mil it ary oce an t e rminal sunny point joint l and use
play

MIL IT ARY OCE AN T E RMINAL SUNNY POINT JOINT L AND USE ST - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

MIL IT ARY OCE AN T E RMINAL SUNNY POINT JOINT L AND USE ST UDY NEED SOME SORT OF IMAGE ADVI SORY COMMI T T E E ME E T I NG AUGUST 28, 2018 ME E T I NG AGE NDA Study Upda te s Pub lic Me e ting Summa ry


  1. MIL IT ARY OCE AN T E RMINAL SUNNY POINT JOINT L AND USE ST UDY NEED SOME SORT OF IMAGE ADVI SORY COMMI T T E E ME E T I NG AUGUST 28, 2018

  2. ME E T I NG AGE NDA • Study Upda te s • Pub lic Me e ting Summa ry • Re vie w Co mpa tib ility Ana lysis • Se t Upc o ming Me e ting Da te s • Ge ne ra l Disc ussio n • Adjo urn

  3. ST UDY UPDAT E S • Brie fing to MG F a rme n (SDDC Co mma nde r) • Sta ke ho lde r inte rvie w with NC DNCR re pre se nta tive s: – Chie f De puty Se c re ta ry – De puty Se c . fo r Arc hive s & Histo ry – Dire c to r o f Histo ric a l Re so urc e s – Dire c to r o f E a ste rn NC Histo ric Site s – NC Sta te Pa rks – Cle a n Wa te r Ma na g e me nt T rust F und – Offic e o f Sta te Arc ha e o lo g y – NC Aq ua riums • I nte rvie w with c o nsulta nt pre pa ring Brunswic k Co unty E c o no mic De ve lo pme nt Pla n

  4. PROJE CT SCHE DUL E Date Meeting 2018 February 23 Project Team Meeting April 11 Project Kickoff, Installation Tour & Committee Meetings May 21-24 Stakeholder Interviews June Advisory Committee Meeting – Review Background Research July 30 Public Meeting – Overview & Research - 1 Day (2 locations) August Advisory Committee Meeting – Review Compatibility Analysis October Advisory Committee Meeting - Review Conflict Resolution Strategies November Policy Committee Meeting – Review Conflict Resolution Strategies December Public Meetings – Interim Findings - 1 Day (2 locations) December Advisory Committee Meeting – Draft Recommendations 2019 January Policy Committee Meeting – Draft Recommendations February Advisory Committee Meeting – Present Draft Study Documents March Advisory & Policy Committee Meetings – Finalize Study Documents April/May Public Meetings – Final Presentation - 1 Day (2 locations)

  5. JUL Y 30 PUBL I C ME E T I NGS

  6. COMPAT I BI L I T Y ANAL YSI S

  7. I NST AL L AT I ON CHARACT E RI ST I CS • Purpo se -b uilt a mmunitio n tra nsshipme nt te rmina l – SAF E T Y • Ammunitio n is sta g e d te mpo rarily a t the te rmina l, while wa iting to b e shippe d. • Co mpo se d o f thre e g e o g ra phic a lly se pa ra te a re a s: – Ma in T e rmina l: 8,600 a c re s – Ple a sure I sla nd Buffe r Zo ne : 2,200 a c re s – L e la nd I nte rc ha ng e Ya rd: 650 a c re s • Ma in T e rmina l linke d to L e la nd I nte rc ha ng e b y a 16 mile ra il line .

  8. JL US ST UDY ARE A MOTSU Components LELAND YARD MAP GOES HERE RAIL CORRIDOR BUFFER ZONE MAIN TERMINAL

  9. MI SSI ON COMPAT I BI L I T Y • Prima ry po ints o f po te ntia l c o mpa tib ility c o nc e rn: – Ma inta ining use o f the full e xte nt o f E SQD fo r te mpo ra ry sta g ing , a s we ll a s lo a ding a nd unlo a ding ve sse ls during tra nsshipme nt o pe ra tio ns. – Ma inta ining sa fe a nd e ffic ie nt tra nspo rta tio n a c c e ss: • Hig hwa y • Ra il • Ma rine – Ma inta ining minima l le ve ls o f e nviro nme nta l c o nstra int.

