michigan questionnaire c ga quest o a e documentation
play

Michigan Questionnaire c ga Quest o a e Documentation System - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Michigan Questionnaire c ga Quest o a e Documentation System (MQDS): A U A Users Perspective P i Heidi Guyer, Gina-Qian Cheung The 11th International Blaise Conference Annapolis, Maryland September 2007 MQDS Background MQDS


  1. Michigan Questionnaire c ga Quest o a e Documentation System (MQDS): A U A User’s Perspective ’ P i Heidi Guyer, Gina-Qian Cheung The 11th International Blaise Conference Annapolis, Maryland September 2007

  2. MQDS Background MQDS Background • Goal: Develop a system used to generate Goal: Develop a system used to generate questionnaires & codebooks from a Blaise data model / data set • Developed by the University of Michigan’s Survey Research Center Survey Research Center • Development Period: 2003 – 2007 • International Consortium of Users: 2006- present p

  3. Main features of MQDS Main features of MQDS Core Tools • Questionnaire Documentation • Codebook Documentation (from Blaise BDB or ( SAS data set) Additional Tools • XML Merge • Reapply Stylesheet • Blaise to SAS • SAS to XML

  4. Review Method Review Method • “Testing to robustness” Testing to robustness • Testing Team identified • Testing plan developed • Testing plan developed • Bug Log developed • Data models assigned D t d l i d • Group & Individual testing sessions • Solicit comments from internal users • Solicit comments from Consortium users

  5. Overall Impressions p • Key Features y – Flexibility – Supports multiple languages – Updated interface p • Pros – Easy to install – Sample project provided – Updated and complete documentation – Format of output • Cons – Limitations with large or complex data models

  6. Program Interface Program Interface

  7. Questionnaire Documentation Q • Key Features – Output in RTF or HTML O t t i RTF HTML – Include hyperlinks and external lookup files • Pros – Flexibility in formatting – User selects items displayed – Supports multiple languages – Hyperlinks can be used to include other files • Cons – Some of the screens are confusing (stylesheet selection) g ( y ) – Default color of hyperlinks and interviewer instructions is the same – Inability to display logic for large or complex data models

  8. Questionnaire Documentation Questionnaire Documentation

  9. Questionnaire Documentation Questionnaire Documentation

  10. Questionnaire Documentation Questionnaire Documentation English Spanish Tagalog Tagalog

  11. Codebook • Key Features – Output in RTF or HTML – Output in RTF or HTML – Ability to generate a codebook from Blaise or SAS data set • Pros Pros – Flexibility in formatting – User selects items displayed – Supports multiple languages Supports multiple languages – Frequencies and descriptive statistics are displayed • Cons – Same usability issues as with the Questionnaire Documentation – Inability to process extremely large data sets – Tool needed to confirm that all variables are included in the output – Codeframes will not match output for recoded or newly created SAS variables

  12. Codebook Documentation

  13. Demonstration Demonstration

  14. Additional Tools • XML Merge • XML Merge • Reapply Stylesheet • Blaise to SAS • SAS to XML All useful time saving tools! All useful, time-saving tools!

  15. Additional uses of MQDS Additional uses of MQDS • Can be used throughout the project Can be used throughout the project lifecycle: – Instrument development and testing Instrument development and testing – Documentation – IRB submission IRB submission – Training – During data collection D i d t ll ti – Post-data collection

  16. Additional uses of MQDS Additional uses of MQDS • Can be used for comparison purposes: – Across waves of a longitudinal study – Across the same study in multiple languages – Across similar studies

  17. CPES Project CPES Project • Collaborative Psychiatric Epidemiology • Collaborative Psychiatric Epidemiology Surveys (CPES) – Three NIMH mental health surveys Th NIMH t l h lth • National Comorbidity Survey – Replication • National Survey of Latinos and Asian Americans • National Survey of Latinos and Asian Americans • National Survey of American Life

  18. CPES Project CPES Project • Primary goals: • Primary goals: – Harmonize and merge multiple datasets – Disseminate for public use Di i t f bli

  19. Harmonization and Disclosure Analysis • Develop survey instrument crosswalk D l i t t lk – Link sections and questions – Evaluate questions for comparability – Re-code questions and re-link if required for harmonization • Merge datasets • Perform disclosure analysis – Re-code and drop variables – Restricted use dataset will be available [soon] [ ] • Generate XML question metadata files (MQDS) – Question text, response options, missing data codes, frequencies etc frequencies, etc.

  20. CPES Home Page Overview g www.icpsr.umich.edu/CPES

  21. Interactive Documentation Interactive Documentation

  22. Interactive Documentation: Frequencies / Summary Stats

  23. Future Directions Future Directions • Investigate incorporation of Data Investigate incorporation of Data Dissemination Initiative (DDI) v.3 recommendations recommendations. • PDF output

  24. Summary Summary • Useful tool for creating questionnaire and Useful tool for creating questionnaire and data documentation • Primary drawbacks encountered with • Primary drawbacks encountered with large, complex data sets

  25. Acknowledgments Acknowledgments ISR-SRC-SRO Tricia Blanchard, Karl Dinkelmann, Eduardo Galván, Hemant Kannan, Peter Sparks ISR-SRC Health & Retirement Study, Panel Study of Income Dynamics Dynamics MQDS Consortium Members Mathematica Policy Research National Centre for Social Mathematica Policy Research, National Centre for Social Research, Statistics Canada, UMich Survey Research Center

Recommend


More recommend