monte carlo neutrino transport in post merger disks
play

MONTE CARLO NEUTRINO TRANSPORT IN POST-MERGER DISKS S HERWOOD R - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

MONTE CARLO NEUTRINO TRANSPORT IN POST-MERGER DISKS S HERWOOD R ICHERS D AN K ASEN , E VAN OC ONNOR , R ODRIGO F ERNANDEZ , C HRISTIAN O TT Daniel Perley Daniel Perley NINJA-2 Catalog Daniel Perley NINJA-2 Catalog SHORT GRB M ERGING


  1. MONTE CARLO NEUTRINO TRANSPORT IN POST-MERGER DISKS S HERWOOD R ICHERS D AN K ASEN , E VAN O’C ONNOR , R ODRIGO F ERNANDEZ , C HRISTIAN O TT

  2. Daniel Perley

  3. Daniel Perley NINJA-2 Catalog

  4. Daniel Perley NINJA-2 Catalog

  5. SHORT GRB • M ERGING COMPACT OBJECTS (L EE & R AMIREZ -R UIZ 2007) • C OLLIMATED JET • 𝑀 𝑗𝑡𝑝 ≈ 10 53 ERG / S ( E . G . B LOOM + 2003) • D ISK COOLS VIA NEUTRINOS • 𝑢 𝑒𝑗𝑔𝑔 ≪ 𝑢 𝑒𝑧𝑜 Metzger & Berger (2011)

  6. NEUTRINOS • A BSORB /E MIT ν e e • D EPOSIT /E MIT E NERGY n p • C HANGE Y E • S CATTER • T RAP N EUTRINOS • R EDISTRIBUTE E NERGY • A NNIHILATE /E MIT • D EPOSIT /E MIT E NERGY

  7. NEUTRINOS • A BSORB /E MIT ν e e • D EPOSIT /E MIT E NERGY n p • C HANGE Y E ν e ν e • S CATTER • T RAP N EUTRINOS p p • R EDISTRIBUTE E NERGY • A NNIHILATE /E MIT • D EPOSIT /E MIT E NERGY

  8. NEUTRINOS • A BSORB /E MIT ν e e • D EPOSIT /E MIT E NERGY n p • C HANGE Y E ν e ν e • S CATTER • T RAP N EUTRINOS p p • R EDISTRIBUTE E NERGY ν e e • A NNIHILATE /E MIT _ • D EPOSIT /E MIT E NERGY ν e e

  9. {ignoring oscillations} NEUTRINOS • A BSORB /E MIT ν e e • D EPOSIT /E MIT E NERGY n p • C HANGE Y E ν e ν e • S CATTER • T RAP N EUTRINOS p p • R EDISTRIBUTE E NERGY ν e e • A NNIHILATE /E MIT _ • D EPOSIT /E MIT E NERGY ν e e

  10. HOW TO MOVE NEUTRINOS

  11. SEDONU + NULIB g/cm 3 ) 8 EOS 1)T AKE F LUID S NAPSHOT ρ T Y e E ν 𝜍 2)E MIT log 10 ( 3)P ROPAGATE 7 NuLib 4)S CATTER AND A BSORB 5)C ALCULATE : 6 • T IMESCALES ε σ scat σ abs • A NNIHILATION R ATES R scat R ann R emit 5 Open-source ! data: Metzger & Fernandez (2014)

  12. SEDONU + NULIB g/cm 3 ) 8 EOS 1)T AKE F LUID S NAPSHOT ρ T Y e E ν 𝜍 2)E MIT log 10 ( 3)P ROPAGATE 7 NuLib 4)S CATTER AND A BSORB 5)C ALCULATE : 6 • T IMESCALES ε σ scat σ abs • A NNIHILATION R ATES R scat R ann R emit 5 Open-source ! data: Metzger & Fernandez (2014)

