nycar arshar are
play

NYCar arshar are Hunt unter Stud udio io - Spring 2019 19 1 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

NYCar arshar are Hunt unter Stud udio io - Spring 2019 19 1 Age genda da Introdu oduction on Client & Current Program Our Mission Benefits of Carshare Issues Purpose & Need Goals ls & O


  1. NYCar arshar are Hunt unter Stud udio io - Spring 2019 19 1

  2. Age genda da Introdu oduction on ● Client & Current Program ● Our Mission ● Benefits of Carshare ● Issues ● Purpose & Need Goals ls & O Objectiv ives Methodol odology ogy ● Case Studies ● Site Visits ● Survey & Public Response Rec ecommen endat ations Conclu lusio sion 2

  3. Client nt & Cur urrent nt Pro rogra ram NY NYC DO C DOT: Ca Carshare Pilot ● Two-year citywide pilot ● 283 designated carshare on-street parking spaces ● Zipcar & Enterprise NY NYC DO C DOT Goals: ● Lower household transportation costs ● Shorten search for parking ● Improve access to services & recreation ● Reduce congestion & improve air quality 3

  4. Introdu oduction on OUR M MISSI SSION: Create an ideal City-administered mobility program that is affordable, convenient, and sustainable to improve the quality of life of all New York City residents. 4

  5. Ben enef efits o of Car arshar are Affor orda dabl ble opt option on to owning ning a car Av Aver erag age c e car arshar are e veh ehicle e rem emoves es 9 9 - 13 3 privat atel ely owned ed veh ehicles es from t the r e road ad Red educes es VMT by 27 27% Hous useho hold lds red educe c e car arbon foot ootpr print by by 0.84 tons/yr yr Enha nhanc nces mobilit ility 5

  6. Issu ssues ● Operating carshare is logistically and financially challenging ● CSOs are not expanding user base beyond established markets ● One-way and two-way services cater to different populations ● Accurate curb value has not been assigned ● Average vehicle age increasing ● Insufficient enforcement of reserved carshare parking spaces 6

  7. Purpose e & Need eed Without inter erven ention, car arshar are e use m e may ay d dec ecline e an and p poten ential al ben enef efits may ay n not be r e real ealized ed ● Population and private vehicle rates are increasing ● Overburdened system - road and subway ● Increase in FHV use ● Environmental impacts - emissions & GHG ● Carshare not found in enough neighborhoods ● Not enough companies participating in carshare 7

  8. Go Goals Suppress future Reduce automobile Increase accessibility automobile ownership ownership 8

  9. Met hod odol olog ogy Conducted sit site v visit isits Creat eated ed survey ey for D DOT ○ Examined physical spaces & ○ 13% of car owners carshare vehicles would consider selling ○ 35% of spaces blocked by their car if there was a private vehicles convenient carshare service in their neighborhood ○ 50% use carshare for ‘recreational Exam amined ed cas ase s e studies es activities/vacations’ ○ ○ Car Next Door, Main reason (57%) for not owning a car is Australia: ○ ‘Alternative Partnerships to offset emissions transportation modes more convenient’. 9

  10. Rec ecommen endat ations 1. 1. Increase Awareness of Carshare 5. 5. Enforce Reserved Carshae Spaces 2. 2. Designate Optimal Site Locations 6. Reduce Cost of Carshare 6. 3. 3. Create Vendor Selection & Site 7. Increase Carshare Data Sharing 7. Distribution System 8. 8. Introduce Parking Permit Program 4. 4. Design Unique and Recognizable 9. 9. Develop Vehicle Buyback Program On-Street Reserved Spaces 10. 10. Expand Mobility Options 1 1 0 0

  11. Rec ecommen endat ations 1. In Increas ease Awar aren eness of of Car arshar are ● Community Outreach and Political Organizing ○ Public Events/Street Teams ○ Establish Partnerships with CBOs ● Advertising and Marketing Campaign ○ Targeted Advertising ○ Companies & City ● Enhance Carshare Visibility 1 1 1 1

  12. Rec ecommen endat ations 2. Des esignat ate O e Optimal al S Site e Locat ation ● Define characteristics ● Map criteria ● Analyze results 1 1 2 2

  13. Rec ecommen endat ations 3. Creat eate Sy System of of Vendor dor Sel elec ection & Si Site Dist istrib ibutio ion ● Prioritization zones ● Bundling spaces ○ High usage spaces vs low usage spaces ○ Desirable geographies vs less- desirable 1 1 3 3

  14. Rec ecommen endat ations 4. Des esign U Unique an e and Rec ecognizab able e On- Street eet R Res eser erved ed Spac aces es ● Residential streets vs Commercial streets ● Branding (City & Vendor) ● Multi-use elements ● Promote sustainability ● Promote multi-modal usage 1 1 4 4

  15. Rec ecommen endat ations 1 1 5 5

  16. Rec ecommen endat ations 1 1 6 6

  17. Rec ecommen endat ations 1 1 7 7

  18. Rec ecommen endat ations 1 1 8 8

  19. Rec ecommen endat ations 1 1 9 9

  20. Rec ecommen endat ations 20 20

  21. Rec ecommen endat ations 5. Enfor force Res eser erved ed Car arshar are Spac aces es ● Consistent parking enforcement ● Revenue generation ● Improve system of reporting blocked spaces 21 21

  22. Rec ecommen endat ations 6. R Red educe e Cost o of Car arshar are ● Subsidized memberships ● Subsidize carshare services ● Reduce NY State Tax on Carshare Vehicles Rentals 22 22

  23. Rec ecommen endat ations 7. In Increas ease Dat ata Sha haring ng ● CSO provide more data to the City ● Ensure personal data privacy ● City uses data to improve carshare 23 23

  24. Rec ecommen endat ations 8. Int ntroduc uce Pa Parking Pe Permit Progr ogram ● Limit free parking ● Create citywide permit system for residential vehicles ● Revenue generation source ● Create more equal access to curb space ● Reduce total vehicle ownership numbers 24 24

  25. Rec ecommen endat ations 9. Vehic icle le Buybac ack Progr ogram ● Remove older, higher emissions vehicles from the road ● Incentives ○ Tax Write Off ○ Cash Payment ○ Carshare Membership or Trips 25 25

  26. Rec ecommen endat ations 10 10. Ex Expand Mobilit ility Opt ption ons ● Increase membership of those living more than ½ mile from a subway station ● Improve walkability, biking, and public transit 26 26

  27. Conc nclus usion ● Next steps ● Limitations ● Further research 27 27

  28. Tha hank nk Y You! u! 28 28

Recommend


More recommend