KSU Swine Day 2014 2014 KSU Swine Day Program 8:00 a.m. 3:30 p.m. - PDF document

KSU Swine Day 2014

2014 KSU Swine Day Program • 8:00 a.m. – 3:30 p.m. ‐ Trade Show Open • 9:45 a.m. – Delta Coronavirus and PED by Drs. Hesse, Dritz, and Woodworth • 11:00 a.m. – What’s next for the Swine Industry by Dr. DiPietre • 11:45 noon ‐ Pork Lunch in Main Ballroom • 1:30 p.m. – Improving survivability of low birth weight pigs by Drs. Nelssen, Davis, and Gonzalez • 2:00 p.m. – Keeping up with rapidly changing ingredient prices by Drs. Tokach, DeRouchey, and Goodband • 3:00 p.m – How retailers are changing the Australian Swine Industry by Dr. John Pluske

Recent K-State Research to aid decision making during rapidly changing feed cost www.ksuswine.org

Recent K ‐ State Research to aid decision making during rapidly changing feed cost • The ones that do the work!

5 2014 Swine Day Report available at: www.KSUswine.org • 32 papers • 41 experiments • 28,791 pigs

www.KSUswine.org Nursery diet updates Premix updates Journal papers Abstracts Podcasts Swine Day

Undergraduate research projects • Kiah Gourley ‐ Lactational estrous • Jake Erceg ‐ Mycotoxins • Annie Clark ‐ Pepsoygen • Korinn Card ‐ EPI system • Andrea Jeffries ‐ Soy proteins • Suzy Fowler ‐ Mycotoxin binders • Cheyanne Evans ‐ Nutrigold & bovine plasma • Jacob Jacquez ‐ Late finishing amino acids

Congratulations! • Undergraduate Student Achievements – Kia Gourley, Midwest ASAS 1 st oral undergraduate competition and NPB Scholarship recipient – Jake Erceg, NPB scholarship recipient – Jared Mumm, NPB scholarship recipient • Graduate Student Achievements – Chad Paulk, Midwest ASAS Young Scholar – Hyatt Frobose, 1 st place Ph.D. oral abstract – Kyle Coble, 2 nd place Ph.D. oral abstract and Pinnacle Award winner from International Ingredients Inc. – Marcio Gonclaves, Pinnacle Award winner from International Ingredients Inc.

11

Source: DLR 11-4-2014

Triumph barn dump contract Carcass Feed cost base, $/cwt $/ton $ 90.00 $ 300.00 Carcass Feed cost base, $/cwt $/ton $ 90.00 $ 300.00

Triumph barn dump contract Carcass Feed cost base, $/cwt $/ton $ 90.00 $ 170.00 Carcass Feed cost base, $/cwt $/ton $ 90.00 $ 300.00

Continue to focus on feed cost • DDGS • Amino acids • Fat • Avoid adding additives that don’t provide benefit – Some additives do provide benefit • Don’t forget feed processing • Rethink practices that cost money

K-State DDGS Calculator (Variable DDGS Energy) Calculator attempts to Corn, $/bu $ 3.50 $ 151.79 76% =DDGS to Corn price ratio consider economic SBM, $/ton $ 400.00 Use fat to equalize energy No return per pig from Monocal, $/ton $ 600.00 Include L-Trp in diets? Yes DDGS N change in diet cost, Limestone, $/ton $ 36.20 Energy as % of corn or oil content Oil, % feed efficiency, and Lysine HCl, $/lb $ 1.30 DDGS oil content, % 8.0% growth rate. It does DL-Met, $/lb $ 3.50 Value of pig gain, $/lb $ 0.70 not account for any L-Threonine, $/lb $ 2.50 Fat, $/lb $ 0.30 economic impact on DDGS, $/ton $ 115.00 L-Trp, $/lb $ 13.50 yield or iodine value. Start weight, lb 50 75 125 170 210 246 End weight, lb 75 125 170 210 246 280 DDGS maximum value F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 Total 40 40 40 40 40 40 DDGS % at max savings Max savings, $/pig $0.73 $1.66 $1.57 $1.49 $1.44 $1.43 $8.32 DDGS levels chosen 30% 30% 30% 30% 25% 0% - Savings, $/pig $0.55 $1.26 $1.26 $1.21 $1.00 $0.00 $5.29