  10. E XPL OSI VE S SAF E T Y ZONE S • E SQD = E xplo sive Sa fe ty Qua ntity Dista nc e • K F a c to r = Assume d de g re e o f risk use d in c a lc ula ting E SQD. • E xa mple E SQD Arc s: – Pub lic T ra ffic Ro ute (PT RD) (K 24/ 30) – I nha b ite d Building (I BD) (K 40/ 50) – K 88 – Ab so lute Sa fe Dista nc e = K 328 W 1/ 3 • E SQD F o rmula : D=K – D = Dista nc e (ft.) – W = Ne t E xplo sive We ig ht (lb s.)

  11. E XPL OSI VE S SAF E T Y ZONE S • E SQD Zo ne s a re no t a pplic a b le to munitio ns during the ir tra nspo rta tio n: – T ruc k tra ffic o n lo c a l hig hwa ys – Ra il tra ffic , inc luding in the L e la nd Ya rd a nd o n the Army ra ilro a d – Ship tra ffic in the Ca pe F e a r Rive r • Onc e o n the T e rmina l, a mmunitio n is te mpo rarily sta g e d pe r the lic e nse a nd a pplic a b le E SQD a rc s fo r e a c h ho lding a re a . • E SQD zo ne s e xpa nd a nd c o ntra c t a s munitio ns a re te mpo ra rily sta g e d a nd the n shippe d o ut.

  12. JL US ST UDY ARE A Inhabited Building Safety Zone MAP GOES HERE Inhabited Building Distance Arc Blast Easements

  13. I BD COMPAT I BI L I T Y • Do D Ma nua l 6055.09 / DA Pa mphle t 385-64 e sta b lish siting c rite ria fo r c e rta in use s within the I nha b ite d Building Dista nc e (a s we ll a s o the r sa fe ty zo ne s). • Prima rily fo c use d o n use s typic a lly fo und o n a milita ry insta lla tio n / a mmunitio n fa c ility. • Be st g uida nc e a va ila b le , a nd c a n b e tra nsla te d to a pply to c ivilia n use s.

  14. DA PAM 385-64 USE T ABL E S

  15. DA PAM 385-64 USE T ABL E E XAMPL E S RE CRE AT I ON USE S WAT E R ST ORAGE T ANK S

  16. JL US ST UDY ARE A IBD Non-MOTSU Uses MAP GOES HERE Inhabited Building Distance Arc Blast Easements Non-MOTSU Uses

  17. I BD USE CHARACT E RI ST I CS • I de ntifie d 19 site s / use s / struc ture s within the I nha b ite d Building Dista nc e E SQD a rc . – 17 pub lic / 2 priva te – 9 o n MOT SU la nd (e xc lude s USAF Re c . Are a ) – USAF re c re a tio n a re a is o n US Go ve rnme nt (no t MOT SU la nd) a nd is sub je c t to a se pa ra te c o mpa tib le use a g re e me nt – 9 within c o mpa tib le use e a se me nts – Use s o n MOT SU la nd sub je c t to lic e nse s g ra nte d b y the De pa rtme nt o f the Army

  18. I BD USE CHARACT E RI ST I CS • Pub lic wo rks fa c ilitie s (wa te r / wa ste wa te r) • Pub lic pa rk in K ure Be a c h • USAF Re c re a tio n Are a – no t pa rt o f MOT SU • F AA Jo int Surve illa nc e Syste m Ra da r F a c ility • F o rt F ishe r F e rry – la nding , a dmin b uilding , pa rking a re a , e tc . • NCWRC Bo a t Ra mp • Brunswic k T o wn / F o rt Ande rso n – histo ric site s a nd struc ture s, visito rs c e nte r, suppo rt b ldg s. • Duke E ne rg y firing ra ng e

  19. I BD COMPAT I BI L I T Y • Co mplia nc e with Do D / DA use g uida nc e • F re q ue nc y o f use / time o f o c c upa tio n • De nsity o f o c c upa tio n • Ca n it b e re lo c a te d? • I s it c ritic a l to pub lic sa fe ty? • Pub lic vs. priva te • E xisting mitig a tio n me a sure s / a g re e me nts • Ab ility to impro ve c o mpa tib ility thro ug h de sig n o r o pe ra tio na l c o nside ra tio ns.

