introduction to qualitative
play

Introduction to Qualitative Frameworks and the August Meeting 2 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Introduction to Qualitative Frameworks and the August Meeting 2 August 2019 Jo L. Husbands U.S. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine Approaches to Assessing S&T Many types of approaches to assessing potential


  1. Introduction to Qualitative Frameworks and the August Meeting 2 August 2019 Jo L. Husbands U.S. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine

  2. Approaches to Assessing S&T • Many types of approaches to assessing potential risks and benefits of advances in S&T • From formal, quantitative models through statistical approaches to qualitative tools • All the approaches potentially relevant to the BWC • Our efforts focused on one approach – qualitative frameworks – that can be used to structure systematic discussions among experts • Sometimes hear the term “expert elicitation” • One feature of our approach – a group process 2

  3. What is a Framework? • A mental model • A way to think about a problem • A list of decision criteria • A representation of expert thinking on an issue 3

  4. How a Framework Can Be Useful • Helps structure discussions in systematic way • Helps standardize terminology to make sure everyone is talking about the same thing • Helps clarify assumptions, open questions, and areas of agreement or disagreement • Provides a mechanism to incorporate technical experts in the assessment • Can engage experts from various fields and from different sectors • Facilitates identification of bottlenecks and barriers & supports efforts to monitor advances that change what is possible 4

  5. Using the Framework • Provides a basis for assessing potential concerns with advances in S&T on a number of levels • Enables analysis of potential risks • In a particular field (e.g., synthetic biology) • Of a new method or tool (e.g., CRISPR-Cas9) • Of a particular line of research (e.g., gain of function) • Of a specific experiment (e.g., enhancing virulence of a pathogen) 5

  6. Experts Meeting - 1 August • 30 participants from 17 countries and 3 international organizations • Tested application of two frameworks developed to assess potential concerns arising from S&T advances • US NASEM (2018) “Biodefense in the Age of Synthetic Biology ” • Tucker (2012) “Innovation, Dual Use and Security” 6

  7. Case Examples Applied the frameworks to two case examples • Change in transmissibility of an emerging viral pathogen • Engineering and controlling commensal bacteria for targeted “live” therapeutics 7

  8. Workshop Process • Used the frameworks to discuss the dimensions that feed into assessing concerns and potential strategies to address or mitigate concerns • Discussed how well each one worked / similarities and differences / how they would need to be adapted to aid in assessing BWC-relevant concerns • Discussed how we might develop a comparable framework to assess potential benefits of advances in S&T • An experiment, an attempt to discover how such frameworks might be used and adapted for the BWC context 8

  9. Thank You! References: • National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, Biodefense in the Age of Synthetic Biology . Washington, DC: National Academies Press Washington, DC: National Academies Press (2018). Available as a free pdf at https://www.nap.edu/catalog/24890/biodefense-in-the-age-of- synthetic-biology. • Jonathan B. Tucker (ed.), Innovation, Dual Use, and Security : Managing the Risks of Emerging Biological and Chemical Technologies . Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press (2012). 9

Recommend


More recommend