Juxtaposition of several signaling systems on HSL lines : the example of the Tours-Bordeaux HSL and future capacity stakes Jean Claude ZABEE Senior Vice President France SYSTRA Thursday, 9th July 2015, Session : 7A – Signalling -
Contents Introduction and fast presentation of the HSR Tours Bordeaux General architecture selected and the rationale to support this choice, Major performances and RAMS requirements of the two systems, How several particular issues due to the juxtaposition of the 2 systems have been considered; Approach taken to handle interfaces with neighboring systems, Methodology adopted for verification and validation. Further opportunities for potential capacity increase on such systems based on the architecture chosen and present additional development that will allow this type of lines to cope with future traffic increase. Jean Claude ZABEE Senior Vice President France SYSTRA 2 Thursday, 9th July 2015, Session : 7A – Signalling
« Sud Europe Atlantique » HSL Main Project Characteristic Tours - Bordeaux extension to the Paris - Tours HSL Around 300 km length Eight connections, combined length around 40km No new stations In - Service Date : End of July 2017 Two signalling systems, independently optimised (max speed, headway) • TVM/SEI 300 • ERTMS Level 2 Jean Claude ZABEE Senior Vice President France SYSTRA 3 Thursday, 9th July 2015, Session : 7A – Signalling
Signalling & Telecoms Schedule A comprehensive scope, from up-stream Design to Systems trials and In-Service preparation activities J ULY 2015 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 D ETAILED D ESIGN C OMMISSIONNING S2 IN 2 PHASES 35 TECHNICAL C OMMERCIAL OPERATING L.G.V. S IGNALLING F ACILITIES BUILD - UP AND CABLING F ACILITIES T ELECOM S ITES DEPLOYMENT 56 GSM-R S ITES T ESTS & T RIAL P LATFORM WORKS RUNS W AY - SIDE WORKS T ECHNICAL C HECKS & T ESTS P H .2 T ESTS P H .3 Jean Claude ZABEE Senior Vice President France SYSTRA 4 Thursday, 9th July 2015, Session : 7A – Signalling
Signalling Solutions: providing Safety and Performance Two Signalling solutions are implemented on SEA Infrastructure, in order to maximise line capacity and increase flexibility: The « SEI/TVM 300 » solution, a highly reliable legacy Command & Control solution, providing operational continuity for the existing Rolling Stock base 300 km/h cruising speed, 3’45’’ headway (for 12 / 13 trains / hour in operation) The ERTMS solution, providing European interoperability and access to a wide range of TOCs 320 km/h cruising speed, 2’45’’ headway (for 15 / 16 trains / hour in operation) We provide Safe Command & Control Systems Design, Implementation and Testing with dual signalling rail operation, through unitary and combined performance optimisation Jean Claude ZABEE Senior Vice President France SYSTRA 5 Thursday, 9th July 2015, Session : 7A – Signalling
ERTMS : improved performance based on proven equipment C ENTRALISED C OMMAND S TATION (CCS) SEI ( INTERLOCKING ) CAI +TVM 300 ( GROUND ) ERTMS MMS INTERFACE P OINT MACHINES LEU RBC GSM-R A NTENNA Nf T RACK CIRCUITS E UROBALISES MODEM BTS ERTMS N2 ON - TRACK SEGMENT TVM RECEIVER EVC BSC T RANSMISSION N ETWORK O DOMETER O N - BOARD EQUIPMENTS Jean Claude ZABEE Senior Vice President France SYSTRA 6 Thursday, 9th July 2015, Session : 7A – Signalling
RAMS The contract of concession fixes three categories of criteria : 1. The rate of trains irregularity must be lower or equal in one minute by one thousand trains x kilometers 2. The global unavailability time of the line (not normal service) must be lower than 120 minutes a year, what corresponds to an very ambitious availability of 99,98 % 3. A maximum number of disruptive incidents is fixed : 1. Indicator F1 for the very disruptive incidents (delays superior to 200 minutes: one a year for the signalling) 2. Indicator F2 for the other incidents (15 incidents a year for 100 km of simple way). In practice, all these requirements are very ambitious ! Jean Claude ZABEE Senior Vice President France SYSTRA 7 Thursday, 9th July 2015, Session : 7A – Signalling
How several particular issues due to the juxtaposition of the 2 systems have been considered Examples • Stopping distances of approach of the particular points really very different • Coherent distances of slowing down between both systems to manage in safety stops the detections of hot boxes • … Approach taken to handle interfaces with neighboring systems Examples • Transition ERTMS Level 2 towards TVM 300 • Connectings towards the conventional network with speed of 220 / 230 kph • … Jean Claude ZABEE Senior Vice President France SYSTRA 8 Thursday, 9th July 2015, Session : 7A – Signalling
Methodology adopted for verification and validation : TVM 300 who does what ? DPR COSEA System System Requirements SGST integration Specification : Signalling Program Signalling Technical Design Validation Principles Ansaldo STS Detailed Design Jean Claude ZABEE Senior Vice President France SYSTRA 9 Thursday, 9th July 2015, Session : 7A – Signalling
Methodology adopted for verification and validation : ERTMS Level 2 who does what ? System requirement DPR COSEA Specifications System SGST Integration R2V Functional SGST Validation ( independant entity ) External Check Ansaldo STS Product Specification Development Jean Claude ZABEE Senior Vice President France SYSTRA 10 Thursday, 9th July 2015, Session : 7A – Signalling
We see well the potential capacity to increase gradually the performances from such systems based on the chosen architecture and few complementary additional developments We can imagine a passage in a commercial speed in 350 kph allowed by the design of the SEA HSR These type of solutions would allow a fast passage at reasonable costs for lines equipped with the only TVM 300 Jean Claude ZABEE Senior Vice President France SYSTRA 11 Thursday, 9th July 2015, Session : 7A – Signalling
...Thank you for your kind attention
Recommend
More recommend