melnea cass boulevard
play

Melnea Cass Boulevard Design Objectives Meeting March 15, 2012 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Melnea Cass Boulevard Design Objectives Meeting March 15, 2012 presented by Boston Transportation Department with Howard/Stein-Hudson Crosby | Schlessinger | Smallridge Toole Design Group GLC Development Resources Boston Transportation


  1. Melnea Cass Boulevard Design Objectives Meeting March 15, 2012 presented by Boston Transportation Department with Howard/Stein-Hudson Crosby | Schlessinger | Smallridge Toole Design Group GLC Development Resources Boston Transportation Department

  2. Agenda Part 2 – Framing Design Concepts Part 2 – Framing Design Concepts Part 1 – Presentation Part 1 – Presentation 6:30 – 7:15 PM 6:30 – 7:15 PM 6:00 – 6:30 PM 6:00 – 6:30 PM • • Breakout Groups Breakout Groups Introduction/Process Introduction/Process Part 3 – Breakout Group Part 3 – Breakout Group What we have learned: What we have learned: • • Community Vision Community Vision Reports/ Q & A – 7:15 – 8:00 PM Reports/ Q & A – 7:15 – 8:00 PM • • Design Directions Design Directions • • Group representatives give summaries of Group representatives give summaries of breakout group discussion breakout group discussion Complete Streets Principles Complete Streets Principles • • Questions and answers Questions and answers Corridor-wide Framework Corridor-wide Framework • • Melnea Cass Boulevard Melnea Cass Boulevard by Area by Area Boston Transportation Department

  3. Boston Transportation Department Project Area

  4. Project Tim eline  Initial Public Meeting – 10/11/2011 • Introducing the project  Community Visioning Meeting – 12/14/2011 • Envisioning success  Design Objectives Meeting – Tonight • Turning the vision into concepts  Sharing Initial Concepts – Spring 2012  Gaining consensus on Preferred Option – Summer 2012 Boston Transportation Department

  5. W hat W e Heard From You - Vision  Safe, clean and beautiful  Well-maintained – snow and litter consistently removed  All parcels owned and cared for  Safe for cyclists and pedestrians  Providing safe, effective transit service  Moving calmed vehicular traffic effectively  Fully integrated with its surrounding neighborhood  A catalyst for neighborhood economic development Boston Transportation Department

  6. W hat W e Heard From You – Design Direction  Keep mature trees as part of new landscaping  Soften the Boulevard – reduce “highway feel” Calm traffic – enhance pedestrian/cyclist safety • Connect to walking/cycling infrastructure beyond the corridor •  Fully integrate the Boulevard with cross streets and the neighborhood Provide a gateway to Dudley Square • Design buildings for active street life • Safe and family-friendly • Boston Transportation Department

  7. W hat W e Learned – Econom ic Developm ent Community Vision Community Vision Development Tools Development Tools Tighten connections to jobs: Tighten connections to jobs: Improve transit Improve transit • • Longwood Medical Area Longwood Medical Area • • Boston University Boston University Keep, but calm, high traffic volumes Keep, but calm, high traffic volumes Medical Center Medical Center • • Southeast Expressway Southeast Expressway Improve pedestrian environment Improve pedestrian environment Strengthen and grow retail center: Strengthen and grow retail center: Create attractive, high-quality Create attractive, high-quality • • Improve connections between Improve connections between environment environment Dudley Square and South End Dudley Square and South End • • Increase shopper population Increase shopper population Develop retail and commercial: Develop retail and commercial: • • At major intersections At major intersections • • Visual connections between Visual connections between Dudley Square and South End Dudley Square and South End • • Draw people across the Draw people across the Boulevard Boulevard • • Create a sense of place Create a sense of place Boston Transportation Department

  8. Com plete Streets Principles  Complete Streets are designed and operated to enable safe access for all users.  Pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists and transit riders of all ages and abilities must be able to safely and comfortably move along and across a complete street. Boston Transportation Department

  9. Com plete Streets Principles • Create vibrant public spaces • Respect and foster a “sense of place” • Create opportunities for healthy living and physical activity • Support economic development • Design for sustainability • “Smart” in the use of technology Boston Transportation Department

