n ttc topical workshop rf superconductivity pushing
play

n TTC Topical Workshop -RF superconductivity: Pushing Cavity - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

arXiv:1711.03077 To be published in Physical Review B n TTC Topical Workshop -RF superconductivity: Pushing Cavity Performance Limits Fermilab, IL, USA (2017) 1 The surface resistance of an SRF cavity is usually written as the summation of


  1. arXiv:1711.03077 To be published in Physical Review B n TTC Topical Workshop -RF superconductivity: Pushing Cavity Performance Limits Fermilab, IL, USA (2017) 1

  2. The surface resistance of an SRF cavity is usually written as the summation of 𝑆 𝑁𝐶 : Mattis-Bardeen surface resistance 2

  3. The surface resistance of an SRF cavity is usually written as the summation of 𝑆 𝑁𝐶 : Mattis-Bardeen surface resistance 𝑆 𝑝𝑢ℎ𝑓𝑠𝑡 : other than the above Damaged layer Metallic sub-oxide Subgap states Dielectric losses etc 𝑆 𝑔𝑚𝑣𝑦 : trapped flux contribution 3

  4. The surface resistance of an SRF cavity is usually written as the summation of 𝑆 𝑁𝐶 : Mattis-Bardeen surface resistance 𝑆 𝑝𝑢ℎ𝑓𝑠𝑡 : others Damaged layer Metallic sub-oxide Subgap states Dielectric losses etc 𝑆 𝑔𝑚𝑣𝑦 : trapped flux contribution 4

  5. The surface resistance of an SRF cavity is usually written as the summation of 𝑆 𝑁𝐶 𝑆 𝑝𝑢ℎ𝑓𝑠𝑡 Damaged layer Metallic sub-oxide R s =R MB +R flux +R others Subgap states Dielectric losses etc 𝑆 𝑔𝑚𝑣𝑦 5

  6. Today, R flux can be substantially reduced by cooling down a cavity with a large temperature gradient.  A. Romanenko, et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 105 105, 234103 (2014). 𝑆 𝑁𝐶  S. Posen et al., J. Appl. Phys. 119 119, 213903 (2016)  S. Huang, T. Kubo, and R. Geng, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 19 19, 082001 (2016) 𝑆 𝑝𝑢ℎ𝑓𝑠𝑡 Damaged layer Metallic sub-oxide R s =R MB +R flux +R others Subgap states Dielectric losses etc 𝑆 𝑔𝑚𝑣𝑦 6

  7. Today, R flux can be substantially reduced by cooling down a cavity with a large temperature gradient.  A. Romanenko, et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 105 105, 234103 (2014). 𝑆 𝑁𝐶  S. Posen et al., J. Appl. Phys. 119 119, 213903 (2016)  S. Huang, T. Kubo, and R. Geng, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 19 19, 082001 (2016) 𝑆 𝑝𝑢ℎ𝑓𝑠𝑡 Damaged layer Metallic sub-oxide R s =R MB +R flux +R others Subgap states Dielectric losses Understanding this part etc is becoming im is important 𝑆 𝑔𝑚𝑣𝑦 more and more! 7

  8. Today, R flux can be substantially reduced by cooling down a cavity with a large temperature gradient.  A. Romanenko, et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 105 105, 234103 (2014). 𝑆 𝑁𝐶  S. Posen et al., J. Appl. Phys. 119 119, 213903 (2016)  S. Huang, T. Kubo, and R. Geng, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 19 19, 082001 (2016) 𝑆 𝑝𝑢ℎ𝑓𝑠𝑡 Damaged layer Metallic sub-oxide R s =R MB +R flux +R others Subgap states Dielectric losses Would contain in information etc on the meaning of surface 𝑆 𝑔𝑚𝑣𝑦 processing recipes. 8

