not everything that counts can be counted and not
play

Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts. Albert Einstein Tehnology Capit al and the US Current A ount Ellen R. McGrattan and Edward C. Prescott October 2008 www.minneapolisfed.org /


  1. Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts. — Albert Einstein

  2. Te hnology Capit al and the US Current A ount Ellen R. McGrattan and Edward C. Prescott October 2008 www.minneapolisfed.org / research / economists / emcgrattan.html

  3. A Direct Investment (DI) Puzzle • BEA reports for 1982–2006: ◦ US companies earned 9 . 4% average returns ◦ Foreign companies earned 3 . 2% average returns on their foreign direct investment abroad

  4. A Direct Investment (DI) Puzzle % 14 Averages, 1982 − 2006 USDIA: 9.4% 12 FDIUS: 3.2% Why is the return 10 differential so large 8 Return on DI of US Companies Abroad and persistent? 6 4 2 0 Return on DI of Foreign Companies in US -2 1982 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003 2006

  5. Why is Return Differential Large?

  6. Why is Return Differential Large? 1. BEA returns are accounting measures 2. Timing of FDI different in US & ROW

  7. Why is Return Differential Large? 1. Multinationals have large intangible capital stocks 2. FDI in US is negligible until late 1970s

  8. Why is Return Differential Large? 1. Multinationals have large intangible capital stocks ◦ DI profits include intangible rents (+) less expenses ( − ) 2. FDI in US is negligible until late 1970s

  9. Why is Return Differential Large? 1. Multinationals have large intangible capital stocks ◦ DI profits include intangible rents (+) less expenses ( − ) ◦ DI stocks don’t include intangible capital 2. FDI in US is negligible until late 1970s

  10. Why is Return Differential Large? 1. Multinationals have large intangible capital stocks ◦ DI profits include intangible rents (+) less expenses ( − ) ◦ DI stocks don’t include intangible capital ⇒ BEA returns not equal economic 2. FDI in US is negligible until late 1970s

  11. Why is Return Differential Large? 1. Multinationals have large intangible capital stocks ◦ DI profits include intangible rents (+) less expenses ( − ) ◦ DI stocks don’t include intangible capital ⇒ BEA returns not equal economic 2. FDI in US is negligible until late 1970s ⇒ Timing of investments different in US & ROW

  12. Two Types of Intangible Capital 1. Intangible capital that is plant-specific 2. Technology capital that is not plant-specific

  13. Technology Capital • Is accumulated know-how from investments in ◦ R&D ◦ Brands ◦ Organization know-how which can be used in as many locations as firms choose

  14. Reported FDI Return ( r BEA ) • With no intangible capitals, r BEA = • With intangible capitals, r BEA =

  15. Reported FDI Return ( r BEA ) • With no intangible capitals, r BEA = after-tax profits/tangible capital • With intangible capitals, r BEA =

  16. Reported FDI Return ( r BEA ) • With no intangible capitals, r BEA = after-tax profits/tangible capital = economic return ( r ) • With intangible capitals, r BEA =

  17. Reported FDI Return ( r BEA ) • With no intangible capitals, r BEA = after-tax profits/tangible capital = economic return ( r ) • With intangible capitals, r BEA = ( r × tangible capital + . . . ) / tangible capital

  18. Reported FDI Return ( r BEA ) • With no intangible capitals, r BEA = after-tax profits/tangible capital = economic return ( r ) • With intangible capitals, r BEA = ( r × tangible capital + part of rent on technology capital+ . . . ) / tangible capital

  19. Reported FDI Return ( r BEA ) • With no intangible capitals, r BEA = after-tax profits/tangible capital = economic return ( r ) • With intangible capitals, r BEA = ( r × tangible capital + part of rent on technology capital + rent on plant-specific intangible+ . . . ) / tangible capital

  20. Reported FDI Return ( r BEA ) • With no intangible capitals, r BEA = after-tax profits/tangible capital = economic return ( r ) • With intangible capitals, r BEA = ( r × tangible capital + part of rent on technology capital + rent on plant-specific intangible − investment in plant-specific intangible) / tangible capital

  21. Reported FDI Return ( r BEA ) • With no intangible capitals, r BEA = after-tax profits/tangible capital = economic return ( r ) • With intangible capitals, r BEA = ( r × tangible capital + part of rent on technology capital + rent on plant-specific intangible − investment in plant-specific intangible) / tangible capital � = r

  22. Reported FDI Return ( r BEA ) • With no intangible capitals, r BEA = after-tax profits/tangible capital = economic return ( r ) • With intangible capitals, r BEA = ( r × tangible capital + part of rent on technology capital + rent on plant-specific intangible − investment in plant-specific intangible) / tangible capital Intangible rents key for US, investments for ROW