  10. Com plete Streets Principles  Pedestrian Safety • • Accessible sidewalks • Appropriate degree of separation from roadways • Lower motor vehicle speeds • Well-lit facilities • Pedestrian-friendly intersections  Shorter crossings  Minimal delay  Less exposure to conflicts  Frequent accessible crossings Comfort and Convenience • • Street trees • Comfortable and inviting spaces with amenities • Connections to other modes Boston Transportation Department

  11. Pedestrian Connectivity [ Insert Assessment Map Here] Boston Transportation Department

  12. Pedestrian Connectivity [ Insert Assessment Map Here] Boston Transportation Department

  13. Com plete Streets Principles  Bicycle Safety • • Dedicated space • Degree of separation between modes • Lower motor vehicle speeds • Less exposure to conflicts • Well-lit facilities • Bicycle-friendly intersections  Minimum green intervals  Bicycle detection  Bicycle priority (i.e. signals, bicycle boxes, etc.) Comfort and Convenience • • Consistent facility types • Connections to other modes • Access to shot term and long term parking • Wayfinding signage Boston Transportation Department

  14. Bicycle Connectivity [ Insert Assessment Map Here] Boston Transportation Department

  15. Com plete Streets Principles  Motor Vehicles Safety • • Designs that reduce conflicts and the severity of crashes • Intuitive and clear geometry • Appropriate degree of separation between modes • Safe options for turning movements • Well-lit facilities • Efficient intersection designs  Minimal delay  Coordinated signal timing Comfort and Convenience • • Well-maintained roadways • Clear guidance and Wayfinding • Access to parking Boston Transportation Department

  16. Com plete Streets Principles  Transit Safety • • Safe and accessible transit stops • Appropriate sidewalk widths • Less conflicts with other modes • Well-lit facilities • Transit-friendly intersections  Minimal delay in service  Accessible crossings  Transit prioritization  Responsive signal design Comfort and Convenience • • Comfortable and inviting transit stops with amenities • Well-maintained transit stops and roadways • Connections to other modes • Real-time route information Boston Transportation Department

  17. Boston Transportation Department [ Insert Assessment Map Here] MBTA Route 1

  18. Boston Transportation Department MBTA Route 8

  19. Boston Transportation Department MBTA Route 1 9

  20. Boston Transportation Department MBTA Route 4 7

  21. Boston Transportation Department MBTA Route CT3

  22. Boston Transportation Department MBTA Routes and Stops

  23. Boston Transportation Department The Urban Ring

  24. BRT ( Bus Rapid Transit)  Frequent Service  Real-time Information  Widely-spaced Stops  Traffic Signal Control  High-capacity Vehicles  Dedicated Lanes Boston Transportation Department

  25. BRT Stations  Safe Pedestrian Access  Easy Loading/Unloading  Comfort and Security Boston Transportation Department

  26. BRT Configurations  Curbside Bus Lanes  Buses mix with traffic  Parking conflicts  Right turn conflicts  Slower travel times and less reliability Boston Transportation Department

  27. BRT Configurations  Center Bus Lanes  Buses don’t mix with traffic  No parking conflicts and turning conflicts managed through signal design  Faster travel times and increased reliability Boston Transportation Department

  28. BRT Alternatives TRAVEL LANES • Urban Ring Phase 2 Locally Preferred Alternative • Reviewed by the Roxbury community including STATION Center Bus RSMPOC • Typically most efficient design for BRT Lanes • Passengers exit onto median island station • Better access for new development STATION and curbside parking TRAVEL LANES TRAVEL LANES Boston Transportation Department

  29. BRT Alternatives TRAVEL LANES • Urban Ring Phase 2 Locally Preferred Alternative • Reviewed by the Roxbury community including STATION Center Bus RSMPOC • Typically most efficient design for BRT Lanes • Passengers exit onto median island station • Better access for new development STATION and curbside parking TRAVEL LANES TRAVEL LANES • Bus stops next to curb for passenger STATION loading/unloading Curbside • Parking conflicts TRAVEL LANES Bus Lanes • Intersection conflicts TRAVEL LANES STATION • Passengers exit bus onto island and STATION curb stations Bus Lanes • Parking access issues One Side • Intersection challenges STATION TRAVEL LANES TRAVEL LANES Boston Transportation Department

  30. Com plete Streets Com ponents Exclusive Transit Lanes Boston Transportation Department

  31. Com plete Streets Com ponents Travel/ Exclusive Travel/ Parking Transit Parking Lanes Lanes Lanes Boston Transportation Department

Recommend


More recommend