GRAD ZAGREB Local activity – City of Zagreb MEANING – Metropolitan Europeans Active Network, Including Novelties in Governance 1
Description of activity § 1-day workshop for minimum of 25 participants from Zagreb area § Workshop covered two themes: § Active citizenship § Management of EU funds by local communities § Overview of themes presented, best practices § Discussion among participants and development of local intervention concepts including active citizen participation and EU funds management § Entry and exit questionnaire 2
Topics of the workshop § Present examples of citizen participation in the EU § Active participation of citizens for local development through EU projects § Key current challenges at local and EU level § Interactive Workshop - formulation of possible interventions § Presentations 3
Better mobility in city neighbourhoods through dialogue 4
Discussion outcomes § Participants raised in an open forum issues with transportation in City of Zagreb § Two groups were formed to jointly define concepts of local interventions to improve transport in the city while incorporating active citizenship: 1. Increasing use of public transportation, bicycles 2. Better communication on local needs and participation in solution finding through a neighbourhood mobile app and network of tenant representatives and local boards 5
Questionnaire results 16 To what extent would you define yourself as a European citizen 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 1. Vrlo nisko 2. Nisko 3. Srednje 4. Visoko 5. Vrlo visoko ULAZNI IZLAZNI 6
Questionnaire results 16 To what extent do you think that decisions made at European level affect your life? 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 1. Vrlo nisko 2. Nisko 3. Srednje 4. Visoko 5. Vrlo visoko ULAZNI IZLAZNI 7
Questionnaire results 14 What is your level of trust in the European Union? 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 1. Vrlo nisko 2. Nisko 3. Srednje 4. Visoko 5. Vrlo visoko ULAZNI IZLAZNI 8
Questionnaire results 18 To what extent are you satisfied with the policies of the European Union? 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 ULAZNI IZLAZNI 0 1. Vrlo nisko 2. Nisko 3. Srednje 4. Visoko 5. Vrlo visoko 9
Questionnaire results 12 To what extent do you feel that your voice has been taken into account in making EU decisions? 10 8 6 4 2 0 1. Vrlo nisko 2. Nisko 3. Srednje 4. Visoko 5. Vrlo visoko ULAZNI IZLAZNI 10
Questionnaire results 14 To what extent do you understand the legislative process in the EU? 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 1. Vrlo nisko 2. Nisko 3. Srednje 4. Visoko 5. Vrlo visoko ULAZNI IZLAZNI 11
Questionnaire results 18 Do you agree or not that access to information in the European Union is simple? 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 1. Vrlo nisko 2. Nisko 3. Srednje 4. Visoko 5. Vrlo visoko ULAZNI IZLAZNI 12
Questionnaire results 18 To what extent are European institutions represented in the media in member states? 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 1. Vrlo nisko 2. Nisko 3. Srednje 4. Visoko 5. Vrlo visoko ULAZNI IZLAZNI 13
Questionnaire results 12 To what extent do you understand the decision-making process at the city level? 10 8 6 4 2 0 1. Vrlo nisko 2. Nisko 3. Srednje 4. Visoko 5. Vrlo visoko ULAZNI IZLAZNI 14
Questionnaire results 12 To what extent do you think that decisions made at the city level affect your daily life? 10 8 6 4 2 0 1. Vrlo nisko 2. Nisko 3. Srednje 4. Visoko 5. Vrlo visoko ULAZNI IZLAZNI 15
Questionnaire results Do you think multiculturalism damages your identity? 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Yes No No opnion 16
Questionnaire results Do you think your local identity fits into a European identity? 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Yes No No opinion 17
Questionnaire results – comments on how to increase dialogue § Roundtables for all stakeholders in the political process, questionnaires of the population of a certain area, greater communication of the politicians with the population § Communicating on social networks, through local committees, etc. § Representatives of neighborhoods and politicians - meeting themes to discuss the problem and solve the problem 18
Thank you Antonio Matkovi ć 19
Recommend
More recommend
