Orient ntatio ion W Webina inar Fri riday, No November 1 r 17 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Orient ntatio ion W Webina inar Fri riday, No November 1 r 17 2: 2:00 00-3: 3:30 E 30 EDT 1

2

3

HISTORY OF COLLABORATION T he issue o f c o o rdina tio n a c ro ss syste ms to se rve disa dva nta g e d yo uth ha s b e e n the fo c us o f b i- pa rtisa n a nd fe de ra l a tte ntio n fo r de c a de s: o Co o rdina ting Co unc il o n Juve nile Justic e a nd De linq ue nc y Pre ve ntio n o White Ho use T a sk F o rc e fo r Disa dva nta g e d Yo uth o Sha re d Yo uth Visio n o I nte ra g e nc y Wo rking Gro up o n Yo uth Pro g ra ms o My Bro the rs K e e pe r 4

CONSOLIDATED APPROPRIATIONS ACT OF 2014 Allo ws fo r the de ve lo pme nt o f P3 Pilo t site s using funds re c e ive d fro m multiple F e de ra l stre a ms while me a suring a nd tra c king spe c ific c ro ss-pro g ra m o utc o me s: o po o ling o f disc re tio na ry funds o re g ula to ry wa ive rs fo r no n ma nda to ry pro g ra m rule s 5

PROGRAM GOALS o ve rc o me pro g ra m silo s a nd fra g me nte d syste ms • to use e xisting re so urc e s to he lp disc o nne c te d yo uth impro ve in the a re a s o f • e duc a tio n, e mplo yme nt, a nd o the r ke y a re a s tha t he lp de ve lo p pro te c tive fa c to rs. I ndividua ls b e twe e n the a g e s o f 14 a nd 24 o Me e t lo w-inc o me e lig ib ility o E ithe r ho me le ss, in fo ste r c a re , invo lve d in the juve nile justic e syste m o Une mplo ye d, o r no t e nro lle d in o r a t risk o f dro pping o ut o f a n o e duc a tio na l institutio n. 6

FEDERAL PARTNERS De pa rtme nt o f E duc a tio n (L e a d Ag e nc y) • De pa rtme nts o f L a b o r • De pa rtme nt o f He a lth a nd Huma n Se rvic e s • Co rpo ra tio n fo r Na tio na l a nd Co mmunity • Se rvic e De pa rtme nt o f Justic e • De pa rtme nt o f Ho using a nd Urb a n • De ve lo pme nt I nstitute o f Muse um a nd L ib ra ry Sc ie nc e s • 7

PILOT SITES Co ho rt I • L o s Ang e le s City | Bro wa rd Co unty | Chic a g o | I ndia na po lis | E a ste rn K e ntuc ky | Ba to n Ro ug e | Okla ho ma | Ysle ta de l Sur Pue b lo | Se a ttle Co ho rt I I • Ma ric o pa Co unty Co ho rt I I I • Ne w Yo rk Sta te | Sa c ra me nto | L o s Ang e le s Co unty | Ne w Yo rk City | Ha rtfo rd | Sa ndo va l Co unty 8

PROGRAM DATA Pa rtic ipa nt da ta a re c a pture d two wa ys: E va lua tio n a nd Da ta Sha ring Ag re e me nts o Qua rte rly Re po rting E D 524B - De mo g ra phic o Da ta Supple me nt Pa rtic ipa nt da ta a re use d: Sha re o ur sto ry with sta ke ho lde rs o I de ntify g a ps in se rvic e s o r a re a s o f ne e d o Hig hlig ht suc c e sse s o 9

DATA AT A GLANCE* Gender 0% 2% 45% Male Female 53% Other Unknown *Q1 data. For point of reference only. Not all grantees data included. 10

DATA AT A GLANCE* 11

12

13

FEDERAL PARTNER AGENCIES Lead A Admini nist stering ng A Agency (U.S. . Department nt o of Educ ucation on) • • Manage pilot selection process • Monitor expenditure of “start-up” grant funds by pilots • Collect performance reports and disseminate them to Federal agencies • Coordinate technical assistance contract (Jobs for the Future) Lead ead Agen gency f for E r Eval aluation (U. U.S. De Department o of L Labor) • • Manage the national evaluation of P3 • Provide technical assistance to pilots on evaluation-related issues Consul nsulting ng A Agency • • Lead monitoring of the pilot and serve as principal point of contact • Seek to resolve implementation challenges Pa Parti ticipatin ating A Agency • • Assist with monitoring pilot performance • Inform the Consulting Agency of issues and concerns involving its programs 14

P3 ROUND 3 AGENCY ROLES Pil Pilot Consult lting Agency ncy Partici icipat atin ing Agency ncy Hartford Labor Health & Human Services Los Angeles County Labor -- New York City Health & Human Labor Services New York State Education Justice Education Department Sacramento Health & Human Labor Services 15

