Parallel Particle Impactors New Personal Samplers for Accurate - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Parallel Particle Impactors New Personal Samplers for Accurate - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Parallel Particle Impactors New Personal Samplers for Accurate Assessment of Worker Exposure to Respirable or Thoracic Dust Saulius Trakumas, Peter M. Hall, and Donald L. Smith SKC Inc., Eighty Four, Pennsylvania www.skcinc.com Sampler
Sampler should approximate particle
penetration through human respiratory tract when purpose of monitoring workers exposure to airborne particulates is health- related.
ACGIH, CEN, and ISO have defined sampling conventions for size-selective sampling of airborne health-related particles:
Inhalable (particles that enter nose/mouth) Thoracic (fraction of particles that
penetrates down to the larynx)
Respirable (fraction of particles that
penetrates down to the alveolar region of the lungs)
Size-selective Sampling Conventions for Health-related Airborne Particulates
Aerodynamic Particle Diameter, da, µm 1 10 100 Sampling Efficiency, E, % 25 50 75 100
Inhalable Thoracic Respirable
Size-selective Particle Samplers
Cyclone
Performance of Six Respirable Cyclones
Aluminum
Aerodynamic Particle Diameter, da, µm 2 4 6 8 10 Sampling Efficiency, E, % 25 50 75 100
Respirable Convention
Dorr-Oliver Cyclone, QS=1.7 L/min Test Aerosol:
DOP Glass Spheres Coal Mine Dust
Dorr-Oliver
Aerodynamic Particle Diameter, da, µm 2 4 6 8 10 Sampling Efficiency, E, % 25 50 75 100
Respirable Convention
GS-1 Cyclone, QS=2.0 L/min Test Aerosol:
DOP Glass Spheres Coal Mine Dust
GS-1 GS-3
Aerodynamic Particle Diameter, da, µm 2 4 6 8 10 Sampling Efficiency, E, % 25 50 75 100
Respirable Convention
SIMPED Cyclone, QS=2.2 L/min Test Aerosol:
DOP Glass Spheres Coal Mine Dust
BGI-4CP
Aerodynamic Particle Diameter, da, µm 2 4 6 8 10 Sampling Efficiency, E, % 25 50 75 100
Respirable Convention
BGI-4CP Cyclone, QS=2.2 L/min Test Aerosol:
DOP Glass Spheres Coal Mine Dust
SIMPED
Aerodynamic Particle Diameter, da, µm 2 4 6 8 10 Sampling Efficiency, E, % 25 50 75 100
Respirable Convention
GS-3 Cyclone, QS=2.75 L/min Test Aerosol:
DOP Glass Spheres Coal Mine Dust
Aerodynamic Particle Diameter, da, µm 2 4 6 8 10 Sampling Efficiency, E, % 25 50 75 100
Respirable Convention
Aluminum Cyclone, QS=2.5 L/min Test Aerosol:
DOP Glass Spheres Coal Mine Dust
Size-selective Particle Samplers
Cyclone Foam
Size-selective Particle Samplers
Cyclone Foam Horizontal elutriator
Size-selective Particle Samplers
Cyclone Foam Horizontal elutriator Conventional impactor
Aerodynamic Particle Diameter, da, µm 2 4 6 8 10 Penetration, P, % 25 50 75 100
Respirable Convention Single Impactor: d50=4.0 µm Two impactors: d50=5.6, and 2.9 µm Four impactors: d50=6.6, 4.6, 3.5, and 2.2 µm Six impactors: d50=7.1, 5.4, 4.4, 3.7, 3.0, and 1.8 µm
Simulation of Respirable Curve Using Impactors
- V. Marple’s design of multiple-nozzle, single-
stage impactor*
2 1 V P ρ = ∆
50 50
9 CV WSt D
p
ρ µ = µ ρ
50
WV Re = W1 W2
* Virgil A. Marple. 1978. Simulation of Respirable Penetration Characteristics by Inertial Impaction.
- J. Aerosol Sci., Vol.9, pp.125-134.
