jiangsu yoke technology
play

Jiangsu Yoke Technology Marketing Presentation PhireGuard DR-92 1 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Jiangsu Yoke Technology Marketing Presentation PhireGuard DR-92 1 PhireGuard DR-92: a new Flame Retardant Technology General Description Original FR technology*, particularly suited for the rigid PU foam segments Based on Cl and P as


  1. Jiangsu Yoke Technology Marketing Presentation PhireGuard DR-92 1

  2. PhireGuard DR-92: a new Flame Retardant Technology General Description  Original FR technology*, particularly suited for the rigid PU foam segments  Based on Cl and P as active FR centres.  Alternative to FR commonly used in PUR and PIR foams, in particular TCPP  High M.Wt., low volatility Flame Retardant, durable FR protection  Compatible with double belt panel lamination, discontinuous panel production, block and spray foams, pour in place… An alternative to TCPP: PhireGuard DR-92 ! * Technology being patented 2

  3. PhireGuard DR-92 in Details Typical Properties  Slightly yellow transparent liquid  Phosphorus content = 11%wt, Chlorine content = 17%wt  Viscosity = 450 cPs  Acid value < 0.5 mgKOH/g  Water content > 0.1 %wt  Does contain some TEP used as viscosity regulator 3

  4. PhireGuard DR-92 in PUR foam, B2 Formulation Results Chemicals Loading Properties Results Polyol, f=4, OHv = 400 100 Cream time 24s Water 0.5 Gel time 53s 141-b 40 Full rise time 68s DMCHA 1.5 Tack-free time 75s DC-193 1 Density 30.6 MDI Index 130 DIN 4102 Surface exp. 123 mm MDI 182 DIN 4102 Edge exp. 139 mm PhireGuard DR-92 22 DIN 4102 Rating B2 4

  5. PhireGuard DR-92 in PIR foam Formulation Studies Chemicals Loading  The effects of the FR loading on Aromatic Pester polyol, OHv = 240 100 the following properties have been studied: Water 1.5  Density 141-b 20  Curing time PMDETA 0.2  LOI DMCHA 1.3  DIN 4102 DC-193 1  Smoke density  Hardness T-131 2.2 MDI Index 207 TCPP or DR-92 30-50 5

  6. Comparison TCPP – DR92: Density and Curing time Density, kg/m3 Curing time, sec 44 100 42 95 40 90 38 TCPP TCPP 36 85 DR-92 DR-92 34 80 32 30 75 30 40 50 30 40 50 Wt% FR Wt% FR The effects of dR-92 on foam density and process are similar to those observed with TCPP 6

  7. Comparison TCPP – DR92: LOI and DIN 4102 LOI, % DIN 4102, cm – 30 wt% FR 28.4 10 9.8 28.2 9.6 28 9.4 9.2 27.8 TCPP 9 27.6 8.8 DR-92 8.6 27.4 8.4 27.2 8.2 27 8 Wt% FR 30 40 50 TCPP DR-92 Compared with TCPP, DR-92 yields superior Fire Protection 7

  8. Comparison TCPP – DR92: LOI and DIN 4102 Transmittance, % Hardness, Shore 100 60 90 50 80 70 40 60 TCPP TCPP 50 30 40 DR-91 DR-92 20 30 20 10 10 0 0 Wt% FR Wt% FR Wt% FR 30 40 50 30 40 50 Compared to TCPP, the use PhireGuard DR-92 results in less smoke Emission and less plasticization of the foam 8

  9. In Summary PhireGuard DR-92 is a flame retardant particularly suited for the production of rigid polyurethane and polysocyanurate foams. In comparison with TCPP, DR-92 offers the following advantages:  Depending on formulations details, some 10% fire protection improvement  Less smoke emission  Less foam plasticization Whilst impacting the foam process and final foam properties in a similar way than TCPP does 9

Recommend


More recommend