One Project The Benefits of Collaborative Project Delivery Your - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

One Project The Benefits of Collaborative Project Delivery Your Logo

Agenda The AIA/MBA Joint Committee 1 Why is Collaborative Project Delviery Important? 2 3 Collaboration in Project Delivery Systems 4 Case Studies 5 Strategies for Owners 6 Discussion 7 Resources Your Logo

The AIA/MBA Joint Committee 1 Why is Collaborative Project Delviery Important? 2 3 Collaboration in Project Delivery Systems 4 Case Studies 5 Strategies for Owners 6 Discussion 7 Resources Your Logo

The AIA/MBA Joint Committee Promoting Collaboration Chartered in 1965, the AIA-MBA Joint Committee provides a unique forum for Architects, General Contractors and Owners to meet and discuss existing conditions of the construction industry. As a result of this forum, a set of guidelines was created to reflect the best practices for procedures involving drawings and specifications, bidding, contract documents and administrative procedures during construction.

The AIA/MBA Joint Committee 1 Why is Collaborative Project Delviery Important? 2 3 Collaboration in Project Delivery Systems 4 Case Studies 5 Strategies for Owners 6 Discussion 7 Resources Your Logo

Collaborative Project Delivery Why is it important now? • Fragmentation in traditional delivery systems causes poor performance

Collaborative Project Delivery Why is it important now? ‘ Ours is the only trillion dollar industry in the history of the world in which misguided owners demand processes that increase cost and reduce quality .’ The Owner’s Dilemma , 2010 Barbara White Bryson with Canan Yetmen

Collaborative Project Delivery Why is it important now?

Collaborative Project Delivery Why is it important now? • Complexity of Projects

Collaborative Project Delivery Why is it important now? • Environmental Sustainability

Collaborative Project Delivery Why is it important now? • Information Management Tools Require It Adapted Autodesk Diagram

The AIA/MBA Joint Committee 1 Why is Collaborative Project Delviery Important? 2 Collaboration in Project Delivery Systems 3 4 Case Studies 5 Strategies for Owners 6 Discussion 7 Resources Your Logo

Collaborative Project Delivery Project Delivery Systems • The Traditional Fragmented Process Design Construction

Collaborative Project Delivery Project Delivery Systems • Boundaries are Beginning to Blur Design Construction

Collaborative Project Delivery Project Delivery Systems • No “Pure” (or Perfect) Delivery Systems “IPD” Design/Build CM at Risk CM Advisor Design/Bid/Build Design Construction

Collaborative Project Delivery Project Delivery Systems • Key Principles of Integration/Collaboration Behavioral Organizational Contractual • Mutual Trust & • Strong Leadership • Mutual Risk and Respect Reward • Jointly Developed • Open Goals • Financial Incentives Communication Tied to Goals • Appropriate • Willingness to Technology (BIM) & • Early Key Participant Collaborate Other Tools Involvement • Collaborative • Intensified Planning • Multi-Party Contracts Innovation • Co-Location • Liability Waivers • Collaborative • Fiscal Transparency Decision Making

Collaborative Project Delivery Project Delivery Systems • Delivery Method by Procurement Option Less Collaborative More Collaborative Matrix Courtesy of AGC Project Delivery Systems for Construction - Michael E. Kenig

What is it? Project Delivery Systems • All Else Fails Without Trust

The AIA/MBA Joint Committee 1 Why is Collaborative Project Delviery Important? 2 3 Collaboration in Project Delivery Systems 4 Case Studies 5 Strategies for Owners 6 Discussion 7 Resources Your Logo

Collaborative Project Delivery Case Studies Cardinal Wuerl North Catholic High School Project Cost $43,283,000 Project Schedule Design: 1/2011 - 4/2012 Construction: 5/2012 - 1/2014 Project Delivery Method Design Bid Build Contract Type AIA Construction Manager Advisor Campayno Consulting Services Architect of Record Astorino General Contractor/Lead Contractor Mascaro Construction Company

