islands and proximity domains
play

Islands and proximity domains Eszter K. Horv ath, Szeged - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Islands and proximity domains Eszter K. Horv ath, Szeged Co-authors: Stephan Foldes, S andor Radeleczki, Tam as Waldhauser Novi Sad, 2013, June 5. Eszter K. Horv ath, Szeged Islands and proximity domains Co-authors: Stephan Foldes,


  1. Islands and proximity domains Eszter K. Horv´ ath, Szeged Co-authors: Stephan Foldes, S´ andor Radeleczki, Tam´ as Waldhauser Novi Sad, 2013, June 5. Eszter K. Horv´ ath, Szeged Islands and proximity domains Co-authors: Stephan Foldes, S´ andor Radeleczki, Tam´ Novi Sad, 2013, June 5. as Waldhauser () 1 / 22

  2. Island domain U ∈ C ⊆ K ⊆ P ( U ) Let h : U → R be a height function and let S ∈ C be a nonempty set. We denote the cover relation of the poset ( K , ⊆ ) by ≺ , and we write K 1 � K 2 if K 1 ≺ K 2 or K 1 = K 2 . We say that S is a island with respect to the triple ( C , K , h ), if every K ∈ K with S ≺ K satisfies h ( u ) < min h ( S ) for all u ∈ K \ S . Eszter K. Horv´ ath, Szeged Islands and proximity domains Co-authors: Stephan Foldes, S´ andor Radeleczki, Tam´ Novi Sad, 2013, June 5. as Waldhauser () 2 / 22

  3. Island domain U ∈ C ⊆ K ⊆ P ( U ) Let h : U → R be a height function and let S ∈ C be a nonempty set. We denote the cover relation of the poset ( K , ⊆ ) by ≺ , and we write K 1 � K 2 if K 1 ≺ K 2 or K 1 = K 2 . We say that S is a island with respect to the triple ( C , K , h ), if every K ∈ K with S ≺ K satisfies h ( u ) < min h ( S ) for all u ∈ K \ S . Eszter K. Horv´ ath, Szeged Islands and proximity domains Co-authors: Stephan Foldes, S´ andor Radeleczki, Tam´ Novi Sad, 2013, June 5. as Waldhauser () 2 / 22

  4. Island domain U ∈ C ⊆ K ⊆ P ( U ) Let h : U → R be a height function and let S ∈ C be a nonempty set. We denote the cover relation of the poset ( K , ⊆ ) by ≺ , and we write K 1 � K 2 if K 1 ≺ K 2 or K 1 = K 2 . We say that S is a island with respect to the triple ( C , K , h ), if every K ∈ K with S ≺ K satisfies h ( u ) < min h ( S ) for all u ∈ K \ S . Eszter K. Horv´ ath, Szeged Islands and proximity domains Co-authors: Stephan Foldes, S´ andor Radeleczki, Tam´ Novi Sad, 2013, June 5. as Waldhauser () 2 / 22

  5. ,,Closeness” relation ( C , K ) δ ⊆ C × C A δ B ⇔ ∃ K ∈ K : A � K and K ∩ B � = ∅ . (1) It is easy to verify that relation δ satisfies the following properties for all A , B , C ∈ C whenever B ∪ C ∈ C : A δ B ⇒ B � = ∅ ; A ∩ B � = ∅ ⇒ A δ B ; A δ ( B ∪ C ) ⇔ ( A δ B or A δ C ) . Eszter K. Horv´ ath, Szeged Islands and proximity domains Co-authors: Stephan Foldes, S´ andor Radeleczki, Tam´ Novi Sad, 2013, June 5. as Waldhauser () 3 / 22

  6. ,,Closeness” relation ( C , K ) δ ⊆ C × C A δ B ⇔ ∃ K ∈ K : A � K and K ∩ B � = ∅ . (1) It is easy to verify that relation δ satisfies the following properties for all A , B , C ∈ C whenever B ∪ C ∈ C : A δ B ⇒ B � = ∅ ; A ∩ B � = ∅ ⇒ A δ B ; A δ ( B ∪ C ) ⇔ ( A δ B or A δ C ) . Eszter K. Horv´ ath, Szeged Islands and proximity domains Co-authors: Stephan Foldes, S´ andor Radeleczki, Tam´ Novi Sad, 2013, June 5. as Waldhauser () 3 / 22

