Impacts of Commercial and Residential Development on the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway: A Case Study in Alabama Dean Goodin, Ph.D. Eric Dohner Linda Brown, USACE
Introduction Coastal Alabama was heavily impacted by Hurricane Ivan (2004) • Landfall at Gulf Shores and Orange Beach • Category 3 with 130 mph winds
Before After
Before After
Highway 182 (Perdido Beach Blvd)
Introduction Coastal Alabama was also impacted by Hurricane Katrina (2005) • 67 mph sustained winds • Storm surge of 10 feet
Introduction New development trend in northern Gulf Coast is construction along the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway (GIWW) • Threat of tropical storms • Escalating prices of beachfront property GIWW extends from Brownsville, TX to Apalachee Bay, FL • 520 miles – open bays or coastal sounds • 780 miles – man-made canals
Gulf Intracoastal Waterway
Foley Land Cut In coastal Alabama, the Foley Land Cut is poised for development • 10-mile stretch of GIWW in Gulf Shores and Orange Beach • Located approximately 2 miles inland • Authorized channel dimensions • 125 feet wide • 12 feet deep • Maintained by Corps of Engineers for commercial barge traffic operations
Foley Land Cut Oyster Bay North Shore East North Shore West
Foley Land Cut Gulf Shores/Orange Beach region developed and marketed as a tourist destination From 1990 to 2000 permanent population increased • 50% Gulf Shores • 68% Orange Beach 2007 Population ~12,000 Seasonal population expected to increase 30%
Foley Land Cut Why FLC? • Sheltered from tropical storms • Available waterfront property • Provides waterway access to Gulf of Mexico via Bon Secour Bay and Wolf Bay Existing development • Condominiums/single-family homes • Marinas • Restaurant • Commercial
Lulu’s Homeport Marina Reynold’s Ready Mix Sailboat Bay Marina The Wharf
Proposed Development 15 proposed developments on FLC • 14 located on north shore of FLC • 1 located on south shore of Oyster Bay • 16,700 condo units • 3464 boat slips • 1722 wet slips • 1742 dry slips • Marinas • Retail shopping • Office space • Amenities (pools, greenspace, boardwalks)
Proposed Development Development Size Boat Slips Condominiums Units Retail/Commercial Greenspace (acres) Wet Dry Permanent Seasonal (square feet) (acres) 47 Canal Place 31 270 308 370 905 - - 501 Point West 37 63 80 340 797 - 18.5 Bayside Harbour 8 116 - 35 81 - 4.7 Bon Secour Village Eastern Marina 5 10 528 - - - - Bon Secour Village West 1000 107 - 3,000 3,000 750,000 500 Delfino Resort 1 26 53 - 145 579 25,000 10.4 Delfino Resort 2 12 50 - 80 320 30,000 4.8 Harbour Lights Marina 16 76 - 170 170 25,000 - KFPH Properties 5 50 - 100 100 20,000 - Lawrenz Eastern Marina 37 77 - 750 500 700,000 1.85 Lawrenz Western Marina 8 43 - 173 115 - 0.84 Oyster Bay Marina 205 396 - 500 500 7,000 155 Summerdance 240 318 826 1048 2127 27,000 100 Walker Creek 10 42 - 155 316 - - Waterways East 12 51 - 92 200 - 10 TOTAL 1652 1722 1742 6958 9710 1,584,000 806.09
EIS Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) • Evaluate environmental and socioeconomic consequences of development • Address potential impacts to FLC and surrounding communities • Waterway Capacity Study • Hurricane Evacuation Study
EIS Direct and indirect impacts Short-term and long-term impacts Cumulative impacts Mitigation of impacts Irreversible and irretrievable commitment of resources Alternatives to proposed actions
EIS Cultural Resources Recreation Resources Threatened & Utilities Air Quality Endangered Species Wetlands Noise Fish & Wildlife Resources Light Vegetative Communities Socioeconomic Water Quality Resources Soils & Geology Traffic & Transportation Land Use Hazardous & Toxic Materials
Waterway Capacity Study Federally authorized use for commercial traffic Recreational use must not impact present and future commercial operations Safety and navigation concerns • Speeding • Uneducated boaters • Congestion in high use areas (Hwy 59 boat ramp, Lulu’s, bridges, etc.)
Lulu’s Homeport Marina Highway 59 Bridge Public Boat Ramp Bon Secour Village Marina The Wharf Marina
Hurricane Evacuation Study Impacts of proposed developments • Increased population of permanent and seasonal residents • Increased number of vehicles Infrastructure • Evacuation routes • Vessel evacuation and security plan • Shelters
Alternatives No Action Alternative Maximum Boat Slip Alternative • Approve permits for up to 3093 boat slips through 2025 Minimum Boat Slip Alternative • Initially approve 1943 boat slips • Option of phasing-in 1150 additional boat slips until reach maximum (3093)
Alternatives Proposed changes from Maximum number of additional Alternatives Phase-in for additional boat slips boat slips original proposals a. No Action N/A 0 N/A b. Maximum Boat Conservative RD approach (bottom number of the 15% Slip Alternative confidence range) in the number of boat slips additional slips for implementing accepted mitigation options N/A approved site plans 3,093 boat slips permitted c. Minimum Boat Conservative RD approach (bottom number of the 15% Slip Alternative confidence range) in the number of boat slips potential future phase in approach no additional boat slips, mitigation options not implemented approved site plans Evaluation Period 1 = 1,943 1,943 boat slips initially permitted Evaluation Period 2 = 2,230 Evaluation Period 3 = 2,517 1,150 additional boat slips phased Evaluation Period 4 = 2,804 in at 25% per evaluation period Evaluation Period 5 = 3,093 beginning after Evaluation Period 1.
Impacts Land Use/Land Cover Socioeconomics Recreational Resources Ecological Resources Noise Light Pollution
Mitigation Mooring Facilities • 4 Primary • 10 Secondary • 1 Tertiary Safety signage Marine police Boater education Maps for commercial operators
In Closing EIS provides an objective evaluation of impacts associated with the proposed actions Example for future development along GIWW and Gulf Coast • Florida • St. Joe Land Company (Apalachicola Bay) • Texas • Port O’Connor (Dolphin Point Community)
Questions?
Recommend
More recommend