K-State DDGS Calculator (Variable DDGS Energy) Calculator attempts to Corn, $/bu $ 3.50 $ 151.79 76% =DDGS to Corn price ratio consider economic SBM, $/ton $ 400.00 Use fat to equalize energy No return per pig from Monocal, $/ton $ 600.00 Include L-Trp in diets? No DDGS change in diet cost, Limestone, $/ton $ 36.20 Energy as % of corn or oil content Oil, % feed efficiency, and Lysine HCl, $/lb $ 1.30 DDGS oil content, % 8.0% growth rate. It does DL-Met, $/lb $ 3.50 Value of pig gain, $/lb $ 0.70 not account for any L-Threonine, $/lb $ 2.50 Fat, $/lb $ 0.30 economic impact on DDGS, $/ton $ 115.00 L-Trp, $/lb $ 13.50 yield or iodine value. Start weight, lb 50 75 125 170 210 246 End weight, lb 75 125 170 210 246 280 DDGS maximum value F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 Total 40 40 40 40 40 40 DDGS % at max savings Max savings, $/pig $0.73 $1.47 $1.35 $1.30 $1.28 $1.36 $7.49 DDGS levels chosen 30% 30% 30% 30% 25% 0% - Savings, $/pig $0.63 $1.23 $1.09 $1.04 $0.88 $0.00 $4.87

Incremental “potential” savings with DDGS 11 ‐ 17 ‐ 2014 $10 $8.32 $7.48 $8 $6.53 $5.58 $6 $4.56 $/pig $3.55 $4 $2.35 $2 $1.15 $0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 DDGS, %

Effect of DDGS (30%) and Midds (19%) at varied withdraw times prior to slaughter Exp. 1 74.0 Corn ‐ soy vs high fiber, P = 0.01 Withdraw effects, quadratic P < 0.03 SEM 0.20 73.0 72.7 72.5 72.5 Carcass Yield, % 72.2 72.0 72.0 71.2 71.0 70.0 69.0 Corn ‐ Soy 20 d 15 d 10 d 5 d High fiber Days fed corn ‐ soy from high fiber prior to marketing Coble et al., 2013

Effect of DDGS (30%) and Midds (19%) at varied withdraw times prior to slaughter Exp. 1 207 Corn ‐ soy vs high fiber, P = 0.11 No withdraw effects, P > 0.29 SEM 2.88 204 Carcass weight, lb 203.3 201.6 200.7 200.7 201 199.9 198 196.8 195 Corn ‐ Soy 20 d 15 d 10 d 5 d High fiber Days fed corn ‐ soy from high fiber prior to marketing Coble et al., 2013

Effect of DDGS (30%) and Midds (19%) at varied withdraw times prior to slaughter Exp. 2 (Nov 17, 2014 prices) Value, $ 124.57 118.29 119.76 119.15 117.78 116.40 Feed, $ 53.88 46.55 45.68 45.56 44.74 44.06 78 Income over feed, $/pig 76 $74.07 74 $73.59 $73.04 $72.34 $71.75 72 $70.69 70 68 Corn ‐ Soy 24 d 19 d 14 d 9 d High fiber Days fed corn ‐ soy from high fiber prior to marketing Coble et al., 2013

Influence of SID Trp:Lys ratio on ADG 100% % of maximal ADG 95% 90% 70 to 100 lb 85% 120 to 180 lb 160 to 210 lb 80% 235 to 280 lb 75% 14 15.5 17 18.5 20 21.5 23 24.5 SID Trp:Lys, % Goncalves et al., 2014

Trp:Lys ratio as a percentage of maximum ADG Summary of all 4 GF trials 0.02 lb/d 0.04 lb/d Max 105% 0.06 lb/d 0.10 lb/d 0.13 lb/d 100% 95% 90% ADG, lb =0.418+13.41*(Trp:Lys) ‐ 28.39*(Trp:Lys)^2 85% 80% 14.5% 16.5% 18.5% 20.5% 22.5% 24.5% Goncalves et al., 2014

