interacting frobenius
play

Interacting Frobenius Algebras are Hopf R. Duncan Summary - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Interacting Frobenius Algebras are Hopf R. Duncan Summary Quantum theory in categorical form Frobenius algebras and their phase groups Complementarity and strong complementarity Bialgebras and Hopf algebras Classical


  1. Phases & Unbiased Points | 0 � | 0 � | 0 � + e i α | 1 � | 1 � | 1 � ✓ ◆ 1 0 Z α = e i α 0

  2. Incompatible Observables a 0 b 0 b 1 a 1

  3. Complementary Observables a 0 b 1 b 0 a 1 1 ⌅ | � a i | b j ⇥ | = D

  4. Complementary Observables a 0 b 1 b 0 a 1 1 D “Mutually Unbiased Bases” ⌅ | � a i | b j ⇥ | =

  5. Complementarity Two observables A and B are complementary if 1 � p | h a i | b j i | = 8 i, j � d � (aka mutually unbiased) � { U b i } i They are strongly complementary if is a subgroup of the phase group . Φ A

  6. Strongly Complementary Observables are Hopf algebras Theorem 3 : Two observables are strongly complementary iff they form a Hopf algebra � � ” ‘ ÷ µ � � � ÷ ” ‘ µ Coecke and Duncan, “Interacting Quantum Observables: categorical algebra and diagrammatics”, NJP 13(043016), 2011, arXiv:0906.4725.

  7. Strongly Complementary Observables are Hopf algebras Theorem 3 : Two observables are strongly complementary iff they form a Hopf algebra � � ” ‘ ÷ Frobenius µ � � � ÷ ” ‘ Frobenius µ Coecke and Duncan, “Interacting Quantum Observables: categorical algebra and diagrammatics”, NJP 13(043016), 2011, arXiv:0906.4725.

  8. Strongly Complementary Observables are Hopf algebras Theorem 3 : Two observables are strongly complementary iff they form a Hopf algebra � � ” ‘ ÷ µ � � � ÷ ” ‘ µ Hopf Hopf Coecke and Duncan, “Interacting Quantum Observables: categorical algebra and diagrammatics”, NJP 13(043016), 2011, arXiv:0906.4725.

  9. Theorem : 
 In fdHilb , strongly complementary observables exist for every dimension. ... but in big enough dimension, it is possible to construct MUBs which are not strongly complementary.

  10. Bialgebras Defn : A bialgebra is 4-tuple: where: is a monoid � is a comonoid � jointly satisfying the commutation laws: � � = = = = � �

  11. The antipode Defn: A Hopf algebra is a bialgebra with a map 
 s : A ⟶ A 
 satisfying s = (H)

  12. Hopf Algebra Axioms is a monoid is a comonoid = = = = s =

  13. Standard Example | 0 i , . . . , | d � 1 i Given an orthonormal basis. ; | n Í if n = m :: | n Í ‘æ | n Í ¢ | n Í :: | n Í ¢ | m Í ‘æ ” µ 0 otherwise = q = q n œ Z D È n | n œ Z D | n Í ‘ ÷ q | m Í ¢ | m Õ Í :: | n Í ¢ | m Í ‘æ | n + m Í :: | n Í ‘æ ” µ m + m Õ = n = | 0 Í = È 0 | ÷ ‘

  14. 
 Standard Example | 0 i , . . . , | d � 1 i Given an orthonormal basis. ; | n Í if n = m :: | n Í ‘æ | n Í ¢ | n Í :: | n Í ¢ | m Í ‘æ ” � µ 0 otherwise Proposition 4 : In complex Hilbert space all strongly complementary = q = q n œ Z D È n | n œ Z D | n Í ‘ ÷ pairs are group algebras of abelian groups 
 Coecke, Duncan, Kissinger, Wang, “Strong Complementarity and Non-locality in Categorical Quantum Mechanics”, 
 q | m Í ¢ | m Õ Í :: | n Í ¢ | m Í ‘æ | n + m Í :: | n Í ‘æ ” Proc. LiCS 2012, arXiv:1203.4988. µ m + m Õ = n = | 0 Í = È 0 | ÷ ‘

  15. Normalisation Oh uh: � = � � This is false in the usual model. We want: � 1 � p | h a i | b j i | = 8 i, j d

  16. Scaled Bialgebras Defn : A scaled bialgebra is 4-tuple: where: is a † SCFA � is a † SCFA � jointly satisfying the commutation laws: � � = = = (B) � �

  17. Scaled Bialgebras Defn : A scaled bialgebra is 4-tuple: where: is a † SCFA � is a † SCFA � jointly satisfying the commutation laws: � � = = = (B) � � = Not this one:

  18. The antipode The antipode can be defined as: � s = := � � Then we have: Theorem: the scaled bialgebra is Hopf iff et ( ” , ‘ , µ , ÷ ) i .e. � � = = (+)

  19. Frobenius-Hopf Algebra Axioms is a † SCFA is a † SCFA = = = = =

  20. Frobenius-Hopf Algs Proposition : Let s be the antipode of a commutative Hopf algebra; then � 1. s is the unique map satisfying (H); 
 2. s is a bialgebra morphism; 
 3. s is an involution; 
 4. s commutes with f : H → K for any bialgebra morphism f between Hopf algebras H and K � See, e.g. Street, Quantum Groups , CUP, 2007.

