrew Clay Partner Intellectual Property

The Unitary Patent & The Unified Patent Court Andrew Clay Partner Intellectual Property & Technology Practice 37 Offices in 18 Countries Major Changes Ahead For The European Patent System The way the Europeans do patents is very

1.22k views • 35 slides
CERCLA Liability Distribution: Emerging Trends Establishing Arranger Liability and Apportionment

CERCLA Liability Distribution: Emerging Trends Establishing Arranger Liability and Apportionment

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A CERCLA Liability Distribution: Emerging Trends Establishing Arranger Liability and Apportionment of Liability Since Burlington Northern WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 12, 2014 1pm Eastern |

1.01k views • 100 slides
Forecasting Patent Filings at the European Patent Office (EPO) using compositional data analysis

Forecasting Patent Filings at the European Patent Office (EPO) using compositional data analysis

Forecasting Patent Filings at the European Patent Office (EPO) using compositional data analysis techniques. Peter Hingley, Financial Controlling and Statistics, European Patent Office, M unich, Germany phingley@epo.org Disclaimer: The forecasts

370 views • 18 slides
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD _______________ SAP AMERICA, INC. ET AL. Petitioner v. VERSATA DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC. Patent Owner _______________ Case CBM2012-00001 (MPT)

682 views • 50 slides

More recommend