In tro d u ctio n s B a ck g ro u n d M O D U S P re se n ta tio n - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

In tro d u ctio n s B a ck g ro u n d M O D U S P re se n ta tio n N e x t S te p s

BACKGROUND R e c C e n tre re q u ire s re p la ce m e n t o r sig n ifica n t u p g ra d e s a n d e x p a n sio n B re n n a n P a rk fie ld s a n d la n d s re q u ire cle a r d ire ctio n to g u id e lo n g -te rm d e cisio n m a k in g

BACKGROUND T H A T C o u n cil e n d o rse th e D e cisio n S ta te m e n t, S co p e o f E n g a g e m e n t, an d se t th e L e v e l o f E n g a g e m e n t at In v o lv e fo r th e P u b lic E n g a g e m e n t o f re n o v a tio n s a n d e x p a n sio n to B re n n a n P a rk R e cre a tio n C e n tre a s pre se n te d F e b ru a ry 20, 201 8, w ith th e ad d itio n a l fe e d b a ck fro m C o u n cil: • P o o l e x p a n sio n ; • U se of a ir sp a ce/h ig h e r sto rie s; • R e v e n u e -g e n e ra tin g o p p o rtu n itie s/pa rtn e rsh ip s; • C o n sid e ra tio n of arts/e v e n ts sp a ce ; • O p tio n s p re se n te d sh o u ld in clu d e th e m o st co st-e ffe ctiv e op tio n , a n d a co st co m p a riso n to a bra n d -n e w fa cility. A N D T H A T C o u n cil e n d o rse th e D e cisio n S ta te m e n t, S co p e of E n g a g e m e n t, a n d se t th e L e v e l o f E n g a g e m e n t at In v o lv e fo r th e P u b lic E n g a g e m e n t to d e fin e a co m m o n visio n an d g o a ls fo r B re n n a n P a rk (C e n te n n ia l W a y to F in ch D riv e ) a s pre se n te d F e b ru a ry 20, 201 8.

BRENNAN PARK ENGAGEMENT SUMMARY S arah Gillett, E ngagem ent Lead M odus P lanning, D esign & E ngagem ent

OVERVIEW In tro d u ctio n F ra m in g & m e ssa g in g W h a t w e did W h o pa rticip a te d W h a t w e he a rd N e x t ste p s

INTRODUCTION T w o -p a rt e n g a g e m e n t pro ce ss • B re n n a n P a rk R e cre a tio n C e n tre ren o v a tio n/e x p a n sio n or rep la ce m e n t • B re n n a n P a rk fie ld s a n d la n d s visio n in g

FRAMING & MESSAGING

FRAMING & MESSAGING: PROCESS

FRAMING & MESSAGING: FUNDING Funding for the Brennan Park Recreation Centre, fields and lands will need to be prioritized within the broader facility upgrade and replacement needs of all the District’s operations. Funding sources could be grants, taxation, borrowing, fees, fundraising and sponsorship. However, the first step is to determine what the community wants and needs at Brennan Park, and how much it will cost.

FRAMING & MESSAGING: KEY QUESTIONS Brennan Park Recreation Centre Brennan Park fields and lands 1 . H o w w o u ld yo u rate yo u r su p p o rt for an in cre a se in in v e stm e n t in 1 . W h a t va lu e s sh o u ld gu id e fu tu re de cisio n s ab o u t B re n n a n P a rk S q u a m ish recre a tio n fa cilitie s ge n e ra lly, reco g n izin g tha t th e la rg e r fie ld s an d la n d s? the in v e stm e n t, th e la rg e r th e ne e d for fu n d in g m e ch a n ism s (su ch 2. W h a t kin d of activ itie s do yo u th in k sh o u ld ha p p e n w ith in th e as: pro p e rty ta x e s, use r fe e s, gra n ts, bo rro w in g , priv a te B re n n a n P a rk su rro u n d in g la n d s/fie ld s, an d in w h a t prio rity ? sp o n so rsh ip )? P le a se le t us kn o w w h y. 3. W h a t is yo u r visio n for th e fu tu re of B re n n a n P a rk fie ld s an d la n d s? W h a t do yo u se e ha p p e n in g he re in the fu tu re ? 2. W h ich op tio n do yo u pre fe r? W h y do yo u pre fe r [the op tio n tha t yo u se le cte d ]? 3. If “ex p a n d an d up g ra d e ” is ultim a te ly se le cte d , ho w w o u ld yo u prio ritize th e ph a sin g of the up g ra d e s an d ex p a n sio n s in O p tio n s 1 an d 2, giv e n tha t av a ila b le fu n d in g w ill lik e ly req u ire a ph a se d ap p ro a ch ov e r tim e ? 4. H a v e w e go t the rig h t m ix of fe a tu re s, i.e . are th e re fe a tu re s pro p o se d tha t yo u do no t su p p o rt, or ha v e w e m isse d fe a tu re s tha t yo u ’d lik e to se e (k e e p in g in m in d tha t ad d itio n a l fe a tu re s w o u ld in cre a se the bu d g e t an d tim e lin e )?

