Mapping and assessing online free available research integrity - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Mapping and assessing online free available research integrity educational resources Daniel Pizzolato Daniel Pizzolato 1 , Ana Maruši , Ana Maruši ć 2 , Ružica Tokali , Ružica Tokali ć 2 , Kris Dierickx , Kris Dierickx 1 6 th WCRI — 2,3,4,5 June 2019, Hong Kong 1 Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium 2 Department of Research in Biomedicine in Health, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia

Godecharle, S., Nemery, B., Diericks, “Integrity Training: Conflicting Practices.” Science 340, no. June (2013): 1403–4.

Godecharle, S., Nemery, B., Diericks, “Integrity Training: Conflicting Practices.” Science 340, no. June (2013): 1403–4. Steneck, Nicholas H. “Global Research Integrity Training.” Science , 2013.

Aim of the study: mapping and assessing online free available research integrity educational resources

Step-by-step process RI educational resources evaluation grid Assessment of RI educational recourses Definition of categorization criteria Collection of free available RI educational resources

Inclusion criteria: • Free available online • Responsible conduct of research (RCR) • Research integrity (RI) • Language Until end of March 2019

Mapping and assessing online free available research integrity educational resources. 238

educational resources < educational materials e.g. COPE case studies collection 1 resource = 597 case studies (27/05/2019)

Step-by-step process RI educational resources evaluation grid Assessment of RI educational recourses Definition of categorization criteria Collection of free available RI educational resources

Categorization criteria: 1- name of the educational resource 12- duration 2- country 13- virtue(s)/vice(s) mentioned 3- resource type 14- final evaluation/final assessment 4- addressed topic(s) 15- norms, codes, guidelines mentioned 5- background customization 16- learning goal(s) 6- teaching approach (group/standalone) 17- level customization 7- teaching approach (active/passive) 18- instructions for trainers 8- author(s)/institution(s) 19- evaluation form available 9- date/last update 20- number of users 10- URL 21- feedback from users 11- DOI 22- language

Step-by-step process RI educational resources evaluation grid Assessment of RI educational recourses Definition of categorization criteria Collection of free available RI educational resources

Country: 120 Australia 7 Educational resources : 238 Canada 1 102 100 Europe 80 Hong Kong 3 80 80 Japan 2 Peru' 1 Puerto Rico 1 60 South Africa 1 US 102 40 34 >1 country 5 Unidentified 34 20 7 5 3 2 1 1 1 1 0

Country: 120 Educational resources : 238 100 25 ORI’s resources 80 60 25% of U.S. resources 10,5% of our collection 40 20 0 Puerto Rico South Africa US >1 country Unidentified

Country (Europe): 25 Austria 1 23 Educational resources : 80 Belgium 1 Croatia 1 20 Denmark 1 Finland 4 15 14 Germany 12 13 12 Italy 2 10 Luxembourg 4 Norway 3 Switzerland 1 5 4 4 3 the Netherlands 14 2 1 1 1 1 1 UK 23 0 > 1 country 13

Country (Europe): 25 Austria 1 23 Educational resources : 80 Belgium 1 Croatia 1 20 Denmark 1 Finland 4 15 14 Germany 12 13 12 Italy 2 10 Luxembourg 4 Norway 3 Switzerland 1 5 4 4 3 the Netherlands 14 2 1 1 1 1 1 UK 23 0 > 1 country 13

Resource type: 70 visual arts 1 66 codes collections 2 Educational resources : 238 60 flashcard collections 2 glossaries 2 49 50 instructor material 2 card games 3 40 PPT presentations 3 role-play scenarios 4 28 30 movies 5 24 Infographics/flowcharts 6 20 checklists 8 12 11 10 reports 10 8 10 6 5 4 podcasts and collections 11 3 3 2 2 2 2 1 guidances 12 0 case studies collections 24 tetxbooks 28 online training 49 videos 66

Topics: 180 research misconduct 155 publication ethics 130 155 data management 86 160 mentor/trainee responsibilities 60 conflict of interest 59 140 130 peer review 51 research with humans 40 120 research with animals 39 collaborative research 37 100 questionable research practices 28 86 social responsibilities 28 80 allegation of misconduct 23 reproducibility 21 60 59 60 lab. safety 17 51 intellectual property 16 40 39 37 whistleblowing 16 40 28 28 23 21 17 16 16 13 11 9 27 financial responsibilities 13 open access 11 20 moral resoning 9 8 8 4 3 3 1 grant application 8 0 work environment 8 environmental responsibilities 4 biosecurity 3 patenting 3 responsible research 1 N/A 27

