multi commodity flow with in network processing
play

Multi-Commodity Flow with In-Network Processing Moses Charikar - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Routing and Steering Network Design Multi-Commodity Flow with In-Network Processing Moses Charikar Yonatan Naamad Jennifer Rexford X. Kelvin Zou Moses Charikar, Yonatan Naamad, Jennifer Rexford, X. Kelvin Zou Multi-Commodity Flow with


  1. Routing and Steering Network Design Multi-Commodity Flow with In-Network Processing Moses Charikar Yonatan Naamad Jennifer Rexford X. Kelvin Zou Moses Charikar, Yonatan Naamad, Jennifer Rexford, X. Kelvin Zou Multi-Commodity Flow with In-Network Processing

  2. Routing and Steering Network Design Outline 1 Routing and Steering 2 Network Design Moses Charikar, Yonatan Naamad, Jennifer Rexford, X. Kelvin Zou Multi-Commodity Flow with In-Network Processing

  3. Routing and Steering Network Design In-Network Processing Computer Networks are now dual-purpose. 1 Route traffic 2 Perform services Moses Charikar, Yonatan Naamad, Jennifer Rexford, X. Kelvin Zou Multi-Commodity Flow with In-Network Processing

  4. Routing and Steering Network Design In-Network Processing Computer Networks are now dual-purpose. 1 Route traffic 2 Perform services Firewalls Load balancers Video transcoders Traffic encryption/compression Etc. Moses Charikar, Yonatan Naamad, Jennifer Rexford, X. Kelvin Zou Multi-Commodity Flow with In-Network Processing

  5. Routing and Steering Network Design In-Network Processing Computer Networks are now dual-purpose. 1 Route traffic 2 Perform services Firewalls Load balancers Video transcoders Traffic encryption/compression Etc. Novel uses require novel algorithms. Moses Charikar, Yonatan Naamad, Jennifer Rexford, X. Kelvin Zou Multi-Commodity Flow with In-Network Processing

  6. Routing and Steering Network Design Middlebox Processing Historically, middleboxes were single purpose. Network Function Virtualization (NFV) allows for greater flexibility. Question: how do we best utilize this newfound flexibility? Moses Charikar, Yonatan Naamad, Jennifer Rexford, X. Kelvin Zou Multi-Commodity Flow with In-Network Processing

  7. Routing and Steering Network Design Our Model Given 1 A graph G modeling our network. 2 Edge capacities B e on links. 3 Processing capacities C v on vertices. 4 A collection of flow demand ( s i , t i ) pairs. Find A way to route and process as much flow as possible. Moses Charikar, Yonatan Naamad, Jennifer Rexford, X. Kelvin Zou Multi-Commodity Flow with In-Network Processing

  8. Routing and Steering Network Design Our Model Given 1 A graph G modeling our network. 2 Edge capacities B e on links. 3 Processing capacities C v on vertices. 4 A collection of flow demand ( s i , t i ) pairs. Find A way to route and process as much flow as possible. Assumption: one unit of flow requires one unit of processing. Moses Charikar, Yonatan Naamad, Jennifer Rexford, X. Kelvin Zou Multi-Commodity Flow with In-Network Processing

  9. Routing and Steering Network Design Routing vs. Steering Our problem has two components: Routing routes traffic between endpoints. Equivalent to Maximum Multicommodity Flow Steering steers traffic to processing nodes. Equivalent to Multi-source/sink Maximum flow We attempt to solve the joint routing and steering problem. Moses Charikar, Yonatan Naamad, Jennifer Rexford, X. Kelvin Zou Multi-Commodity Flow with In-Network Processing

  10. Routing and Steering Network Design An (exponential) LP Problem admits an obvious walk-based LP D Maximize � � p i ,π i =1 π ∈ P p v Subject to p i ,π = � ∀ i ∈ 1 .. D , π ∈ P i ,π v ∈ π D � � p i ,π ≤ B e ∀ e ∈ E i =1 π ∋ e D p v � � i ,π ≤ C v ∀ v ∈ V i =1 π ∈ P p v ∀ p v i ,π ≥ 0 i ,π Problem: program size may be exponential. Moses Charikar, Yonatan Naamad, Jennifer Rexford, X. Kelvin Zou Multi-Commodity Flow with In-Network Processing

  11. Routing and Steering Network Design Equivalent LP We can also write an edge-based LP Moses Charikar, Yonatan Naamad, Jennifer Rexford, X. Kelvin Zou Multi-Commodity Flow with In-Network Processing

  12. Routing and Steering Network Design Equivalent LP We can also write an edge-based LP Too big to fit on this slide. Moses Charikar, Yonatan Naamad, Jennifer Rexford, X. Kelvin Zou Multi-Commodity Flow with In-Network Processing

