of parameters in nonlinear identification benchmarks Anna - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

of parameters in nonlinear
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

of parameters in nonlinear identification benchmarks Anna - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

52 nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control Firenze, Italy, December 10-13, 2013 Study of the effective number of parameters in nonlinear identification benchmarks Anna Marconato, Maarten Schoukens, Yves Rolain and Johan Schoukens ELEC


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Study of the effective number

  • f parameters in nonlinear

identification benchmarks

Anna Marconato, Maarten Schoukens, Yves Rolain and Johan Schoukens ELEC – Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium

52nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control – Firenze, Italy, December 10-13, 2013

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Wiener-Hammerstein benchmark

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Effective number of parameters

 Property of the identified model  Degrees of freedom in the model parametrization

3

𝒐eff vs. 𝒐𝜾

Number of parameters

 SVMs?  Regularization?

𝒐𝜾 𝒐eff

slide-4
SLIDE 4

 E

 Motivation example: FIR case  Linear / Nonlinear in the parameters  Comparison on WH benchmark

4

Outline

𝒐eff vs. 𝒐𝜾

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Motivation: FIR example

𝑧 = 𝑕 𝑙𝑣 𝑢 − 𝑙

𝑒 𝑙=0

system response

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Motivation: FIR example

𝑧 = 𝑕 𝑙𝑣 𝑢 − 𝑙

𝑒 𝑙=0

𝑕 = 𝐿𝑈𝐿 −1𝐿𝑈𝑧

system response least squares solution

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Motivation: FIR example

?

least squares solution system response

𝑧 = 𝑕 𝑙𝑣 𝑢 − 𝑙

𝑒 𝑙=0

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Motivation: FIR example

𝑧 = 𝑕 𝑙𝑣 𝑢 − 𝑙

𝑒 𝑙=0

𝑕 = 𝐿𝑈𝐿 −1𝐿𝑈𝑧 = 𝑊Σ−1𝑉𝑈𝑧 = 𝑊𝜄 𝐿 = 𝑉Σ𝑊𝑈

SVD

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Motivation: FIR example

𝑕 = 𝑊 𝜄

𝑜𝜄 × 1 𝑜eff × 1

𝑕 = 𝑊𝜄

𝑜𝜄 × 1 𝑜θ × 1

truncated solution least squares solution system response

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Regressor matrix and 𝒐eff

LINEAR REGRESSION

𝜄 = 𝐿𝑈𝐿 −1𝐿𝑈𝑧 = 𝑊Σ−1𝑉𝑈𝑧

𝐿 = 𝑉Σ𝑊𝑈

SVD

𝑧 = 𝐿𝜄 Rank K 𝒐eff

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Jacobian matrix and 𝒐eff

NONLINEAR IN THE PARAMETERS

Δ𝜄 = 𝐾𝑈𝐾 −1𝐾𝑈𝑓 = 𝑊Σ−1𝑉𝑈𝑓 𝜄 𝑗+1 = 𝜄 𝑗 + Δ𝜄 Rank J 𝒐eff

𝐾 = 𝑉Σ𝑊𝑈

SVD

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

WH results: comparison

𝒐𝜾 =134 RMSE = 5.6 mV

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

WH results: singular values of J

threshold

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

WH results: 𝒐eff

𝑜eff = 𝜏𝑗

2

𝜏𝑗2 + 𝜇

𝑜𝜄 𝑗=1 REGULARIZATION (ridge regression)

𝜇 = 1 𝑜eff = 33

𝜏2

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

WH results: comparison

134 64 69 29 33 52

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Conclusion

Effective number of parameters

 Measure of model complexity for a given dataset

More correct comparison of nonlinear models

 WH benchmark

Rank reduced estimation based on truncated SVD

 NL in the parameters: still open problem

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Thank you for your attention! Any questions?

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Study of the effective number

  • f parameters in nonlinear

identification benchmarks

Anna Marconato, Maarten Schoukens, Yves Rolain and Johan Schoukens ELEC – Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium

52nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control – Firenze, Italy, December 10-13, 2013

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Silverbox results: comparison

𝒐𝜾 = 23 RMSE = 0.34 mV

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Silverbox results: comparison