Topics: 180 research misconduct 155 ORI’s nine core topics “other topics” publication ethics 130 155 data management 86 160 mentor/trainee responsibilities 60 conflict of interest 59 140 130 peer review 51 research with humans 40 120 research with animals 39 collaborative research 37 100 questionable research practices 28 86 social responsibilities 28 80 allegation of misconduct 23 reproducibility 21 60 59 60 lab. safety 17 51 intellectual property 16 40 39 37 whistleblowing 16 40 28 28 23 21 17 16 16 13 11 9 27 financial responsibilities 13 open access 11 20 moral resoning 9 8 8 4 3 3 1 grant application 8 0 work environment 8 environmental responsibilities 4 biosecurity 3 patenting 3 responsible research 1 N/A 27

Topics: 180 research misconduct 155 ORI’s nine core topics “other topics” publication ethics 130 155 data management 86 160 mentor/trainee responsibilities 60 conflict of interest 59 140 130 peer review 51 research with humans 40 120 research with animals 39 collaborative research 37 100 questionable research practices 28 86 social responsibilities 28 80 allegation of misconduct 23 reproducibility 21 60 59 60 lab. safety 17 51 intellectual property 16 40 39 37 whistleblowing 16 40 28 28 23 21 17 16 16 13 11 9 27 financial responsibilities 13 open access 11 20 moral resoning 9 8 8 4 3 3 1 grant application 8 0 work environment 8 environmental responsibilities 4 biosecurity 3 patenting 3 responsible research 1 N/A 27

ORI’s nine core topics: 180 research misconduct 155 • FFP 86 160 • falsification 10 • fabrication 7 140 • plagiarism 42 • image manipulation 10 120 publication ethics 130 • publication-related issues 53 100 • authorship 77 data management 86 80 mentor/trainee responsibilities 60 60 conflict of interest 59 peer review 51 40 research with humans 40 research with animals 39 20 collaborative research 37 0 research publication data mentor/trainee conflict of peer review research with research with collaborative misconduct ethics management responsibilities interest humans animals research

“other” topics: 30 QRPs 28 28 28 social responsibilities 28 allegation of misconduct 23 25 23 reproducibility 21 21 Lab. safety 17 20 intellectual property 16 17 whistleblowing 16 16 16 financial responsibilities 13 15 13 open access 11 11 moral resoning 9 10 9 8 8 grant application 8 work environment 8 5 4 environmental responsibilities 4 3 3 biosecurity 3 1 patenting 3 0 responsible research 1

“other” topics: 30 QRPs 28 28 28 social responsibilities 28 allegation of misconduct 23 25 23 reproducibility 21 21 Lab. safety 17 20 intellectual property 16 17 whistleblowing 16 16 16 financial responsibilities 13 15 13 open access 11 11 moral resoning 9 10 9 8 8 grant application 8 work environment 8 5 4 environmental responsibilities 4 3 3 biosecurity 3 1 patenting 3 0 responsible research 1

Background customization: 26% biomedical science humanities social sciences natural science and physics engineering 2% 53% administrative sector 4% no customization 7% 7% 1%

Background customization: 26% biomedical science humanities social sciences natural science and physics engineering 2% 53% administrative sector 4% no customization 7% 7% 1%

Background customization: 26% biomedical science humanities social sciences natural science and physics engineering 2% 53% administrative sector 4% no customization 7% 7% 1%

Background customization: 26% biomedical science humanities social sciences natural science and physics engineering 2% 53% administrative sector 4% no customization 7% 7% 1%

Teaching approach: standalone/group passive/active

Teaching approach: 16% 2% passive/active 82% standalone group standalone/group

Teaching approach: 16% 22% 2% 17% 61% 82% standalone group standalone/group passive active mixed

Step-by-step process RI educational resources evaluation grid Assessment of RI educational recourses Definition of categorization criteria Collection of free available RI educational resources

EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES EVALUATION GRID

Steneck, Nicholas H. “Global Research Integrity Training.” Science , 2013.

Thank you daniel.pizzolato@kuleuven.be

The VIRT2UE project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research programme under grant agreement N 787580.