massive stars mass loss
play

Massive Stars Mass Loss Mathieu Renzo Advisors: S. N. Shore, C. D. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TASC 2014, November 7, UCSD Massive Stars Mass Loss Mathieu Renzo Advisors: S. N. Shore, C. D. Ott 1 / 8 Mass Loss - Why is it important ... ... for the stellar structure? ... for the environment? Evolutionary timescale chemical and


  1. TASC 2014, November 7, UCSD Massive Stars Mass Loss Mathieu Renzo Advisors: S. N. Shore, C. D. Ott 1 / 8

  2. Mass Loss - Why is it important ... ... for the stellar structure? ... for the environment? • Evolutionary timescale • chemical and dynamical evolution of Galaxies • Final fate (BH, NS or • trigger star formation WD?) • Structure (CSM) and • blow bubbles appearance (WR) 2 / 8

  3. Mass Loss - Possible Driving Mechanisms Metal Line Driving ⇐ Winds Dynamical Instabilities ⇐ LBVs, Episodic Mass Loss, Super-Eddington winds Binary interactions ⇐ Roche Lobe Overflows Figure: η Car, false colors, from wikipedia. 3 / 8

  4. Mass Loss in Stellar Evolution Codes ( ) Parametric models with large uncertainties (clumpiness, non-wind mass loss) encapsulated in efficiency factor: ˙ M ( L , T eff , Z , R , M , ... ) ← η ˙ M ( L , T eff , Z , R , M , ... ) Figure: From Smith 2014, ARA&A, 52, 487S 4 / 8

  5. Mass Loss - Different ˙ M prescriptions with Grid of Z ⊙ stellar models: • Initial mass: M ZAMS = { 15, 20, 25, 30, 35 } M ⊙ ; • Efficiency: 1 1 η = { 1, 3 , 10 } ; • Different combinations of wind mass loss rates for “hot”, “cool” and WR stars: Kudritzki et al. ’89; Vink et al. ’01; Nieuwenhuijzen et al. ’90; De Jager et al. ’88; Nugis & Lamers ’00; Hamann et al. ’98. 5 / 8

  6. Mass Loss - Preliminary Results with /1 Example: 25 M ⊙ , Z ⊙ from ZAMS to O depletion 1.0 s25D 1.0 0.9 s25D 0.33 0.8 s25D 0.1 0.7 0.6 X surf 0.5 0.4 0.3 Vink, De Jager, Nugis & Lamers Vink, De Jager, Nugis & Lamers Vink, De Jager, Nugis & Lamers 0.2 TAMS Y c = 0 0.1 0.0 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 log 10 (( t O depl − t ) /yr ) 6 / 8

  7. Mass Loss - Preliminary Results with /2 Example: 25 M ⊙ , Z ⊙ from ZAMS to O depletion 1.0 s25KdJNL 1.0 0.9 s25KdJNL 0.33 0.8 s25KdJNL 0.1 0.7 0.6 X surf 0.5 0.4 0.3 Kudritzki, De Jager, Nugis & Lamers Kudritzki, De Jager, Nugis & Lamers Kudritzki, De Jager, Nugis & Lamers 0.2 TAMS Y c = 0 0.1 0.0 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 log 10 (( t O depl − t ) /yr ) 7 / 8

  8. Mass Loss - Conclusions • Mass loss is important both for the stellar structures and their environment; • Several mass loss mechanisms, hard to implement in stellar evolution codes; • Large theoretical and observational uncertainties on the mass loss rate ˙ M ; • Effects of these uncertainties unexplored in a systematic way. Thank you for your attention. 8 / 8

Recommend


More recommend