8 0.87 3.5 53 0.33 2.2 1 2.4 5.8
- No. of nozzles
din, mm D50,µm 16 0.63 2.5 1 2.5 5.0
- No. of nozzles
din, mm D50,µm 23 0.48 3.0 5 1.0 4.2 109 0.22 2.1 1 2.3 6.4
- No. of nozzles
din, mm D50,µm Qs=2.0 Lpm
Parallel Particle Impactor (PPI)
2 1 V P ρ = ∆
iOut iIn i
P P P ∆ + ∆ = ∆
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 1
2 1 2 1 ..... 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1
NOut NIn Out In Out In
V V V V V V ρ ρ ρ ρ ρ ρ + = = + = +
⎟ ⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜ ⎜ ⎝ ⎛ + = = ⎟ ⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜ ⎜ ⎝ ⎛ + = ⎟ ⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜ ⎜ ⎝ ⎛ +
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 2 1
1 1 ..... 1 1 1 1
NOut NIn N Out In Out In
S S Q S S Q S S Q
W1in W2in
*US Patent pending
W1out W2out
Parallel Particle Impactor Prototype
1.33 2.06 4.6 2.59 1.30 2.2 1.40 1.73 3.5 1.30 2.59 6.6 dout, mm din, mm D50,µm
Respirable PPI (Qs=2.0 Lpm)
2.18 4.00 11.9 5.10 2.12 4.8 2.25 3.25 8.9 2.12 5.10 17.5 dout, mm din, mm D50,µm
Thoracic PPI (Qs=2.0 Lpm)
Experimental Setup
% 100 ) ( ) ( ) ( × = d C d C d E
Up Down
Test aerosol used:
DOP PST Glass Spheres Coal Mine Dust
Clean Air (50 Lpm) Virtual Impactor Charge Neutralizer Turbulence Generators Honeycomb Flow Straightener Clear Plexiglass Cylinder (D=12 , H=48 ) ” ” Access Port Foam Sampling Lines Ball Valve Test Device To Filter Makeup Flow Aerosol Generator Aerodynamic Particle Sizer (APS 3320)
APS was calibrated periodically using PSL
particles of known size
To minimize erroneous counts and coincidence
effect, small test particles were removed before entering test chamber using a virtual impactor and test particle concentration inside the chamber was kept below 100 cm-3.
Experimental Setup
Aerodynamic Particle Diameter, da, µm 2 4 6 8 10 12 Penetration, P, % 25 50 75 100
QS=0.5 L/min PST test particles Impactor 50% cut-off, d50, µm No Design Measured 1 6.6 6.4 2 4.6 4.7 3 3.5 3.6 4 2.2 2.3
Performance of Individual Impactors of Respirable PPI Prototype
Overall Performance of Respirable PPI Prototype
Aerodynamic Particle Diameter, da, µm 2 4 6 8 10 12 Penetration, P, % 25 50 75 100
QS=2.0 L/min PST test particles Curve constructed using experimental data obtained for each individual impactor Performance of whole sampler Respirable Convention Performance of sampler exposed to coal mine dust for 6 hours (~ 4.5 mg/m3)
Aerodynamic Particle Diameter, da, µm 2 4 6 8 10 12 Penetration, P, % 25 50 75 100
Test Particles: PST (ρp=1.79 g/cc) DOP (ρp=0.99 g/cc) Glass Spheres (ρp=2.5 g/cc) Respirable Convention
Performance of Respirable PPI Prototype when Tested Using Different Test Particles
Aerodynamic Particle Diameter, da, µm 2 4 6 8 10 12 Penetration, P, % 25 50 75 100
HD Cyclone, QS=2.2 L/min Respirable Convention PPI, QS=2.0 L/min
Comparison of Performance of Respirable PPI Prototype and HD Cyclone
Bias Maps of Respirable PPI Prototype and HD Cyclone
1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25
Geometric Standard Deviation, GSD Mass Median Diameter, MMAD, µm
1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5
<-10% -10%< <-5% -5%< <5% 5%< <10% >10%
Respirable PPI prototype HD Cyclone
Inlet Exhaust Impaction Plate
Parallel Particle Impactor Final Design
Performance of Respirable and Thoracic PPIs
Aerodynamic Particle Diameter, da, µm Penetration, P, %
25 50 75 100
Respirable PPI Thoracic PPI Thoracic Convention Respirable Convention
0.5 1 5 10 50
Conclusion
A novel design incorporating several inertial
impactors arranged in parallel was applied to fabricate respirable and thoracic PPIs.
PPIs were found to follow accurately appropriate
- conventions. PPI samplers performed equally well
for liquid and solid test particles and penetration characteristics remained unchanged after prolonged exposure to coal mine dust.
Conclusion
The suggested PPI design can be applied to model
a sampler with characteristics simulating the shape
- f any monotonically changing predetermined curve