housing choices advisory committee october 5 2016
play

Housing Choices Advisory Committee October 5, 2016 1 Welcome and - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Housing Choices Advisory Committee October 5, 2016 1 Welcome and Introductions Overview and Background Example Regulations Salem Regulations Questions and Discussion Public Comment 2 Addition above garage Addition to


  1. Housing Choices Advisory Committee October 5, 2016 1

  2.  Welcome and Introductions  Overview and Background  Example Regulations  Salem Regulations  Questions and Discussion  Public Comment 2

  3. Addition above garage Addition to house Basement conversion New construction Photos: https://accessorydwellings.org/ 3

  4. Garage conversion or addition House addition Interior conversion New construction Photos: City of Minneapolis 4

  5.  Land for Long-Term Housing Needs  Single-Family Land: Surplus of 1,975 acres ( 9,131 units )  Multifamily Land: Deficit of 207 acres ( 2,897 units ) 5

  6. Phase 1 – Expand Housing Choices 1. Allow accessory dwelling units 2. Allow more multifamily housing types in 18 - 21 months single-family zones Phase 2 – Encourage Multifamily Development 1. Revise design review process 2. Revise Planned Unit Development 12 - 15 months regulations 3. Identify tools to increase redevelopment Phase 3 – Redesignation of Land 1. Redesignate land for multifamily housing 18 - 24 months Total 4 - 5 years 6

  7.  Size  Parking  Occupancy  Design Garage conversion  Other Standards House conversion Photos: https://accessorydwellings.org/ 7

  8. Salem? Flexible Restrictive • Larger size • Smaller size • 1+ parking spaces • No added parking • Owner occupancy • No owner occupancy • Design standards • No design standards 8

  9.  Size: 75% or 800 SF  Parking: None  Occupancy: No  Design: Limited  Result: >350 in 2015 (Approx. 30 a year before 2010 SDC waiver) Photo: https://accessorydwellings.org/ 9

  10.  Size: 750 SF  Parking: 1  Occupancy: No  Design: “Match”  Result: Rare Graphic: City of Keizer 10

  11.  Size: 40% or 900 SF  Parking: None  Occupancy: Yes  Design: “Integrated”  Result: <1 % of total units (26 from 2000-2013) 11

  12.  Converted single- family home  Size: 600 SF (minimum each)  Parking: 3 total  Occupancy: Yes  Design: No Photo: Google Maps 12

  13.  Temporary, free and dependent  Size: 600 or 1,000 SF (maximum for all accessory structures)  Parking: None  Occupancy: No  Design: None Photo: Google Maps 13

  14. Garages “Extra House” Sheds Pole Barns Photos: Google Maps 14

  15. Salem? Flexible Restrictive • Larger size • Smaller size • 1+ parking spaces • No added parking • Owner occupancy • No owner occupancy • Design standards • No design standards Photos: https://accessorydwellings.org/ 15

  16.  Size  Height  Setbacks  Parking  Owner Occupancy  Design  Other Standards 16

  17.  Detached: 600 SF if main building ≤ 1,200 SF 1,000 SF or 50% if main building > 1,200 SF 25% rear yard coverage  Attached: 600 SF minimum ( two family shared ) Lot coverage, etc. Note: Single-Family Residential (RS) zone regulations Photo: Google Maps 17

  18.  Detached: 15 feet  Attached: 35 feet new buildings 28 feet or existing height existing buildings Note: Single-Family Residential (RS) zone regulations Photo: Google Maps 18

  19.  Detached:  Front: 12 or 20 feet  Side: 5 feet  Rear: 0 to 6 feet  Attached:  Front: 12 or 20 feet  Side: 3 or 5 feet  Rear: 14 or 20 feet Note: Single-Family Residential (RS) zone regulations Photo: Google Maps 19

  20.  Single-Family: 2 spaces  Two Family Shared: 3 spaces  Guest House: None Photo: Google Maps 20

  21.  Single-Family: No  Two Family Shared: Yes  Guest House: No Note: Single-Family Residential (RS) zone regulations Photo: Google Maps 21

  22.  Single-Family: No  Two Family Shared: No  Guest House: No Note: Single-Family Residential (RS) zone regulations Photo: Google Maps 22

  23.  Others questions, concerns or suggestions? Photo: https://accessorydwellings.org/ 23

  24. • Develop Concept October Refine Throughout 2016 • Committee Review • Open House • Draft Code February 2017 • Adoption Process 24

  25. Photo: https://accessorydwellings.org/ 25

  26. Housing Choices Advisory Committee October 5, 2016 26

Recommend


More recommend