Ohio Federal and Military Jobs Commission (OFMJC) Support Ohio - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Ohio Federal and Military Jobs Commission (OFMJC) Support Ohio Federal Research Network (OFRN) Improving Ohio’s Economy Through R&D WSU ‐ Dennis Andersh OSU ‐ Marty Kress https://ohiofrn.org/

Ohio Federal Research Network (OFRN) $31.9M of State Funding Total for FY16‐19 Growing Ohio’s Economy by Leveraging Research and Development $350 million in new federal research contracts over five years WPAFB/NASA Glenn Priorities Project Requirement, Federal Alignment, Technical Concept & Approach Sponsoring Organization (s) AFRL NASA Glenn  Human Performance/ Health Sciences  Hybrid Electric Propulsion  Hypersonics  Air-breathing Propulsion  Directed Energy Weapons (Lasers)  Advanced Communications  Autonomy  Solar Electric Propulsion  C4ISR  Power and Energy Storage  LVC  Materials and Manufacturing  Materials/ Manufacturing NASIC  Propulsion  Cyber Naval Medical Research Unit  Data analytics  Human performance  C4ISR  Human physiology  Modeling/Simulation/Analysis  Manned /unmanned aeromedical ops  Hypersonics  Toxicology  Directed Energy  Risk assessment  Space Systems Impact to Date Team & Economic Impact For State of Ohio Budget, Schedules, Deliverables, & Risks Next Steps • Collaboration and Proposal Quality is increasing dramatically ‐ yet requires • Ohio FY18‐19 Budget included $3.45M / Yr for OFRN continued support and focus • • Have $1.9M remaining from previous budget cycle. Projects required a lead university, 2 partner universities, and at least one • Investing up to $8.8M in Round 3 Industry sponsor and Federal sponsor. • 11 of 13 Ohio Research Universities • Submitted a $15M Federal Request in FY18 Defense Budget and • won competitive funding from Round 1 and Round 2 ‐ $18 million in awards Submitting in FY19 Defense Budget • Worked with Universities to improve their success going forward. • Working with entire Ohio Federal House and Senate legislative • 57 Business Partners engaged ‐ delegation. • half are small businesses ‐ $1.6 million awarded to industry • Got $10M FY18 NDAA for AFRL. • Industry Days and regional meetings held throughout the state • Got $10M in FY19 House and Senate NDAA for AFRL • Multiple Universities Across State Pursuing Joint Efforts Across DoD • Round 3 RFP process is ongoing‐‐designed to foster integrated • Joint Proposals in Excess of $350M are now in the Pipeline across Ohio solutions • Universities have won $117M+ in new awards from DARPA, ONR, AFRL, • OFRN will invest $7M to $10M in projects NASA, and IARPA 2 .

Ohio Federal Research Network (OFRN) $31.9M of State Funding Total for FY16‐19 Growing Ohio’s Economy by Leveraging Research and Development $350 million in new federal research contracts over five years NASA Glenn Air Force Research National Air & Space Naval Medical State of Ohio Research Center Laboratory (AFRL) Intelligence Center Research Unit (GRC) Priorities Priorities (NASIC) Priorities (NAMRU) Priorities Wright State University Technical Review Executive Review Board & The Ohio State Council University C4ISR & Data Human Power and Energy Storage Materials and Adv. C2PNT Analytics Performance and Propulsion and Integration Manufacturing Ohio Univ. Wright State Univ. Health Sciences Ohio State Univ. Case Western Univ. of Dayton Ohio State Univ. Wright State Univ. Reserve Univ. Outcomes: $20M in OFRN Funds leading to $117M in follow‐on and $350M in process 3