  9. Based on the BCS theory we calc lculate Rs Rs 𝑆 𝑁𝐶 sim imultaneously taking into account both the in contrib ibutio ions. 𝑆 𝑝𝑢ℎ𝑓𝑠𝑡 Damaged layer Metallic sub-oxide R s =R MB +R flux +R others Subgap states Dielectric losses etc 𝑆 𝑔𝑚𝑣𝑦 9

  10. Structures, parameters, and theoretical tool 10

  11. superconductors with im imperfect surface 11

  12. superconductors with im imperfect surface 𝑒 Conductance 𝜏 𝑜 𝜏 𝑡 Interface resistance 𝑆 𝐶 12

  13. superconductors with im imperfect surface 𝑒 Conductance 𝜏 𝑜 𝜏 𝑡 Interface resistance 𝑆 𝐶 These structures model realistic surfaces of superconducting materials which can contain oxide layers, absorbed impurities or nonstoichiometric composition . 13

  14. Theoretical tool We use the quasiclassical theory in the diffusive limit.  Usadel equation  Self-consistency condition  Boundary conditions K. D. Usadel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 25 , 507 (1970). M. Yu. Kuprianov and V. F. Lukichev, Sov. Phys. JETP 67 , 1163 (1988). It is convenient to define the following dimensionless parameters: 14

  15. Theoretical tool We use the quasiclassical theory in the diffusive limit.  Usadel equation  Self-consistency condition  Boundary conditions K. D. Usadel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 25 , 507 (1970). M. Yu. Kuprianov and V. F. Lukichev, Sov. Phys. JETP 67 , 1163 (1988). It is convenient to define the following dimensionless parameters: 𝛽 = 𝑂 𝑜 𝑒 = 0.05 (when d = 1 nm, 𝜊 𝑡 = 20 nm, and 𝑂 𝑜 = 𝑂 𝑡 ) 𝑂 𝑡 𝜊 𝑡 15

  16. Theoretical tool We use the quasiclassical theory in the diffusive limit.  Usadel equation  Self-consistency condition  Boundary conditions K. D. Usadel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 25 , 507 (1970). M. Yu. Kuprianov and V. F. Lukichev, Sov. Phys. JETP 67 , 1163 (1988). It is convenient to define the following dimensionless parameters: 𝛽 = 𝑂 𝑜 𝑒 = 0.05 (when d = 1 nm, 𝜊 𝑡 = 20 nm, and 𝑂 𝑜 = 𝑂 𝑡 ) 𝑂 𝑡 𝜊 𝑡 𝛾 = 4𝑓 2 ℏ 𝑆 𝐶 𝑂 𝑜 Δ𝑒 = 16𝑒 𝑆 𝐶 𝑆 𝐶 (when d = 1 nm, 2 ~ 𝜊 0 = 40 nm) 10 −14 Ωm 2 𝜊 0 𝑆 𝐿 𝜇 𝐺 For example, R B of YBCO/Ag obtained in [J. W. Ekin et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 62 , 369 (1993)] is R B ~ 10 -13 -10 -12 Ωm2, which yields β~10 -100. 16

  17. Theoretical tool We use the quasiclassical theory in the diffusive limit.  Usadel equation  Self-consistency condition  Boundary conditions K. D. Usadel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 25 , 507 (1970). M. Yu. Kuprianov and V. F. Lukichev, Sov. Phys. JETP 67 , 1163 (1988). It is convenient to define the following dimensionless parameters: Normal and anomalous Quasiclassical Matsubara Green functions T. Matsubara, Prog. Theor. Phys. 14 , 351 (1955). Penetration depth 17

  18. Theoretical tool We use the quasiclassical theory in the diffusive limit.  Usadel equation  Self-consistency condition  Boundary conditions K. D. Usadel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 25 , 507 (1970). M. Yu. Kuprianov and V. F. Lukichev, Sov. Phys. JETP 67 , 1163 (1988). It is convenient to define the following dimensionless parameters: Normal and anomalous Quasiclassical Matsubara Green functions T. Matsubara, Prog. Theor. Phys. 14 , 351 (1955). Penetration depth Retarded normal and anomalous Quasiclassical Green functions Density of states and surface resistance 18