  20. GL ASS F RAGME NT AT I ON HAZARDS Do D Ma nua l 6055.09 E xtra c t

  21. JL US ST UDY ARE A Tall Structure Glass Fragmentation Hazard MAP GOES HERE Inhabited Building Distance Tall Structures (5+ stories)

  22. E ME RGE NCY E VACUAT I ON CRI T E RI A • Do D Ma nua l 6055.09 / DA Pa mphle t 385-64 e sta b lish ide ntic a l “E me rg e nc y Withdra wa l Dista nc e s fo r No ne sse ntia l Pe rso nne l” • Dista nc e s a re inte nde d fo r initia l re spo nse to a n inc ide nt invo lving a mmunitio n/ e xplo sive s. • Sub stitute g uida nc e in the a b se nc e o f E SQD a rc s fo r the ra il line . • Applie s to b o th tra nspo rta tio n a nd fa c ilitie s

  23. E VACUAT I ON DI ST ANCE S • Ra ilc a r inc ide nt e va c ua tio n dista nc e whe n o ve r 500 lb s: 5,000 ft. • F a c ility inc ide nt e va c ua tio n dista nc e whe n o ve r 55,285 lb s: D=105W 1/ 3

  24. JL US ST UDY ARE A Rail Incident Withdrawal Distance MAP GOES HERE 5,000 Foot Emergency Withdrawal Distance

  25. RAI L I NCI DE NT WI T HDRAWAL ARE A • Dista nc e a pplie s to a ny g ive n po int o n the line whe re a n inc ide nt o c c urs, no t the e ntire line . • Withdra wa l dista nc e ma y b e inc re a se d b a se d o n the spe c ific situa tio n. • Are a Cha ra c te ristic s: – 2010 Po pula tio n: +/ - 11,200 – 2010 Dwe lling Units: +/ - 5,200 • Co nc e rns: – So uth Brunswic k Sc ho o l Ca mpus – No rthwe st Distric t Pa rk – US 17 Co mme rc ia l Are a – US 74/ 76 I ndustria l Are a

  26. JL US ST UDY ARE A Rail Incident Withdrawal Distance: Developed Areas MAP GOES HERE Developed Land Cover

  27. JL US ST UDY ARE A Rail Incident Withdrawal Distance: Population Density (2010) MAP GOES HERE Population Density High Low

  28. JL US ST UDY ARE A Facility Incident Withdrawal Distance MAP GOES HERE Facility Emergency Withdrawal Distance (D=105W 1/3 )

  29. F ACI L I T Y I NCI DE NT WI T HDRAWAL ARE A • Dista nc e a pplie s to a ny g ive n fa c ility – do c ks we re use d a s a n e xa mple . • Withdra wa l dista nc e ma y b e inc re a se d b a se d o n the spe c ific situa tio n. • Are a Cha ra c te ristic s: – 2010 Po pula tio n: +/ - 14,300 – 2010 Dwe lling Units: +/ - 10,850 • Co nc e rns – Brunswic k Nuc le a r Sta tio n – Ple a sure I sla nd E va c ua tio n Ro ute – So uth Brunswic k Sc ho o l Ca mpus

  30. JL US ST UDY ARE A Facility Incident Withdrawal Distance: Developed Areas MAP GOES HERE Developed Land Cover

  31. JL US ST UDY ARE A Facility Incident Withdrawal Distance: Population Density (2010) MAP GOES HERE Population Density High Low

  32. E XAMPL E E VACUAT I ON PL AN

Recommend


More recommend