Jiangsu Yoke Technology Marketing Presentation PhireGuard DR-92 1
PhireGuard DR-92: a new Flame Retardant Technology General Description Original FR technology*, particularly suited for the rigid PU foam segments Based on Cl and P as active FR centres. Alternative to FR commonly used in PUR and PIR foams, in particular TCPP High M.Wt., low volatility Flame Retardant, durable FR protection Compatible with double belt panel lamination, discontinuous panel production, block and spray foams, pour in place… An alternative to TCPP: PhireGuard DR-92 ! * Technology being patented 2
PhireGuard DR-92 in Details Typical Properties Slightly yellow transparent liquid Phosphorus content = 11%wt, Chlorine content = 17%wt Viscosity = 450 cPs Acid value < 0.5 mgKOH/g Water content > 0.1 %wt Does contain some TEP used as viscosity regulator 3
PhireGuard DR-92 in PUR foam, B2 Formulation Results Chemicals Loading Properties Results Polyol, f=4, OHv = 400 100 Cream time 24s Water 0.5 Gel time 53s 141-b 40 Full rise time 68s DMCHA 1.5 Tack-free time 75s DC-193 1 Density 30.6 MDI Index 130 DIN 4102 Surface exp. 123 mm MDI 182 DIN 4102 Edge exp. 139 mm PhireGuard DR-92 22 DIN 4102 Rating B2 4
PhireGuard DR-92 in PIR foam Formulation Studies Chemicals Loading The effects of the FR loading on Aromatic Pester polyol, OHv = 240 100 the following properties have been studied: Water 1.5 Density 141-b 20 Curing time PMDETA 0.2 LOI DMCHA 1.3 DIN 4102 DC-193 1 Smoke density Hardness T-131 2.2 MDI Index 207 TCPP or DR-92 30-50 5
Comparison TCPP – DR92: Density and Curing time Density, kg/m3 Curing time, sec 44 100 42 95 40 90 38 TCPP TCPP 36 85 DR-92 DR-92 34 80 32 30 75 30 40 50 30 40 50 Wt% FR Wt% FR The effects of dR-92 on foam density and process are similar to those observed with TCPP 6
Comparison TCPP – DR92: LOI and DIN 4102 LOI, % DIN 4102, cm – 30 wt% FR 28.4 10 9.8 28.2 9.6 28 9.4 9.2 27.8 TCPP 9 27.6 8.8 DR-92 8.6 27.4 8.4 27.2 8.2 27 8 Wt% FR 30 40 50 TCPP DR-92 Compared with TCPP, DR-92 yields superior Fire Protection 7
Comparison TCPP – DR92: LOI and DIN 4102 Transmittance, % Hardness, Shore 100 60 90 50 80 70 40 60 TCPP TCPP 50 30 40 DR-91 DR-92 20 30 20 10 10 0 0 Wt% FR Wt% FR Wt% FR 30 40 50 30 40 50 Compared to TCPP, the use PhireGuard DR-92 results in less smoke Emission and less plasticization of the foam 8
In Summary PhireGuard DR-92 is a flame retardant particularly suited for the production of rigid polyurethane and polysocyanurate foams. In comparison with TCPP, DR-92 offers the following advantages: Depending on formulations details, some 10% fire protection improvement Less smoke emission Less foam plasticization Whilst impacting the foam process and final foam properties in a similar way than TCPP does 9
Recommend
More recommend