  7. ,,Closeness” relation ( C , K ) δ ⊆ C × C A δ B ⇔ ∃ K ∈ K : A � K and K ∩ B � = ∅ . (1) It is easy to verify that relation δ satisfies the following properties for all A , B , C ∈ C whenever B ∪ C ∈ C : A δ B ⇒ B � = ∅ ; A ∩ B � = ∅ ⇒ A δ B ; A δ ( B ∪ C ) ⇔ ( A δ B or A δ C ) . Eszter K. Horv´ ath, Szeged Islands and proximity domains Co-authors: Stephan Foldes, S´ andor Radeleczki, Tam´ Novi Sad, 2013, June 5. as Waldhauser () 3 / 22

  8. ,,Closeness” relation ( C , K ) δ ⊆ C × C A δ B ⇔ ∃ K ∈ K : A � K and K ∩ B � = ∅ . (1) It is easy to verify that relation δ satisfies the following properties for all A , B , C ∈ C whenever B ∪ C ∈ C : A δ B ⇒ B � = ∅ ; A ∩ B � = ∅ ⇒ A δ B ; A δ ( B ∪ C ) ⇔ ( A δ B or A δ C ) . Eszter K. Horv´ ath, Szeged Islands and proximity domains Co-authors: Stephan Foldes, S´ andor Radeleczki, Tam´ Novi Sad, 2013, June 5. as Waldhauser () 3 / 22

  9. Distant families We say that A , B ∈ C are distant if neither A δ B nor B δ A holds. It is easy to see that in this case A and B are also incomparable (in fact, disjoint), whenever A , B � = ∅ . A nonempty family H ⊆ C will be called a distant family , if any two incomparable members of H are distant. Lemma If H ⊆ C is a distant family, then H is CDW-independent. Moreover, if U ∈ H , then U is admissible. Eszter K. Horv´ ath, Szeged Islands and proximity domains Co-authors: Stephan Foldes, S´ andor Radeleczki, Tam´ Novi Sad, 2013, June 5. as Waldhauser () 4 / 22

  10. Distant families We say that A , B ∈ C are distant if neither A δ B nor B δ A holds. It is easy to see that in this case A and B are also incomparable (in fact, disjoint), whenever A , B � = ∅ . A nonempty family H ⊆ C will be called a distant family , if any two incomparable members of H are distant. Lemma If H ⊆ C is a distant family, then H is CDW-independent. Moreover, if U ∈ H , then U is admissible. Eszter K. Horv´ ath, Szeged Islands and proximity domains Co-authors: Stephan Foldes, S´ andor Radeleczki, Tam´ Novi Sad, 2013, June 5. as Waldhauser () 4 / 22

  11. Distant families We say that A , B ∈ C are distant if neither A δ B nor B δ A holds. It is easy to see that in this case A and B are also incomparable (in fact, disjoint), whenever A , B � = ∅ . A nonempty family H ⊆ C will be called a distant family , if any two incomparable members of H are distant. Lemma If H ⊆ C is a distant family, then H is CDW-independent. Moreover, if U ∈ H , then U is admissible. Eszter K. Horv´ ath, Szeged Islands and proximity domains Co-authors: Stephan Foldes, S´ andor Radeleczki, Tam´ Novi Sad, 2013, June 5. as Waldhauser () 4 / 22

  12. Distant families We say that A , B ∈ C are distant if neither A δ B nor B δ A holds. It is easy to see that in this case A and B are also incomparable (in fact, disjoint), whenever A , B � = ∅ . A nonempty family H ⊆ C will be called a distant family , if any two incomparable members of H are distant. Lemma If H ⊆ C is a distant family, then H is CDW-independent. Moreover, if U ∈ H , then U is admissible. Eszter K. Horv´ ath, Szeged Islands and proximity domains Co-authors: Stephan Foldes, S´ andor Radeleczki, Tam´ Novi Sad, 2013, June 5. as Waldhauser () 4 / 22