Collaborative Project Delivery Case Studies Cardinal Wuerl North Catholic High School Major Impetus for Higher Levels of Collaboration: • Owner wanting to use this project to embrace BIM • Owner wanting to structure information for operations and maintenance phase Collaborative Principles Used • Behavioral • Open Communication • Willingness to Collaborate • Organizational • Strong Leadership • Early Jointly Developed Goal Definition • Appropriate Technology and other Implementation Tools • Co-location • Contractual • Early Involvement of Key Participants Outcomes/Keys to Success • Early involvement of Mascaro prior to release of CD’s to structure a collaborative BIM implementation plan • Getting buy-in from all participants to buy into the goal of doing what is best for the project success • Sharing information and contributing in an open environment

Collaborative Project Delivery Case Studies UPMC Clinical Lab Project Size Renovation: 133,000 sf Project Cost Project: $38 M Project Schedule 17 months Project Delivery Method Negotiated / CM-at-Risk Contract Type AIA A133 (GMP) Team Massaro Perkins Eastman

Collaborative Project Delivery Case Studies UPMC Clinical Lab Major Impetus for Higher Levels of Collaboration: • Project Complexity – repurposing a building not ideally suited as a laboratory building presented major risk for budget and schedule overruns due to extremely complex MEP coordination issues • Budget – unrealistic budget set early in the project required high collaboration to ensure maximum amount of program scope was accomplished within delivery time period Collaborative Principles Used Outcomes/Keys to Success • Behavioral • Project done on schedule and close to original budget • Mutual Trust and Respect despite unrealistic expectations and changes due to existing conditions • Open Communication • On time delivery provided owner with flexibility to deal with • Willingness to Collaborate planning for the Patients Affordable Care Act • Organizational • Higher collaboration provided real time changes and key • Early Jointly Developed Goal Definition player feedback on constructability and value engineering • Intensified Planning • Getting entire team working together to solve complex • Appropriate Technology and other logistical issues virtually before becoming major time Implementation Tools consuming field issues • Contractual • Early Involvement of Key Participants • Fiscal Transparency

Collaborative Project Delivery Case Studies Bechtel MRTC & A6 Buildings Project Cost $15.4 Million Project Scope To deliver two mirror image office buildings on Separate, adjoining parcels of land Project Schedule Design: August 2, 2012 – May 3, 2013 Construction: February 1, 2013 – April 24, 2014 Project Delivery Method Design-Build Contract Type Bechtel’s Standard D -B Purchase Order General Contractor/Lead Contractor DCK Worldwide Architect of Record Paradigm Architecture/Michael Baker, Inc.

Collaborative Project Delivery Case Studies Bechtel MRTC & A6 Buildings Major Impetus for Higher Levels of Collaboration: • Bechtel was dissatisfied with the collaborative levels achieved on previous D-B Projects so the retained a consultant from the DBIA to guide the process. • Owner needs to have a Fixed-Firm Price contract – could not have change orders or cost overruns. • Owner has historically been viewed as a very difficult owner and wanted to change their reputation with contractors. Collaborative Principles Used • Behavioral • Open Communication • Willingness to Collaborate • Mutual Trust and Respect • Organizational • Jointly Developed Goals • Co- Location (dck’s Office, Baker’s Office, PNC Park) • Appropriate Technology - BIM used • Contractual • Early Key Participant Involvement (MEP Subs were part of the team before the RFP was released) • Financial Incentives Tied to Goals • Fiscal Transparency Outcomes/Keys to Success

Collaborative Project Delivery Case Studies Cleveland Clinic Marymount Hospital Surgery Expansion Project Size Addition: 43,965 sf - Renovation: 29,458 sf Project Cost Project: $45 M - Construction: $27.5 M Project Schedule Design: 2008 - 2010 Construction: Nov’10 – March’12 (Addition) & May’13 (Renovation) Project Delivery Method CM with Design Assist Partners and Lump Sum Bidders Contract Type Separate Contracts between Owner/Architect/CM with a performance charter Partners Cleveland Clinic – Bostwick Design Partnership – Karpinski Engineering – Turner Construction