  13. Routing and Steering Network Design Equivalent LP We can also write an edge-based LP Too big to fit on this slide. Key ideas: 1 Each flow demand gets two sets of variables: f i and w i . w i = unprocessed flow being routed f i = total flow being routed 2 w i absorbed at middleboxes, f i absorbed at terminals 3 w i is bounded by f i 4 Other constraints are standard extensions of the multicommodity flow LP. Moses Charikar, Yonatan Naamad, Jennifer Rexford, X. Kelvin Zou Multi-Commodity Flow with In-Network Processing

  14. Routing and Steering Network Design Proof of Equivalence (outline) Equivalence of the two LPs is nontrivial OPT may use edges more than once. Care is required! 5 5 2 2 2 5 5 5 5 s 0 0 T 5 5 Proof outline: Cancel redundant w i and f i flows as much as possible. Argue that cycles must have some e where w i ( e ) drops. Peel off this edge and proceed Conclusion: O ( | V | · | E | · | D | ) algorithm for converting between the two LPs. Moses Charikar, Yonatan Naamad, Jennifer Rexford, X. Kelvin Zou Multi-Commodity Flow with In-Network Processing

  15. Routing and Steering Network Design Multiplicative Weights Edge-based LP can get unwieldy. (1 − ǫ ) MW-based approximation in ˜ O ( dm 2 /ǫ 2 ) time. Similar to the Garg-K¨ onemann algorithm with a more elaborate update step. Moses Charikar, Yonatan Naamad, Jennifer Rexford, X. Kelvin Zou Multi-Commodity Flow with In-Network Processing

  16. Routing and Steering Network Design Experiments Ran experiments on Abilene network traces Baseline: route flow first, worry about processing later Two sets of processing power distributions: All nodes get equal processing capacity A random subset of n / 2 nodes get processing capcity. Moses Charikar, Yonatan Naamad, Jennifer Rexford, X. Kelvin Zou Multi-Commodity Flow with In-Network Processing

  17. Routing and Steering Network Design Experiments (absolute) Results 4000 Naive (All) LP (All) Naive (Half) LP (Half) 3000 Average Routed Flow (Mbps) 2000 1000 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Per-node Processing Capacity (Mbps) Moses Charikar, Yonatan Naamad, Jennifer Rexford, X. Kelvin Zou Multi-Commodity Flow with In-Network Processing

  18. Routing and Steering Network Design Experiments (ratio) Results 1 All Process Half Process 0.9 Naive-to-OPT Routing Ratio 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Per-node Processing Capacity (Mbps) Moses Charikar, Yonatan Naamad, Jennifer Rexford, X. Kelvin Zou Multi-Commodity Flow with In-Network Processing

  19. Routing and Steering Network Design Outline 1 Routing and Steering 2 Network Design Moses Charikar, Yonatan Naamad, Jennifer Rexford, X. Kelvin Zou Multi-Commodity Flow with In-Network Processing

  20. Routing and Steering Network Design Network Design We now know how to utilize middleboxes. How do we optimally place them in the first place? Middleboxes are indivisible → combinatorial problem. Moses Charikar, Yonatan Naamad, Jennifer Rexford, X. Kelvin Zou Multi-Commodity Flow with In-Network Processing

  21. Routing and Steering Network Design Network Design Given 1 An edge-capacitated graph G . 2 The set of flow demands 3 For each middlebox v , proposals and costs of installing various amounts of processing capacity Find 1 The optimal purchase plan of middlebox processing power in G . Moses Charikar, Yonatan Naamad, Jennifer Rexford, X. Kelvin Zou Multi-Commodity Flow with In-Network Processing

  22. Routing and Steering Network Design Four Key Problems Directed Undirected Budgeted Maximization Minimization Moses Charikar, Yonatan Naamad, Jennifer Rexford, X. Kelvin Zou Multi-Commodity Flow with In-Network Processing

  23. Routing and Steering Network Design Four Key Problems Directed Undirected Budgeted Maximization NP-Hard NP-Hard Minimization NP-Hard NP-Hard Moses Charikar, Yonatan Naamad, Jennifer Rexford, X. Kelvin Zou Multi-Commodity Flow with In-Network Processing

  24. Routing and Steering Network Design Four Key Problems Directed Undirected O (1) ( † ) Approximation O (log n ) Maximization Hardness O (1) O (1) O (log n ) ( ∗ ) O (log n ) ( ∗ ) Approximation Minimization Hardness O (log n ) O (log n ) Moses Charikar, Yonatan Naamad, Jennifer Rexford, X. Kelvin Zou Multi-Commodity Flow with In-Network Processing

  25. Routing and Steering Network Design End Questions? Moses Charikar, Yonatan Naamad, Jennifer Rexford, X. Kelvin Zou Multi-Commodity Flow with In-Network Processing

Recommend


More recommend