new generation polar research vessel p project initiated
play

New Generation Polar Research Vessel P Project Initiated j t I - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

New Generation Polar Research Vessel P Project Initiated j t I iti t d ISOPE 2004 Presented by Toulon, France Richard Voelker May 24, 2004 U.S. Maritime Administration Presentation Outline Presentation Outline Introduction Introd


  1. New Generation Polar Research Vessel P Project Initiated j t I iti t d ISOPE 2004 Presented by Toulon, France Richard Voelker May 24, 2004 U.S. Maritime Administration

  2. Presentation Outline Presentation Outline • Introduction Introd ction • Initial Requirements for New Vessel • Project Results P j t R lt – Technical Studies – Mission Sensitivity Studies Mission Sensitivity Studies • Preliminary Project Schedule • Some Current Issues Some Current Issues • Tracking Project Progress

  3. Introduction

  4. Purpose of Project Purpose of Project Assess and possibly implement the leasing of a new vessel in the leasing of a new vessel in 2012 to replace the existing icebreaking research vessel icebreaking research vessel NATHANIEL B. PALMER

  5. National Science Foundation (NSF) • Is an independent U.S. Government agency Is an independent U S Government agency • Invests over $5.6 billion each year in about 20 000 research and education projects in 20,000 research and education projects in science and engineering • One of the programs is the United States • One of the programs is the United States Antarctic Program

  6. NSF’s S s Office of Polar Programs • Supports basic research in a wide range of scientific disciplines in both the Arctic and scientific disciplines in both the Arctic and Antarctic • Additionally, provides logistics, operational and Additionally, provides logistics, operational and laboratory support both shore side and in the marine environment • Current marine activities in the Antarctic are provided by two vessels: – NATHANIEL B. PALMER NATHANIEL B PALMER – LAURENCE M. GOULD

  7. NATHANIEL B. PALMER - 1992 to present

  8. LAURENCE M. GOULD - 1997 to present

  9. U.S. Antarctic Research Vessel HERO - 1968 to 1984

  10. U S Department of Transportation U.S. Department of Transportation Maritime Administration (MARAD) • Memorandum of Agreement between NSF g and MARAD • MARAD to provide technical support MARAD to provide technical support including naval architecture and marine engineering services, technical g g , management, acquisition support, construction oversight and acceptance tests and trials for the new vessel

  11. Initial Requirements l New Vessel for V N

  12. Science Requirements • Bottom mapping during icebreaking • Geotechnical drilling capability • Geotechnical drilling capability • Enhanced towing of nets and instruments in ice • Moon pool (completely enclosed) to deploy – Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV)/Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV) – Diving – Conductivity, Temperature, Depth (CTD) rosette – Ocean-Bottom Seismograph (OBS) • Accommodation for 50 scientists Accommodation for 50 scientists • Provision for a helicopter deck and hangar • Traditional set of A-frames, winches, cranes • Inter-deck science/cargo elevator Inter deck science/cargo elevator

  13. Operational Requirements p q • Enhanced level icebreaking @ 3 knots -- 1.4m • Capable of independent operation in multiyear ice p p p y • Suitable for operations in both polar regions • Excellent seakeeping capability • Endurance at 12 knots -- 80 days/20,000 miles • Endurance at 12 knots -- 80 days/20 000 miles • Comply with new International Maritime Organization (IMO) Guidelines for Arctic Vessels [effectively a double h ll hull vessel] l] • Improve ship’s self-generated noise signature for better scientific acoustic sensor performance • Reduce exhaust emissions from diesel engines and incinerator • Clear view aft from starboard pilot house control station Clear view aft from starboard pilot house control station

  14. Project Results Technical Studies Technical Studies Mission Sensitivity Studies

  15. Marine Engineering Studies Naval Architecture and Final

  16. Principal Characteristics Principal Characteristics LOA 115 m Draft 9 m LWL 104 m Displacement 11,200 LT Beam 23 m Shaft horsepower 16,700 kW

  17. View of Box Keel View of Box Keel

  18. View of Starboard Side View of Starboard Side

  19. Podded Propulsion System Currently Preferred • Direct drive diesels are hard • Direct drive diesels are hard to fit into a ship with a large moon pool – electric plant provides flexibility provides flexibility • Diesel generators can be “floated” on isolation mounts for low noise/vibration • Twin azimuthal propulsors give greater maneuverability in ice and open water station in ice and open water station keeping

  20. Diesel Engine Exhaust Emissions Diesel Engine Exhaust Emissions Goal: 90 Percent Lower Rate of Diesel Exhaust E Emissions Compared to Existing Research Vessels i i C d t E i ti R h V l Emission Estimates for Various NOx + THC PM Engine Configurations (g/kW-hr) (g/kW-hr) NBP-1990 engines 20 0.50 PRV-2007 engines without optional treatment 9 0.50 PRV-2007 engines with 2003 optional technology 4 0.06 PRV-2007 engines with 2007 optional technology PRV 2007 engines with 2007 optional technology 2 2 0.03 0.03

