LPA LPA Fairfield-Suisun Unified School District Facilities Master Plan Governing Board FMP Process Presentation July 9, 2015 1
Sacramento Irvine San Diego San Jose welcome 50 years 285 people sacramento 80 staff dedicated fairfield – suisun usd san jose to education 40+ Master Plans irvine san antonio san diego 2
Sacramento Irvine San Diego San Jose LPA core FMP team integrated design process Jim Kisel Steve Newsom Lindsay Hayward AIA, LEED AP BD+C LEED AP BD+C AIA, LEED AP BD+C Associate Associate Principal client-inclusive & Project Director Educational Facilities Planner Director of School Planning stake-holder driven a holistic tic approac proach h to problem lem solving ing that at places es the client ent in the cente ter foster tering ing part rtic icipa ipatio ion n and d direct rect inter teraction tion with th the multidis ltidiscip iplina linary ry team am of specialis ialists • FMP is the first step in the facilities improvement process • recommended every 3-5 years by CDE and to apply for state funding • important to engage district and community stakeholders • data driven decision making • sustainable focus facilitates good stewardship • development of high performance learning environments • building upon FSUSD mission and strategic plan LPA LPA 3
create value / district strategic goals Fairfield-Suisun USD – mission statement “a premier learning community that empowers each student to thrive in an ever - changing world” Fairfield-Suisun USD - district goals and major activities for the 2014-2015 school year goal #1 – implement, support, and monitoring of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) goal #2 – maintain a safe environment for students and staff goal #3 – maintain fiscal solvency, liquidity, and effective use of District resources goal #4 – maintain positive District and community relations goal #5 – to function as a continually effective Governance Team 4
create value / district facilities master plan goals 1 – focused master plan • maintenance & repair driven proposed scopes managed to an available funding budget • school & community expectations tempered • 2 – comprehensive long term vision starts with educational philosophy for how students will learn in the future • meets District’s goals within the mission and vision statement • discovers the impact of educational programs to facilities • • phased implementation approach defining success – a “road map” to the future 5
create value facilities master plan components Demographics Educational Vision Review & Goals Enrollment Trends • Site Capacities • District Mission Statements • Student Loading • Guiding Principals • Standards Student Learning • Attendance Boundaries • Methodologies New Development • Program Standards • Technology Integration • Increased Student Outcomes • & Achievement Collaboration • Community Stakeholders Budget Estimates Cost Estimates & • District Staff & Prioritization Prioritization • School Site Principals • Communicate Needs • Campus Master Plan Concepts • Build Support for District Goals Financial Analysis Final Final Local Revenue • Facilities Master Plan Facilities Master Plan State Eligibility • Facilities Condition Recommendations Recommendations Voter Approved • Assessments Options Funding Plan • • Campus Overview Scenarios • Existing Conditions • Health/Life Safety Issues • Code/ADA Compliance • Building Systems • Visual Observations 6
enrich lives program vision exploration common themes…inspire curiosity 21st century skills – the 5 c’s Critical Thinking Creativity Collaboration Communication Community common core integration healthy students / healthy schools learning environment / learning styles Visual Audio Tactile Kinesthetic social & casual learning spaces business & community linkages technology transparency improving student outcomes & achievement goal 7 7
prove it / existing facility assessments facilities needs assessment building upon the good work done to date for site work, existing buildings and utility systems upgrade and/or replacement, levels of scope and improvement recommendations can be assessed to help the fairfield-suisun unified school district strategize and prioritize future projects. • district data / record drawings research • older campus needs, building & utility systems condition coordination with previous program goals • external & internal landscape and athletic fields assessment • • site walks & principal interviews/questionnaires • campus safety & fencing • deferred maintenance items • energy efficiency & prop 39 funding building code / ada / health & life safety issues • longevity vs. future maintenance costs • critical itical first t step: ep: assem emblin ling g an accura rate te existing ting facilit ilities ies data tabase e to predic edict future re constr truc uction tion costs 8 8
prove it / facilities master plan digital deliverable educational program vision executive summary • guiding principles vision • • educational program standards technology readiness • sq. ft. & physical characteristics • facilities needs assessments campus overview • code, health & student/staff safety issues • classroom capacity & space utilization • • maintenance & operational efficiency building materials & systems condition • implementation planning school site master plan diagrams • cost estimates • • funding source analysis scope prioritization • communication of recommendations • 9
inter + act committees & stakeholder engagement School Site Input District Focus Groups Community School Site Elementary School 1+1 Charrette Focused Interactions Programs Site Secondary School Fairfield -Suisun USD Charrette ASB High School Students Programs Governing Board 4 Special 1x ON- Principal Surveys GB Charrette Education LINE Maintenance 1 Facilities & Facilities day Master Plan Outreach Committee Child (FMPC) 1 1x ON- Staff Survey Nutrition 5 LINE FMPC Technology Support 1 Community Forums Executive Steering Services (TSS) 3 (1 Per Region) Committee English Learner (ESC) 1 8 Services ESC Number of Meetings/Interactions # Early Childhood 1 Programs Facilities Assessment & Public Safety Academy 1 ea. College & Career Academy Educational Program Vision overlay to develop school site master plans 10
inter + act FMP committee members Facilities Master Plan Committee (FMPC) (30-45 Committee Members Total – Meets Monthly) District Participants • (3) Governing Board Members • Superintendent • Asst. Supt. Business Services • Asst. Supt. Instructional Services & ES/Secondary Directors • Director Facilities, Maintenance & Facilities Staff • (6-8) Teachers & Administrators Representatives (Cross Section of Roles/Disciplines) • Certificated Employee Representative • Classified Employee Representative • Student & PTA Representatives (1-2/HS Attendance Area) Community Members • (4-6) Community Leader Representatives • Governmental Agencies • (4-6) Business Community Representatives • Engaged FSUSD Parents • Community College Representative • Senior Community Representative • Tax Group Representative • Chamber of Commerce Representative • Real-estate Organizations Representative (Purpose is to develop District wide master plan program/facilities vision and standards with a goal to equally weight the total number of FSUSD and local community participants on the FMPC group.) 11
inter + act proposed scheduled 12
we believe that a sustainable master plan is… 1. people driven 2. research informed 3. learner centered 4. exploratory 5. transparent 6. implement-able 7. long range 8. regularly updated LPA creating sustainable places and spaces that enrich the lives of those who use them 13
Governing Board Discussion…
Recommend
More recommend