in pursuit of excellence long range facilities planning
play

In Pursuit of Excellence Long Range Facilities Planning Committee - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

In Pursuit of Excellence Long Range Facilities Planning Committee Meeting 2: Tuesday, October 3, 2017 Committee Purpose & Charge Consider the educational needs of all students and align with the districts mission, vision and goals.


  1. In Pursuit of Excellence

  2. Long Range Facilities Planning Committee Meeting 2: Tuesday, October 3, 2017

  3. Committee Purpose & Charge • Consider the educational needs of all students and align with the district’s mission, vision and goals. • Represent the entire community, its values and perceptions in the facility planning process. • Assess and prioritize the district’s current and long-term facility needs, including, but not limited to: • Building age, safety and condition • District growth and capacity • Evolving educational delivery and programs

  4. Learner Profile Communicator Collaborator/Contributor • Builds positive and productive relationships • Shares responsibility for collaborative work • Offers and accepts feedback to grow self and • Seeks and evaluates a range of points of view others • Applies learning to transform the world • Expresses ideas confidently and creatively in a • Views problems globally variety of modes • Invests in continuous community improvement • Connects globally • Leaves a legacy • Communicates ideas respectfully and honors the • Influences others for positive outcomes contributions of others Critical Thinker Creator • Views problems with a global perspective • Asks deep and thoughtful questions • Takes initiative • Challenges existing ways of thinking • Exhibits perseverance and resilience in challenges • Explores through curiosity and innovation • Explores answers beyond the literal • Learns from experiences • Applies reflection in self-assessment • Exhibits flexibility and adaptability • Seeks opportunities to solve problems

  5. Agenda • Welcome • Define Committee Consensus • Texas School Finance 101 • SAISD Financial Overview • Overview of Potential Projects • Project Review Part 1 (Elementary Campuses) • Closing - Committee Q&A

  6. Committee Consensus

  7. Consensus • Consensus is defined by Merriam-Webster as: – 1 a: a general agreement – 1 b: the judgment arrived at by most of those concerned – 2: group solidarity in sentiment and belief; concerned with the process of deliberating and finalizing a decision • Goal is to agree on definition and then, once recommendation goes forward, for everyone to be able to support.

  8. Consensus What is this Committee’s Definition of Consensus? Options: • Unanimous agreement • Unanimous consent (can “live with it”) • Unanimous agreement minus one or two votes • Unanimous consent minus one or two votes • Super majority thresholds (90%, 80%, 75%, two-thirds, and 60% are common) • Simple majority

  9. Texas School Finance 101 Dr. Jeff Bright, Asst. Superintendent of Business Support Services

  10. Texas School Funding Quiz Where does the majority of funding come from for San Angelo ISD? Wall? Sterling City? Grape Creek?

  11. Is this your tax bill?

  12. PROPERTY TAX 101 As values increase, cities and counties can maintain their rate and generate more revenue . In the Texas School Funding System, district property taxes do NOT function like city and county taxes…

  13. The Texas School Funding System

  14. The Funding Cup

  15. Local Property Taxes

  16. State Aid

  17. Local Values Increase State Aid Decreases

  18. Local Values Are HUGE

  19. State Aid (TAXPAYER DOLLARS)

  20. This Actually Sounds Simple….

  21. School District Budget Overview Debt Food Service Service General Fund Grant Funding Total District Budget Bond Program 9

  22. Fund Budgets State Federal Local “____” Fund Every fund’s revenue can come from one, two, or all three sources. 9

  23. General Fund Budget Revenues State Federal Local General Fund 9

  24. SAISD General Fund Revenue Sources Federal 1% 2017-18 Local State 47% 52% State Local Federal Revenues

  25. The district may not increase the M&O rate without a Tax Ratification Election (TRE)

  26. Total Districts 1,018 Below $1.04 62 At $1.04 500 Above $1.04 456 Statewide Data M&O Tax Rates

  27. Debt Service Fund Budget State Local State Debt Service (I &S) 9

  28. The district sets an I&S tax rate to pay off debt.

  29. Total Districts 1,018 Above $.40 131 Below $.40 714 No I&S rate 173 Statewide Data I&S Tax Rates

  30. Overview of Potential Projects

  31. Long-Range Planning Drivers EVOLVING GROWTH AGING • Facility Assessment— • Facility Assessment— • Demographics Report— Repair + Replacement Code Compliance Student Enrollment • Preventive / Deferred • Guiding Documents— • Technology + Maintenance Instructional Delivery Transportation Plans

  32. 2017 Potential Projects 2008 Bond Projects (Elementary Campuses)

  33. Project Review ELEMENTARY CAMPUSES www.saisd.org

  34. Alta Loma Assessment: • Undersized core capacity • Safety & Security upgrades • Does not meet current building code, T.E.A. Standards and ADA compliance regulations • Aging conditions Scope of Work to Consider: New construction and renovation of existing spaces

  35. Austin Assessment: • Undersized core capacity • Does not meet current building code, T.E.A. Standards and ADA compliance regulations • Disjointed layout • Minimal parking • Aging conditions Scope of Work to Consider: New construction and renovation of existing spaces

  36. Belaire Assessment: • Undersized core capacity • Safety & Security upgrades • Does not meet current building code, T.E.A. Standards and ADA compliance regulations • Disjointed layout • Aging conditions Scope of Work to Consider: New construction and renovation of existing spaces

  37. Bonham Assessment: • Supported by portables • Safety & Security upgrades • Does not meet current building code, T.E.A. Standards and ADA compliance regulations • Aging conditions Scope of Work to Consider: New construction and renovation of existing spaces

  38. Bowie Assessment: • Undersized core capacity • Supported by portables • Does not meet current building code, T.E.A. Standards and ADA compliance regulations • Disjointed layout / Hexagon building • Minimal parking • Aging conditions Scope of Work to Consider: New construction

  39. Fannin Assessment: • Undersized core capacity • Supported by portables • Safety & Security upgrades • Does not meet current building code, T.E.A. Standards and ADA compliance regulations • Disjointed layout / Hexagon building • Aging conditions Scope of Work to Consider: New construction and renovation of existing spaces

  40. Fort Concho Assessment: • Supported by portables • Safety & Security upgrades • Does not meet current building code, T.E.A. Standards and ADA compliance regulations • Library is remote from main building • Minimal parking • Aging conditions Scope of Work to Consider: New construction and renovation of existing spaces

  41. McGill Assessment: • Undersized core capacity • Safety & Security upgrades • Does not meet current building code, T.E.A. Standards and ADA compliance regulations • Multiple buildings • Aging conditions Scope of Work to Consider: New construction

  42. Next Meeting Project Review - Part 2 (Secondary and Support)

  43. Large Group Q&A Dr. Javier Flores, LRFPC Facilitator

  44. Additional Comments or Questions? Please submit using notecards or email to Dr. Dethloff at: Carl.Dethloff@saisd.org

  45. Closing

  46. Thank You! Questions? Next Meeting: Tuesday, October 24, 2017 11:30 a.m. SAISD Board Room

Recommend


More recommend