  13. CD-independent subsets in posets Definitions Let P = ( P , ≤ ) be a partially ordered set and a , b ∈ P . The elements a and b are called disjoint and we write a ⊥ b if either P has least element 0 ∈ P and inf { a , b } = 0 , or if P is without 0 , then a and b have no common lowerbound. A nonempty set X ⊆ P is called CD-independent if for any x , y ∈ X , x ≤ y or y ≤ x or x ⊥ y holds. Eszter K. Horv´ ath, Szeged Islands and proximity domains Co-authors: Stephan Foldes, S´ andor Radeleczki, Tam´ Novi Sad, 2013, June 5. as Waldhauser () 5 / 22

  14. CD-independent subsets in posets Definitions Let P = ( P , ≤ ) be a partially ordered set and a , b ∈ P . The elements a and b are called disjoint and we write a ⊥ b if either P has least element 0 ∈ P and inf { a , b } = 0 , or if P is without 0 , then a and b have no common lowerbound. A nonempty set X ⊆ P is called CD-independent if for any x , y ∈ X , x ≤ y or y ≤ x or x ⊥ y holds. Eszter K. Horv´ ath, Szeged Islands and proximity domains Co-authors: Stephan Foldes, S´ andor Radeleczki, Tam´ Novi Sad, 2013, June 5. as Waldhauser () 5 / 22

  15. CD-independent subsets in posets Definitions Let P = ( P , ≤ ) be a partially ordered set and a , b ∈ P . The elements a and b are called disjoint and we write a ⊥ b if either P has least element 0 ∈ P and inf { a , b } = 0 , or if P is without 0 , then a and b have no common lowerbound. A nonempty set X ⊆ P is called CD-independent if for any x , y ∈ X , x ≤ y or y ≤ x or x ⊥ y holds. Eszter K. Horv´ ath, Szeged Islands and proximity domains Co-authors: Stephan Foldes, S´ andor Radeleczki, Tam´ Novi Sad, 2013, June 5. as Waldhauser () 5 / 22

  16. CD-independent subsets in posets Definitions Let P = ( P , ≤ ) be a partially ordered set and a , b ∈ P . The elements a and b are called disjoint and we write a ⊥ b if either P has least element 0 ∈ P and inf { a , b } = 0 , or if P is without 0 , then a and b have no common lowerbound. A nonempty set X ⊆ P is called CD-independent if for any x , y ∈ X , x ≤ y or y ≤ x or x ⊥ y holds. Eszter K. Horv´ ath, Szeged Islands and proximity domains Co-authors: Stephan Foldes, S´ andor Radeleczki, Tam´ Novi Sad, 2013, June 5. as Waldhauser () 5 / 22

  17. CD-independent subsets in posets Definitions Let P = ( P , ≤ ) be a partially ordered set and a , b ∈ P . The elements a and b are called disjoint and we write a ⊥ b if either P has least element 0 ∈ P and inf { a , b } = 0 , or if P is without 0 , then a and b have no common lowerbound. A nonempty set X ⊆ P is called CD-independent if for any x , y ∈ X , x ≤ y or y ≤ x or x ⊥ y holds. Eszter K. Horv´ ath, Szeged Islands and proximity domains Co-authors: Stephan Foldes, S´ andor Radeleczki, Tam´ Novi Sad, 2013, June 5. as Waldhauser () 5 / 22

  18. CDW-independence Definition A family H ⊆ P ( U ) is weakly independent if � H ⊆ ⇒ ∃ i ∈ I : H ⊆ H i H i = (2) i ∈ I holds for all H ∈ H , H i ∈ H ( i ∈ I ) . If H is both CD-independent and weakly independent, then we say that H is CDW-independent . Eszter K. Horv´ ath, Szeged Islands and proximity domains Co-authors: Stephan Foldes, S´ andor Radeleczki, Tam´ Novi Sad, 2013, June 5. as Waldhauser () 6 / 22

Recommend


More recommend