  21. Emission Reduction per Horsepower 120% 100% 100% 100% 100% 80% 60% 45% 40% 20% 20% 12% 10% 6% 6% 0% NBP-1990 Engines PRV-2007 Engines PRV-2007 Engines with PRV-2007 Engines with without optional treatment 2003 optional technology 2007 optional technology NOx+THC (g/kW-hr) PM (g/kW-hr)

  22. To achieve the 2007 goal -- there is a g need to reduce the quantity of sulfur in diesel fuel oil in diesel fuel oil. Sulfur inhibits the use of NO x and particulate matter emission reduction particulate matter emission reduction equipment (such as catalysts and filters) which are needed to meet filters) which are needed to meet U.S. Environmental Protection A Agency regulations for air quality. l ti f i lit

  23. The Future of Ultra-Low Sulfur Diesel Fuel in the U.S. 4,000 3,400 ppm) 3,500 Content (p 3,000 2,500 2,000 uel Sulfur 1,500 1,000 500 500 500 F 15 15 15 0 2004 2007 2010 2012 Year Marine & Locomotive Highway Bulldozers & Tractors

  24. U.S. Marine Fuel Oil Sulfur Levels in 2004 and 2012 M Marine Diesel Oil i Di l Oil Heavy Fuel Oil 35,000 35 000 Content 27,000 27,000 30,000 25,000 el Sulfer C ) (ppm) 20,000 15,000 10,000 10 000 Fue 3,400 5,000 15 0 2004 2004 2012 2012 Year

  25. Mission Sensitivity Studies

  26. Construction Cost Sensitivity of Added PRV Mission Capabilities Add d PRV Mi i C biliti BASELINE CAPABILITY = 100 0% = 100.0% ( NATHANIEL B. PALMER ( NATHANIEL B. PALMER CAPABILITIES PLUS ELECTRIC ARCTIC GUIDELINES (Double Hull) & PODDED PROPULSION) + = 106.4% IMPROVED HULL FORM • AFT WORKING DECK = baseline + SUPERIOR ACOUSTICAL FEATURES • 1.2 M ICEBREAKING BOTTOM MAPPING = 97.7% + • SCIENCE WORKSHOP DURING ICEBREAKING WITH BOX KEEL + GEOTECHNICAL DRILLING = 103.7% • WINCHES • CRANES CRANES + + = 139.5% / 158.2% 139 5% / 158 2% ICEBREAKING 4/4.5 FT • 37 SCIENTISTS ACCOMMODATIONS + = 106.5% 80-DAY ENDURANCE • 60-DAY ENDURANCE AUV/ROV OPERATIONS = 103.4% 103.4% + + THROUGH MOON POOL THROUGH MOON POOL • LABORATORIES = 100.3% + REDUCED DIESEL EXHAUST EMISSIONS • WORKBOAT GREATER LENGTH FOR 80 M + = 115.5% JUMBO PISTON CORING • SONARS & ACOUSTICAL SYSTEMS = 105.1% + 50 SCIENTISTS ACCOMMODATIONS • VAN STORAGE IMPROVED TOWING OF NETS AND = baseline • HELICOPTER DECK AND STORAGE + INSTRUMENTATION

  27. Sensitivity Studies 200.0 180.0 160.0 Dollars) 140.0 120.0 t Millions of Cos 100.0 80.0 60.0 ($ 40.0 20.0 0.0 ADDED SCIENCE MISSION CAPABILITY Added Science Mission Capability

  28. Selected Mission Options with 1.2m Icebreaking

  29. Construction Cost for Selected Mission Capabilities 250 250 200 a f Dollars) on Cost 150 Constructio Millions of 100 Box Keel, Reduced Emissions, 80m Core, 50 Scientists, 80 Days Endurance, SHALDRIL, Moon Pool, Double Hull ($ M C B Box Keel, Reduced Emissions, 80m Core, 50 Scientists, 80 Days Endurance, K l R d d E i i 80 C 50 S i ti t 80 D E d 50 50 SHALDRIL Box Keel, Reduced Emissions, 80m Core, 50 Scientists Baseline (NBP Capabilities Plus Electric Podded Propulsion) 0 0.9 1.15 1.1 1.4 Level Icebreaking Capability (meters)

  30. Preliminary Preliminary Project Schedule Project Schedule

  31. Timeline of Major Project Activities 2005 Calendar Year 2002 2003 2004 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Pre - RFP Mission requirements, vessel technical studies, cost sensitivity studies, procurement plan, guidance plans, and technical specifications for RFP RFP Proposal Evalu- ation & Contract Award Post - RFP Shipyard detail design and construction of vessel and construction of vessel, science outfitting, and vessel acceptance Delivery Project Project Start Complete

  32. Some Current Issues t I C S

Recommend


More recommend