IFAD Corporate Decentralization Plan Lisandro Martin, Chief, OPE
Today’s presentation Principles Models Next steps 2
The process towards the Plan Milestone Date Regional decentralization plans 13 June First CDCG 20 June Second CDCG 30 June Early findings of CLE Decentralization 26 July Third CDCG 13 September Draft CLE report 13 September PMD and CSD comments on draft Plan 03 October Final CLE Report 06 October OMC 10 October EMC 12 October Management Response to CLE 24 October IMT 25 October Evaluation Committee 28 November Executive Board 14-15 December
Principles Upgrading the software of decentralization Drawing on earlier experiences and on the findings of the CLE from a variety from from light of experiences touch to quantity to to critical mass quality harmonization from overlapping from silos to from limited to staff pooling greater to delegated streamlined authority functions Ensuring that the objectives of Decentralization are commensurate with resources 4
Models A more coherent approach, building on lessons learned 3 ICO Models: Group countries Group Individual offices based on common geographically- justified for strategic close countries with characteristics but importance with one technical and no additional or two professional fiduciary services technical or service staff serving one and possibly staff. country. support from FSU/CSD servicing the sub-region or CPO-led for Sub-Regional Country Single At least three region. smaller active country Hubs Programme Country programmes and programmes, CPM-led for larger Groups Offices managed by a programmes. CPM-led office. Country Country By the end of programme staff programme staff IFAD11, it is shared across shared across expected that their countries covered countries covered number is reduced. by the Group. by the Hub. 5
A Global IFAD managing over 80% of financing from the Field 9 Country Program m e Groups 8 Sub-Regional Hubs 11 Single Country Offices 1 6 I COs 1 1 I COs 1 7 I COs • Ethiopia • China: Philippines • Vietnam : Cambodia, Myanmar, Lao PDR • Brazil • I ndia: Nepal, Sri Lanka • I ndonesia • Haiti • Bangladesh: Pakistan • Kenya : Burundi • Sudan • Tanzania: Rwanda, Uganda • Mozam bique: Zambia, Malawi • Morocco • Madagascar • Senegal : Mali • DRC • Turkey • Egypt : Yemen • Ghana • Kyrgyzstan • Peru : Bolivia • Nigeria • Cote d’I voire: Burkina Faso • Guatem ala • Niger • Cam eroon • Guinea • Sierra Leone
Models Incremental ICO costs to be partially off-set through savings USD millions 4 000 4 Estimated incremental costs over IFAD 10 and 11 Gross cost 3 000 3 increase USD Thousands 2 000 Savings 2 1 000 Net cost 1 increase - 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Year 6
Next Steps A few essential tasks Finalize cost-implications of the proposed plan and undertake an institution-wide functional analysis - to align resources in ICOs and HQ. Undertake a workload analysis to inform distribution of ICO models, staffing needs, roles and responsibilities in country teams, and prioritization of tasks and activities at ICO level. Develop a clearer corporate vision for non-lending activities (objectives, targets, type of products and services, staffing and resources needed, etc.) - to enrich the effectiveness of decentralization . Evaluate the Hanoi Pilot – to consider expanding Delegation of Authority practices to other hubs and/or country groups. 7
Questions and discussion Any questions? Thank you
Recommend
More recommend