OCPP COE - Hybrid/Turboelectric Propulsion and Power Project Requirement, Federal Alignment, Technical Concept & Approach Sponsoring Organization (s)  Federal Stakeholder: NASA. Goals in NASA’s hybrid- turboelectric propulsion technology roadmap: o Power density 14 kW/kg for machine and 25 kW/kg for power converter. o Efficiency 99% for both machine and power converter.  Potential impact on federal stakeholder mission: o Innovations: slotless stator, caved rotor, hybrid switch, and 3-level T-typte neutral point clamp converter. Design and verify a 300-kW and 2-MW electric drive system o Benefits for federal customers: 1) understand risks for hybrid turbo/electric propulsion. solutions to achieve the power density/efficiency requirements; 2) identify the technology gaps between Challenges : high power density and high efficiency of the research and commercialization of large electrified aircraft. electric machine and power electronic converter. Team & Economic Impact For State of Ohio Budget, Schedules, Deliverables, & Risks  Period of performance: 36 months.  Major milestones:  Teams: OSU and University of Akron (UA) o Converter: tested the 3-phase 300-kW converter under full  Potential economic development impact for the State of load using a 100-kW permanent magnet machine. Ohio: o Machine: rotor failure analysis finished, rotor redesigned, o Create more jobs in the fields of electrified aircraft and sent for manufacturing. advanced power semiconductor devices. o Drive system: converter integrate with an alternative motor. o Additional research: NASA University Leadership Initiative  Deliverables: 300-kW machine prototype, 300-kW power ($10 M for 5 years), GE/State of Ohio ($2.5 M for 5 converter prototype, loss and weight estimation, 2-MW design. years), DoE vehicle program ($2 M for 3 years), NASA  Key technical risks: delay in motor manufacturing, high speed brushless doubly-fed machine program ($2 M for 3 years). operation stability.  Commercial impact industry/sector/business partners: o Aerospace, automotive, heavy-duty vehicle industry. o GE Aviation, NASA, AFRL, Boeing, Ford, GM, etc. o SAFRAN, SMART Microsystems. 4 Rev 06‐18

M&M COE – Adaptive Bio-Inspired Aerospace Structures Actuated by Shape Memory Alloys Project Requirement, Federal Alignment, Technical Concept & Approach Sponsoring Organization (s) OBJECTIVE: Develop High Temperature Shape Memory Alloys • NASA Glenn Research Center (High Temperature & Smart Alloys Branch) • 2015 NASA Technology Roadmaps TA 12: Materials, Structures, Mechanical Systems, and Manufacturing. • Shape-morphing materials for a variety of applications, i.e., control surfaces, deployable reentry vehicles, expandable habitats, and deformable mirrors actuators Team & Economic Impact For State of Ohio Budget, Schedules, Deliverables, & Risks • Univ of Toldeo, OSU, CWRU • Period of Performance: [24 months] Milestones • Estimate 20 jobs; ~$20M potential from creation of the Global • Identification of NASA desired composition for HTSMAs Center for Shape Memory Materials & Structures • Characterization of the structure of the HTSMAs using high- resolution TEM • Various fundamental and applied funding opportunities at Deliverables NASA, AFRL, US DOE, NSF, and DARPA • Alloy development for High Temperature SMAs by adding different amounts of ternary elements • Industry Partners: GE Aviation, Lincoln Electric, and Norman • Create functional shape memory and superelastic NiTiHf Noble Risks : • Thermodynamic stability of ternary additions to Ni-Ti • Embrittling 5 Rev 06‐18

Ohio PRESIDES COE - High Performance Multifunctional Structural Energy Storage Project Requirement, Federal Alignment, Technical Concept & Approach Sponsoring Organization (s) NASA + AFRL: multifunctional load‐bearing structures with energy storage functionality; potential weight & volume savings; Increase flight endurance and payload capacity; specific energy density >300 Wh/kg; long‐life >100 cycles; & safe. AFRL: Small and micro UAVs; self‐powered load‐bearing Create high‐performance multifunctional structural energy structures; autonomous sensor networks & surveillance storage systems. Establish multifunctional design rules and NASA: Structural energy storage for electric propulsion; cross‐ performance guidelines for their integration. Challenges: Manufacturing compatibility; Electrochemical cutting programs on light‐weighting and reduced onboard performance of embedded cells; Structural integrity of power for space & aero‐vehicles; extra‐vehicular suits; power structural battery; Thermal management. load‐leveling for solar powered missions. Team & Economic Impact For State of Ohio Budget, Schedules, Deliverables, & Risks Period of performance: 24 months PI: Vikas Prakash (CWRU) Key Milestones: Q1: Target applications, candidate structural NASA: J. M. Pereira, Patricia Loyselle materials and commercial batteries identified. AFRL: M. Rottmayer, J. Baur, T. Howell Q5: Multifunctional design of structure‐battery. University partners: Bo Li (CWRU); Bang‐Hung Tsao (UDRI) Q7: Prototype and Validation Industry partners: Jim Green (CSA America), Jeff Taylor (Event Q8: Multifunctional design rules, performance guidelines & 38 Unmanned Systems), B. Henslee (CRG Inc.) industry standards established. Economic impact: (in 2 years): Jobs: 2+; Follow‐on federal Key deliverable: Structure‐battery modules: sandwich funding: $300K/year structures, I‐beams etc. Focus—sUAS, more‐electric air‐vehicles Commercial Impact (sectors): Aerospace; Automotive; Key risk: None Energy; Consumer Electronics; Health 6 Rev 06‐18