Tara S ara Smit mith Job obs for or the he F Fut uture ure ts tsmit mith@jf h@jff.org rg 16

TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TEAM 17

TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE ACTIVITIES Targeted, str trategic tech chnical assis istance wil will be de develope oped based d on on th the ne needs and nd pr priorities of of th the P3 3 grantees. As Assigned T TA A Coa oach a and nd Peer E Exch change Netwo work regula regu larly ly sc sched heduled led (PEN) PEN) m mee eetings gs coaching ca coa calls Peer sharing calls with Peer learning calls with other Round 2/3 P3 Round 1 P3 grantees grantees Webinars Affinity Groups and Communities of Practice 18

TOOLS FOR COMMUNITY-BASED INITIATIVES Resources developed by the TA Team to support community-based initiatives Available at: http://www.jff.org/initiatives/place-based-initiatives-and- performance-partnership-pilots/tools 19

FISCAL MAPPING FOR COMMUNITY-BASED INITIATIVES Fis Fiscal al m mapp appin ing t technic ical al assist assistan ance inclu ncludes:  Fisca cal l mapp appin ing t tool ool an and g guid ide memo o (avail ailable at at: : http:/ ://www www.jff.org/ g/initiati tives/pla lace-based ed- in init itiat iativ ives-an and-per performa mance-par artnershi ship- pil pilots/ s/fisc iscal-ma mappi pping-tool ool)  Webi bina nar r seri ries a and nd r resource ces for co r communi nities gettin ing st star arted wit ith fisc iscal mapp appin ing  Subj bject ct mat atter expert sit site visit isits s (se select com ommunit itie ies) s) 20

RESOURCES TO SUPPORT COMMUNITY-BASED INITIATIVES  Yout outh. h.Go Gov: https: ps://youth.gov/ JFF FF Webpages on the on the PBI PBI & P3 P3 I Initiativ nitiative:  http http:// //ww www.jff.org/initiat initiativ ives/p /place-ba based- initiativ initiatives-and and-perform rmanc nce-par artne nership ip-pi pilo lots  Forum for Y Youth I Invest estmen ent’s W s Web ebsite: e: http://f /foru rumfyi fyi.org rg/ 21

22

NATIONAL EVALUATION CONTACTS • Christina Yancey, Project Officer • U.S. Department of Labor, Chief Evaluation Office • Yancey.Christina.L@dol.gov • Linda Rosenberg, Project Director • Mathematica Policy Research • LRosenberg@mathematica-mpr.com • Cay Bradley, Evaluation Technical Assistance Lead • Mathematica Policy Research • CBradley@mathematica-mpr.com Study overview: https://www.dol.gov/asp/evaluation/currentstudies/Performance_Partnership_Pilot s_for_Disconnected_Youth_National_Evaluation.htm 23

WHAT IS THE NATIONAL EVALUATION OF P3? • Overall objective is to fully document the P3 effort. Further, based on the results from local evaluations at each of the nine cohort 1 pilots, the study will highlight effective and promising practices for achieving employment-related outcomes for youth. • Four main components • Implementation and systems study (all pilots) • Evaluation technical assistance (all pilots with local evaluations) • Pilot data reporting (cohort 1) • Synthesis of local P3 pilot evaluations (cohort 1) SOCIAL POLICY RESEARCH ASSOCIATES 24

IMPLEMENTATION AND SYSTEMS STUDY • Objectives • Learn how individual pilots are using their granted flexibilities to improve the outcomes of disconnected youth • Examine how flexibilities enhance community partnerships and systems • Identify lessons and promising areas for building on the P3 approach • Data collected through a site visit to each Cohort 2/3 pilot • Interviews with program administrators and staff • Interviews with partner administrators and staff • Short survey of partner administrators • Group discussions with P3 participants • In 2018, evaluation team member will contact pilots to discuss plans for the visit 25

EVALUATION TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE: AN IMPORTANT RESOURCE FOR PILOTS • Objectives of evaluation technical assistance (eval TA) • To support P3 pilots’ local evaluations • To develop evidence of successful models that meet research clearinghouse standards • For pilots with local evaluations, including: • Experimental and quasi-experimental studies • Implementation studies • Key eval TA staff: • Cay Bradley, cbradley@mathematica-mpr.com • Diana McCallum, dmccallum@mathematica-mpr.com 26

EVAL TA: KEY ACTIVITIES FOR PILOTS WITH A LOCAL EVALUATION • Prepare a logic model • Summarize the evaluation design in either: • An implementation evaluation plan (no comparison group) • An impact evaluation plan (comparison or control group) • Discuss evaluation plan with eval TA liaison(s) and revise as needed • Meet with eval TA liaison(s) to discuss evaluation as it begins and as needed • Raise questions, problems, or concerns with eval TA liaisons 27