  21. Frobenius-Hopf Algs Corollary : 
 (1) s is a self-adjoint unitary 
 (2) 2. s = s = s (3) s is the antipode of op (4) = f ve f . �

  22. Frobenius-Hopf Algs Corollary : 
 (1) s is a self-adjoint unitary 
 (2) 2. s = s = s (3) s is the antipode of op (4) = f ve f . � Proof(4): = ( s ⊗ m ) � f � ( s † ⊗ n ) = ( s † ⊗ m ) � f � ( s ⊗ n ) = f f .

  23. Frobenius-Hopf Algs Lemma : if f commutes with s then 
 hen f = f ; � f � = = = f f f �

  24. The convolution C We can use the bialgebra to define a convolution: � � f + f Õ := � f Õ 0 := f � � � This gives a commutative monoid.

  25. The convolution := n + 1 = n 0 Lemma : Let � � n � Then = nm and n m = n + m m � � bialgebra morphism for ( ) . Further, is a bialgebra morphism. n

  26. The Integers: In 3       1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 = 1 0 0 1 = 0 1 0 2 = 0 0 1       1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0

  27. The convolution Lemma : Let f be a bialgebra morphism; then we have: – f ◦ (g + h) = (f ◦ g) + (f ◦ h), 
 – (g + h) ◦ f = (g ◦ f) + (h ◦ f), and 
 – f + (s ◦ f) = 0 . � Hence the bialgebra morphisms of form a unital ring R , and the bialgebra morphisms of do too! op �

  28. f f f f � ( g + h ) = = = ( f � g ) + ( f � h ) g g h h 2. g h g h ( g + h ) � f = = = ( g � f ) + ( h � f ) f f f 3. f + ( f � s ) = = = = = 0 f f f f

  29. The Convolution Lemma : Let a , b ∈ such that ab = 1 . Then b = a † . � Proof: basic idea is show that ( -b ) + a † = 0 � f 0 f 0 f 0 f 0 f f � f f f 0 = = f = = f f f � � f f f f f f = = = = = =

  30. Set-like elements Defn . A point h : I ⟶ A is - set-like if it satisfies is -r of the � h � h h = � � Prop. The set-like elements of a commutative Hopf algebra form an abelian group, with h -1 = sh � is -r Corollary : if the -set-like elements are -unbiased, of the they are a subgroup of the phase group.

  31. Example: qubits Classical points Unbiased points π

  32. Example: qubits | 0 � = � ⇥ 1 0 = α e i α 0 π | 1 � = Classical points Unbiased points π

  33. Example: qubits | 0 � = � ⇥ 1 0 = α e i α 0 π | 1 � = π Classical points Unbiased points π

  34. Example: qubits | 0 � = � ⇥ 1 0 = α e i α 0 π | 1 � = π Classical points Unbiased points π

  35. Example: qubits | 0 � = � ⇥ 1 0 = α e i α 0 π | 1 � = π Classical points Unbiased points π | + � = � ⇥ cos α i sin α = α 2 2 i sin α cos α π 2 2 | �⇥ =

  36. Classical points are eigenvectors i α

  37. Classical points are eigenvectors i α

  38. Classical points are eigenvectors α i i

  39. Classical Maps By definition every -set-like element in determines a - is -r of the phase map: we call these - classical maps. is -r of the � Lemma : let k : 1 ⟶ 1 be -classical; then is -r of the (1) k is a coalgebra morphism for (2) k † = sks

  40. The Following are Equivalent: δ Z = δ X = � Z = � X = i = i i i � j i � j i � j ⇒ = j = j j 1. The classical structures are closed i = i i i � j i � j i � j ⇒ = j = j j

  41. The Following are Equivalent: δ Z = δ X = � Z = � X = 2. The classical i maps are comonoid homomorphisms

  42. The Following are Equivalent: δ Z = δ X = � Z = � X = 2. The classical maps are comonoid homomorphisms i i

  43. The Following are Equivalent: δ Z = δ X = � Z = � X = 3. The classical maps j i i satisfy canonical commutation relations j j i

  44. The Following are Equivalent: δ Z = δ X = � Z = � X = 4. The classical structures form a bialgebra

Recommend


More recommend