  19. Density of States 19

  20. Density of states DOS of Normal conductor 20

  21. Density of states DOS of Normal conductor DOS of BCS superconductor DOS of BCS superconductor 21

  22. DOS of DOS of BCS superconductor Normal conductor BCS Normal superconductor conductor 22

  23. DOS of DOS of BCS superconductor Normal conductor BCS Normal superconductor conductor N-side DOS S-side DOS 23

  24. DOS of DOS of BCS superconductor Normal conductor BCS Normal superconductor conductor N-side DOS S-side DOS The proximity effect ? ? changes DOS 24

  25. N-side DOS 𝛽 = 0.05 25

  26. N-side DOS 𝛽 = 0.05 minigap 26

  27. N-side DOS S-side 𝛽 = 0.05 DOS 𝛽 = 0.05 minigap 27

  28. Taking into account a finite quasi particle life time ( 𝜁 → 𝜁 + 𝑗Γ ) smears out the cusps. N-side DOS S-side DOS 𝛽 = 0.05 Γ=0.05 𝛽 = 0.05 Γ=0.05 28

  29. DOS for the right figure (SC with a surface layer of gradually reduced BCS pairing constant) can also be calculated. 29

  30. Temperature dependence of penetration Depth 30

  31. Without subgap states Exponential T dependence at any temperature 31

  32. Without subgap states Exponential T dependence at any temperature Effect of subgap states 𝑈 ≪ 𝑈 𝑑 quadratic T dependence at a low temperature 32

  33. Surface Resistance (1)Ideal surface without subgap states (2)Ideal surface with subgap states (3)normal thin layer on the surface 33

  34. Surface Resistance (1)Ideal surface without subgap states (2)Ideal surface with subgap states (3)normal thin layer on the surface 34

  35. DOS Quasiparticles gap T → 0 35

  36. T ↘ Quasiparticles gap gap As T decreases, a number of quasiparticles exponentially decrease. 𝑆 𝑡 ∝ 𝑓 − ∆ 𝑙𝑈 → 0 T → 0 36

  37. T=0 T ↘ T ↘ Quasiparticles gap gap gap As T decreases, a number of quasiparticles exponentially decrease. 𝑆 𝑡 ∝ 𝑓 − ∆ 𝑙𝑈 → 0 (𝑆 𝑗 = 0) T → 0 37

  38. Typical behavior of Nb cavities Mattis-Bardeen − ∆ 𝑙 𝐶 𝑈 𝑆 𝑁𝐶 ~𝑓 38

  39. Surface Resistance (1)Ideal surface without subgap states (2)Ideal surface with subgap states (3)normal thin layer on the surface 39

  40. DOS Quasiparticles Subgap states 40

  41. T ↘ Quasiparticles Quasiparticles Subgap Subgap states states 41

  42. T ↘ T ↘ T → 0 Quasiparticles Quasiparticles Subgap Subgap Subgap states states states Even at T → 0, quasiparticles can be excited by the microwave field when finite subgap states exist. 42

  43. T ↘ T ↘ T → 0 Quasiparticles Quasiparticles Subgap Subgap Subgap states states states Even at T → 0, quasiparticles can be excited by the microwave field when finite subgap states exist. 43

  44. examples Γ Δ = 0.06 44

  45. examples Γ Δ = 0.06 Γ Δ = 0.03 45

  46. examples Γ Δ = 0.06 Γ Δ = 0.03 Γ Δ = 0.01 46

  47. examples Γ Δ = 0.06 Γ Δ = 0.03 Γ Δ = 0.01 47

  48. Γ Δ = 48

  49. As Γ increases, the residual resistance 𝑆 𝑗 increases. Γ Δ = 49

  50. Γ At this region, 𝑆 𝑡 Δ = 0.06 decreases as Γ increases. Γ Γ Δ = Δ = 0.03 Γ Δ = 0.01 50

Recommend


More recommend