Influence of SID Trp:Lys ratio on F/G 100% % of maximal gain/feed 95% 90% 70 to 100 lb 85% 120 to 180 lb 160 to 210 lb 80% 235 to 280 lb 75% 14 15.5 17 18.5 20 21.5 23 24.5 SID Trp:Lys, % Goncalves et al., 2014

Influence of Trp:Lys ratio on ADG of nursery pigs from 24 to 49 lb 1.05 1.00 0.99 0.97 0.96 0.95 0.94 0.95 ADG, lb 0.85 0.81 0.75 14.5 16.5 18 19.5 21 22.5 24.5 Trp:Lys ratio, % Goncalves et al., 2014

Trp:Lys ratio as a percentage of maximum ADG Regression analysis of nursery trial Max 0.01 lb/d 105% 0.03 lb/d 0.05 lb/d 0.08 lb/d 100% 95% 90% 85% 80% 14.5% 16.5% 18.5% 20.5% 22.5% 24.5% Goncalves et al., 2014

Influence of Trp:Lys ratio on F/G of nursery pigs from 24 to 49 lb 2 Broken line linear = 16.6% 1.9 1.84 Feed/gain 1.8 1.73 1.72 1.72 1.72 1.71 1.69 1.7 1.6 1.5 14.5 16.5 18 19.5 21 22.5 24.5 Trp:Lys ratio, % Goncalves et al., 2014

Continue to focus on feed cost  DDGS • Amino acids ‐ Good News, Bad News • Fat – Offers some savings • Avoid adding additives that don’t provide benefit – Some additives do provide benefit • Don’t forget feed processing • Rethink practices that cost money

Low ‐ protein, Amino Acid Diets with Corn or Milo A Good News Bad News Story • 25 to 50 lb and 100 to 290 lb pigs • 2 × 3 factorials: • Milo vs. corn • Amino acid supplementation (low, medium, or high). • Low amino acids: L ‐ lysine HCl and DL ‐ methionine. • Medium amino acids: L ‐ lysine HCl, DL ‐ methionine, and L ‐ threonine • High amino acids: L ‐ lysine HCl, DL ‐ methionine, L ‐ threonine, and L ‐ valine. .

Effect of Grain Source on Average Daily Gain and Feed Efficiency – 25 to 50 lb Pigs 2.00 2.00 No differences No differences 1.54 1.53 1.50 1.50 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.00 0.50 0.50 Milo Corn Milo Corn ADG, lb F/G Jordan et al., 2014

Effect of Amino Acid Supplementation on Average Daily Gain and Feed Efficiency – 25 to 50 lb Pigs 1.30 2.00 No differences No differences 1.06 1.10 1.55 1.05 1.53 1.04 1.51 1.50 0.90 1.00 0.70 0.50 0.50 Low Medium High Low Medium High ADG, lb F/G Jordan et al., 2014

Effect of Grain Source on Average Daily Gain and Feed Efficiency – 100 to 290 lb Pigs 2.25 3.00 P < 0.07 P < 0.01 2.92 2.02 1.97 2.00 2.90 2.84 1.75 2.80 2.70 1.50 Milo Corn Milo Corn ADG, lb F/G Jordan et al., 2014

Effect of Amino Acid Supplementation on Average Daily Gain and Feed Efficiency – 100 to 290 lb Pigs 2.10 3.00 Quadratic, P < 0.05 2.90 2.03 2.88 2.90 2.86 2.01 2.00 2.80 1.95 2.70 1.90 2.60 2.50 1.80 Low Medium High Low Medium High ADG, lb F/G Jordan et al., 2014

Effect of Amino Acid Supplementation on Iodine Value – 100 to 290 lb Pigs 71.0 Milo vs. Corn, P < 0.01 69.6 68.9 68.8 69.0 67.9 67.9 IV 67.3 67.0 65.0 Low Medium High Low Medium High Milo Corn Jordan et al., 2014