Implementing a real world safety program IMHO Ray Lampros Agenda - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Implementing a real world safety program IMHO – Ray Lampros

Agenda • How do you eat an elephant? • Which bite do you eat first? • How long does it take to eat an elephant? • What regulations cover elephant eating? • How much does it cost? • Why would you want to eat an elephant?

Buzz Group • Each table • 2 minutes • Why would you want (need) to implement a safety program ? • Group spokesperson • Go!

Today more than ever, Companies are held accountable to a mix of stakeholders Authority Legislators Regulators Governance Customers standards Codes of Practice Immediate End user Society ‘The informed consumer’ Neighbors Communities Public at large Indigenous people Media Your Company NGOs Employees Future generations Current staff Their families Prospective new employees Past employees Business Partners Suppliers The natural environment Contractors Local Joint venture partners Global

EHS System Fundamentals EHS Policy Statement ( 5 key elements) 5 Policy Standards 100 Technical Protocols Best Practice Papers

EHS Policy Statement ( 5 key elements - Vision) • Respect the law • Reduce the environmental footprint • Involve Contractors • Ever safer workplace • Efficient workflows

EHS 5 Policy Standards (What to do) • Continuous Improvement Safety Cycle • Risk Assessment / Change management • Talent management • External and internal audit program • Information / documentation

EHS 100 Technical Protocols: Basis for Audits (How to do it) 1. Premises and Housekeeping 2. Mechanical, Electrical, and Personal Safeguarding 3. Fire Protection and Prevention 4. Accident and incident recording, investigation, and reporting 5. EHS Organization 6. Environmental Controls

Integrating Best Practice • Site sharing • Peers • External training • Trade Shows • Professionals

Where have you come from, where are you now, where are you going?

Roadmap

MIND THE GAP

2012 Audit Results Audit Rating Sections Points 2012 % Available Audit Scored 1 – Premises and Housekeeping 500 287 57% 2 – Mechanical, Electrical, & Personal Safeguarding 1000 660 66% 3 – Fire Protection & Prevention 550 384 70% 4 – Accident / Incident Recording, Investigation, and 300 185 62% Reporting 5 – EHS Organisation 800 526 66% 6 – Environmental Controls 850 646 76% 70% is acceptable, 12 items under 50% . Totals 4000 2688 67%

KPI’s • Audit Ratings – Goal: 80% by 2016  Average Rating  Spread  % topics below 50% • Accident / Incident frequency • Environment  Reduce energy use ($$$)  Clean air, water, soil, etc. ($$$) • Capital Spend

Mechanical, Electrical & Personal Safeguarding 2.1 – Machine Guarding and Interlock Checks – 450 points 2.1.1 – 2.1.6 – Guarding per each area - 375 2.1.7 – LOTO system and use - 50 2.1.8 – Labeling of switches, isolators and valves - 25 2.2 – Plant Auxiliary Equipment – 135 points 2.3 – Hazardous Substances – 50 points 2.4 – Electrical Equipment – 125 points 2.5 – Ergonomics – 50 points 2.6 – Protective Equipment Issued / Used – 140 points 2.7 – Notices and Signs – 50 points Target: 1000 points

Machine Guarding Plan of Attack • Road Map • Phased approach • Prioritize • Control Cost • OSHA Requirements • Maximum Value Risk Assessment

Our Chosen Partner

2014 Audit Results Audit Rating Sections Points 2012 2014 2014 Available Audit Audit % Scored 1 – Premises and Housekeeping 500 287 392 78% 2 – Mechanical, Electrical, & Personal 1000 660 784 78% Safeguarding 3 – Fire Protection & Prevention 550 384 430 78% 4 – Accident / Incident Recording, Investigation, 300 185 203 68% and Reporting 526 599 75% 5 – EHS Organisation 800 6 – Environmental Controls 850 646 687 81% 70% is acceptable, 0 items under 50% . Totals 4000 2688 3095 77% Goal is to reach 80% in 2016

Q&A