  23. What We Do • Develop model with time-varying openness to FDI ◦ Infer paths of degrees of openness & relative size from − FDI income flows − Net exports − Relative populations ◦ Assume all investments earn same economic return • Compute BEA statistics for the model economy

  24. What We Find • Use model where each investment earns 4.6% on average • We find average BEA returns on DI, 1982–2006: ◦ of US = 7.1% ◦ in US = 3.1%

  25. What We Find • Use model where each investment earns 4.6% on average • We find average BEA returns on DI, 1982–2006: ◦ of US = 7.1% .... BEA reports 9.4% ◦ in US = 3.1% .... BEA reports 3.2% ⇒ Mismeasurement accounts for over 60% of return gap

  26. What We Find • Use model where each investment earns 4.6% on average • We find average BEA returns on DI, 1982–2006: ◦ of US = 7.1% .... BEA reports 9.4% ◦ in US = 3.1% .... BEA reports 3.2% ⇒ Mismeasurement accounts for over 60% of return gap • Also show: “net asset position” not a meaningful concept

  27. Theory

  28. Production of Multinationals from j in Country i at t Y j it = A it σ it ( N it M j t ) φ ( Z j it ) 1 − φ Y j i : output of multinationals from j in country i A i : country i ’s TFP σ i : country i ’s degree of openness to FDI N i : country i ’s measure of production locations M j : technology capital of multinationals from j Z j i : composite of factors in i used by j ’s multinationals

  29. Production of Multinationals from j in Country i at t Y j it = A it σ it ( N it M j t ) φ ( Z j it ) 1 − φ Y j i : output of multinationals from j operating in country i A i : country i ’s TFP (measured TFP in red) σ i : country i ’s degree of openness to FDI N i : country i ’s measure of production locations M j : technology capital of multinationals from j Z j i : composite of factors in i used by j ’s multinationals

  30. Aggregate Output in Country i at t 1 � Y it = A it N φ j � = i M j t ) φ Z 1 − φ it ( M i φ t + σ it it • Key result provided σ i > 0: Each i has constant returns, but summing over i results in a bigger aggregate production set.

  31. Aggregate Output in Country i at t 1 � Y it = A it N φ j � = i M j t ) φ Z 1 − φ it ( M i φ t + σ it it • Key result provided σ i > 0: It is as if there were increasing returns, when in fact there are none.

  32. Implications of Adding Technology Capital 1 • If φ = 0 in Y i = A i ( N i [ M i + σ � j M j ]) φ ( Z i ) 1 − φ φ i • If φ > 0 and σ i = 0, • If φ > 0 and σ i > 0,

  33. Implications of Adding Technology Capital 1 • If φ = 0 in Y i = A i ( N i [ M i + σ � j M j ]) φ ( Z i ) 1 − φ φ i ◦ Standard neoclassical theory ◦ No need for FDI • If φ > 0 and σ i = 0, • If φ > 0 and σ i > 0,

  34. Implications of Adding Technology Capital 1 • If φ = 0 in Y i = A i ( N i [ M i + σ � j M j ]) φ ( Z i ) 1 − φ φ i ◦ Standard neoclassical theory ◦ No need for FDI • If φ > 0 and σ i = 0, ◦ No foreign subsidiaries ◦ More locations implies higher Y/N and Y/L • If φ > 0 and σ i > 0,

  35. Implications of Adding Technology Capital 1 • If φ = 0 in Y i = A i ( N i [ M i + σ � j M j ]) φ ( Z i ) 1 − φ φ i ◦ Standard neoclassical theory ◦ No need for FDI • If φ > 0 and σ i = 0, ◦ No foreign subsidiaries ◦ More locations implies higher Y/N and Y/L • If φ > 0 and σ i > 0, ◦ Foreign subsidiaries if σ i not too small ◦ More done by big (high A, N ), closed (low σ ) countries

  36. Composite Input of Multinationals from j in i T ,i ) α T ( K j • Z j i = ( K j I ,i ) α I ( L j i ) 1 − α T − α I K j T ,i = tangible capital K j I ,i = plant-specific intangible capital L j = labor input i • With capital accumulation, K j T ,i,t +1 = (1 − δ T ) K j T ,it + X j T ,it K j I ,i,t +1 = (1 − δ I ) K j I ,it + X j I ,it M j = (1 − δ M ) M j t + X j t +1 M ,t

  37. Multinationals Incorporated in Country j Solve � p t (1 − τ d,t ) D j max t t given definition of dividends, � D j i K j T ,i,t +1 − K j t + T ,it � �� � Reported reinvested earnings � i { (1 − τ p,it )( Y j it − W it L j it − δ T K j T ,it − X j I ,it − χ j i X j = M ,t ) � �� � Reported profits less expensed investments and taxes i = 1 and χ j where χ i i = 0, j � = i

Recommend


More recommend