WHAT WE DID

WHAT WE DID Activities 1 . S ta k e h o ld e r m a p p in g w ith sta ff 2. S ta k e h o ld e r in te rv ie w s 1 2 in te rv ie w s • 3. O n lin e su rv e y 1 032 co m p le te d , 869 pa rtia lly • co m p le te d , 4004 co m m e n ts 4. In -p e rso n ev e n ts A p p ro x im a te ly 1 50 pa rticip a n ts, 723 • co m m e n ts

WHAT WE DID Promotions 1 . A pro je ct w e b p a g e an d F a ce b o o k e ve n t w a s la u n ch e d on M a y 30 2. A pre ss rele a se an n o u n cin g e n g a g e m e n t pro ce ss w a s issu e d on M a y 31 3. A d s w e re pla ce d in th e C h ie f N e w sp a p e r M a y 31 , Ju n e 4 an d Ju n e 1 4 4. P o ste rs an d po stca rd s w e re distrib u te d to ke y lo ca tio n s th ro u g h o u t th e co m m u n ity. 5. P ro je ct am b a ssa d o rs w e re ou t in th e co m m u n ity Ju n e 1 -Ju n e 20 6. In fo rm a tio n ab o u t th e pro je ct w a s sh a re d th ro u g h th e R e cre a tio n N e w sle tte r

WHO PARTICIPATED

WHO PARTICIPATED: GENDER S q u a m ish (2 01 6) B re n n a n P a rk P a rticip a n ts 3% 0% 33% 50% 50% 64% F e m a le M a le N o n -b in a ry / th ird g e n d e r F e m a le M a le P re fe r n o t to sa y

WHO PARTICIPATED: AGE B re n n a n P a rk P a rticip a n ts S q u a m ish (2 01 6) 36% 34% 1 9% 1 6% 1 4% 1 2 % 1 2 % 1 1 % 9% 6% 5% 5% 5% 5% 4% 4% 2% 1 % 1 % 0% U n d e r 1 0-1 4 1 5-1 9 2 0-2 9 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80+ U n d e r 1 0-1 4 1 5-1 9 2 0-2 9 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80+ 1 0 1 0

WHO PARTICIPATED: GEOGRAPHY A re yo u a resid e n t of th e D istrict of W h a t ne ig h b o u rh o o d do yo u live in ? S q u a m ish ? Ga rib a ld i H ig h la n d s 25% Ga rib a ld i E sta te s (in cl. T a n ta lu s R o a d / D o w a d D rive ) 1 8% 3% 0% B ra ck e n d a le 1 5% D o w n to w n 1 1 % Va lle y cliffe 1 1 % N o rth Ya rd s 6% D e n tv ille 5% L o g g e rs L a n e E a st (n e a r B re n n a n P a rk ) 4% H o sp ita l H ill 2% S L R D – B rita n n ia B e a ch , R in g C re e k , U p p e r … 1 % P a ra d ise Va lle y 1 % 97% S t’á7m e s (S ta w a m u s) 0% C h ’iyák m e sh (C h e a k a m u s) 0% Ye s N o I'm n o t su re 0% 5% 1 0% 1 5% 2 0% 2 5% 30%

WHO PARTICIPATED: USE H o w ofte n do yo u or a m e m b e r of H o w ofte n do yo u or a m e m b e r of yo u r im m e d ia te fa m ily yo u r im m e d ia te fa m ily cu rre n tly use cu rre n tly use fa cilitie s lo ca te d in th e su rro u n d in g B re n n a n P a rk R e cre a tio n C e n tre ? B re n n a n P a rk fie ld s an d la n d s? 3% 6% 1 4% 1 6% 32% 8% 43% 1 1 % 1 4% 9% 1 6% 1 9% 1 1 % M o re th a n o n ce a w e e k O n ce a w e e k M o re th a n o n ce a w e e k O n ce a w e e k 2 -3 tim e s p e r m o n th 2 -3 tim e s p e r m o n th O n ce a m o n th O n ce a m o n th S e a so n a l R a re ly R a re ly N e ve r N e ve r

WHAT WE HEARD RECREATION CENTRE

WHAT WE HEARD: FUNDING The community engagement results demonstrate appetite for increased investment in Squamish recreational facilities. H o w w o u ld yo u rate yo u r su p p o rt fo r an in cre a se in in ve stm e n t in S q u a m ish recre a tio n fa cilitie s ge n e ra lly, reco g n izin g th a t th e la rg e r th e in ve stm e n t, th e la rg e r th e ne e d fo r fu n d in g m e ch a n ism s (su ch as: pro p e rty ta x e s, use r fe e s, gra n ts, bo rro w in g , priva te sp o n so rsh ip )? 1 % 4% A ne e d to resp o n d to an d pre p a re fo r S q u a m ish ’s rap id ly • gro w in g po p u la tio n , ag in g or in a d e q u a te fa cilitie s, th e 1 7% im p o rta n t role th a t B re n n a n P a rk pla ys in the co m m u n ity, fo ste rin g he a lth y life style s 47% R e sp o n sib le go ve rn m e n t sp e n d in g an d su p p o rt fo r • priva te fu n d in g R e se rva tio n s ab o u t in cre a sin g pro p e rty ta x e s • 31 % 1 - S tro n g ly O p p o se 2 - O p p o se 3 - N e u tra l 4 - S u p p o rt 5 - S tro n g ly S u p p o rt

WHAT WE HEARD: OPTIONS The community engagement results show a strong preference for an upgrade/renovation of the Brennan Park Recreation Centre as opposed to a rebuild. W h ich op tio n do yo u pre fe r? M in im ize disru p tio n to pa rk in g an d gre e n sp a ce • M a k e efficie n t use of ex istin g fa cilitie s • 27% T h e co st of rep la cin g th e R e cre a tio n C e n tre is a co n ce rn • 54% 20% E x p a n d & U p g ra d e - O p tio n 1 E x p a n d & U p g ra d e - O p tio n 2 R e p la ce - O p tio n 3