  13. SEDONU + NULIB g/cm 3 ) 8 EOS 1)T AKE F LUID S NAPSHOT ρ T Y e E ν 𝜍 2)E MIT log 10 ( 3)P ROPAGATE 7 NuLib 4)S CATTER AND A BSORB 5)C ALCULATE : 6 • T IMESCALES ε σ scat σ abs • A NNIHILATION R ATES R scat R ann R emit 5 Open-source ! data: Metzger & Fernandez (2014)

  14. SEDONU + NULIB g/cm 3 ) 8 EOS 1)T AKE F LUID S NAPSHOT ρ T Y e E ν 𝜍 2)E MIT log 10 ( 3)P ROPAGATE 7 NuLib 4)S CATTER AND A BSORB 5)C ALCULATE : 6 • T IMESCALES ε σ scat σ abs • A NNIHILATION R ATES R scat R ann R emit 5 Open-source ! data: Metzger & Fernandez (2014)

  15. HOW DO NEUTRINOS LOOK?

  16. ASYMMETRIC NEUTRINO RADIATION HMNS BH Special relativity beams and hardens neutrinos

  17. ASYMMETRIC NEUTRINO RADIATION BH HMNS

  18. SPECTRA BH HMNS Escape spectra are not quite blackbody.

  19. WHAT DO NEUTRINOS DO?

  20. HEATING/COOLING RATE 𝑆 𝜗 = 1 𝑒𝜗 𝜗 𝑒𝑢 Neutrinos cool equator And heat above disk

  21. LEPTONIZATION RATE 𝑓 = 𝑒𝑍 𝑓 𝑆 𝑍 𝑒𝑢 Neutrinos raise Electron fraction

  22. DOES LEAKAGE SUCK?

  23. COMPARISON TO LEAKAGE 10 20 erg/g binding energy  stronger outflows

  24. COMPARISON TO LEAKAGE BH HMNS MC neutrinos escape more easily

  25. COMPARISON TO LEAKAGE BH HMNS MC neutrinos escape more easily

  26. CAN NEUTRINOS POWER A JET?

  27. 𝑒𝑅 + ~ 𝐽 1 − cos 𝜄 2 𝑒𝐹 𝑒 𝐽 𝐹 + 𝐹 𝑒Ω 𝑒 𝐹 Ω ANNIHILATION Ruffert et al. (1997) g/cm 3 ) 8 𝜍 ν log 10 ( • S TRONG A NGULAR 𝜾 D EPENDENCE 7 𝜉 • A LL SPECIES 6 PARTICIPATE 5 data: Metzger & Fernandez (2014)

  28. ANNIHILATION • LARGE POLAR SPECIFIC HEATING 2 • 3 × 10 46 ERG IN BH JET 0 1 • 10 48 − 10 50 ERG REQUIRED 1 (L EE & R AMIREZ -R UIZ 2007)  J ET IS UNLIKELY 2

  29. ANNIHILATION • LARGE POLAR SPECIFIC HEATING 2 • 3 × 10 46 ERG IN BH JET • 2 × 10 48 ERG IN HMNS JET 0 1 • 10 48 − 10 50 ERG REQUIRED 1 (L EE & R AMIREZ -R UIZ 2007)  J ET IS UNLIKELY 2

  30. CONCLUSIONS • A NNIHILATION CANNOT DRIVE JET ( PROBABLY ) • L EAKAGE LACKS SPECTRAL AND ANGULAR EFFECTS • MC  FASTER COOLING AND LEPTONIZATION • CAVEAT: NON - EQUILIBRIUM

  31. CONCLUSIONS SELF-PROMOTION • A NNIHILATION CANNOT • S EE THE P APER ! DRIVE JET ( PROBABLY ) AR X IV : 1507.03606 • • L EAKAGE LACKS SPECTRAL • S EE THE C ODE ! AND ANGULAR EFFECTS • BITBUCKET . ORG / SRICHERS / SEDONU • MC  FASTER COOLING AND LEPTONIZATION • S EE THE P ERSON ! • TAPIR . CALTECH . EDU /~ SRICHERS • CAVEAT: NON - EQUILIBRIUM

Recommend


More recommend